MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Modelled 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Knowledge effective (COT) rating sheet with proof
Services and applicants of of attendance of colleague/s
Pedagogy content from
knowledge within 1. an online observation of
and across online synchronous
curriculum teaching
teaching areas 2. if option 1 is not
possible, an observation
of a video lesson that is
SLM-based or MELC-
aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are
not possible, an
observation of a
demonstration teaching
via LAC

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Promoted Any supplementary material Quality
Education effective (in print/digital format) made
Services strategies in by the ratee and used in the
positive use of lesson delivery that highlights
ICT to facilitate effective strategies in the
the teaching and positive use of ICT to facilitate
learning process the teaching and learning
process and Performance
Monitoring and Coaching
Form to show proof of coaching
and mentoring colleague/s
 Activity sheet/s
 One lesson from a self-
learning module(SLM)
 Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
Lesson Exemplars, and
the likes)
 Video Lesson
 Audio Lesson
 Other learning materials
in print/digital format
(please specify and
provide annotations)

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 3. Developed and Any supplementary material Quality
Education applied effective (in print/digital format) made
Services teaching by the ratee and used in the
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
strategies to lesson delivery that highlights
promote critical effective teaching strategies to
and creative promote critical and creative
thinking, as well thinking, as well as other higher-
as other higher- order thinking skills and
order thinking Performance Monitoring and
skills Coaching Form to show proof
of coaching and mentoring
colleague/s
 Activity sheet/s
 One lesson from a self-
learning module(SLM)
 Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
Lesson Exemplars, and
the likes)
 Video Lesson
 Audio Lesson
 Other learning materials
in print/digital format
(please specify and
provide annotations)

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 2. Diversity of 4. Exhibit a 22.5% Any supplementary material Quality
Education Learners & learner-centered (in print/digital format) made
Services Assessment culture that by the ratee and used in the
and promotes success lesson delivery that highlights
Reporting by using effective effective teaching strategies that
teaching respond to learners’ linguistic,
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
strategies that cultural, socioeconomic, or
respond to their religious backgrounds and
linguistic, cultural, Performance Monitoring and
socioeconomic Coaching Form to show proof
and religious of coaching and mentoring
backgrounds colleague/s
 Activity sheet/s
 One lesson from a self-
learning module(SLM)
 Lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
Lesson Exemplars, and
the likes)
 Video Lesson
 Audio Lesson
 Other learning materials
in print/digital format
(please specify and
provide annotations)

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 5. Evaluated with Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education colleagues (COT) rating sheet with proof
Services teaching of attendance of colleague/s
strategies that are from
responsive to the 1. an online observation of
special online synchronous
educational needs teaching
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
of learners in 2. if option 1 is not
difficult possible, an observation
circumstances*, of a video lesson that is
including: SLM-based or MELC-
geographic aligned
isolation; chronic 3. if options 1 and 2 are
illness; not possible, an
displacement due observation of a
to armed conflict, demonstration teaching
urban via LAC
resettlement or
disasters; child
abuse and child
labor practices

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 6. Used strategies Evidence that highlights Quality
Education for providing providing accurate and
Services timely, accurate constructive feedback to
and constructive encourage learners to reflect on
feedback to and improve their own learning
encourage that shows timeliness of
learners to reflect feedback given to any of the
on and improve following
their own learning  activity sheet
 performance task
 portfolio
 quiz or test
 self-learning module
and Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form to show
proof of coaching and mentoring
colleague/s

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Advised and 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education and Planning guided colleagues (COT) rating sheet with proof
Services in the selection, of attendance of colleague/s
organization, from
development and 1. an online
use of appropriate observation of
teaching and online synchronous
learning teaching
resources, 2. if option 1 is not
including ICT, to possible, an
address specific observation of a
learning goals video lesson that is
SLM-based or
MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2
are not possible, an
observation of a
demonstration
teaching via LAC

Efficiency
Timeliness
8. Modelled to One lesson plan (e.g., DLP, Quality
colleagues the DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
setting of Exemplars, and the likes) or
achievable and one lesson from a self-
challenging learning module prepared by
learning the ratee with achievable and
outcomes that are appropriate learning outcomes
aligned with that are aligned with the learning
learning competencies as shown in any
competencies to of the following:
cultivate a culture  Lecture/discussion
of excellence for  Activity/activity sheet
all learners  Performance task
 Rubric for assessing
performance using
criteria that
appropriately describe
the target output
in demonstrated in a LAC
session as attested by the
LAC Coordinator/Approving
Authority with proof of
attendance of colleague/s

Efficiency
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. Community 9. Guided 22.5% 1. School letter approved Quality
Education Linkages and colleagues to by the school/
Services Professional strengthen 2. department/grade level
Engagement relationships with head (e.g.,
& Personal parents/guardians communication with the
Growth and and the wider barangay to use a
Professional school community government vehicle to
Development to maximize their transport modules)
involvement in the 3. Approved action
educative process plan/project proposal/
activity proposal
involving the
stakeholders
4. Accomplishment/
narrative report of an
approved activity

Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 10. Contributed  Approved activity/project Quality
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Education actively to proposal for a webinar,
Services professional retooling, upskilling, and
networks within other
and between training/seminar/worksh
schools to op with accomplishment
improve report
knowledge and to  Approved activity/project
enhance practice proposal for
benchmarking or
innovation with
accomplishment report
 Certificate as contributor Efficiency
to LRMDS
 Certificate of completion
in a course/training
 Certificate of
recognition/speakershipi
n a webinar, retooling,
upskilling, and other
training/ seminar/
workshops
 Any proof of
participation in school
LAC sessions
(online/face-to-face)
certified by the LAC
Coordinator
 Others (Pease specify
and provide
annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 11. Initiated Main MOV: Quality
Education professional
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Services reflections and Synthesis of Individual
promote learning Performance and Commitment
opportunities with Review Form-Development Plan
colleagues to (IPCRF-DP) of colleague/s
improve practice
Supporting MOV:

Any document aligned with

the IPCRF-DP such as

 Certificate of recognition
as resource
speaker/training
committee chairperson
 Training matrix of LAC
sessions highlighting
teacher’s role
 Minutes of LAC session
highlighting teacher’s role
 Sample personal
Efficiency
notes/reflection of
colleagues on regional/
division/ school-led
INSETs and/or other
trainings supervised/
conducted by teacher
 Summary of evaluation/
quality assurance report
on the conducted
regional/division/school-
led INSETs and/or other
trainings
 Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Timeliness

Basic 5. Plus Factor 12. Performed 10% Proof that the teacher: Quality
Education various related
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee Rater Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Services works/activities  served as OIC in the
that contribute to absence of the principal
the teaching-  represented the principal in
learning process meetings and conference
 observed teaching
performance of Teachers I-
III
 assisted the school
selection committee in the
evaluation of credentials
when hiring or promoting
teachers Efficiency
 served in a committee
 served as adviser to co-
curricular activities
 served as
coordinator/chairperson
 authored/contributed to a
book or journal
 participated in the
RO/SDO/school0initiated
TV-/radio-based instruction
 served as module/learning
material writer
 served as module/learning
material validator
 coached and mentored
learners in competitions
 mentored pre-service/in-
service teachers
 others (please specify and
provide annotations
Timeliness

Rater Ratee Approving Authority