MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Name of Rater: _________________________________________________

Position: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Position: ______________________________________________________
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating Quality
sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s
Education Knowledge knowledge of done through onsite / face-to-face/ in-person
Services and content within classroom observation.
Pedagogy and across
Efficiency
curriculum If onsite / face-to-face / in- person classes
teaching areas. are not implemented,
(PPST 1.1.2) • through observation of synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in other modalities;
or
• through observation of a demonstration
Timeliness
teaching* via LAC session.
Basic 2. Used a range of Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating Quality
sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s
Education teaching strategies
7% done through onsite / face-to-face/ in-person
Services that enhance classroom observation.
learner
achievement in If onsite / face-to-face / in- person classes
literacy and are not implemented,
• through observation of synchronous /
Efficiency
numeracy skills.
(PPST 1.4.2) asynchronous teaching in other modalities;
or
• through observation of a demonstration Timeliness
teaching* via LAC session.
Basic 3. Applied a range Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating Quality
of teaching sheet/s or inter- observer agreement
Education
strategies to form/s done through onsite / face-to- face / in-
Services person classroom observation.
develop critical
7% If onsite / face-to-face / in- person
and creative classes are not implemented,
thinking, as well as
other higher-order • through observation of synchronous /
Efficiency
asynchronous teaching in other
thinking skills.
modalities; or through observation of a
(PPST 1.5.2) demonstration teaching* via LAC
session. Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating Quality
sheet/s or inter-observer agreement form/s
Education Environment classroom done through onsite / face-to- face / in-person
Services and Diversity structure to engage classroom observation.
of Learners learners, individually
or in groups, in If onsite / face-to-face / in- person classes
meaningful are not implemented,
exploration, • through observation of synchronous /
discovery and asynchronous teaching in other modalities; Efficiency
or
hands-on activities
within a range of • through observation of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC session.
physical learning
environments.
(PPST 2.3.2) Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner 7% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating Quality
sheet/s or inter- observer agreement
Education behavior form/s done through onsite / face-to- face / in-
Services constructively by person classroom observation.
applying positive If onsite / face-to-face / in- person
and non-violent classes are not implemented,
discipline to ensure • through observation of synchronous /
learning- focused asynchronous teaching in other Efficiency
modalities; or through observation of a
environments.
demonstration teaching* via LAC
(PPST 2.6.2) session. Timeliness
Basic 6. Used 7% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating Quality
sheet/s or inter- observer agreement
Education differentiated, form/s done through onsite / face-to- face / in-
Services developmentally person classroom observation.
appropriate
learning If onsite / face-to-face / in- person
experiences to classes are not implemented,
address • through observation of synchronous /
learners’ gender, asynchronous teaching in other Efficiency
modalities; or through observation of a
needs, strengths, demonstration teaching* via LAC
interests and session.
experiences.
(PPST 3.1.2) Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating Quality
sheet/s or inter- observer agreement
Education and Planning managed and form/s done through onsite / face-to- face / in-
Services implemented person classroom observation.
developmentally
sequenced If onsite / face-to-face / in- person
teaching and classes are not implemented,
learning • through observation of synchronous /
processes to asynchronous teaching in other
modalities; or through observation of a
meet curriculum demonstration teaching* via LAC Efficiency
requirements session.
and varied
teaching Timeliness
contexts.
(PPST 4.1.2)
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC Quality
collegial 7% sessions / FGDs / meetings / other
discussions collegial discussions
that use teacher 2. Minutes of LAC sessions
and learner / FGDs / meetings / other collegial
feedback to discussions on use of teacher and
enrich teaching learner feedback to enrich
practice. teaching practice
(PPST 4.4.2). 3. Reflection notes of teachers on
their demonstration of teaching
practices following participation Efficiency
from LAC sessions / FGDs /
meetings / other collegial Timeliness
discussions that use teacher and
learner feedback to enrich teaching
practice, with proof/s of
attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS form/document
that highlights the objective
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 9. Selected, 7% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating Quality
sheet/s or inter- observer agreement
Education developed, form/s done through onsite / face-to- face / in-
Services organized and used person classroom observation.
appropriate
teaching and If onsite / face-to-face / in- person
learning classes are not implemented,
1. through observation of synchronous /
resources, asynchronous teaching in other
including ICT, to modalities; or
address learning 2. through observation of a demonstration Efficiency
goals. teaching* via LAC session.
(PPST 4.5.2)
Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating Quality
sheet/s or inter- observer agreement
Education Assessment selected, organized form/s done through onsite / face-to- face / in-
Services and and used diagnostic, person classroom observation.
Reporting formative and
summative If onsite / face-to-face / in- person
assessment classes are not implemented,
1. through observation of synchronous /
strategies asynchronous teaching in other modalities;
consistent with or
curriculum 2. through observation of a demonstration
requirements. teaching* via LAC session.
(PPST 5.1.2)
7%
Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education evaluated learner 1. Individual Learning Monitoring Plan
Services progress and (ILMP)
achievement using 2. Peer assessment data
learner attainment 3. Sample of learners’ output with reflection
/ self- assessment
data. 4. Progress charts/anecdotal records
(PPST 5.2.2) 5. Class/e-class record/grading
sheets
6. Lesson plans showing index of Efficiency
mastery
7. Frequency of errors with identified Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
7% least/most mastered skills
8. Any equivalent ALS form/document
that highlights the objective (e.g.,
Individual Learning Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment Form 2)
9. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

Basic 12. Any one (1) of the following: Quality

Education Communicated ● A sample of corrected test paper
Services of a learner in a learning area
promptly and
clearly the with parent’s or guardian’s
signature and date of receipt
learners’ needs,
progress and ● Minutes of meetings with key
stakeholders
achievement to Efficiency
(e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT,
key stakeholders,
CPC) with proof of Timeliness
including
attendance
parents/guardia
● Report card with
ns. (PPST 5.4.2). parent’s or guardian’s signature in
all quarters supported by minutes
of meeting
● Communication with key
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co- teachers,
LGU) using various modalities
● Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
● Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Basic KRA 5: 7% Quality

Education Personal
Services Growth and
Professional
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Development 13. Applied a A reflection/journal entry that Timeliness
personal highlights the application of a
philosophy of learner- centered teaching
teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan or
learner-centered. community work
(PPST 7.1.2)

14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the ICT Quality

professional Coordinator / School Head /
development Focal Person in charge of e-
goals based on the SAT Efficiency
Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form (MRF)
Standards for Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase Timeliness
Teachers. (PPST II
7.5.2
Basic 5. Plus Factor 2% Quality
Education
Services
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Efficiency
various related ● committee involvement;
works / activities ● involvement as
that contribute to module/learning material
the teaching- writer/validator;
learning ● involvement as a resource
person/speaker/learning
process.
facilitator in in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction;
● book or journal authorship/ co-
authorship/contributor ship;
● advisor ship/coordinator ship/
chairpersonship;
Timeliness
● participation in demonstration
teaching;
● participation as research
presenter in a
forum/conference;
● mentoring of pre-service/in-
service teachers;
● conducted research within the
rating period;
others (please specify) with annotation
on how it contributed to the
teaching- learning process.