النموذج السببي للعلاقة بين اليقظة الذهنية ومستوى التوافق النفسي وفاعلية الذات لدى (الطلاب المتفوقين وغير المتفوقين أكاديميا) بالمرحلة الثانوية

‫]‪<ÐÊ]çjÖ]<ïçjŠÚæ<íéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ]<°e<íÎøÃ×Ö<îffŠÖ]<tƒçÛßÖ‬‬
‫]‪< <høŞÖ]<ï‚Ö<l]„Ö]<íé×Â^Êæ<îŠËßÖ‬‬
‫‪< <íèçÞ^nÖ]<í×u†¹ê<D^⁄éµ+^Ò_<°ÎçËj¹]<'Ææ<°ÎçËj¹]E‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮﺫﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺒﻲ ﻟﻠﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﻈﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ‪:‬‬
‫***‬
‫
א‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻔﻮﻗﻴﻦ‬ ‫**‪.−‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻔﻮﻗﻴﻦ ﻭﻏﻴﺮ‬ ‫
א ‬
‫)ﺍﻟﻄﻼﺏ‬ ‫* ‪.−‬‬
‫ﻭﻓﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻟﺪﻯ‬ ‫‪ .‬א
‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‬
‫ﺃﻛﺎﺩﻳﻤﻴﺎ( ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻮﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺪﺭ‪:‬‬
‫]‪< <VíÚ‚Ï¹‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺑﻰ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺮ‪:‬‬
‫ ! ‪#$ .‬‬‫ ‬
‫ ‬ ‫
‬
‫ﺟﻤﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﺭﺍﻧﺪﺍ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻤؤﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﻲ‪:‬‬
‫& ‪/‬‬ ‫‪*& -.‬‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻙ(‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ‪,‬‬
‫ﺃﺣﻤﺪ)ﻡ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺳﺤﺮ '‬
‫)‬ ‫ﺳﻌﻴﺪ‪+) ،‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻭﻱ‪،‬‬ ‫ )* *‬ ‫ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ‪ '( :‬‬
‫ﺯﻳﺪﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺃﺣﻤﺪ‬ ‫&‪' %‬‬
‫ﻣؤﻟﻔﻴﻦ‬
‫ ‪* 0 * 3. % 2 , * /‬‬ ‫ ‪ 1‬‬
‫ﻣﺞ‪ ,26‬ﻉ‪123‬‬ ‫‪'0‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻠﺪ‪/‬ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ‪:‬‬
‫ﻣﺤﻜﻤﺔ‪34 / .
:‬ﻧﻌﻢ‪.*)7
6.
% / 5‬‬
‫ ‬
‫‪2019‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﻼﺩﻱ‪:‬‬
‫‪2*)7
( %1 - % %9 8 %. %‬‬
‫ﺩﻳﺴﻤﺒﺮ‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ‪:‬‬
‫‪7 ?@(, 28>1 * =
< 8;1 :(.‬‬
‫‪255 - 324‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺤﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫‪(Martin SeligmanN,S %) % ) $ 3‬‬ ‫ ‪ * 2 )7‬‬
‫‪1048524‬‬ ‫ﺭﻗﻢ ‪:MD‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ‪21 - )7 - % / 8). %‬‬
‫ ‪A‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺘﻮﻯ‪)
@:‬ﺑﺤﻮﺙ‬
‫ﻧﻮﻉ )‪1999‬‬
‫‪8 2(Shorey, et al, 2007) B A 80 Arabic‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ‪ :‬‬
‫ ‪= ) * / %‬‬
‫‪EduSearch‬‬ ‫ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎﺕ‪:‬‬
‫!‪* %((, < % ( 2 4 5‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻴﻘﻈﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺣﻠﺔ‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻮﻳﺔ ‪ 8 D, % > * 2"
) " 3 $‬‬
‫ ) ‪ 2‬‬
‫‪2 http://search.mandumah.com/Record/1048524‬‬
‫ ‪%‬‬
‫‪ (,‬‬
‫‬ ‫‬
‫‪ 3‬‬
‫‬ ‫ﺭﺍﺑﻂ‪
* $ 4 E& :‬‬
‫& ‪ + * 3 (
* ' 3 ! 3.‬‬
‫* ‪. 0‬‬
‫** ‪.
) F F ( $.‬‬
‫*** ‪.
) F F (, $.‬‬
‫© ‪ 2022‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ‪ .‬ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻇﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻗﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻇﺔ‪ .‬ﻳﻤﻜﻨﻚ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺒﺎﻋﺔ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻤﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﻋﺒﺮ ﺃﻱ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ )ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻲ(‬
‫ﺩﻭﻥ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺧﻄﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻈﻮﻣﺔ‪.‬‬
<ÐÊ]çjÖ]<ïçjŠÚæ<íéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ]<°e<íÎøÃ×Ö<îffŠÖ]<tƒçÛßÖ]
< <høŞÖ]<ï‚Ö<l]„Ö]<íé×Â^Êæ<îŠËßÖ]
< <íèçÞ^nÖ]<í×u†¹ê<D^⁄éµ+^Ò_<°ÎçËj¹]<'Ææ<°ÎçËj¹]E
‫
א‬.−** ‫
א‬.− *
‫ א‬.
***
< <VíÚ‚Ï¹]
#$ . !

/ & *& -. , ' ) +) * *) '( ' %&
* 0 * 3. % 2 , * / 1 '0
.*)7
6.
% / 5 34 / .

2*)7
( %1 - % %9 8 %. %
7 ?@(, 28>1 * =
< 8;1 :(.
(Martin SeligmanN,S %) % ) $ 3 * 2 )7
21 - )7 - % / 8). % A )
@ 1999)
8 2(Shorey, et al, 2007) B A 80 = ) * / %

* %((, < % ( 2 4 5!
8 D, % > * 2"
) " 3 $ 2 )
2 %
(,

3

* $ 4 E&
+ * 3 (
* ' 3 ! 3. &
. 0 *
.
) F F ( $. **
.
) F F (, $. ***
< <høŞÖ]<ï‚Ö<l]„Ö]<íé×Â^Êæ<îŠËßÖ]<ÐÊ]çjÖ]<ïçjŠÚæ<íéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ]<°e<íÎøÃ×Ö<îffŠÖ]<tƒçÛßÖ]< <<<íée†ÃÖ]<íée Ö]<ØfÏjŠÚ<í×¥
2 J. J 1 2 - + # 7 J - %& 2
M . 0 '( J! L 3 2 ( KK * 81

J< & %. & 20 4D M % ' + %. 83 % %
) % % % J 1 JA N 4
2 (Eland St. Charles, 2010)"%) 1." 0. N(*
A %. 2 (Masud, Anderson & Sheean, 2009)"%1 % "
8 * 6 % ) * % 2 $ 4 % %$
) 2 R 4 4 0. :( 2 >! M ' ٕ 2;!
% % + 8 =A % ) ) % . 2. +
. @ 1 8
% 9 8 ,R B 2 ( * 6 .

