ARAGLAYON

NA
PANTUKAN!
COMMUNITY PROFILE OF PANTUKAN
NATURE OF WORK
44% work regular jobs,
38% of them have
occasional work, and 18%
are unemployed.

The community is mostly an

agricultural one with a
plurality (35%) of the
respondents working in
jobs related to agriculture,
fishing, and forestry.
AVERAGE
MONTHLY INCOME
Majority or 55% of
respondents from
Pantukan are low-income
earners with average
monthly income below
₱5,000

Mean of average monthly

income of ₱7711.98 only
Food
PROMPTS ABOUT THE FOOD ADEQUACY PARAMETERS DEPICT A
PICTURE OF FOOD INSECURITY WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.
ONLY 15% OF RESPONDENTS DO NOT WORRY THAT THEIR

Adequacy HOUSEHOLD WILL HAVE ENOUGH FOOD TO SUSTAIN THEIR

FAMILY.
MAJORITY ALSO SAID THAT THEY HAD TO NOT EAT THE FOOD

Parameters  THEY WANT (79%), LIMIT THE VARIETY OF THEIR FOOD (76%),
AND EAT SMALLER MEALS (58%) DUE TO LACK OF RESOURCES.
 HOUSEHOLD FOOD INSECURITY
ACCESS PREVALENCE (HFIAP)
Measly 3% of the
households in
Pantukan rate
themselves as entirely
food secure
Rest of the households
experienced food
insecurity
Data demonstrate a
high level of
incidence of food
insecurity in the
community
VULNERABILITIES OF PANTUKAN
 High Food Insecurity Prevalence
Pantukan’s HFIAP shows that 97% of respondents rate themselves
as food insecure, only 3% rate themselves as entirely food secure
presence of food insecurity in the surveyed households is
alarming
food insecurity is proven to be linked to poorer health
outcomes (Gunderson & Ziliak, 2015)
Inadequate Nutrional Intake Amongst Children
Inadequate amounts of energy
and calcium (nutrients)
Inadequate amounts of
riboflavin and thiamin
(vitamins)
Causes risk to children's
immune systems allowing them
to be more vulnerable to
diesease
Low Average Monthly Income and High Unemployment
Most households in Pantukan have an average
monthly income of lower than ₱5,000
most of them do not have stable jobs (18%
unemployment rate among the sample, more the
double the national rate
the average monthly income of the households in
Pantukan in 2019 (₱7,712) is much lower than the
that of families in the Philippines in 2021 (₱24,997)
(PSA, 2022).
COMMUNITY PROFILE OF MACO
NATURE OF WORK
63% WORK REGULAR JOBS,
32% OF THEM HAVE
OCCASIONAL WORK, AND
5% ARE UNEMPLOYED.

THE COMMUNITY IS MOSTLY

AN AGRICULTURAL ONE
WITH A PLURALITY (28%) OF
THE RESPONDENTS
WORKING IN JOBS RELATED
TO AGRICULTURE,
FISHING, AND FORESTRY.
AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME
Majority earn less
than ₱7,000
monthly (32% earn
<₱5,000 while 21%
earn ₱5,000-
₱7,000)

Mean of the
average monthly
income of ₱9,813
only.
Food ONLY 25% OF RESPONDENTS DO NOT WORRY THAT THEIR
HOUSEHOLD WILL HAVE ENOUGH FOOD TO SUSTAIN THEIR
FAMILY.

Adequacy MAJORITY ALSO SAID THAT THEY HAD TO NOT EAT THE FOOD
THEY WANT (72%), LIMIT THE VARIETY OF THEIR FOOD (63%)

Parameters 
HOWEVER, MOST DON'T HAVE TO MAKE CHANGES TO THEIR
FOOD INTAKE (EX. 53% DO NOT HAVE TO LIMIT MEAL SIZE)
 HOUSEHOLD FOOD INSECURITY
ACCESS PREVALENCE (HFIAP)
Only 14% rate
themselves as entirely
food secure
The rest of the
households
experienced food
insecurity
Data demonstrate a
high level of
incidence of food
insecurity in the
community, but
relatively lower
compared to Pantukan
VULNERABILITIES OF MACO
 Low Average Monthly Income

