PROJECT PROPOSAL

I Project Title 2-DAY NATIONAL LEARNING CAMP RMA TRAINING FOR SDO SAN
JUAN GRADE 2 AND 3 ENGLISH AND MATH TEACHERS
II Rationale In response to the pressing need to address the learning losses caused
by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department of Education (DepEd)
recognizes the critical role of teachers in facilitating learning recovery
and enhancing learners' academic performance. As stipulated in DepEd
Order 14, s. 2023, the Policy Guidelines on the Implementation of
National Learning Camp (NIC) emphasize the importance of supporting
learners to overcome the challenges brought about by the pandemic.

The 2-Day Capacity Building of Grades 2 and 3 Teachers National

Learning Camp, as previously implemented, has shed light on the
significance of providing continuous support and professional
development opportunities to educators. To build on this momentum
and further improve teaching strategies, DepEd acknowledges the
necessity of conducting a 2-Day National Learning Camp Debriefing and
Qualitative Data Gathering specifically for SDO San Juan Grade 2 and
3 English and Math Teachers.

This upcoming event will be instrumental in equipping educators with

additional tools and insights gained from the previous learning camp's
outcomes. By delving into the qualitative data gathered from the
previous camp and through open discussions during the debriefing
sessions, teachers will have the chance to reflect on their teaching
approaches and make necessary adjustments based on the specific
needs and challenges faced by their students.

The qualitative data gathered during the debriefing will provide valuable
information on the effectiveness of the strategies employed in the
previous camp, enabling educators to identify successful practices and
areas for improvement. By incorporating teacher feedback, the
Department of Education - National Capital Region can tailor future
capacity-building initiatives more effectively, ensuring that they directly
address the unique requirements of the San Juan educational
community.

Furthermore, this qualitative data gathering will also facilitate the

identification of best practices among teachers, fostering a collaborative
learning environment where educators can share innovative teaching
methods and support one another in their professional growth. The
knowledge exchange during this 2-day event will undoubtedly
 contribute to the overall enhancement of teaching quality and
ultimately lead to improved student achievement.

DepEd remains steadfast in its commitment to supporting teachers as

they play an indispensable role in students' educational journey. As
echoed in DepEd Order 42, s. 2017, the department recognizes that the
quality of learning is inextricably linked to the quality of teaching.
Through the 2-Day National Learning Camp Debriefing and Qualitative
Data Gathering, SDO San Juan Grade 2 and 3 Teachers will receive the
necessary backing and resources to continue their remarkable efforts in
nurturing young minds and fostering a conducive learning
environment.
II Objectives The objectives of the project are as follows:

 Comprehensively assess and analyze the outcomes of the previous

2-Day Capacity Building of Grades 2 and 3 Teachers National
Learning Camp.
 Foster a collaborative learning environment among SDO San Juan
Grade 2 and 3 Teachers during the debriefing sessions.
 Develop customized teaching strategies tailored to the specific
needs of SDO San Juan Grade 2 and 3 students.
 Strengthen future NLC implementation in SDO San Juan based
on Data Driven findings

IV Date/Venue August 8-9 , 2023

TBA
V Expected As a result of the thorough assessment and analysis of the outcomes
Outcome/ from the previous National Learning Camp, participating teachers will
Outputs gain data-driven insights into the effectiveness of their teaching
strategies.
Through the facilitated collaborative reflection and knowledge exchange
sessions during the 2-Day National Learning Camp Debriefing,
participating teachers will experience strengthened professional
networking and camaraderie among peers. They will have the
opportunity to share their experiences, successes, and challenges,
building a supportive community of educators within SDO San Juan.
By actively involving teachers in the development of customized teaching
strategies, the training will yield tailored approaches that directly
address the unique needs of SDO San Juan Grade 2 and 3 students.
The culmination of the data-driven insights, enhanced collaboration,
and customized teaching approaches will contribute to improved
learning outcomes and facilitate learning recovery among Grade 2 and 3
students in SDO San Juan.
VI Implementati Responsible
on and M&E Office/Officer
Mechanism Success (RO/O) and Timeli
Activity
Indicator Responsible ne
Officer in the
M&E (ROM&E)
Pre-implementation Stage
1. Preparation of Workshop RO/O: August
project proposal and matrix and Program 1,
procurement procurement Managers, 2023
documents (WFP, process
APP, PPMP) ROM&E:
 CID Chief and
ASDS
Venue:
RO/O: August
Confirmed Program 2,
2. Preparation of the
venue and Managers 2023
event logistics (e.g.
transportation Logisti
posting, bidding,
service ROM&E: cs:
awarding)
providers CID Chief and August
ASDS 2,
2023
RO/O:
3. Coordination with Program
external speakers Managers,
Confirmation
(including sending of Division L&D August
of attendance
letters of invitation Manager 3,
of external
to speakers from 2023
speakers
RO, other divisions, ROM&E:
and schools) SGOD Chief and
ASDS
RO/O:
Program
Released Managers,
4. Invitation of
memo of Division L&D August
attendees from
authority of Manager 3,
schools and division
participants to 2023
office
attend event ROM&E:
SGOD Chief and
ASDS
Implementation Stage
RO/O:
Registration sub-
committee
100% August
Division L&D
1. Registration of attendance of 8 and
Manager
participants invited 9,
attendees 2023
ROM&E:
SGOD Chief and
ASDS
RO/O:
Program
Number of Managers,
August
capacitated Division L&D
8 and
2. Workshop proper teachers and Manager
9,
instructional
2023
managers ROM&E:
SGOD Chief and
ASDS
RO/O: August
Documentation 10 and
sub-committee 11,
3. Documentation of Division L&D 2023
Documentary
the conduct of the Manager
report
activity
ROM&E:
SGOD Chief and
ASDS
4. Presentation of the 100% QAME RO/O: August
QAME access participation Division L&D 10 and
link/QR code of attendees Manager, 11,
 Registration Sub- 2023
Committee