$& 2 ( D 6 26 D ( D 23! % 3(
*& 8( 3 * =A S) -
> . 6 %
* * 6 *& -T %K 6 2@ + * %K
(GV 2GUUH 2% K D ) .* 6 ( =M
2(Eland St. Charles, 2010) "%) 1." W@ 1. % *

T * $ 4 8 (Brian D. Brausch, 2011) ""
/ % $ 3 . *9 / 2 ) - $
3 ?,1A # & %. #$ 2 7 ' * @ 8
% 2 $ +
& 3 . 3 * , * 0T $
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GHI
<<
< <NLMU<<:ÛŠè*<I< MNN
MNN *‚ÃÖ]<<<<<<<<<<<<< <á]‚è‡<‚éÃ‰<‚·_<J*<I< <ïæ^ŞÏÖ]<…ç’ßÚ<†v‰J*<I< <íÃ¶<*çÛ¦<]‚Þ…
% %$ %,R 8 2S) T )7 , +! ) ,

% $ 3 . , *& $ 3. *
. ( * 6 .
- ' . % 2 $ * 6 $ 4 0 4

"%1 % " 3 / % 34. 2=D
A B, $ 4 %. (Masud, Anderson & Sheean, 2009)
6 % *& 8A 8 2
2 $ 4 *& ED *& ! %$ X * ) *
2." % 34 * > (,1 / A * A (& *

$ 4 - %. *& "" 1 ."M 2 1
% $ 4 -$ A %. 2 A +

M , 3) * M 8) * ) * 6 %
'K 2 , M * . @ A
0. 8) 2 >!
(BEAR, 2006, 31) .* ) 6 $ '<
(Eland St. "%) 1." *& 5)
(Masud, Anderson & Sheean, "%1 %. " 2Charles, 2010)
" 8 " 2(GUYY) "+! % *" 22009)
$ 4 . * 3)@ +M % 9
# %. 3 4D * (GUYZ)
6 2# < A * 3 09 2 ( ), M
@

! )
& $ 4 % W@ . .1.
GHV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

#$ 2 (Kong, Wang, & Zhao, 2014) * ' %

* A $ 2 (Latzman & Masuda; 2013) *
(Keye, M. D & Pidgeon, A. M. 2013).
$ 4 % MD % 1 *& 3 %
.
%M > %M =D - $ 2* 6
. 0
< <VovfÖ]<í×ÓÚ
2 8) * 3 ; ! 1 31
6 2 )7 ; % 0 % K !.
8 K % 2 $ 4 2) * ; $ *
. % 2-,A ! M $& M 5! $3
; J$ = / 2= ' * *)7 0. * 5! $ *
* 1 % 2\ . * 2%7 ' * 3

3 ' 2S - 8D; * % $ 4 - B,
= $ 3 'K * 8 2* 3 % * 3M - *
.3 ٕ 3 M +
$ B, *& (GUYZ) " 8 " W@ 1. /

W@ #$ *& 1. =D - $ T ٕ 2=D -
) % 8 1. 2 (2011) Brian D. Brausch,""
(GUYZ) "'M
" 2(GUU]) "'M
" 2(GUUZ 2
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GH[
<<
2
) ; +) 6 ) 2=D - * 6 - B, *&
1." W@ #$ *& 1. 2=D - * 6 T ٕ
Masud, Anderson ) "%1 %. " 2(Eland St., 2010) "%)
.(& Sheean, 2010
=D B %. 4 0

* 0 8 8D, %
* ' ! % 23 . * K . J * ' *& %
1 %( 23 * % 3 . %T 3. 2 8 % 0. * E
3 , , * ' 3
26 * 8( 8, *$
. 0 + % % 2') D1 % 33) 8 8). %
. 0 =D 4 3MD $ 2* 6
- ' D1 ) *& % W@ 1.
2* 6 2 $ 4 B, < ) 0 =D

@ 8 T * )7 8D, % 1 J$ * 0 > 2 $
:*
% 2 $ 2* 6 - % * E$ < % 8
.M %M % 0 =D - 4 -
< <í‰]…‚Ö]<Í]‚â_
$ * 6 $ 4 % MD J) 5 % 1 FY

) -; 6
. %M % 0 =D -
.* ?(,
GH] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

* 6 $ 4 % 8 % * E$ < & % 1 FG

% 0 - $ 4 . 8D, % $
.* ?(,
) -; 6 .
M %M
< < VovfÖ]<æ‚u

=) 4 %) % 0 =D * J$ 6
:3 / ( <
(Mindfulness) íéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ] IM
$& .J * 2%3 %! 3. * $ 4 "#"

J . 23 ' 2 , $ % * ) 8 *
' 8 * , # * K 6 2 , &
K
. (Flook, 2010, 28) 3
34 * , * 39 $ 4 "

K" % 8
% 23 % 3. * 3& 4 $& 2A ( %
. (Davis & Hayes, 2011, 199)<, 89 3 2 1A
* ? 'K T + % 3. * "_ " 3 % *

2 ! * %) * J) A X '4 %

(Z`` 2GUYZ 2_ -3 D.) .
8 J * % 39 : $ 4 %. 0 %

M * -( ' 3 ' , # 4 2 ,
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GIU

<<
$ 4
* = 3 8( * ) @ )&
2%
.( 0 &) / $ * ,
(Adjustment) îŠËßÖ]<ÐÊ]çjÖ] IN
2 @ + %K % 5 . * * 6

517 8( * M
3 % M * @ % ) 8( /
(Depping, 2011, 11) . ) ) 3) ) 4
* * %K % 9 :@

)& * 6 0 %
) 51& % 2 @ 2%,R 2 $ + 3& 8( *&
* 6
* = 3 8( * ) @ )&
2
.( 0 &) / $ * ,
(Self – Efficacy) l]„Ö]<íéÖ^ÃÊ IO
M * 'M" 3. * $ :%,\ -)"

(Sajjadi, S., Jamaldini,M., Baranzehi,H. " X 8( 3 8& *
& Maghsoodi, H., 2015 92)

. 9 (Y]Y 2Y]VV 2 ) % D "83 . %"
, * M J$
2B; M * # @ . % M .
. %) .K)7 ( 3) 8$ 3) < A * ! 1A
(GUUV 283
GIY < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

) 2 % '( A ) 39 : $ 0

'0 - T 23 < A * $ +M (& * ' & %
. A 6
(Student Exceling Academically) ÑçË{{jÖ] IP
% * 8( -$ = 9 :

. 6 = 0
.-0 8A ( * 5) % @
< <:ovf×Ö<ï†¿ßÖ]<…^ý]
< <Jíéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ]<Ìè†Ãi
N*0 / / * ' * 3 $ 4 M
4 * (M % J K :39 Allen, Blashki, Gullone 3 /
* .A . . , * . (& % 2'!
/ . 3. * 33 2A K % ?, ) / 3 ) *
. (Allen, Blashki, ( *& -T $ 2+M D0
2 MT
Gullone, 2006, 288)

@ *& J * T * :39 Kettler 3
(& % + %. 2 )& . . (& % , .
) 6 *M 81 ! %. a 2 @ . ') 39 ', *
(Kettler, 2013, 4) .
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GIG

<<
* N / B * 3

' 3. % * 2 (,1 * 0. * 2 (,1 0

4
M 1 .89 8D, % 6 $ 2* % 2. 81
%. * W@ M .* $ 6 , $
2 )7 ?@(, % + )&
$ 4
2=!; 26 2 KA % ) , 8 +
3.
. (Ketller, 2013, 5-6) * =@ B .
(Vago & Silbersweig, 2012) ï‚Ö íéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ]<l^ÞçÓÚ
$ 4 / E$ E$ % 6 & *
Self- Processing * $ K3) 4 )$
(Vago & Silbersweig, 2012)
34 < . * $ 4 * ( ) K 6 *
E$ $ 2 ( ) ٕ 2' B, 89 * A
9 , * %. J T B *
% %. % 2 ) Biased 'Kb . Distorted 1 % %. %
% 2K $ B, 3. * $ 4 *& 4 $@ 2*! K $
Meta self- * $ * < % -$ = % ?, 5 8D,
- ) 8 2 ' 7 * ' % K 2awareness
0 % 2%,R + ) MD M ٕ 2Self- regulation) * $ 4 )
$3
Self- transcendence) * $ ) $ 8 'K )
GIZ < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

8 4
; 3 8 F ' ) a (S-ART) (
:* K B, 2* $ K3) 1 8 3
Intention and Motivation:

-
. $ , 4D ) $; 4 3( %
Attention regulation:
J ' &) J ! % * 1 & 8
.(- 7
Emotion Regulation:
8D, % 4 . * ( * ) =.

