Republic of the Philippines

North Eastern Mindanao State University

Tandag City, Surigao del Sur
Telefax No. 086-214-4221
086- 214-2723
www.sdssu.edu.ph

RUBRICS FOR SOIL /WATER /NOISE SAMPLING ASSESSMENT IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

ASSESSMENT (EIA)

Points
TASK CRITERIA

5 3 1
(Outstanding) (Meets Goal) (Poor)

Conducting Student performed his/her Student performed an Student did little to no

experiments share of the investigation,
made observations,
collected data, and
theorized about concepts.
adequate amount during
the investigation, made
some observations,
collected little data, and
tried to theorize about
concepts.
work during the
investigation/ exploration
portion, offered no
observations, did not
collect data, and did not
theorize about concepts.

Recording Student records accurate Student records accurate Student observations lack
Observations and insightful observations. observations, written and/or accuracy or details.
Student demonstrates illustrated.
critical thinking.

Use of Materials Student use materials Student uses materials Student requires significant
independently and appropriately for the instructors support to use
appropriately for the purpose of the experiment. materials for the purpose of
purpose of the experiment. Minimal instructors the experiments.
assistance required.

Working with Always listened to, shared Usually listened to, shared Rarely listened to, shared
others with, or supported others. with, or supported others. with, or supported others.
Was a group leader. Worked as a team. Not a team player.

Organizing Data Student independently
records at least four pieces
of relevant information in
an organized manner that
makes sense for the data
collected and shows the
relationships in the data.
Student records at least Student is able to record
four some information, but it is
pieces of relevant unorganized and/or
information in an organized unrelated.
manner that makes sense
for the data collected,
though that manner of
organization may not be the
best to show the
relationships in the data.

Interpreting Data Student consistently refers Student may refer back to Student is unable to refer
back to data to support data as evidence but is back to the data as
claims, predictions, inconsistent and inaccurate. evidence for claims about
answers, tests, or (May say that the data predictions, answers,
solutions. supports argument when it tests,or solutions
clearly doesn’t.)

TOTAL