You are on page 1of 16

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: JEAN MARICON D. REGASPI Name of Rater: IMELDA B. BARRAMEDA


Position: TEACHER II Position: MASTER TEACHER II
Rating Period: AUGUST 2022 - FEBRUARY 2023 Date of Review: FEBRUARY 10, 2023

Mid-year Review Rating


Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Basic 1. 1. Applied August Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Education Content knowledge of 2022- 7% (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
Services Knowle content within and February observer agreement form/s for the 1st
dge and across curriculum 2023 done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
Pedago teaching areas. face / in-person classroom Quarter
gy (PPST 1.1.2) observation.

If onsite / face-to-face / in-


person classes are not
implemented,
Efficiency No CO yet
● through observation of
synchronous / conducted
asynchronous teaching in for the 1st
other modalities; or and 2nd
● through observation of a Quarter
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Basic 2. Used a range of Classroom Observation Tool No CO yet
Educatio teaching strategies (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n that enhance observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services learner done through onsite / face-to- Quality and 2nd
achievement in face / in-person classroom Quarter
literacy and observation.
Efficiency
numeracy skills.
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
(PPST 1.4.2)
person classes are not
implemented,
Timeliness No CO yet
● through observation of conducted
synchronous / for the 1st
asynchronous teaching in and 2nd
other modalities; or Quarter
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 3. Applied a range Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n strategies to observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services develop critical and done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
creative thinking, face / in-person classroom Quarter
as well as other observation.
Efficiency No CO yet
higher-order
If onsite / face-to-face / in- conducted
thinking skills.
person classes are not for the 1st
(PPST 1.5.2) implemented, and 2nd
Quarter
● through observation of Timeliness
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session

Basic 2. 4. Managed 22.5% Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet


Educatio Learnin classroom structure (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n g to engage learners, observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services Environ individually or in done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
ment groups, in face / in-person classroom Quarter
and meaningful observation.
Diversit exploration, Efficiency No CO yet
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
y of discovery and conducted
person classes are not
Learner hands-on activities implemented, for the 1st
s within a range of and 2nd
physical learning ● through observation of Quarter
environments. synchronous /
(PPST 2.3.3) asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a Timeliness
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 5. Managed learner Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio behavior (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n constructively by observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services applying positive done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
and non-violent face / in-person classroom Quarter
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
discipline to ensure observation. Efficiency No CO yet
learning-focused conducted
environments. If onsite / face-to-face / in- for the 1st
(PPST 2.6.2) person classes are not and 2nd
implemented, Quarter
● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or Timeliness
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 6. Used Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio differentiated, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n developmentally observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services appropriate done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
learning face / in-person classroom Quarter
experiences to observation.
address learners’
If onsite / face-to-face / in- Efficiency No CO yet
gender, needs,
person classes are not
strengths, interests conducted
implemented,
and experiences. for the 1st
(PPST 3.1.2) ● through observation of and 2nd
synchronous / Quarter
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a Timeliness
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Basic 3. 7. Planned, Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio Curricul managed and (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n um and implemented observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services Plannin developmentally done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
g sequenced face / in-person classroom Quarter
teaching and observation.
learning processes
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
to meet curriculum
person classes are not
requirements and implemented, Efficiency No CO yet
varied teaching conducted
contexts. (PPST ● through observation of for the 1st
4.1.2) synchronous / and 2nd
asynchronous teaching in Quarter
other modalities; or
● through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.

Timeliness

8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance Quality No LAC yet


collegial in LAC sessions / conducted
discussions that FGDs / meetings / for the 1st
use teacher and other collegial and 2nd
learner feedback to discussions Quarter
enrich teaching 2. Minutes of LAC
sessions / FGDs / Efficiency
practice. (PPST
meetings / other
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
4.4.2) collegial discussions Timeliness No LAC yet
on use of teacher and conducted
learner feedback to for the 1st
enrich teaching and 2nd
practice Quarter
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of
teaching practices
following participation
from LAC sessions /
FGDs / meetings /
other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the
objective)
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio developed, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n organized and observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services used appropriate done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
teaching and face / in-person classroom Quarter
learning resources, observation.
including ICT, to
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
address learning If onsite / face-to-face / in- Efficiency No CO yet
goals. person classes are not conducted
(PPST 4.5.2) implemented, for the 1st
and 2nd
● through observation of Quarter
synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of
a demonstration
Timeliness
teaching* via LAC
session.
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom Observation Tool Quality No CO yet
Educatio Assess selected, organized (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- conducted
n ment and used observer agreement form/s for the 1st
Services and diagnostic, done through onsite / face-to- and 2nd
Reportin formative and face / in-person classroom Quarter
g summative observation.
assessment
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
strategies
person classes are not
consistent with implemented,
curriculum
requirements. ● through observation of
(PPST 5.1.2) synchronous /
asynchronous
teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation of
a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session.
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Efficiency No CO yet
conducted
for the 1st
and 2nd
Quarter