8 ; *& * * ( @ F ) A ) 7
< ! ) 7 8D, % . 21D - *& 8
.(* ' &) 8 =) 6 ; . 2*
Improving Social cognition:
# 7 * ' (, J$ 2 * ) %@ %7
*& 1 -$ * # 2%,R ( 3 2* )
.%,R ' ٕ * #
Non- attachment and non-de- centering: #$ !"
%! 25! F $ @0 2 $ * *

',) E : / 2 ) # 7 % 4 K
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GI`
<<
(* ) + K3) +M 2J K 8 * 'M 'K + 2(=)
. 1 X
< <íéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ]<‚ñ]çÊæ<íéÛâ_
% * ' 09 34. $ 4 %. * 0 A +
%! .3 09 S1 * * *& ) . W@
2( 2 1 2 2J :% 8 , * ;
, 1 > . 1 81 J$ -T .6 2 3)
.(Brown, Ryan, & Creswell, 2007, 266) ' W@ *& $ 4
* , $ 4 * D, %. *& Mace 1. M

2*( J1 ) 23 2(=@ 6 ) E K :3 2'
$ D1 2( 2) ) 6 D1 2( 2 $ < $& 2%7
(Mace, 2008, 151). $ 2 $ * )
2' ') % 2 ;! B . B, *& $ 4 -T

-$ :80 & - , )D M * ) K 8
80 ! -$ 2% *! 2 ) B A 2 K B A
.6 = !
%a 2#$ % > * 2 & > * M / K
. (Myint, *& > $ 4 '1 ) )
Choy, & Lam, 2011, 165-166)

: "
)* $ (
&' %"
GIH < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

) KK 8D, % @ ' & * ' 1 KK FY
.;! 3)
* S 83 4 4 * %A 2# 1 % FG
.3
7 2 ,
. (Weissbecker et al., 2002, * 1 ' * 1 KK FZ
299)
Meta– Cognitive < * $ 4 , % F`
:80 1 . A 4D -$ Awareness
* +)1 .3) 8 E * .6 +M 3. # & %
3. 26@ A J$ %9 + K 4
; % > * . % , < )& . *& E
(Hasker, .3 MD A * ; * 9 . & A
2010, 15)
; * ) @ 80 . ) @ $ 4 FH
4 % 2%K A B, :3 2 - / * )
2;! B, * @ 80 2 ') 6 2
D!
2 ! , 2- ) 26 2* =@ B .
. (Duerr, : 2 $ 2J 2 ' $ % %
2008, 15-16)
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GII

<<
4 A J$ 80 % ٕ 2J9 MD ; $ 4 %& 28 %
* .0 +M % ' 3 0. - '(M (,1 3. * 3&
. E 2K J9 MD * / -$ ; $
(Thompson, 2011, 6 .
< <:íéßâ„Ö]<í¿Ïé×Ö<ì†ŠË¹]<l^è†¿ßÖ]
Langer Theory of Mindfulness : $ 4 ) 4
* % "$" * ; % 61 :( $ 4
.(Bodhi, 2000, 33) 8 ) * ' 8 a
8 2') @ * ' * $ 4 %. ")" -
* 9 26 * ' 2 , 4 3) * S 2')
. )
. ') 6 <1A * 4 * ' * $ 4 2-,. '

M * @ *& -T 2 8 ) B % W 1
(Langer, 1989, 72) .,
$, * %M ) * 8
> 8 ) % ' +) %. $ 4 4 B
) "#" ")" W@ 34. 23 A c Mindful 5
% - '(M - ' ' $ % a . (Lager & Beck, 1979
1 '( ) % % #$ 2 M ; 8D,
(Langer & Beck, 1979, 200)
GIV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

4 3 * ' 4 3A 4 J$ 0 M
Self- $ 4 :* 2 4 . Shapiro et al. $ M $
2 Self – Management $ ' ٕ 2Regulation
J$ Exposure. B 2 Values Clarification :!
(Shapiro et al., J) 2J 2( ) 0D0 4 6@ +
2006, 379 – 380).

(Psychological Adjustment) îŠËßÖ]<ÐÊ]çjÖ]
M + 6 . $& ( * * 6 8
# $& ( ! * 8 28 # 31 +)
+ 6 2 +) . , 0 . . +)
( +) + 6 . 23 ! 3! % 23 J! *
% = 8 J1 2 3 % 3 L %$ A % J!
. % * 6 2) * @ # K * > 23
$ ٕ 2 @ ( % @
6 % $a ( * 1T
.') ( % )
6 %
< <îŠËßÖ]<ÐÊ]çjÖ]<<ÝçãËÚ
2 ( 8 2 4 * %7 (,
3
6
. < . ( * *& ( N ٕ 51& % D1 3)
* 4 * 28 * 2'A * %,R + $ + > 2)
.
& 3 % #$ 23 ,
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GI[
<<
. + % K : %1 %! 3 :6 %. *& * 1

B 2 ( % , 91 3) * * $ + >
% 6 * ) 23 ) 6 % J - 2& %
% 3 2
) @ 4 + ) 0 2 , K
= ) ./ . ! ) ( MD 2%,\ ?,1.
(HU 2GUUZ 2*
< < ÐÊ]çjÖ]<“ñ^’}

< <Víé×Ò<íé×ÛÂ<ÐÊ]çjÖ] IM
+ 8 d @
J %7 MD 4 *& 1 6 %&
) >& + *), # * 6 (
f eM %. 2 @
@ %7 % *1 * 8 6 %& 8 2 1
.
6 %. 2 (,1 J %c 4 % %. * %

25 ( $ % *3 ( 2%,R $ % 5 ( * @M
.' ) +) * * ) MD * %7
< <VíéÚ^ßè<íé×ÛÂ<ÐÊ]çjÖ] <IN

8 @3 ( ' ' ' - * ' 6
80 6 %. 23 17 '; ) % %! * ' 8
2*@ ,R * $ 3! 2 , - 5 ( %! * W@ # . (
,R 3! - 3! @ - = ,R B - - B
GI] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

:( 1) . - 8 ( 6 %& 3 * * ) ,\ *M
( [Z 2Y]]I 2-3
< <Víéñ^Ïi…]<íé×ÛÂ<ÐÊ]çjÖ] <IO

2 , J 8 * ) * +! %. $ *
%. =) * ) % &
*7 23) 3 8
* 1 . 3 -T 2 % J! +) ! *& -T
3) % + 6 J1 J $ 2 +) , *& 3
% % % * 34 ) J$ % 8 % ٕ 2-,. 3) % +) +
* ) *& ) J$ -T 2 ' 8D, 8
.* 2* ) 2*) 0D0
. * ) J$ 2-,A )
(Z[ 2Y]][ 2*3 *()
< <VíéfŠÞ<íé×ÛÂ<ÐÊ]çjÖ] IP
) 4 D, , / 2 6 %&
6 %9 8 % 0 % 2% %K * * M . 2 (M
8 %7 26 % & * ' '
- 251c ) 9 1 M ) . ;
2'; @ M @D * ) ; * ' ( -$
% M 2,\ =) % 2M # + * # 6 % 51c 8(
2 6 #
2-,. ' * 6 > 2 % ' *
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GVU

