CHAPTER 1 RUBRICS

Group: ______ Title: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Members:

________________________________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________

________________________________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________

SECTION 5 POINTS 4 POINTS 3 POINTS 2 POINTS 1 POINT SCORE

 The sources are cited,  Some sources are

 The sources are  The sources are cited,  Most sources are
with errors. cited wrongly.
properly cited. with few errors. wrongly cited.
 The information is stated  Some irrelevant
Background of  The information is  The information is stated.  Mostly irrelevant
the Study fairly. information.
clearly stated.  Very good syntax, with information.
 Good syntax, with few  Fair syntax, with
 Excellent syntax. few errors.  Poor syntax.
errors. moderate errors.

 The problem is fairly

 The problem is clearly  The problem is stated  The problem needs  Poor problem
clear and correct in
and correctly stated. correctly. few corrections. statement.
Statement of statement.
the Problem  Highly achievable.  Achievable  Less achievable.  Not achievable.
 Fairly achievable.
 Excellent syntax.  Very good syntax.  Fair syntax.  Poor syntax.
 Good syntax.

 The objectives are  The objectives are fairly  The objectives are less
 The objectives are  The objectives are not
highly accurate. accurate. accurate.
accurate. accurate.
 Can be highly tested  Can be fairly tested and  Can be fairly tested
 Can be tested and  Less likely to be
Objectives and achieved. achieved. and achieved.
achieved. achieved and tested.
 Clearly and properly  Fairly clear and properly  Less clear and
 Clear and properly stated  Ambiguously stated.
stated stated. properly stated
 Very good syntax.  Poor syntax.
 Excellent syntax.  Good syntax.  Fair syntax.

Hypothesis  The hypotheses are  The hypotheses are  The hypotheses are fairly  The hypotheses are  The hypotheses are
highly testable. testable. testable. less likely testable. not testable.
 Clearly and properly  Clearly and properly  Fairly clear and properly  Less clear and  Ambiguously stated.
stated. stated. stated. properly stated.  Poor syntax
  Excellent syntax.  Very good syntax.  Good syntax.  Fair syntax.

 The Variables are

 The Variables are
clearly and correctly  The Variables are  The variables are  The variables are
correctly identified.
identified. identified. identified, but lacking. poorly identified/zero
Conceptual  The discussion of the
Framework  The discussion of the  The discussion of the  The discussion is less  The discussion is
diagram is clear and
diagram is highly clear diagram is precise. precise. ambiguous.
precise.
and precise.

 The significances are  The significances are

clearly and correctly  The significances are  The significances stated stated, but neither  The significances
stated. mostly clear and are not as clear and correct/clear nor stated are ambiguous.
 Highly accurate and correctly stated. correct. incorrect; few are  Poorly accurate and
precise.  Accurate and precise.  Fairly accurate and stated precise.
Significance of  More possible  Possible beneficiaries precise.  Less accurate and  No or ambiguous
the Study beneficiaries are are mentioned and the  Less beneficiaries and precise. beneficiaries and
mentioned and the possible benefits are possible benefits are  Fewer beneficiaries possible benefits
benefits are clearly stated. stated. and possible benefits stated.
stated  Very good syntax  Good syntax stated.  Poor syntax
 Excellent syntax.  Fair syntax

 The overall coverage

 Part or half of the study  Fewer study coverage
of the study is clearly  More coverage of the  Zero or ambiguous
coverage is stated. mentioned.
stated. study is clearly stated. coverage mentioned
 Few parts of  Few parts of
 The summary of  Part of methodology is  Zero or ambiguous
methodology are methodology are
Scope and methods is clearly clearly presented. statement of
Limitation clearly/fairly stated. stated, but not clear.
presented.  Clear statement of methodology
 Fairly stated limitations  Few limitations are
 Highly clear statement limitations.  Ambiguous limitations
are presented. stated.
of limitations.  Very good syntax.  Poor syntax
 Good syntax  Fair syntax
 Excellent syntax

 Terms are
 Terms are fairly
 Terms are highly clear  Terms are clearly and  Terms are defined, but ambiguously
defined (3 terms are
Definition of and correctly defined. correctly defined. not as clear and correct stated/two or one
Terms stated)
 Excellent syntax  Very good syntax  Good syntax terms
 Fair syntax
 Poor syntax
TOTAL POINTS