Households in Maco HAVE an average monthly income of

₱9,812.57 AND have significantly lower monthly incomes
compared to the national average. This poses a massive
disparity between families in Maco and families around the
Philippines. This disparity creates a vulnerability as families
in Maco may not have enough income to fully support their
basic necessities.
Inadequate Nutritional Intake among Children
Raw data from Maco suggests
that although not as worse as
Pantukan, the vast majority of
children in the community self-
reported low levels of energy
intake with more than 75% of
respondents self-reporting less
than adequate daily calorie
intake.
 High Food Insecurity Prevalence
MACO’S HFIAP SHOWS THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE COMMUNITY EXPERIENCE
FOOD INSECURITY WITH ONLY 14% OF THOSE SURVEYED SAYING THAT THEIR
HOUSEHOLD IS FOOD SECURE.
86% ARE EXPERIENCING SOME KIND OF FOOD INSECURITY WITH 32% RATING
THEMSELVES AS MILDLY FOOD INSECURE, 30% AS MODERATELY FOOD
INSECURE, AND 23% AS SEVERELY FOOD INSECURE.
PROJECT PROPOSAL
Rationale for Choosing Community Beneficiary
1. Pantukan has a higher incidence of food insecurity based on the
Household Food Insecurity Access Prevalence (HFIAP) index
food insecurity is more widespread in
Pantukan
z-value of the Household Food Insecurity
Prevalence Score (HFIAS) of the two
communities showed that Pantukan’s
average HFIAS is statistically greater than
that of Maco (-2.916 < -1.645, rejecting the
hypothesis that there is no significant
difference between the two datasets)
A higher HFIAS suggests that residents
from Pantukan rate themselves as more
food insecure compared to those from
Maco.
 Rationale for Choosing Community Beneficiary
2. Pantukan residents generally have lower incomes compared to
Maco's
Maco’s being
₱9,812.57, more than
20% greater compared
to Pantukan’s
₱7711.98.
a moderately strong
negative relationship
(r = -0.57) between the
the Income Group and
HFIAS
 Rationale for Choosing Community Beneficiary
2. Pantukan residents generally have lower incomes compared to
Maco's
the lower a
household’s income,
the higher its HFIAS,
meaning that poorer
families rate
themselves as food
insecure than higher-
earning ones
Rationale for Choosing Community Beneficiary
3. Children's nutrient intake is generally lower in Pantukan compared
to Maco

Although the nutrient intake in both Maco and Pantukan are both low, the
children in Pantukan having a lower nutrient intake than the children in
Maco calls for more immediate and urgent action in order to reduce the
risk of immune system deficiency.
 Rationale for Choosing Community Beneficiary
4. Unemployment and seasonal work are more widespread in
Pantukan than Maco
unemployment and
occasional work rates
are higher in
Pantukan compared
to Maco.
Maco has higher
levels of regular work.
 Rationale for Choosing Community Beneficiary
4. Unemployment and seasonal work are more widespread in
Pantukan than Maco
correlation shows that
higher rates of
unemployment and
seasonal work
correspond with higher
HFIA scores
(moderately strong
inverse correlation,
r=-0.60).
 Three Phases

TANIM NA LUTUAN NG KAIN

PANTUKAN PANTUKAN KABATAAN
 Preliminary Phase

town hall meetings and consultations with residents target sectors:

agricultural workers for Tanim na Pantukan
unemployed household heads for Lutuan ng Pantukan
elementary teachers for Kain Kabataan

meetings to be held before the implementation of the three-phase

program (with LGU, NGOs, etc.)
gatherings will serve as the community’s orientation for the
proposed projects.
Tanim na Pantukan

Agricultural upskilling via on-site

training sessions
focus on food security
Two tracks: Agricultural Track
and Poultry Track (30
beneficiary each)
 Tanim na Pantukan
Agricultural Track
granted free seeds and subsidized
fertilizers, pesticides, and other
equipment deemed necessary during
the preliminary meetings upon their
completion of the program.
 Tanim na Pantukan
Poultry Track
subsidized poultry feed and chickens,
grants for poultry pens
Culminating Activity
5 separate community gardens and
poultry pens each manned by a group
of beneficiaries near each other's
barangays.
Tanim na Pantukan
Rationale
Pantukan is an agricultural community
agricultural training significantly increases
crop and poultry yield, raising the income of
the upskilling beneficiaries (Wonde et al.,
2022).