<<
6 2; 1 2) *& -T ' * 6 %A
.%7 3 * 4 % %K D, ,
< < ÐÊ]çj×Ö<ì†ŠË¹]<l^è†¿ßÖ]
2
*
4 6 ' )
8 4 80 4 J$ B 26 3 4 %
$ 0 - A % / 6 %. * . 2*
3) % 6 3 5! $ * %0 , 2 (,1
=& . * 6 3 *& 4 2* 8 4
. 3 %. 6 * %,R * % )
* %T *7 J) =(. . 2) 1. $& B, *&
.# . ) g %@ > 6 %. % / 26
(School of Psychoanalysis: íè‚é×ÏjÖ]E îŠËßÖ]<Øé×vjÖ]<í‰…‚Ú +

ID 3 * 'K3). /D0 % % (,1 %. (Freud): -
% * 3) 'K3)A J$ 8 %. 2- Super ego)* A A Ego A
2

* * A 2 * %K 6 * 3
' +!, * *3 ! A . 2 'K3)A % 6 + * *
J$ * 9) 2* A A +M . 83 '$ . $@ 23
2 1. $,9 M 2 # :( $ 2 6@ *&
51& % 'K) K :( * A A 09 +!, M ! A %.
T N6 5 ( + (,1 %K 2 A )
GVY < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

34 *& hT $ 21D 8 . * EK + >! -M )
) . \ ( * $ 5! % * ! B A
(GH` 2GUUV 2=,
< <Vì‚è‚¢]<îŠËßÖ]<Øé×vjÖ]<í‰…‚Ú <IN

J , '4 6 *& ') * 8 ) 4
0R %3 8 2 * +) 0R *& % 3
1 # >( * +) . * K $ 2 MD # )7
' 8 * # 8 %a 6 8T 3 : -$
. % > ) + *. * # %. "\" - 2 (,1
6 6 8). % S % 2 ) 7
/ %. - 2 1 % B (\) K -$ * ) +
> 26 * > 1 34& * ; 6 % *! #
/ 2 7 @ 8 * . 'M ) * @3 ) %.
=( *& -T 6 D < 8& 6 %& .* ) <
2 7 MD 6 * M . 0 6 < (Horney)
09 * @ (From) *& E %7 %. ) 6@ ' . *
* '
7 %7 ,A <
7 "" T 2 (,1
8D 1 %. 23 !
% %. 2 5 7
%7 6 $& . * "" -. 8 ' * ' *& E * $
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GVG

<<
L -$ +) . 0 % 4 ( $ * ) 517 %
(HV FH` 2GUY` 2% * <D)) . ! % * a
* 'M . * 6 *& 4 * J) %& 8 %

D 2 # J) S ! 1 2 , )
-M. . ) #$ 2* A A ( . 3 > 3 !, %
#$ 2+M * A A $ 3 > % K +
. * 6 6
< <l]„Ö]<íé×Â^Ê<<ÝçãËÚ
2*A * * 3 * @ 8 % $
A *& J$ 1 2 - - * 09 8D, % #$
8) 8, W@ *& 8( ! 3 4 4 * ' $
'0 3 , 8( % * J$ 0T 2 1A %
.(Runne, 1996) = 3) 8$
" * $ %a (Bandura, 1986, 193)

. 3 < A 8
. %! $ . %. He & Freeman "% *" -

* . * ; * 81 2' 3 K)& * M - *
8 *& !7 =) 2 = <0. $
(He & Freeman, GUYU) .'1 # # *
< <l]„Ö]<íé×Â^Ê<^Ãe_
GVZ < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]
:* 3 $ ; . 0D0 " "
Magnitude :íé×Â^ËÖ]<…]‚ÏÚ IM

, 2 , M ) * < X + 'M - *& 1
( -
3 % . '( M M (
2 ( * 3 % 2 M * A % D,
(IV 2GUY` 2% . <!) . (
Generality: íéÚçÛÃÖ] IN
3& % A 2 31 M *& M 8 *

. %! -$ M 31 M *
3 / % 2 1A ) 8D, % %. " " T

2 1A 1 ) :3 A % D,
, 3. 23
2*>K % 8.) .# ?,1 ?@(, 2M (
(GZ` 2GUYG
Strength: ì‚4Ö]<æ_<ìçÏÖ] IO
2 '0 % (,1 1 'M %. * " " T
2S) -T * 1A , % % * '
81 4D 80 4D 09 M 0. 8) % !
3 $ 'M + A % 23 ! JT . % . 2 3 < . *
(G]Z 2GUUY 2- 1 ) <D ) .! < A 3) * %0
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GV`

<<
', <! * $ 'M %. *& Bandura " " 1.

8 * '0 M # -$ %. 2M 3<D -
$ M 'M %. * T 2 M1 , 3) * 0. 3) 8$
(GZH 2GUYG 2*>K % 8.) .M 3<D - ', <! *
< <ÑçËjÖ]æ<ífâç¹]<ÝçãËÚ
% K % . ) 26 3 *, B
* -,9 . '( 3D4 * 8 K F *& F , 8 +.
, * T A @ * '@ )
:* 8 J$ ! 2 , 8 * %M %
.%7 ' E, M, ' 6 FY
* % % % * K < A 6 FG
. , 1 , ! * +)
, 3 2 <$ 6 FZ
* " " , 34 + J$ . M 2 <$
.*! % % *0
. 2K * < A 81 6 3 5 F`
7 A ) * K < A * '
34 + *! % % ,A /0 8D, J) $ M .
8A " :* ? 2Y]VG A 'K % 8.
* M * D % %$ 8A #@. %M %
GVH < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

2 ' 2* 7 ' ) * + < A
, %) 2 @ A ( % ?, *A
J$ 80 8 8). % #$ 2' 3 1.
(H 2GUU` 2% ) *) . .
) 2 M > '( ! 0D0 8D, <$ 3 +
* % 8) %. 2
* 6 *& 3 ') 4
* - * 4 J$ * SD(7 +1 * %@ . %
' <$ 4 80 23 % % 1 8) * 3 !
."%)" "*" "" * /* <$ 4 ")"
< <:íé×ÏÃÖ]<í¿ÏéÖ]<Ùçu<l^‰]…
DNLMSE<àŠu<ØéÂ^;c<Ù^ÛÒ<í‰]…6 IM
*A 8), 2*A , % 8 3& ) % *& 3
2 $ 2 ! 3 ) , A = )
2 2* ( 2( 2 4D ) 4 . (

(GII) % - 2 $
4 ) & * (8
2 . 3 2( , ((,) 3 0 M
B 3& *& W@ 1. Stepwise 8 ,
2@(&
8 * $ 4 ) & * 2(/ M ;) A
. $
4 ) & % A J$ % ٕ
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GVI

<<
(Williams, M. J., Dalgleish, T. Karl, A, & Kuyken, W., í‰]…6 <IN
2014)
2 4 , 8
* < % 9 *&
% & > 1 2*A : /D0 % M
($
G`Z 2*0. I]V) (]Ù) % 289 % > %
(GZH) * 0 1 .([.]) - (GH.V) -
(Ì.HY) - 289 % % ($ [G 2*0. YHZ)
% / 2*7 3 8( M 2(Y.YZ) -
Exeter Mindfulness Network 4 ,7 '1 8D, % %
3, %. 2newsletter (www.exeter-mindfulness-network.org)
% ($
]] 2*0. ZGH)
(`G`) % 00 . > !
2(YY.[) - 2 (HU.YI) - 2 =@ % %
(MBCT) 4 * * * ED ) * # 1 * M
* A K 8D, % % % M 2 =@ ED
Primary Care Settings in Rural ' * ! 6
) /D0 . % = M and Urban Settings in The UK.
*, 6 ) *& W@ ( M . 4 , 8

# . D / 2 4 , 8 2@(&
8 2+
2(U.]Z 2U.[G) % 0 2(U.]G 2U,VV) % *A *, 6D
81 2- * 8 W@ 1. .(U.]Y 2U.VV) % 00
GVV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

W@ + !. W@ J$ 2 4 *, E$ *& 2)
(Bear, et al. (2006). Bear, et al. (2008.