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the Quality  Involved
Educatio evaluated learner following: learners in
n progress and ● Individual Learning monitoring
Services achievement using Monitoring Plan (ILMP) and
learner attainment evaluation
● Peer assessment data
data. learner
(PPST 5.2.2) ● Sample of learners’ progress
output with reflection / and
self-assessment achieveme
● Progress nt using
charts/anecdotal records Individual
● Class/e-class Learning
record/grading sheets Monitoring
● Lesson plans showing Plan
index of mastery (ILMP) for
the 1st and
● Frequency of errors with
2nd Quarter.
identified least/most  Commun
mastered skills icated with
● Any equivalent ALS the
form/document that learners
highlights the objective progress
(e.g., Individual Learning through
reflection
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
Agreement (ILA), ALS of the
Assessment Form 2) learner’s
● Others (Please specify output with
and provide annotations)  Evaluat
ed with the
students
progress
and
achieveme
nt through
E-class
record for
the 1st and
2nd Quarter.
 Monitor
learners
progress
through
frequen
cy of errors
with
identified
unmastere
d skills
Efficiency

Timeliness  Indivi
dual
Learning
Monitoring
Plan
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
(ILMP) for
the 1st and
2nd Quarter.
 Sample
of the
learner’s
output with
reflection
for the 1st
and 2nd
Quarter.
 E-class
record for
the 1st and
2nd Quarter.
 Frequen
cy of errors
with
identified
unmastere
d skills for
the 1st and
2nd quarter
Basic 12. Communicated Any one (1) of the Quality  Comm
Educatio promptly and following: unicated to
n clearly the learners’ ● A sample of corrected the
Services needs, progress test paper of a learner in a parent/guar
and achievement to dian of
learning area with parent’s
key stakeholders, learners
or guardian’s signature
including progress
parents/guardians
and date of receipt through the
(PPST 5.4.2) ● Minutes of meetings sample of
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
with key stakeholders Corrected
(e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT, test paper
CPC) with proof of with
attendance parents
signature
● Report card with
and date
parent’s or guardian’s
received
signature in all quarters  Comm
supported by minutes of unicated to
meeting the
● Communication with key parent/guar
stakeholders (e.g., dian of
parents/guardians, co- learners
teachers, LGU) using progress
various modalities through the
● Anecdotal record PLAC
showing entries per Meeting
Quarter.
quarter
 Comm
● Any equivalent ALS
unicated to
form/document that the
highlights the objective parent/guar
● Others (Please specify dian of
and provide annotations) learners
progress
through the
Report
Card of
learners
with 1st
Semester
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
grade with
parents
signature.
 Comm
unication
with the
parents
through
home visit,
messenger
chat,
communica
tion letters
and SMS
Text
messaging.
 Comm
unication
with the
parents
through
Anecdotal
Record of
students.
Efficiency
Timeliness  Sampl
e of
Corrected
test paper
with
parents
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
signature
and date
received
for the 1st
and 2nd
Quarter.
 PLAC
Meeting for
the 1st and
2nd Quarter
 Report
Card of
learners
with 1st
Semestral
grade with
parents
signature.
 Home
visit,
messenger
chat,
communica
tion letters
and SMS
Text
messaging
for the 1st
and 2nd
Quarter.
 Anecd
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
otal Record
of students
for the 1st
and 2nd
Quarter.
5. 13. Applied a A reflection/journal entry Quality Submitted
Persona personal that highlights the two DLL
l Growth philosophy of application of a learner- with
and teaching that is centered teaching reflection of
Professi learner- philosophy in the lesson learner-
onal centered
centered. plan or community work
Develop philosophy.
ment
(PPST 7.1.2)
Efficiency Submitted
two DLL
with
reflection of
learner-
centered
philosophy.
14. Set 1. Certification from the Quality  Submi
professional ICT Coordinator / School tted
development Head / Focal Person in IPCRF-DF
goals based on charge of e-SAT  Condu
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP cted
Mid-year
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
review
Standards for (MRF)
Efficiency Submitted
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP 2
(PPST 7.5.2) from Phase II acceptable
MOV’s
Timeliness Submitted
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
2
acceptable
MOV’s
within the
prescribed
RPMS
phase.
Basic Plus 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Quality Attended,
Educatio Factor various related ● committee involvement; performed
n works / and
● involvement as
Services activities that involved in
module/learning material different
contribute to writer/validator; commitee,
the teaching- ● involvement as a speaking
learning process
resource engageme
person/speaker/learning nt,
facilitator in in the advisership
RO/SDO/school-initiated and
coordinator
TV/radio-based
ship within
instruction; and
● book or journal beyond the
authorship/ co- school and
authorship/contributorshi community.
Mid-year Review Rating
Weigh Performa Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Master Teacher) Mid-year Review
MFOs KRA Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Results
t per nce Ratin
Remarks Rating Remarks
Target g
p; Efficiency Submitted
●advisorship/ MOV’s that
highlighted
coordinatorship/
the
chairpersonship; achieved
● participation in positive
demonstration teaching; contribution
● participation as to the
research presenter in a teaching
forum/conference; lerning
process.
● mentoring of pre-
service/in-service
teachers;
● conducted research
within the rating period;
● others (please specify)

1. with annotation on how


it contributed to the
teaching-learning Timeliness
process.

IMELDA B. BARRAMEDA JEAN MARICON D. REGASPI REY M. BUENO

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like