Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 20% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet or Inter-
Services and content within and observer agreement form from
Pedagogy across curriculum 1. an observation of
teaching areas. synchronous teaching
(limited face-to-face teaching,
online teaching, or two-way
radio instruction).
2. if option 1 is not possible, an
observation of a recorded
video lesson or audio lesson
Efficiency
that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned.
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC
Timeliness
2. Used research- One (1) Lesson plan with Quality
based knowledge annotations Identifying the
and principles of research-based knowledge
teaching and and/or principles of teaching and
learning to learning used as basis for
enhance planning/ designing the lesson.
professional
practice
Efficiency
Timeliness
Weight
per KRA
Basic 3. Displayed Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education proficient used of (COT) rating sheet or Inter-
Services Mother Tongue, observer agreement form from
Filipino, and 1. an observation of
English to synchronous teaching
facilitate teaching (limited face-to-face teaching,
and learning online teaching, or two-way
radio instruction).
aligned.
possible, an observation of a Efficiency
LAC
Timeliness
4. Used effective Classroom Observation Tool Quality
verbal and non- (COT) rating sheet or Inter-
verbal classroom observer agreement form from
communication 1. an observation of
strategies to synchronous teaching
support learner (limited face-to-face teaching,
understanding, online teaching, or two-way
participation, radio instruction). Efficiency
engagement, and 2. if option 1 is not possible, an
achievement. observation of a recorded
aligned.
LAC Timeliness
Weight
per KRA
Basic 2. Leaning 5. Established 20% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Environment safe and secure (COT) rating sheet or inter-
Services learning observer agreement form from
environments to
enhance learning 1. an observation of
through the synchronous teaching
consistent (limited face-to-face
implementation of teaching, online teaching, or Efficiency
policies, two-way radio instruction)
guidelines and 2. if option 1 is not possible,
procedures. an observation of a
recorded video lesson or
audio lesson that is SLM-
based or MELC aligned.
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC
Timeliness
6. Maintained Classroom Observation Tool Quality
learning (COT) rating sheet or inter-
Environments that observer agreement form from
promote fairness,
respect and care 1. an observation of
to encourage synchronous teaching
learning (limited face-to-face
teaching, online teaching, or
two-way radio instruction) Efficiency
that is SLM-based or MELC
aligned.
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC Timeliness
Weight
per KRA
Basic 7. Maintained SET A Quality
Education learning Any supplementary material
Services environments that (in print/digital format) made
nurture and by the ratee* and used in the
inspire learners to lesson delivery that highlights
participate, maintaining learning
cooperate and
environments that nurture and
collaborate in
inspire learners to participate,
continued
learning cooperate and collaborate in
continued learning Efficiency
● activity sheet/s
● one lesson from a self-
learning module (SLM)
● lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL,
WHLP, WLP, WLL, lesson
exemplars, and the likes)
● video lesson
● audio lesson
● other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
specify and provide annotations)
with client/learner feedback on
how the material encouraged
the learners to participate,
cooperate, and collaborate
SET B
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet or inter-
observer agreement form
from
1. an observation of
synchronous teaching (limited
face-to-face teaching, online
teaching, or two-way radio
instruction)
observation of a recorded video Timeliness
lesson or audio lesson that is
Weight
per KRA
SLM-based or MELC-aligned
LAC
8. Applied a range SET A Quality

of successful Any supplementary material
strategies that (in print/digital format) made
maintain learning by the ratee* and used in the
environments that lesson delivery that highlights
motivate learners a range of strategies that
to work maintain learning
productively by environments that motivate Efficiency
assuming learners to work productively
responsibility for by assuming responsibility for
their own learning their own learning
● activity sheet/s
● one lesson from a self-
learning module (SLM)
● lesson plan (e.g., DLP, DLL,
WHLP, WLP, WLL, lesson
exemplars, and the likes)
● video lesson
● audio lesson
● other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
specify and provide annotations)
SET B Timeliness
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet or inter-
observer agreement form
from
1. an observation of
teaching, or two-way radio
instruction)
Weight
per KRA
observation of a recorded video
LAC
Basic 3. Diversity of 9. Designed, 20% SET A Quality
Education Learners, adapted and Classroom Observation Tool
Services Curriculum implemented (COT) rating sheet or inter-
and Planning, teaching observer agreement form
& strategies that are from
Assessment responsive to 1. an observation of
and learners with
Reporting disabilities,
giftedness and
talents teaching, or two-way radio
instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible, an Efficiency
LAC
SET B
Teacher Reflection Form
(TRF) on designing, adapting,
and/or implementing teaching
strategies that are responsive to
learners with disabilities,
giftedness and talents and a
certification from the school
head that the ratee’s classes
have no identified learner/s with
disabilities, giftedness and/or
talents. Timeliness
Weight
per KRA
10. Adapted and SET A Quality
used culturally Classroom Observation Tool
appropriate (COT) rating sheet or inter-
teaching observer agreement form
strategies to from
address the 1. an observation of
needs of learners synchronous teaching (limited
from indigenous face-to-face teaching, online
groups teaching, or two-way radio
instruction)
LAC
Efficiency
SET B
Teacher Reflection Form
(TRF) on adapting and using
culturally appropriate teaching
strategies to address the needs
of learners from indigenous
groups and a certification from
the school head that the ratee’s
classes have no identified
learner from indigenous groups. Timeliness
Basic 11. Adapted and 1. Proof of evaluation on the Quality
Education implemented implementation of the adapted/
Services learning programs contextualized learning program
that ensure
relevance and 2. Progress report on the
responsiveness to implementation of the adapted /
the needs of all contextualized learning program
Weight
per KRA
learners Efficiency
3. Accomplishment/completion/
technical report on the
implementation of an adapted /
contextualized learning program
4. Action plan/activity proposal /