(Sangeetha., 2014) í‰]…6 IO
* 3 8 4 0. * *&
* @ B *A 8( - + 2;! ' ,
( * YIH % -
2
) * K % .89
"%" J . -$ 8 * * 4
6 M 2+
%,\ % (PSS-10) * ;!
(Feldman, et, al., 2007) %,\
W@ 34. . A D) ( 2(Cohen, et. al., 1983)
M
1T
4 'K %9 M 34. 8 %. 2
-M * ) *& W@ 1. .=D % * ;! B, *
MD J$ %. # %. * 8 2* ;! 4 %
60 81 k %. % 4 * 'K -. %. * $ . ( 8M %
.* ;! * B,
(Napora., 2013) IP
< A 4 * 89 0. * *&
lmn 1 .# * ) =D - * 8( * *A
) 2
lop ) ) *& M 2*) W3 , 2
2"%" "% " & % 4
3 , .
mq !
) ) 1 M 2* =)
2(Brown & Rayn, 2003)
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GV[
<<
34. . 81 8 * 8( ' 8 6@M I ' 89 W *
4 * =) % (, 2 0D0 ; % 3 MD ' W@
- * * 3

4 %. *& W@ # 1. 2
J$ * A 2* =) % . *A < A
A 2 9 8 2 4 - KK * =A ,
. 8( * 89 '< 0 -$
< <VîŠËßÖ]<ÐÊ]çjÖ]<Ùçu<l^‰]…
< <DNLMSE<àŠu<…çÞ_<Ý^â…<í‰]…6 IM
- * 6 < B, * * 17 0. *&
., ?, , T

(GU) ; . J$ < )7 *) W3 %0 ,

% 8 * 6
%0 , (YVFYH) % .
.%0 * 17 W #$ 2 6 "8 .."
2 @ 2* 3 @(7 ) % ,
*R = * 8 (T-test) , 2r . , 2-
) . *& ( 2 (SPSS) ) @(7 K 4

6 - * -
*
% @(& $ 6
.-
:(
-0 /0 ( *
- * -
*
% @(& $ 6 )
GV] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

% @(& $ 6 ) 26 ; * 6
. ;
* 6 - * -
2*

< <DNLMSE<îÞ]†âˆÖ]<C^‘<àe<Ø’éÊ<í‰]…6 IN
* * -17 W * *& J$
/ , M . 0 =D - $ * 6 % *
F 0
(G`) % * *) 1 W3
FYV) % . 2 ! (YG) ) (YG) 3 F -0 *0 (
#$ 2 $ * 6 * !, ) * ( % 2 (Y]
$ )
2(GUYI 2/ & F * 6 )
6
M 2
GGH * (GUYI 2/ = Sorense - "%:
) (YH) % % -$ / & % * *@ -17 W 6
* 6 * 6 #$ 0 2 ) ) * 1&
6 +. ' #$ D 2% ) * (-
) -,. ' $
-17 W / W@ 34. .(*
) 00 ' %
. $ * 6 * / $ * , * *@
( ' *& / ?, M 2*
* -17 W < %
6 , * 6 -; 8 / % K < )a ( :3.
* 17 , 2- 17 =9 * W ,
.D 7 8@ 1 K 8D, % $ * 6 % *
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G[U

<<
< <<l]„Ö]<íé×Â^Ê<Ùçu<l^‰]…
< <DNLMRE<H^‰<‚·_<F^â<í‰]…6 IM
$, % 8 28 ) % MD / *& /
- 2(/& /$) 5 % 8 09 ) * 2 $ )
) % 8 * 3 *@0 8 (- /6) * 8(

* 2/ . & . $ ) $, 8
*
J$ 6 2 $
$,
8
3 M @3 * 3 0 A J$ 6( 0 % 9 D
.%M =D % (lon) 2% =D % (lpn) 3 (psm)
* 8 2( 1) , () , 2*@0 % 8 ,
* % @(&
6 ) 3 W@ % ) % / . %
% * $ :( ', S 2 @ * /7 $ )
% @(&
6 ) 28 ) * 3 6 )
@(&
6 ) ./7 :( $, * /7 $ ) *
:( $ ) 2 $ 0 * /7 $ ) * %
%M =D ) * % @(&
6 ) *& !7 2$
% @(&
6 ) . % * .%M :( 8 * %
6 ) . $, * % %M =D ) *
:( $ * % %M =D ) * % @(&

$, % 8 28 % ) MD ) . .%M
.% %M =D - $
G[Y < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

< <DNLMPE<l^ée†Â<Üé×£]<‚fÂ<‚·_<í‰]…6 IN
0 - $ - *
.* 8( * ) 5 -
t ; <! * * *
(YG[) 2$ % (YHG) 3 2 0 %
(G[U) %
% (%YU) 1 2 @ 1 , 2/7 %
W@ ( M . $
. 6 . +)
* * 0 - $ - %. *&
2* 8( ; -K 6 ) W@ 34. 2 )
% 8 2* ) 5 -K 6 ) 2+ 8( -$ :(
'! %0 *(. W@ <! * 2* ) 5 * 8(
'K NB, 8( h$ 0
* % % ')
3 M <! * ( D1 3) 3 3 $ -
8 2) * $ 8 * % K < ) ٕ .3M
.-,. ; <! * ,
< <<DNLMNE<…^rßÖ]<Ù6^Â<ài^Ê<í‰]…6 IO
2 $ % 8 2* - * *& J$
* % MD * 2 0 - ) '
* 6 % 1 2( ) ' $ ) ;
2*A 5 2
) ) * 2 > ; % ) -K * 2*
1 . 0 - -(M - 2* -
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G[G

<<
) ' $ 2* % MD :*

@ 8 T *
* *( W3 0 , M v 0 -

% @ 1 , M 2 J$
% = (HUU) % 0 2
%, 4 * 0
. 6 2 +) % (%YU) * 80 2-0 *0 (
' % 2 $ % 2* % a 0 M
@(& =. 0 , W@ 8( 2 )
8 rw . 8 2 2 2 @
F: W@ % 1 2-A % 8 , 2" , 2%
F .(%VU) $ - 2(%HH) % - * - %.
2* % - @(& $ MD )
@(& $ MD ) F . 0 - $
F . 0 - ) ' * % -
F ./7 :(
) ; -K * * @(& $ 6 )
) F .*A 5 -K * * @(& $ 6 )
6 ) F .* - -K * * @(& $ 6
.-(M - -K * * @(& $
:*R / B 0 >( 0 %
$ * 6 % 8 $ 4 % MD ) FY

