You are on page 1of 15

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: PHILIP B. YANSON Name of Rater: ANA MARIA L. TOLENTINO


Position: Teacher III Position: Master Teacher I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Bulacan Date of Review: January 2022
Rating Period: September 2021 – July 2022

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review


Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Classroom Observation Tool Quality 4 Made subject 4 Could have 4
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet or inter- integration done more
Services and content within observer agreement form from meaningful insightful
Pedagogy and across 1. an observation of and relevant integration
to learners’ with seamless
curriculum synchronous teaching (limited
need transition from
teaching face-to-face teaching, online one integration
areas teaching, or two-way radio to another
instruction) 2. if option 1 is not
possible, an observation of a
recorded video lesson or audio
Efficiency
lesson that is SLM-based or
MELC-aligned 3. if options 1
and 2 are not possible, an
observation of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC

Timeliness
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used 1. One (1) lesson plan with Quality 4 Incorporated 4 Try to have at 5
Education research-based annotations identifying the research- least 2
Services based research-
knowledge and research-based knowledge
strategies based
principles of and/or principles of teaching that are knowledge.
teaching and and learning used as basis for appropriate The use of
learning to planning / designing the to the level of Inquiry
enhance lesson) the learners Approach is a
professional commendable
approach
practice

Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 3. Displayed Classroom Observation Quality 5 The lesson 5 Good 5
Education proficient use Tool (COT) rating sheet plan grammar was
Services or inter-observer submitted evident both
of Mother
agreement form from were error on the lesson
Tongue, 1. an observation of free. Showed planning and
Filipino and synchronous a wide range the delivery of
English to teaching (limited faceto-face of vocabulary the lesson.
facilitate teaching, online suitable for
teaching and teaching, or two-way the learners.
radio instruction)
learning
2. if option 1 is not
possible, an
observation of a
recorded video lesson
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
or audio lesson that is Efficiency
SLM-based or MELCaligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are
not possible, an
observation of a
demonstration
teaching* via LAC

Timeliness
Basic 4. Used Classroom Observation Quality 4 Encourages 4 Could have 5
Education effective verbal Tool (COT) rating sheet or the learners use a variety
Services and non-verbal inter-observer agreement to participate of approaches
classroom form from and gives in giving
communication 1. an observation of praising feedbacks
strategies to synchronous remarks such as
support learner teaching (limited faceto-face whenever a reward
understanding, teaching, online learner pointing
participation, teaching, or two-way participates system,
engagement radio instruction) stickers,
and 2. if option 1 is not different types
achievement possible, an observation of claps etc.
of a recorded video Efficiency
lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or
MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are
not possible, an
observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC Timeliness
Basic 5. Established Classroom Observation Quality 5 Managed the 5 Handled the 5
Learning
Education safe and Tool (COT) rating sheet or online class class well by
Environment
Services secure inter-observer agreement from the consistently
learning form from beginning of checking and
environments 1. an observation of session until reminding the
to synchronous the conduct learners to
enhance teaching (limited faceto-face of activities behave
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
learning teaching, online by clearly accordingly.
through teaching, or two-way stating the
the consistent radio instruction) classroom
implementation 2. if option 1 is not rules and
of policies, possible, an observation activity
guidelines and of a recorded video procedures.
procedures lesson or audio lesson Called out
that is SLM-based or the attention
MELC-aligned of learners
3. if options 1 and 2 are not that are
possible, an observation misbehaving
of a demonstration and not
teaching* via LAC participating.
Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 6. Maintained Classroom Observation Quality 5 Incorporated 5 The teacher is 5
Education learning Tool (COT) rating sheet or activities that very
Services environments inter-observer agreement promotes considerate
that promote form from fairness and developed
fairness, 1. an observation of through learning
respect and synchronous scoring strategies that
care to teaching (limited faceto-face rubrics where are inclusive.
encourage teaching, online in criteria that
learning. teaching, or two-way are related to
radio instruction) showing
2. if option 1 is not proper
possible, an observation behavior and
of a recorded video respect were
lesson or audio lesson included.
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
that is SLM-based or Included
MELC-aligned some
3. if options 1 and 2 are not activities that
possible, an observation can be done
of a demonstration asynchronou
teaching* via LAC sly to foster
learning at
their own
pace.
Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 7. Maintained SET A Quality 4 Included 4 The group 4
Education learning Any supplementary material (in activities that activities
Services environments print/digital promotes encouraged
that nurture format) made by the ratee* and cooperation learners to
and inspire used in the and collaborate
learners to lesson delivery that highlights collaboration. and work
participate, maintaining among each
cooperate learning environments that nurture other politely.
and and inspire
collaborate in learners to participate, cooperate
continued and
learning. collaborate in continued learning Efficiency
● activity sheet/s
● one lesson from a self-learning
module
(SLM)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
● lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL,
WHLP,
WLP, WLL, lesson exemplars,
and the
likes)
● video lesson
● audio lesson
● other learning materials in
print/digital
format (please specify and provide
annotations)
with client/learner feedback on
how the
material encouraged the learners
to participate,
cooperate, and collaborate