Criteria
18-60 years old, agricultural worker or
unemployed, and with monthly incomes less
than ₱10,000
 Budget Allocation (P150k)
"Tanim na Pantukan"
Total Budget Allocation for ‘Taniman sa Pantukan’  NA  ₱ 150,000 

        

Total Allocation of Agricultural Track      NA  ₱ 70,000 

Fertilizer   7 sacks  ₱ 10,000 

High-yield Open Pollinated Variety of Corn Seeds  10 bags  ₱ 10,000 

Palay and Vegetable seeds (Rice, Pechay, Bean, Cucumber)   10 bags  ₱ 10,000 

Miscellaneous Farming Tools (Wheelbarrow, Watering Can, Rake, Shovel,

10 each   ₱ 30,000  
Sickle)  

Payment for Resource Speakers  NA  ₱ 10,000 

 Budget Allocation (P150k)
"Tanim na Pantukan"
Total Allocation of Poultry Track      NA  ₱ 60,000 

Poultry Feed  10 sacks  ₱ 12,000 

Darag Chickens   100 units  ₱ 8,000  

Poultry Pen Construction Grants  NA  ₱ 30,000 

Payment for Resource Speakers  NA  ₱ 10,000 

     

Logistics (Food, Travel Expenses, Venue,

NA  ₱ 20,000 
Paraphernalia Printing, Equipment required, etc.) 
 Lutuan ng Pantukan

Community Kitchen: Facilities for

improving culinary skills and
nutritional knowledge
Raw materials from the community
garden
Profit from Kitchen will be used for
equipment for the garden
Interdependent relationship
between the community garden and
kitchen
 Lutuan ng Pantukan
Rationale
raise the community's low average
income
provide work for the unemployed
and the elderly
 Lutuan ng Pantukan

Culminating Activity
5 stalls as community 'karinderias'
manned by a group of beneficiaries
each.

Criteria for Beneficiaries

18-60 years old, unemployed,
and with monthly incomes
<₱10,000, or aged >60 years old
 Budget Allocation (P92k)
"Lutuan ng Pantukan"
Total Budget Allocation for ‘Lutuan ng Pantukan’  NA  ₱ 92,000 

Stall Construction  5  ₱ 45,000 

Consumables and Preliminary Ingredients  NA  ₱ 25,000 

Dishwashing Soap   5 bottles  ₱ 1,000 

Standing Tables and Cabinets   5 units  ₱ 5,000 

Spoon and Fork Utensils   100 sets  ₱2,000

Paper Plates   NA  ₱2,000

Food and Safety Permit Applications  NA  ₱ 2,000 

Payment for Resource Speakers  NA  ₱ 5,000 

Logistics (Food, Travel Expenses, Venue, Paraphernalia Printing, Equipment

NA  ₱ 5,000 
required, etc.) 
 Kain Kabataan

one-month-long feeding program for

children
In coordination with "Lutuan ng
Pantukan"
5 stalls to provide for 20 students
each
 Kain Kabataan
Rationale
High HFIAP in Pantukan
Low levels of energy, calcium, iron,
and vitamin intake amongst Pantukan
children
Criteria for Beneficiaries
Underweight, low self-reported nutrient
intake, and from a family earning
<₱10,000 or whose parents are
unemployed
 Budget Allocation (P58k)
Total Budget Allocation for ‘Kain
NA  ₱58,000 
Kabataan’ 

Reusable Meal Containers and Cups  150 pcs  ₱6,000 

Utensils  2 x100pc Bags  ₱1,800 

Full meal for each student  100 per session (8 sessions)  ₱50,200 
Project Timeline
Project Timeline
THANK
YOU!
 Bibliography
Gudersen, C., & Ziliak, J. (2015). Food insecurity and health outcomes. Health Affairs, 34(11),
1830-1839. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0645
Mapa, D. S. (2022, April 22). Highlights of the Preliminary Results of the 2021 Family Income
and Expenditure Survey (FIES) Visit 1. Philippine Statistics Authority. https://psa.gov.ph/press-
releases/id/167321
Maulidiana, A. R., & Sutjiati, E. (2021). Low intake of essential amino acids and other risk factors
of stunting among under-five children in Malang City, East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Public
Health Research, 10(2), 2161-2169. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2161
Special Area for Agricultural Development. (2021). Davao de Oro.
https://saad.da.gov.ph/priority_provinces/region-xi/davao-de-oro
Wonde, K. M., Tsehay, A. S., Lemma, S. E. (2022). Training at farmers training centers and its
impact on crop productivity and households' income in Ethiopia: A propensity score matching
(PSM) analysis. Heliyon, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09837