. 0 =D %
. %M =D -
G[Z < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

$ 2* 6 % 8 $ 4 % MD ) FG

. 0 =D %
. M -
- 2(/& /$) 5 ; % 8 @(&
8 09 ) FZ
=D - $ 4 * 3 8 2(6 > /6) *A
. 0
* 6 - % 2 $ 4 - % * E$ < % F`
..
M % 0 =D - $
< <äjßéÂæ<ovfÖ]<ÄÛj¥
% ( 0 =D % GUU) % / %
. (?(,
) ) -; 6 < =) 4
< <í‰]…‚Ö]<íßéÂ<V^⁄éÞ^m
= 1 : A ?@(, =
(0& GZ 2$
YV) 0 =D 2(Ù) % ?@(,
6 , 2< =) 4 < 1 8A
0 K 2% 0 *) * % A
<! * (M 6 , M . = (GUU) 2<
( * 2(6 > /6) *A - 2(/& /$)
) h;
:* ; # 6
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G[`

<<
(Y) 8)
./7 $ % -
(YUU) =% /7 (YUU) =% $

; /
6 > HU 6 HU 6 > HU 6 HU
5 5 *K
U.ZUG GUI.]]G U.I`Y GU`.HII
A *K %. (Y) 8) % :! /
U.I`Y) 'M - 2
(/c YV.G` 2$ YV.U`) % (
8( 8D, A . 6 M . (/c U.ZUG 2$
.GUY]/GUY[ * % *0 *
< <Ví‰]…‚Ö]<l]æ_
(.
%M > %M ) =D - $ 4

FY
. 0
. 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D - $
FG
(.
%M > %M ) =D - * 6
FZ
. 0
<°ÎçËj¹]< WÆæ< °ÎçËj¹]E< høŞÖ]< ï‚Ö< íéßâ„Ö]< í¿ÏéÖ]< Œ^éÏÚ

< <Vínu^fÖ]<K6]‚Âc<íèçÞ^nÖ]<í×u†¹ê<D^⁄éµ6^Ò_
< <VŒ^éÏ¹]<àÚ<Í‚+]< I_<
G[H < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

% MD * E$ * *& 3 %. /
> %M ) =D - $ 2* 6 - $ 4
- $ 4
a 0 M $ 2 0 (.
%M
4 . %. 2 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D
=X
0 (.
%M > %M ) =D - $
:* . , * ( * 23 5D * 2-4
([) %! 2( :*0 2 ([) %! 2 4D :8A
:+ 2 ([) %! 2* ( :/0 2
, + 8 :
, 2 ([) %! 2 , , *
8M A ( * ' (Ù) *)a 2 ([) %! 2 ,
* % ! ٕ 2 B 8
<! * .

?@(, = * 6 8M
(.
.' (`G)
%((, % (YU) * ) A (

B 0 M /
81 M 2(Y 6)
@ <! . % ( 2
8) *
(.
%M > %M ) =D - $ 4 *@ )7 *
= :3 2
( <0. . ' ' 2 0

%. / 23 %) 5 5 ' 2 8 0
*0D0 ""
M , 2 0 =D % 8M % )
% 5 ' 2( .
/ – .
/ F @
/ (Likart)
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G[I
<<
*
b
@ <! . % = 0 2-T 5 -,. % ) 0@
:* <! *

.M # :! * 2 !;

> %M ) =D - $ 4 A *@ )7 ' <
.*@ )7 <! * 0 (
. %M
.
% ' 8 @D >(
.& * -$ 3<D ;
' S!
.K $ . !& . 8 8 4D -. < &
?@(, = *

6 0 M #$
% +!
M * 0
6( % 9 0 =D % (Ù)
?@(, = * 6 ' ( *
%! / 2M 8).
%M ) =D - $ 4
, A * K ' (`G)
6 2*0D0
M 6 0 (.
%M >
(. 0 % 2
) 3 2(Y) ' $
5 80 2 ) (YGZ) * ) * . % / 2' (`Y)

8M. 2 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D - $ 4
> %M ) =D - $ 4 B, 80 (`Y) * )
?@(, = B * . 0 (.
%M
0 (.
%M > %M ) =D - $ 4

: 0 &
G[V < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

< <Víè4ÚçÓéŠÖ]<“ñ^’¤]<h^Šu Ih<

:‫اﻻﺗﺴﺎق اﻟﺪاﺧﻠﻰ‬
= / 2
D( % 9 *, 6 *
% (Ù) ; ?@(, = * 2
) (' ) ' 8
' 8 ) % D )& / 2 A E, 2 0 =D
.% ) 6 2
)
% ' 8 % D +) %. 8) % :! /

2 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D - $ 4

2(Y) ' (U.UH) - @( &
) 5) %
%
-,A D 2' J$ $
*& 1
) ' 8 * 8 (U.[]H :U.Z]G)
.
*, 6
:‫ﺛﺒﺎت اﻟﻤﻘﻴﺎس‬
8 = 2 ( @K) = 6 %
0 % 6
:r .
:‫اﻟﺘﺠﺰﺋﺔ اﻟﻨﺼﻔﻴﺔ‬
=D % ?@(, = ) % 8 = -
=D - $ 4
)K * 0
* , 2 0 & 0 (.
%M > %M )
8 ; / 2(Spearman - Brown & Gutman) %) 2% F %
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G[[
<<
*& 1 2+ 8 2(U.]HI) )K %
.
0
<< V8^fÞæ†Ò<^ËÖ_<ØÚ^ÃÚ It<

> %M ) =D - $ 4
0 8 = 3
2+ 0 8 2(U.]V`) M ; / 2 0 (.
%M
.
0 1 *
:‫ﺻﺪق اﻟﻤﻘﻴﺎس‬
< < VÔ]<Ñ‚‘
4
) % D = # 6( ,
2 0 & 2 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D - $
2(GUYI) *K % 2 *) 2 %0 ' : & $ 4
)
D 2 0 % (HU) M * 6 /
(U.[V) 8 M ; / (U,UH) - @(
&
.
6( *& 1
<D^⁄éµ6^Ò_<°ÎçËj¹]<WÆæ<°ÎçËj¹]E<høŞÖ]<ï‚Ö<l]„Ö]<íé×Â^Ê<Œ^éÏÚ
< <íèçÞ^nÖ]<í×u†¹ê
2 = GUU $
6 %$ . %
:' Z[
;
- $
?@(, = B *
0 & 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D
G[] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]
< <VŒ^éÏ¹]<àÚ<Í‚+]<I_
% (YU) * (G 6) A (
B 0 M /
2(Y 6)
@ <! . % (
8) * %((,
%M > %M ) =D - * 6 *@ )7 * 81 M
= :3
( <0. . ' ' 2 0 (.

%. / 23 %) 5 5 ' 2 8 0
, 2(/& F$)
%M % % 8M % )
' 2( .
/ – .
/ F @
/) (Likart) *0D0 ""
M
@ <! . % = 0 2-T 5 -,. % ) 0@ % 5
:* <! *
*
b

.M # :! * 2 !;
> %M ) =D - * 6 A *@ )7 ' <
.*@ )7 <! * 0 (.
%M
.
% ' 8 @D >(
.& * -$ 3<D ;
' S!
.K $ . !& . 8 8 4D -. < &
?@(, = *
6 0 M #$
* 0 2
6( 2*, 6 % 9 0 =D % (Ù)
* 6 ' ( *
%! / 2M 8). % +!
M
> %M ) =D - * 6 A * K ' (HI) %
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G]U

<<
= 2*0D0

M 6 0 (.
%M
) 3 2(ZY) ' $
?@(,
* ) * . % / 2' (HH)
:(. 0 % 2

%M > %M ) =D - * 6 - 5 80 2 ) (YIH)
* 6 - B, 80 (HH) * ) 8M. 2 0 (.

