Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: CORTEZ, ALLAINE M. Name of Rater: CARDENAS, MONALISA C.

Position: Teacher III Position: MASTER TEACHER II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: TUKTUKAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Date of Review: May 14, 2021
Rating Period: S.Y. 2020-2021
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied S. Y. 22.5% 1. Classroom Observation Quality 5 5 5
Education Knowledge knowledge of 2020- Tool (COT) rating sheet
Services and content within and 2021 or inter-observer
Pedagogy across curriculum agreement form from
teaching areas. 2. an online observation of
online synchronous
teaching
3. if option 1 is not
possible, an observation
of a video lesson that is
SLM- based or MELC-
Efficiency 3 4 3.5
aligned
4. if options 1 and 2 are
not possible, an
observation of a
demonstration teaching
5. via LAC
Timeliness
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Basic 2. Ensured the 1. material (in print/digital Quality 5 5 5
Education positive use of ICT to format) made by the ratee
Services facilitate the teaching and used in the lesson
and learning process delivery that highlights the
positive use of ICT to
facilitate the teaching and
learning process
2. Activity sheet/s
3. One lesson from a self-
learning module (SLM)
4. Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
Lesson Exemplars, and the
likes) Efficiency 5 5 5
5. Video lesson
6. Audio lesson
7. Other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
specify and
8. provide annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range 1. material (in print/digital Quality 4 4 4
Education of teaching format) made by the ratee
Services strategies to and used in the lesson
develop critical delivery that highlights
and creative teaching strategies to
thinking, as well develop critical and creative
as other higher- thinking, as well as other
order thinking higher-order thinking skills
skills.
Weight
per KRA
2. Activity sheet/s Efficiency 4 4 4
Lesson Exemplars, and the
likes)
5. Video lesson
6. Audio lesson
specify and provide Timeliness
8. annotations)
Basic 2. Diversity of 4. Established a 22.5% 1. Any supplementary material Quality 4 4 4
Education Learners & learner centered (in print/digital format) made
Services Assessment culture by using by the ratee and used in the
and teaching lesson delivery that
Reporting strategies that highlights teaching
respond to their strategies that are
linguistic, cultural, responsive to learners’
socioeconomic linguistic, cultural, Efficiency 4 4 4
and religious socioeconomic, or religious
backgrounds backgrounds
2. Activity sheet/s
Lesson Exemplars, and the Timeliness
likes)
5. Video lesson
6. Audio lesson
8. specify and provide
annotations)
Weight
per KRA
Basic 5. Planned and 1. Classroom Observation Quality 4 4 4
Education delivered teaching Tool (COT) rating sheet
Services strategies that are or inter-observer
responsive to the agreement form from
special 2. an online observation of
educational needs online synchronous
of learners in teaching
difficult 3. if option 1 is not
circumstances*, possible, an observation Efficiency 3 3 3
including: of a video lesson that is
geographic SLM- based or MELC-
isolation; chronic aligned
illness; 4. if options 1 and 2 are
displacement due not possible, an
to armed conflict, observation of a
urban demonstration teaching
resettlement or via LAC
disasters; child
abuse and child
labor practices
Timeliness
Basic 6. Used 1. Evidence that highlights Quality 4 4 4