SET B
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating
sheet or inter-observer agreement
form from
1. an observation of synchronous
teaching (limited face-to-face
teaching,
online teaching, or two-way radio
instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible, an
observation of
a recorded video lesson or audio
lesson
that is SLM-based or MELC- Timeliness
aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an
observation of a demonstration
teaching**
via LAC
8. Applied a SET A Quality 4 The teacher 4 Teacher
range of Any supplementary material (in used should guide
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
successful print/digital format) made by the strategies and keep an
strategies ratee* that fosters eye on the
that maintain and used in the lesson delivery independent learners
learning that learning. progress and
environments highlights a range of strategies output while
that motivate that independent
learners to maintain learning environments learning is
work that happening.
productively motivate learners to work Give at least a
by assuming productively by minimum
responsibility assuming responsibility for their supervision.
for their own own
learning learning
● activity sheet/s Efficiency
● one lesson from a self-learning
module (SLM)
● lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL,
WHLP,
WLP, WLL, lesson exemplars,
and
the likes)
● video lesson
● audio lesson
● other learning materials in
print/digital format (please specify
and provide annotations)

SET B Timeliness
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT)
rating sheet or inter-observer
agreement form from
1. an observation of synchronous
teaching (limited face-to-face
teaching, online teaching, or two-
way
radio instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible, an
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
observation of a recorded video
lesson
or audio lesson that is SLM-based
or
MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an
observation of a demonstration
teaching** via LAC
Basic KRA 3: 9. Designed, SET A Quality 5 Answered 5 Well 5
Education Diversity of adapted and Classroom Observation Tool the prompt accomplished
Services Learners, implemented (COT) rating sheet or questions in TRF
Curriculum teaching interobserver agreement form the Teacher
and strategies from Reflection
Planning, & that are 1. an observation of synchronous Form with
Assessment responsive to teaching (limited face-to-face such dept
and learners with teaching, online teaching, or and
Reporting disabilities, two-way radio instruction) knowledge.
giftedness 2. if option 1 is not possible, an Information
and talents observation of a recorded video were
lesson or audio lesson that is presented
SLM-based or MELC-aligned with
3. if options 1 and 2 are not accuracy
possible, an observation of a and relevant.
demonstration teaching* via Efficiency
LAC
SET B
Teacher Reflection Form (TRF)
on designing, adapting, and/or
implementing teaching strategies
that are responsive to learners
with
disabilities, giftedness and talents
and a certification from the
school head that the ratee’s
classes have no identified Timeliness
learner/s
with disabilities, giftedness and/or
talents
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 10. Adapted SET A Quality 5 Answered 5 Well 5
Education and used Classroom Observation the prompt accomplished
Services culturally Tool (COT) rating sheet or questions in TRF
appropriate inter-observer agreement the Teacher
teaching form from Reflection
strategies to 1. an observation of Form with
address the synchronous such dept
needs of teaching (limited face-toface and
learners teaching, online knowledge.
from teaching, or two-way radio Information
indigenous instruction) were
groups 2. if option 1 is not possible, presented
an observation of a with
recorded video lesson or accuracy
audio lesson that is SLMbased or and relevant.
MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC

SET B
Teacher Reflection Form
Efficiency
(TRF) on adapting and using
culturally appropriate teaching
strategies to address the
needs of learners from
indigenous groups and a
certification from the school
head that the ratee’s classes
have no identified learner/s
from indigenous groups

Timeliness
Basic 11. Adapted 1. Proof of evaluation* on Quality 4 Took part of 3 Could have 3.5
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Education and the implementation of CIP (IM DR made a well
Services implemented the adapted / MATH) prepared
learning contextualized learning learning
programs that program program for
ensure 2. Progress report on the struggling
relevance and implementation of the learners in
responsiveness adapted / contextualized Science 4
to the needs of learning program
all learners 3. Accomplishment Efficiency
/ completion / technical
report on the
implementation of an
adapted / contextualized
learning program
4. Action plan / activity
proposal / activity matrix
that shows an adapted / Timeliness
contextualized learning
program
Basic 12. Utilized A list of identified least / Quality 4 Took part of 3 Lacks of 3.5
Education assessment most mastered skills based Grade Level MOVs
Services data to inform on the frequency of errors / PHIL-IRI supporting to
the correct responses with any (Filipino) the
modification of of the following supporting remediation
teaching and MOV program
learning 1. accomplishment report for
practices and remedial / enhancement
programs. activities (e.g., remedial Efficiency
sessions, Summer
Reading Camp, Phil-IRIbased
reading program)
2. intervention material used
for remediation /
reinforcement /
enhancement
3. lesson plan/activity log for
remediation /
enhancement utilizing of
assessment data to Timeliness
modify teaching and
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
learning practices or
programs
Basic KRA 4: 13. Maintained 1. Accomplishment report of a Quality 5 Involved 5 All MOVs are 5
Education Community learning program / project / activity himself with present.
Services Linkages environments that maintains a learning community
and that are environment projects that
Professional responsive to 2. Program / Project / Activity are beneficial
Engagement community plan on maintaining a to the
& Personal contexts learning environment learners and
Growth and 3. Minutes of a consultative their family.
Professional meeting / community
Developmen stakeholders meeting
t about a program / project / Efficiency
activity that maintains a
learning environment with
proof of attendance
4. Communication letter about
a program / project /
activity that maintains a
learning environment

