MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: RICHARD R. RAQUEÑO Name of Rater:

Position: TEACHER III Position:
Rating Period: AUGUST 2022 - FEBRUARY 2023 Date of Review: FEBRUARY 10, 2023

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc
per KRA Results
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. 1. Applied knowledge 7% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Content of content within and (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services Knowledg across curriculum observer agreement form/s done
e and teaching areas. through onsite / face-to-face / in-
Pedagogy (PPST 1.1.2) person classroom observation.

If onsite / face-to-face / in-person

classes are not implemented,

● through observation of
synchronous /
Efficiency
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Used a range of Classroom Observation Tool
Education teaching strategies (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services that enhance learner observer agreement form/s done
achievement in through onsite / face-to-face / in- Quality
literacy and numeracy person classroom observation.
skills. (PPST 1.4.2)
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
classes are not implemented,
Efficiency
● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or Timeliness
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 3. Applied a range of Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education teaching strategies to (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services develop critical and observer agreement form/s done
creative thinking, as through onsite / face-to-face / in-
well as other higher- person classroom observation.
order thinking skills.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
(PPST 1.5.2)
classes are not implemented, Efficiency
● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or Timeliness
● through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. 4. Managed 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Learning classroom structure to (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services Environm engage learners, observer agreement form/s done
ent and individually or in through onsite / face-to-face / in-
Diversity groups, in meaningful person classroom observation.
of exploration, discovery
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
Learners and hands-on Efficiency
classes are not implemented,
activities within a
range of physical ● through observation of
learning synchronous / asynchronous
environments. (PPST teaching in other modalities; or
2.3.3) ● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education behavior (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form/s done
applying positive and through onsite / face-to-face / in-
non-violent discipline person classroom observation.
to ensure learning-
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
focused
classes are not implemented,
environments. (PPST Efficiency
2.6.2) ● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 6. Used differentiated, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education developmentally (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services appropriate learning observer agreement form/s done
experiences to through onsite / face-to-face / in-
address learners’ person classroom observation.
gender, needs,
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
strengths, interests
classes are not implemented,
and experiences.
(PPST 3.1.2) ● through observation of
synchronous / asynchronous Efficiency
teaching in other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. 7. Planned, managed Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Curriculu and implemented (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services m and developmentally observer agreement form/s done
Planning sequenced teaching through onsite / face-to-face / in-
and learning person classroom observation.
processes to meet
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
curriculum
classes are not implemented,
requirements and
varied teaching ● through observation of
contexts. (PPST synchronous /
4.1.2) asynchronous teaching in Efficiency
other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial discussions LAC sessions / FGDs /
that use teacher and meetings / other collegial
learner feedback to discussions
enrich teaching 2. Minutes of LAC sessions /
practice. (PPST 4.4.2) FGDs / meetings / other
collegial discussions on Efficiency
use of teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Timeliness
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions / FGDs /
meetings / other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective)
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education developed, organized (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and used appropriate observer agreement form/s done
teaching and learning through onsite / face-to-face / in-
resources, including person classroom observation.
ICT, to address
learning goals. If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
(PPST 4.5.2) classes are not implemented,
Efficiency
● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Assessm selected, organized (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services ent and and used diagnostic, observer agreement form/s done
Reporting formative and through onsite / face-to-face / in-
summative person classroom observation.
assessment strategies
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
consistent with
classes are not implemented,
curriculum
requirements. ● through observation of
(PPST 5.1.2) synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Efficiency

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education evaluated learner ● Individual Learning
Services progress and Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
achievement using
● Peer assessment data
learner attainment
data.
● Sample of learners’ output
(PPST 5.2.2) with reflection / self-
assessment
● Progress charts/anecdotal
records Efficiency
● Class/e-class
record/grading sheets
● Lesson plans showing index
of mastery
● Frequency of errors with
identified least/most mastered
skills
● Any equivalent ALS
Timeliness
form/document that highlights
the objective (e.g., Individual
Learning Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 12. Communicated Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education promptly and clearly ● A sample of corrected test
Services the learners’ needs, paper of a learner in a
progress and learning area with parent’s or
achievement to key
guardian’s signature and date
stakeholders,
of receipt
including
parents/guardians ● Minutes of meetings with
(PPST 5.4.2) key stakeholders (e.g., PTA, Efficiency
SGC, SPT, CPC) with proof of
attendance
● Report card with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
● Communication with key
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using various Timeliness
modalities
● Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that highlights
the objective
● Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

5. Quality
Personal
Growth
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
and 13. Applied a A reflection/journal entry Efficiency
Professio personal that highlights the application
nal philosophy of of a learner-centered teaching
Developm teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan
ent learner-centered. or community work
(PPST 7.1.2)
14. Set 1. Certification from the ICT Quality
professional Coordinator / School Head /
development goals Focal Person in charge of e-
based on the SAT Efficiency
Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
Standards for (MRF) Timeliness
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from
(PPST 7.5.2) Phase II
Basic Plus 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education Factor various related ● committee involvement;
Services works / ● involvement as
activities that module/learning material
contribute to writer/validator;
the teaching- ● involvement as a resource
learning process
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction; Efficiency
● book or journal authorship/
co-authorship/contributorship
;
●
advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
● participation in
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
demonstration teaching; Timeliness
● participation as research
presenter in a
forum/conference;
● mentoring of
pre-service/in-service
teachers;
● conducted research within
the rating period;
● others (please specify)

1. with annotation on how it

contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

RICHARD R. RAQUEÑO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority