MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: MARIE GRACE T. LIMPAG Name of Rater: NEIL JIGGER C. AGAN
Position: TEACHER III Position: HEAD TEACHER IV
Rating Period: AUGUST 2022 - JULY 2023 Date of Review: JULY 7, 2023

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. 1. Applied knowledge SY 2022- 7% Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 5 0.350
Education Content of content within and 2023 (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services Knowledg across curriculum observer agreement form/s done
e and teaching areas. through onsite / face-to-face / in-
Pedagogy (PPST 1.1.2) person classroom observation.

If onsite / face-to-face / in-person

classes are not implemented,

● through observation of
synchronous/asynchronou
Efficiency 5 5
s teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range of SY 2022- Classroom Observation Tool 5 5 0.350
Education teaching strategies 2023 (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services that enhance learner observer agreement form/s done
achievement in through onsite / face-to-face / in- Quality
literacy and numeracy person classroom observation.
skills. (PPST 1.4.2)
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
classes are not implemented,
Efficiency
● through observation of
synchronous/asynchronou
s teaching in other
modalities; or Timeliness 5
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* 5
via LAC session.
Basic 3. Applied a range of SY 2022- Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 5 0.350
Education teaching strategies to 2023 (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services develop critical and observer agreement form/s done
creative thinking, as through onsite / face-to-face / in-
well as other higher- person classroom observation.
order thinking skills.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
(PPST 1.5.2)
classes are not implemented, Efficiency 5 5
● through observation of
synchronous/asynchro
nous teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of Timeliness
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. 4. Managed SY 2022- 7% Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 5 0.350
Education Learning classroom structure to 2023 (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services Environm engage learners, observer agreement form/s done
ent and individually or in through onsite / face-to-face / in-
Diversity groups, in meaningful person classroom observation.
of exploration, discovery,
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
Learners and hands-on Efficiency 5 5
classes are not implemented,
activities within a
range of physical ● through observation of
learning synchronous/asynchronous
environments. (PPST teaching in other modalities; or
2.3.3) ● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner SY 2022- Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 5 0.350
Education behavior 2023 (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form/s done
applying positive and through onsite / face-to-face / in-
non-violent discipline person classroom observation.
to ensure learning-
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
focused
classes are not implemented,
environments. (PPST Efficiency 5 5
2.6.2) ● through observation of
synchronous/asynchronou
s teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 6. Used differentiated, Classroom Observation Tool Quality 4 4 0.315
Education developmentally (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services appropriate learning observer agreement form/s done
experiences to through onsite / face-to-face / in-
address learners’ person classroom observation.
gender, needs,
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
strengths, interests,
classes are not implemented,
and experiences.
(PPST 3.1.2) ● through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous Efficiency 5 5
teaching in other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. 7. Planned, managed, SY 2022- 7% Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 5 0.350
Education Curriculu and implemented 2023 (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services m and developmentally observer agreement form/s done
Planning sequenced teaching through onsite / face-to-face / in-
and learning person classroom observation.
processes to meet
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
curriculum
classes are not implemented,
requirements and
varied teaching ● through observation of
contexts. (PPST synchronous/asynchronou
4.1.2) s teaching in other Efficiency 5 5
modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
8. Participated in SY 2022- 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality 3 3 0.245
collegial discussions 2023 LAC sessions / FGDs /
that use teacher and meetings / other collegial
learner feedback to discussions
enrich teaching 2. Minutes of LAC sessions /
practice. (PPST 4.4.2) FGDs / meetings / other
collegial discussions on Efficiency
the use of teacher and
learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Timeliness 4 4
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions / FGDs /
meetings / other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective)
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 5 0.350
Education developed, organized, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and used appropriate observer agreement form/s done
teaching and learning through onsite / face-to-face / in-
resources, including person classroom observation.
ICT, to address
learning goals. If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
(PPST 4.5.2) classes are not implemented,
Efficiency 5 5
● through observation of
synchronous/asynchronou
s teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom Observation Tool Quality 5 5 0.350
Education Assessm selected, organized, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services ent and and used diagnostic, observer agreement form/s done
Reporting formative, and through onsite / face-to-face / in-
summative person classroom observation.
assessment strategies
If onsite / face-to-face / in-person
consistent with
classes are not implemented,
curriculum
requirements. ● through observation of
(PPST 5.1.2) synchronous/asynchronou
s teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Efficiency 5 5

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the following: Quality 3 3 0.245
Education evaluated learner ● Individual Learning
Services progress and Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
achievement using
● Peer assessment data
learner attainment
data.
● Sample of learners’ output
(PPST 5.2.2) with reflection/self-
assessment
● Progress charts/anecdotal
records Efficiency
● Class/e-class
record/grading sheets
● Lesson plans showing the
index of mastery
● Frequency of errors with
identified least/most mastered
skills
● Any equivalent ALS
Timeliness 4 4
form/document that highlights
the objective (e.g., Individual
Learning Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 12. Communicated Any one (1) of the following: Quality 3 3 0.245
Education promptly and clearly ● A sample of corrected test
Services the learners’ needs, paper of a learner in a
progress, and learning area with the parent’s
achievement to key
or guardian’s signature and
stakeholders,
date of receipt
including
parents/guardians ● Minutes of meetings with
(PPST 5.4.2) key stakeholders (e.g., PTA, Efficiency
SGC, SPT, CPC) with proof of
attendance
● Report card with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
● Communication with key
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using various Timeliness 4 4
modalities
● Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that highlights
the objective
● Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

5. Quality 3 3 0.245
Personal
Growth
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
and 13. Applied a A reflection/journal entry Efficiency 4 4
Professio personal that highlights the application
nal philosophy of of learner-centered teaching
Developm teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan
ent learner-centered. or community work
(PPST 7.1.2)
14. Set 1. Certification from the ICT Quality 3 3 0.256
professional Coordinator / School Head /
development goals Focal Person in charge of e-
based on the SAT Efficiency 4 4
Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
Standards for (MRF) Timeliness 4 4
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from
(PPST 7.5.2) Phase II
Basic Plus 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Quality 4 4 0.080
Education Factor various related ● committee involvement;
Services works / ● involvement as
activities that module/learning material
contribute to writer/validator;
the teaching- ● involvement as a resource
learning process
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction; Efficiency 4 4
● book or journal authorship/
co-authorship/contributor
ship;
● advisor ship/coordinator
ship/ chairpersonship;
● participation in
demonstration teaching;
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performanc Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
e Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
● participation as a research Timeliness
presenter in a
forum/conference;
● mentoring of
pre-service/in-service
teachers;
● conducted research within
the rating period;
● others (please specify)

1. with annotation on how it

contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

NEIL JIGGER C. AGAN MARIE GRACE T. LIMPAG MA. ROWENA P. DAYONDON

Rater Ratee Approving Authority