ROM&E:
SGOD Chief and
ASDS
Post-implementation Stage
RO/O:
Documentation
Septe
Sub-Committee
Final mber
1. Submission of
Documentary 1,
documentary reports ROM&E:
Report 2023
Division LRMS
Manager, CID
Chief
2. Preparation and Distributed RO/O:
distribution of Certificates Certificate Sub-
certificates Committee August
8 and
ROM&E: 9,
Division LRMS 2023
Manager, CID
Chief
3. Submission of Liquidation RO/O:
liquidation report Report Program
Managers,
Septe
Division LRMS
mber
Manager
25,
2023
ROM&E:
CID Chief and
ASDS

VII Target
Participants 43 grade 2 and 3 Teachers

VIII Funding
Requirements Particulars Amount in Pesos
and Sources: Venue, meals, and
accommodation
package at Red
OSEC-NCR-23-
Hotel Cubao, of the P 172,000.00
2984
participants
(P2000.00/pax) x 43
Pax
OSEC-NCR-23-
TOTAL P 172,000.00
2984

All expenses relative to the conduct of this activity shall be charged

against OSEC-NCR-23-2984, subject to the usual accounting and auditing
rules and regulations.

IX HGDG Score 18.67 (See attached GAD Checklist 2)

Prepared by:

MARNELLI B. TOLENTINO HELEN S. ACEDO EULAFEL C. PASCUAL

Education Program Supervisor Education Program Supervisor Education Program Supervisor
Checked and reviewed by:

JOSEFINO C. POGOY
Chief Education Supervisor, CID

Certified Funds Available: Certified Cash Available:

ALLAN ELIEZER M. MAL-IN JAMES EDUARD J. TUZON

Administrative Officer V Accountant III
OIC-Budget Officer

Recommending approval:

BUENAFE E. SABADO
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Approved:
MARGARITO B. MATERUM
Schools Division Superintendent
 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
2-DAY NATIONAL LEARNING CAMP DEBRIEFING AND QUALITATIVE DATA
GATHERING FOR SDO SAN JUAN GRADE 7 AND 8 TEACHERS
August 25 and 26, 2023
Red Hotel Cubao, Quezon City

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

MARGARITO B. MATERUM
Schools Division Superintendent
Office of the Schools Division Superintendent

BUENAFE E. SABADO
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Office of the Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
+

JESEFINO C. POGOY DOMINIQUE T. RIVERA

CID Chief SGOD Chief

PROGRAM MANAGERS

HELEN S. ACEDO/MARNELLI B. TOLENTINO/EULAFEL C. PASCUAL

Education Program Supervisor - Math/English/Filipino

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Program Leonardo P. Dagum

Registration/Attendance Marienel V. Pacheco

Irish Fatima S. Tiomico

Documentation Jushua C. Terrazola

Certificates Marienel V. Pacheco

Irish Fatima S. Tiomico

Evaluation Orlando Claor

Master of Ceremony
 GAD Checklists 2: For the Project Identification and Design Stages

Note: Put 'X' mark on

appropriate box
Score
Done?
          for Comments/
Element and an
  items/question (col.2) item/ gender issues
No
  (col.1) Partly Yes element identified

  (2a) (2b) (2c) (col.3) (col.4)

1.0 Involvement of women and
men (max score: 2; for        
2
each
item, 1) 0 0.5 1  
1.1 Participation of women and
men in beneficiary  
groups in the identification
    X 1
of the problem  
(possible scores: 0, 0.5,
1.0)  
1.2 Participation of women and
men in beneficiary  
    X 1
groups in project design
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)  
2.0 Collection of sex-
disaggregated data and gender-  
    X 2
related information (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)  
3.0 Conduct of gender analysis
and identification of      
 