activity matrix that shows an
adapted / contextualized
learning program
Timeliness
12. Utilized A list of identified least/ most Quality
assessment data mastered skills based on the
to inform the frequency of errors / correct
modification of responses with any of the
teaching and following supporting MOV
learning practices
and programs 1. accomplishment report for
remedial / enhancement
activities (e.g., remedial
sessions, Summer Reading
Camp, Phil-IRI based reading
program) Efficiency
2. intervention material used for

remediation /reinforcement /
enhancement
3. lesson plan/activity log for
remediation / enhancement
utilizing of assessment data to
modify teaching and learning
practices or programs
Timeliness
Weight
per KRA
Basic 4. Community 13. Maintained 30% 1. Accomplishment report of a Quality
Education Linkages and learning program / project / activity that
Services Professional environments that maintains a learning
Engagement are responsive to environment
& Personal community 2. Program/Project/Activity plan
Growth and contexts. on maintaining a learning
Professional environment
Development 3. Minutes of a consultative
meeting/ community
stakeholders meeting about a
program/ project /activity that
maintains a learning
environment with proof of
Efficiency
attendance
4. Communication letter about a
program/ project /activity that
maintains a learning
environment. Timeliness
Basic 14. Reviewed 1. Annotated video /audio Quality
Education regularly personal recording of one’s teaching that
Services teaching practice shows impact of regularly
using existing reviewing one’s teaching
laws and practice/s
regulations that 2. Annotated teaching material
apply to the that shows impact of regularly
teaching reviewing one’s teaching
profession and practice/s
the ● lesson plan Efficiency
responsibilities ● activity sheet
specified in the ● assessment materials
Code of Ethics for ● others (please specify)
Professional 3. Personal reflection notes as
Teachers outputs from participation in
review of personal teaching
practices in four (4) quarters
4. Proof of attendance (with
date) in LAC or coaching and
mentoring sessions for review of
Timeliness
personal teaching practices
Weight
per KRA
Basic 15. Complied with 1. Proof of participation Quality
Education and Implemented /involvement in a school-
Services school policies community partnership for the
and procedures implementation of a school
consistently to policy /procedure (e.g.,
foster harmonious certificate as
relationships with
learners, parents, committee member, narrative
and other report)
stakeholders Efficiency
. 2. Minutes of parent teacher
conference/stakeholders’
meeting about an implemented
school policy/ procedure with
proof of attendance
3. Communication letter about

an implemented school
policy/procedure sent to parent /
guardian
Timeliness
16. Applied a One (1) lesson plan with Quality

personal annotations explaining the
philosophy of application of a learner-
teaching that is centered teaching philosophy
learner-centered. (e.g., constructivism,
existentialism) used as basis for
planning / designing the lesson
Efficiency
Timeliness
Weight
per KRA
17. Adopted 1. Documented feedback from Quality
practices that superiors, colleagues, learners,
uphold the dignity parents/guardian, or other
of teaching as a stakeholders directly reflecting
profession by the ratee’s good practices that
exhibiting uphold the dignity of teaching as
qualities such as a profession
caring attitude, 2. Annotated evidence of
respect and practice indirectly linking to the
integrity upholding of the dignity of
teaching as a profession by
exhibiting qualities such as
caring attitude, respect and
integrity
● Screenshot of text message /
chat / email /any form of Efficiency
communication with parents /
guardian or learners (name or
any identifier removed)
● Remarks from mentor/master
teacher / school head about
one’s qualities (e.g., entries in
Performance Monitoring and
Coaching Form [PMCF] or in
Mid-Year Review Form)
● Recognition from the school /
school community about one’s
qualities
● Others (please specify)
Timeliness
18. Set 1. Updated IPCRF-DP from Quality
professional Phase II
development 2. Mid-year Review Form (MRF)
goals based on 3. IPCRF-DP
the Philippine 4. Certification from the ICT Efficiency
Professional Coordinator / School Head /
Standards for Focal Person in charge of e-SAT
Teachers
Timeliness
Weight
per KRA
Basic 5. Plus Factor 19. Performed 10% Any proof of: Timeliness
Education various related
Services works/activities ● committee involvement
that contribute to ● advisorship of cocurricular
the teaching activities
learning process
● book or journal authorship
/contributorship Efficiency
● coordinatorship
/chairpersonship
● coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
● serving as reliever of classes
in the absence of teachers
● mentoring pre-service
teachers Timeliness
● participation in demonstration
teaching
● participation as technical
working group member
● others (please specify and
provide annotations)
Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mid-Year Review Form (MRF) For Teacher I-Iii

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

8. Applied a range SET A Quality

4. Action plan/activity proposal /

2. intervention material used for

3. Communication letter about

16. Applied a One (1) lesson plan with Quality

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like