Education strategies for providing accurate and
Services providing timely, constructive feedback to
accurate and improve learner
constructive performance and that shows
feedback to timeliness of feedback given
improve learner to any of the following
performance 2. activity sheet
3. performance task
Weight
per KRA
4. quiz or test Efficiency 3 3 3
5. self-learning module
Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Selected, 22.5% 1. Classroom Observation Tool Quality 3 3 3
Education and Planning developed, (COT) rating sheet or inter-
Services organized and observer agreement form
used appropriate from
teaching and
learning
resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals
Weight
per KRA
2. an online observation of Efficiency 3 3 3
online synchronous teaching
3. if option 1 is not possible, an
observation of a video
lesson that is SLM- based or
MELC- aligned
4. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching
5. via LAC
Timeliness
8. Set achievable 1. One lesson plan (e.g., Quality 3 3 3
and appropriate DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP,
learning WLL,
outcomes that are 2. Lesson Exemplars, and
aligned with the likes) or one lesson
learning from a self-learning
competencies module prepared by the Efficiency 3 3 3
ratee with achievable
and appropriate learning
outcomes that are
aligned with the learning
competencies as shown
in any of the following:
3. Lecture/discussion Timeliness
4. Activity/activity sheet
5. Performance task
6. Rubric for assessing
performance using
criteria that
appropriately describe
the target output
Weight
per KRA
Basic 9. Built 1. Proof of participation in Quality 4 4 4
Education 4. relationships with any activity for improved
Services Community parents/ access to education
Linkages and guardians and the such as, but not limited
Professional wider school to the ff. activities
community to 2. Distribution of learning
Engagement facilitate materials to
& Personal involvement in the learners/parents (e.g.,
educative process receipt form/monitoring Efficiency 4 4 4
form during distribution
of learning materials,
etc.)
3. Brigada Eskwela (e.g.,
commitment form to
stakeholders, developed
advocacy materials,
certificate of participation
that involves
parents’/stakeholders’
Timeliness
engagement signed by
the school head, etc.)
4. Home visitation (e.g.,
home visitation form,
etc.)
5. Others (please specify
and provide annotations)
6. Parent-teacher log or
proof of other
stakeholders meeting
(e.g., one-on-one parent-
teacher- learner
conference log;
attendance sheet with
minutes of online or
face-to-face meeting;
proof of involvement in
the learners’/parents’
orientation, etc.)
7. Any form of
communication to
Weight
per KRA
parents/stakeholders
(e.g., notice of meeting;
screenshot of chat/text
message/communication
with parent/guardian
[name or any identifier
removed]; digital/ printed
copy of Learner
Enrollment Survey Form
signed by the ICT
Coordinator/Focal
8. person and School
Head)
Basic 10. Participated in 22.5% 1. Certificate of completion in a Quality 4 4 4

Education professional course/training
Services networks to share 2. Certificate of participation in
knowledge and to a webinar, retooling,
enhance practice upskilling, and other
training/ seminar/ workshop
with proof of implementation
3. Certificate of recognition/
speakership in a webinar,
retooling, upskilling, and
other training/ seminar/
workshop
4. Any proof of participation to
a benchmarking activity
5. Any proof of participation in
school LAC sessions
(online/face-to-face) certified
by the LAC Coordinator
6. Others (please specify
7. and provide annotations)
Weight
per KRA
Efficiency 4 4 4
Timeliness
Basic 11. Developed a 1. Main MOV: Quality 4 4 4
Education personal 2. Individual Performance
Services improvement plan and Commitment
based on Review Form-
reflection of one’s Development Plan
practice and (IPCRF- DP)
ongoing 3. Efficiency 4 4 4
professional 4. Supporting MOV:
learning 5. Any document aligned
with the IPCRF-DP such
as
6. Reflection of one’s
practice during LAC Timeliness 4 4 4
session/s with proof of
attendance
7. Reflection/Personal
Notes on Coaching and
Mentoring and/or Mid-
year Review
8. Personal notes journal
on division/school-led
INSET with proof of
attendance
Weight
per KRA
9. Certificate of enrolment/
registration form/class
card in graduate/post-
graduate school/online
courses
10. Any learning material
highlighting the
improvement done
based on accomplished
“reflection” section
11. Others (Please specify
12. and provide
annotations)
Basic 12. Performed 1. Proof of: Quality 4 4 4
Education various related 2. committee involvement
5. Plus
Services works/ activities 3. advisorship of co-
Factor that contribute to curricular activities
the teaching- 4. involvement as
learning process module/learning
material writer
5. involvement as
module/learning Efficiency 4 4 4
material validator
6. participation in the
RO/SDO/school-
initiated TV-/radio-
based instruction
7. book or journal
authorship/
contributorship
8. coordinatorship/ Timeliness 4 4 4
chairpersonship Timeliness
9. coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
10. mentoring pre-service
teachers
11. participation in
Weight
per KRA
demonstration teaching
12. participation as research
presenter in a forum/
conference
13. others (please specify
and provide
annotations)
CARDENAS, MONALISA C. CORTEZ, ALLAINE M. QUIAMBAO, ROWENA T.
Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: CORTEZ, ALLAINE M. Name of Rater: CARDENAS, MONALISA C.

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Basic 6. Used 1. Evidence that highlights Quality 4 4 4

Basic 10. Participated in 22.5% 1. Certificate of completion in a Quality 4 4 4

CARDENAS, MONALISA C. CORTEZ, ALLAINE M. QUIAMBAO, ROWENA T.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like