B * . 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D -
> %M ) - * 6
?@(, =
./ & 0 (.
%M
< < Víè4ÚçÓéŠÖ]<“ñ^’¤]<h^Šu<Ih

:‫اﻻﺗﺴﺎق اﻟﺪاﺧﻠﻰ‬
/ 2
D( % 9 *, 6 *
?@(, = * 2
) (' ) ' 8 =
)& / 2 A E, 0 =D % (Ù) ;
. ) 6 2
) ' 8 ) % D
$
% ' 8 % D +) %. /
) 5) % 2 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D -
2(G[ 2GZ) % (U.UH) - @( &

%
-,A D 2% % $
*& 1
) ' 8 * 8 (U.]V] :U.G[I)
.
*, 6
G]Y < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

. 8 = ( @K) = 6 %

0 % 6
:r
:‫اﻟﺘﺠﺰﺋﺔ اﻟﻨﺼﻔﻴﺔ‬
% ?@(, = ) % 8 =
=D - $
)K * 0 =D
* , 2 0 & 0 (.
%M > %M )
8 ; / 2(Spearman - Brown & Gutman) %) 2% F %
*& 1 2+ 8 2(U.[HZ) )K %
.
0
< < V8^fÞæ†Ò<^ËÖ_<ØÚ^ÃÚ<<It
> %M ) =D - $
0 8 = 3
2+ 0 8 (U.]HG) M ; / 2 0 (.
%M
.
0 1 *
< < VÔ]<Ñ‚‘

) % D = # 6( ,
2 0 & 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D - $
8 , % (GUU]) _ 1 : & $
)
0 =D % (Ù) M * 6 / 2(GUY[)
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G]G

<<
8 M ; / 2(U.UH) - @(

& D
.
6( *& 1 (U.[G)
0 (

. %M > %M ) =D - * 6
-
. 0 / &
< <VŒ^éÏ¹]<àÚ<Í‚+]<I_
% MD * E$ * *& 3 %. /
> %M ) =D - $ 2* 6 - $ 4
* 6
a 0 M $ 2 0 (.
%M

a 0 M $ 2 0 (.
%M > %M )
%. 2 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D - * 6
(.
%M > %M ) =D - * 6 .
* ( * 23 5D * -4 =X
2 0
:* . 0D0 81 2*(,1 6 :8A : %@ %
+ 6 :*0 * 2 ([) %! *) 6 :8A *
(]) %! 2* 6 :/0 * 2 (]) %! 2 $
:* . 0D0 81 2* ) 6 :*0
@ 2
6 :
, * 2 (]) %! 2* 6 :+ *
(]) %! 2-A 6 :
* 2 (]) %! 2*)
<! * .
8M A ( * ' (HZ) *)a 2
(. % 8M % 2(ZZ 2GG) M. % $

G]Z < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

(9 % 8M %

, !& 0 2' (HY)

(HI) ?@(, = * 6 8M @ ( *

.'
% (YU) * (G 6) A (

B 0 M /
2(Y 6)
@ <! . % (
8) * %((,
%M > %M ) =D - * 6 *@ )7 * 81 M
= :3
( <0. . ' ' 2 0 (.

%. / 23 %) 5 5 ' 2 8 0
, 2(/& F$)
%M % % 8M % )
' 2( . / – . / F @ /) (Likart) "*0D0 "
M
@ <! . % = 0 2-T 5 -,. % ) 0@ 2% 5
:* <! *
*
b

.M # :! * 2 !;
> %M ) =D - * 6 A *@ )7 ' <
.*@ )7 <! * 0 (.
%M
.
% ' 8 @D >(
.& * -$ 3<D ;
' S!
.K $ . !& . 8 8 4D -. < &
?@(, = *

6 0 M #$
* 0
6( *, 6 % 9 0 =D % (Ù)
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G]`

<<
* 6 ' ( *

%! / 2M 8). % +!
M
> %M ) =D - * 6 A * K ' (HI) %
= 2*0D0
M 6 0 (.
%M
) 3 2(ZY) ' $
?@(,
* ) * . % / 2' (HH)
:(. 0 % 2

%M > %M ) =D - * 6 - 5 80 2 ) (YIH)
* 6 - B, 80 (HH) * ) 8M. 2 0 (.

B * . 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D -
> %M ) =D - * 6
?@(, =
. 0 & 0 (.
%M
< < Víè4ÚçÓéŠÖ]<“ñ^’¤]<h^Šu<Ih

:‫ اﻻﺗﺴﺎق اﻟﺪاﺧﻠﻰ‬-
/ 2
D( % 9 *, 6 *
?@(, = * 2
) (' ) ' 8 =
D )& / 2 A E, 0 =D % (Ù) ;
. ) 6 2
) ' 8 ) %
% ' 8 % D +) %. (Y`) 8) % :! /
(.
%M > %M ) =D - * 6

' (U.UH) - @(
&
) 5) % 2 0

-,A D 2' J$ $ 2(ZY)
G]H < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

1
) ' 8 * 8 (U.]V] : U.G[I) %
.
*, 6 *&
. 8 = ( @K) = 6 %
0 % 6
:r
< < VíéË’ßÖ]<íñˆrjÖ]<I_

% ?@(, = ) % 8 =
& (,1
)K * 0 =D
Spearman - Brown & ) %) 2% F % * , 2 0
2(U.]]V) )K % 8 ; / 2(Gutman
.
0 *& 1 2+ 8
< < V8^fÞæ†Ò<^ËÖ_<ØÚ^ÃÚ<<Ih

%M ) =D - * 6
0 8 = 3
0 8 (U.][`) M ; / 2 0 (.
%M >
.
0 1 * 2+
< < VÔ]<Ñ‚‘
6
) % D = # 6( ,
0 & 0 (.
%M > %M ) =D - *
2(GUYY) - T SD( / & *7 1 * 6
)
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G]I

<<
D 0 % (Ù) M * 6 /
*& 1 (U.[Y) 8 M ; / (U,UH) - @(
&
.
6(
< <^â7ŠËiæ<sñ^jßÖ]<š†Â
< <VÙæù]<š†ËÖ]
- @(& $ ( ! ) MD )
2 $ ) ) % D ; 9 8 % 2(U.UH)
* ($ ) =D - ; (* 6 )
80 * 6 $ 4 % MD # % 2 A
4 % -M * ) !. / 2(Sangeetha, 2014)
60 81 k %. % 4 * 'K -. %. * $ 2* ;!
(Hou, J., Wong, S. Y., Lo, H. H. & Ma, 2* ;! * B,
;! 4 , 8 3)@ 34. / 2H. S., 2013)
6 ) (GUYH) >. S( ( : + , .
- 1 ) <D + 2* 6 *
) ; +) @(
&
* -0 *0 8A %( $ 2%) % @(& 6 ) (GUUY)
(Babak et. al., 2008) %,\ # + 2 $ )
3( ;! 3) % $ 3 %$ %.
. * 6 *& 4 * J) ') * 8 4 - 2')
G]V < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

S ! 1 , ) * 'M

. # J)
- @(& $ ( ! ) MD )

) ) % D ; 9 % (U.UH)
($ ) =D - ; (* 6 ) 2 $
. A *
- @(& $ ( M ) MD )

