Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(BNR)
BRIDGE DATA PROCESSING
BMS Application
CONDITION SURVEY Condition No Bridge in good condition
By Accredited State Exclude
Bridge Inspector 2 & 3?
Compute
Ranking
BNR
BMS Reporting
No Engineering Yes
Inspection
Recommended Recommended
Required?
Intervention Intervention
Cost Type
Conduct Engineering
Inspection
Modify Modify
Intervention Cost Intervention Type Eng’g. Insp. Report
Recommendations
Scoring/
Prioritization
Bridge Programs
BRIDGE DATA PROCESSING
BMS Application
CONDITION SURVEY Condition No Bridge in good condition
By Accredited State Exclude
Bridge Inspector 2 & 3?
Compute Ranking
BNR
BMS Reporting
No Engineering Yes
Inspection
Recommended Recommended
Required?
Intervention Intervention
Cost Type
Conduct Engineering
Inspection
Modify Modify
Intervention Cost Intervention Type Eng’g. Insp. Report
Recommendations
Scoring/
Prioritization
Bridge Programs
Bridge Needs Ratio (BNR)
Objectives:
This procedure will provide a method for ranking of the
intervention needs requirement of each bridge based on
the calculated normalized Bridge Needs Ratio (BNR)
parameter.
Other
Calculate BMC Factors
1. BNR = NMPS
2. BNR = NMPS x BRF
3. BNR = NMPS x BRF x (ECRP-BMC)/ECRP
4. BNR = NMPS x BRF x BMC/ECRP
Condition State 3 0 0 3
1. Deck
Recommendation MM RM RM
Maj. Maint. Cost 0.050 M 0.050 M
Condition State 2 2 2 6
2. Main
Recommendation MM MM MM
S Member
Maj. Maint. Cost 0.100 M 0.150 M 0.200 M 0.450 M
P Condition State 3 3 3 3
A 3. Secondary
Recommendation Y
N Member
Maj. Maint. Cost
Condition State 3 3 3 3
4. Left
Recommendation MM MM MM
Railing
Maj. Maint. Cost 0.010 M 0.010 M 0.010 M 0.030 M
Condition State 0 0 0 0
5. Right
Recommendation RM RM RM
Railing
Maj. Maint. Cost
Data from Bridge Condition Survey
ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT Pier 1 Pier 2 Total NA
Condition State 0 0 0
1. Main
Recommendation RM RM
Structure
Maj. Maint. Cost
Condition State 0 2 2
2. Foundation
Recommendation RM MM
P Maj. Maint. Cost 0.200 M 0.200 M
I Condition State 1
3 1
3 3
2
E 3. Expansion
Recommendation RM RM
R Joints
Maj. Maint. Cost
Condition State 1 0 1
4. Bearings/
Recommendation RM RM
Restraints
Maj. Maint. Cost
Condition State 0 3 3
5. Scour
Recommendation RM MM
Protection
Maj. Maint. Cost 0.050 M 0.050 M
Data from Bridge Condition Survey
ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT Abut 1 Abut 2 Total NA
Condition State 0 0 0
1. Main
Recommendation RM RM
Structure
Maj. Maint. Cost
Condition State 0 0 0
2. Foundation
Recommendation RM RM
A Maj. Maint. Cost
B Condition State 1
3 2
3 3
3
U 3. Bearings/
Recommendation RM MM
T Restraints
Maj. Maint. Cost 0.010 M 0.010 M
M Condition State 0 0 0
E 4. Expansion
Recommendation RM RM
N Joints
Maj. Maint. Cost
T Condition State
5. Left
Recommendation Y
Wing Wall
Maj. Maint. Cost
Data from Bridge Condition Survey
ELEMENT ATTRIBUTE ASSESSMENT Abut 1 Abut 2 Total NA
A
Condition State 2 3 5
6. Right
Recommendation MM MM
B Wing Wall
0.005 M 0.005 M 0.010 M
Maj. Maint. Cost
U
Condition State
T 7. Scour/Bank
Recommendation Y
M Protection
Maj. Maint. Cost
E
N
Condition State 1
3 1
3 3
2
8. Bridge
Recommendation RM RM
T Approach
Maj. Maint. Cost
ATTRIBUTE Wi Cond.State, Ci NA Total CiWi Cm No. Total CmWi
S1 S2 S3