Timeliness
Basic 14. Reviewed 1. Annotated video / Quality 5 Attended 5 The teacher 5
Education regularly audio recording of LAC ensured
Services personal one’s teaching that sessions and professional
teaching shows impact of seminars. growth by
practice using regularly reviewing Provided attending
existing laws one’s teaching notes and LACs and
and regulations practice/s insightful seminars
that apply to 2. Annotated teaching reflections. conducted
the material that shows within and
teaching impact of regularly outside the
profession and reviewing one’s school.
the teaching practice/s
responsibilities ● lesson plan
specified in the ● activity sheet
Code of Ethics ● assessment Efficiency
for Professional materials
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Teachers ● others (please
specify)
3. Personal reflection
notes as outputs from
participation in review
of personal teaching
practices in four (4)
quarters
4. Proof of attendance
(with date) in LAC or
coaching and
mentoring sessions for Timeliness
review of personal
teaching practices
Basic 15. Complied Quality 5 Proof of 5 MOVs are 5
Education with and 1. Proof of participation / communicati compiled and
Services implemented involvement in a on and presented.
school policies school-community constant
and procedures feedbacking
partnership for the
consistently to with the
foster implementation of a parents and
harmonious school policy / learners
relationships procedure (e.g., regarding
with learners, certificate as school
parents, and committee member, policies and
other narrative report) activities
stakeholders 2. Minutes of parentteacher were
conference / constantly
stakeholders’ meeting done.
Efficiency
about an implemented
school policy /
procedure with proof of
attendance
3. Communication letter
about an implemented
school policy /
procedure sent to
parent / guardian
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Timeliness
Basic 16. Applied a One (1) lesson plan Quality 4 Teachers 4 Ensured that 5
Education personal with annotations exhibited a the lesson is
Services philosophy of explaining the personal learner-
teaching that is application of a philosophy centered.
learner- learner-centered related to a
centered teaching philosophy progressivist.
(e.g., constructivism, Efficiency
existentialism) used
as basis for planning /
designing the lesson Timeliness
Basic 17. Adopted 1. Documented feedback Quality 5 Screenshots 5 All MOVs are 5
Education practices that from superiors, colleagues, and other available.
Services uphold the learners, parents / documentatio
dignity of guardian, or other n of
teaching as a stakeholders directly feedbacks
profession by reflecting the ratee’s good and
exhibiting practices that uphold the communicati
qualities such dignity of teaching as a on were
as caring profession available.
attitude, 2. Annotated evidence of PMCF and
respect and practice indirectly linking to MRF are
integrity the upholding of the dignity presented
of teaching as a profession
by exhibiting qualities such
as caring attitude, respect
and integrity Efficiency
● Screenshot of text
message / chat / email /
any form of communication
with parents / guardian or
learners (name or any
identifier removed)
● Remarks from mentor /
master teacher / school
head about one’s qualities
(e.g., entries in
Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
[PMCF] or in Mid-Year
Review Form)
● Recognition from the Timeliness
school / school community
about one’s qualities
● Others (please specify)
Basic 18. Set 1. Updated IPCRF-DP Quality 5 Updated 5 MOVs are 5
Education professional from Phase II IPCRF-DP, present.
Services development 2. Mid-year Review Form MRF and E-
goals based on (MRF) SAT
the Philippine 3. IPCRF-DP Certification
Professional 4. Certification from the were
Standards for ICT Coordinator / presented.
Teachers School Head / Focal Efficiency
Person in charge of eSAT

Timeliness
Basic KRA 5: Plus 19. Performed Any proof of: Quality 5 Teacher 5 Compilation of 5
Education Factor various related ● committee became a evidences or
Services works / involvement member of MOVs are
activities that ● advisorship of cocurricular district TWG, attached
contribute to activities has written
the teaching ● book or journal an Action
learning authorship / Research
process contributorship Proposal,
● coordinatorship / and
chairpersonship designated
● coaching and as a district
mentoring learners in and school
competitions level
● serving as reliever of coordinator
classes in the Efficiency
absence of teachers
● mentoring pre-service
teachers
● participation in
demonstration
teaching
● participation as
technical working
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
group member
● others (please Timeliness
specify and provide
annotations)

ANA MARIA L. TOLENTINO PHILIP B. YANSON CORAZON A. DELA ROSA, EdD

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like