gender issues (max score: 2;
for each item, 1)     2  
3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and
inequalities related to  
gender roles, perspectives
    X 1
and needs, or access to  
and control of resources
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)  
3.2 Analysis of constraints and
opportunities related  
to women's and men's
    X 1
participation in the project  
(possible scores: 0, 0.5,
1.0)  
4.0 Gender equality goals,
outcomes, and outputs  
(possible scores:0, 1.0,
2.0)    
    X 2
Does the project have clearly
stated gender  
equality goals, objectives,
outcomes or outputs?  
5.0 Matching of strategies with     X 2
gender issues  
(possible scores: 0, 1.0,
2.0)  
Do the strategies and  
activities match the gender
issues and gender eqality
goals identified?  
6.0 Gender analysis of the likely
impacts of the        
1.67
project (max score: 2, for
each item, 0.67)        
6.1 Are women and girl chldren
among the direct or  
    X 0.67
inderect beneficiaries?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)  
6.2 Has the project considered
its long-term  
impact on women's
    X 0.67
socioeconomic status and  
Empowerment? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)  
6.3 Has the project included
strategies for avoiding or  
minimizing negative impacts
  X   0.33
on women's status  
and welfare? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.66)  
7.0 Monitoring targets and
indicators (possible  
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)  
Does the project include
gender equality targets     X 2  
and indicators to measure
gender equality  
outputs and
outcomes?  
8.0 Sex-disaggregated database
requirements (possible  
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)  
Does the project M&E     X 2
system require the  
collection of sex-
disaggregated data?  
9.0 Resources (max score: 2; for
1
each item, 1)        
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the
project sufficient  
for gender equality
promotion or integration?  
OR, will the project tap X     0
counterpart funds from  
LGUs/ partners for its GAD
efforts? (possible  
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)  
9.2 Does the project have the     X 1
expertise to promote  
gender equality and
women's empowerment?  
OR, is the project committed
to investing project  
staff time in building
capacities within the project  
to integrate GAD or promote  
gender equality?
(possible scores: 0, 0.5,
1.0)  
10.0 Relationship with the
agency's GAD efforts        
2
(max score: 2; for each
item, 0.67)        
10.1 Will the project build on or
strengthen the  
agency/ PCW/
government's commitment  
to the empowerment of
women?  
(possible scores: 0, 0.33,     X 0.67
0.67)  
IF THE AGENCY HAS NO
GAD PLAN: Will  
the project help in
formulating the implementing  
agency's GAD plan?  
10.2 Will the project build on the
initiatives or actions  
of other organization in the
    X 0.67
area? (possible  
scores: 0, 0.33,
0.67)  
10.3 Does the project have an
exit plan that will ensure  
the sustainability of GAD
    X 0.66
efforts and benefits?  
(possible scores: 0, 0.33,
0.67)  
TOTAL GAD SCORE FOR THE
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION        
AND DESIGN STAGES           18.67  

Interpretation of
  the GAD score    
   
0 - 3.9 GAD is invisible in the project (proposal
  is retured).  
   
4.0 - 7.9 Proposed project has promising GAD prospects
(proposal earns  
a "conditional pass," pending identification of
  gender issues and  
strategies and activities to address these and inclusion of the
  collection of
sex-disaggregated data in the monitoring and
  evaluation plan).  
   
8.0 - 14.9 Proposed project is gender-sensitive (proposal passes the GAD
test)
15.0 - 20.0 Proposed project is gender-responsive (proponent is commended).
                   
List of Participants:

1. Elisa R. Antolin- SPES

2. Flor Amor Cleope - SPES
3. Renante Dorado - SPES
4. Susan L. GohilL - SPES
5. Micah Melorin - PCES
6. Charina O. Parangat - PCES
7. Jessica Bariso - PCES
8. Dyan Amor S. Falcon - PCES
9. Avegile R. Dullesin - SLES
10. Jennifer S. DeLemos - SLES
11. Leoncia T. Alaco - SLES
12. Jennet V. Jamero - KES
13. Vanessa Legaspi - KES
14. Rhia S. Apurada - KES
15. Lexter M. de Belen - KES
16. Evelyn B. Tejada - SJES
17. Esperanza M. Britanico - SJES
18. Salvacion A. Medina - SJES
19. Lorife Jean L. Viesca - SJES
20. Gelie N. Abrajano - WCES
21. Mary Dianne B. Campaner -WCES
22. Mae Ronalyn Doronio -WCES
23. Gleanne L. Hennandez - NCIES
24. Rizaly C. Bautista - NCIES
25. Luningnig J. Baladjay -NCIES
26. Clarissa Ann Teanilla - SES
27. Sonia N. Lagat - SES
28. Eva Manjares - SES
29. Ma. Rholette D. Benedcito- PES
30. Christiane Nicole F. Aristorenas - PES
31. Myla V. Guillera - PES
32. Severnita O. Pabilona - PES
33. Wilma O. Rosales - PES

SDO:
1. SDS
2. ASDS
3. Chief
4. Marnelli B. Tolentino
5. Eulafel C. Pascual
6. Helen S. Acedo
7. Orlando Claor
8. Jushua Terrasola
9. Fatima Tiomico
10. Marienel Pacheco