) ) % 8 ; 9 * ( % (U.UH)
* ($ ) =D - ; (* 6 ) 2 $
MD ) (GUY`) -, % + 2 A
, . 0 =D % - * 6 * $ * % )
% @(& $ MD ) (GUYG) . F+
2* 6 ; * 3) ) ' ; * =D )
2 (,1 ) 8 % @(&
MD ) (Strelneks, 2003)

= 6 M ( 2 D 7 2 (M ) 2 A 2
% _ % _ 8( + * * ?(,
'3 - $ % @(& $ ) MD ) 2(GUYU)
$ MD .-0 8A ( =D - *3 $,
6 %. % 2 7 % :! 2*3 $, '3 -
2 ) A ) +1 %. %7 5 $ ٕ 2 $ < 6
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G][
<<
. 517 * . *& 8( * -$ - 8( 8) :
_ ) @ ( 6 ?,1 %. - 2 $ 6 *
(GUU] 21
- @(& $ ( M ) MD )

) ) % 8 2 ; 9 ( % (U.UH)
($ ) =D - ; (* 6 ) 2 $
B + @ K) 2 A *
8 % 2 $ * 6 - % MD / *
+ (Crocket et all, 2006) %,\ 2(GUYG) )
% @(&
6 ) 2(GUU`) _ =) *(
) A *
%M /7 $ )
.$ :( #$ 2* * 6
- @(& $ ( M ) MD )
) ) % 8 ; 9 4D % (U.UH)
($ ) =D - ; (* 6 ) 2 $
. A *
- @(& $ ( M ) MD )
% 8 ; 9 $ 4 ) % (U.UH)
- ; (* 6 ) 2 $ ) )
2(GUYZ ) _ + 2 A * ($ ) =D
+ #$ 2$ :( -
% 4 -
G]] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]
+ !. 2 $ 4 ) 2(GUYI)

+ 2* 4 % 2(GUYG) -K
2 (,1 * )7 = ) 4 2(GUY[) 6
.6 - B, 4 - 5 2(GUY]) * ) <D)
< <VîÞ^nÖ]<š†ËÖ]
% (U.UH) - @(& $ MD )
) 2 $ ) ) % 8 ; 9 8
(/7 ) - ; (* 6
-M * ) (Sangeetha., 2014) + , 2 A
- 1 ) <D + 2* ;! 4 %
% * (* ( x
) ) 8 @(&
8 09 ) (GUUY)
. $
* =D )
% (U.UH) - @(& $ MD )
MD ) 2 $ ) ; 9
% (U.UH) - @(& $ ( ! )
;) * 6 ) ; 9 * (
<D) + , A (/7 ) - (+
* , W %. *& W@ (GUY`) % *
4 =(. 2 - * ) * 6 - %
* , 8D, % 6 %. %
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZUU
<<
M * ) , 2 3

2GUYU 28 ) . > ( , =) 31
(Y[
- @(& $ ( M ) MD )
) ) % 8 ; 9 * ( % (U.UH)
- ; 2(* 6 ) 2 $
_ % _ 8( + 2 A (/7 )
- $ * @(& $ 6 ) 2(GUYU) %
W@ 1. 2=D :(
) ;
-0 8A (
( =D - *3 $, '3 - T & *&
* , # 4 + 2 $ <! * -0 8A
* J$ 23 8 D M %( A %. B
34 * ) 4 + 6 2)@ 3 %91
.
-$ 8 3 * . .
) 8D, %
% ) J$ % 8 23& * * )
. # 80 g J$ 8;1 % M =A
.(I]` :GUUV 2%. * %0 )
- @(& $ ( M ) MD )
) ) % 8 2 ; 9 ( % (U.UH)
(/7 ) - ; (* 6 ) 2 $
* ' : + 2 A
ZUY < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]
-0 /0 ( ) % ) MD ) 2(GUYH)
% MD * + * 2* 6 3 , *
. * 2 $ ) 8 )
$, % 8 8 % ) MD ) . !. / 2(GUYI)

2% %M =D - $ 2
3 %. / 2@(&
6 ) (Strelneks, 2003)
* 6 %. - 2 3((,
@ = 3) 2@ % ( -M ' (
$ % > ) % *& 8( 3 )
.@
(U.UH) - @(& $ ( M ) MD )
2 $ ) ) % 8 ; 9 4D %
(/7 ) - ; 2(* 6 )
3 4 (Napora., 2013) + 2 A
2* =) % . *A < A - * *
6 (Uguak, U. A., Elias, H., Uli, J. & Suandi, T., 2006)
.$ % * . % /7 - *
(U.UH) - @(& $ ( M ) MD )
) ) % 8 2 ; 9 $ 4 ) %
- ; (* 6 ) 2 $
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZUG

<<
%. (GUYZ) _ D. + 2 A (/7 )

6 ) (GUYG) -K + 2 - + $ 4 -
- + 2/ :( $ 4 - * @(&
$
+ # 2$ % $ 4 * %M /7 (GUYV)
(Franco * 2 $ 3 $ 4 % MD *
2 $ 3 'K * 09
$ 4 %. !. /et al., 2011)
$ 4 2 (,1 * )7 = ) B
% 6 ) (GUYV) 13 + , 2 )7 = )
% . : + , 2
) :( $ 4
*
% @(& $ 6 ) (GUYV)
.
6 - * -

< <VoÖ^nÖ]<š†ËÖ]
% 2(U.UH) - @(& $ MD )
2+ ; $ ) 2 ; 9 8
- @(& $ ( ! ) MD )
6 ) ; 9 8 % (U.UH)
. A *!, ($ ) =D - + ; *
% (U.UH) - @(& $ MD )
) 2 $ ) ) % 8 2 ; 9
*!, ($ ) =D - ; (* 6
ZUZ < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

# B, (GUYI) g % . : + , 2 A

.* 6 % *
- @(& $ ( M ) MD )
) ) % 8 2 ; 9 * ( % (U.UH)
($ ) =D - ; (* 6 ) 2 $
%K % %c * 6 4 % 2 A *!,
%& 2 % W 517 ! * 1 3 2%) %$ %
2 4 > % 6 * % 8 :) 8
2GUY` 2% * <D)) . 4 4 3. 23& 4 *
(HV FH`
% 2(U.UH) - @(& $ MD )
2+ ; $ ) ; 9 (
- @(& $ ( ! ) MD )
* 6 ) ; 9 4D % 2(U.UH)
. A *!, ($ ) =D - + ;
% (U.UH) - @(& $ MD )
) 2 $ ) ) % 8 2 ; 9 4D
*!, ($ ) =D - ; (* 6
. A
(U.UH) - @(& $ ( M ) MD )
) ) % 8 2 ; 9 $ 4 ) %
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZU`
<<
=D - ; (* 6 ) 2 $

:( % 8( : + 2 A *!, ($ )
.
$ * 6 * !, ) * (GUYV) * K
< <VÄe]†Ö]<š†ËÖ]
% (U.UH) - @(& $ MD )
) 2 $ ) ) % 8 2 ; 9 8
A !, (/7 ) - ; (* 6
=( 8M. $ 3 %$ (Baba et. al., 2008) %,\ # +
6 B 2 'K *& -T 33) . ;! + 8 3
31 %( 3 $ M $ 4 - 2* = !
2;! * % 5 $ %& 2 W@ *& J -T -$
.(G] 2GUUI 2) - ) . 8 , %
- @(& $ ( ! ) MD )

2 $ ) ; 9 % (U.UH)
- @(& $ ( M ) MD )
* 6 ) ; 9 % (U.UH)
. A !, (/7 ) - + ;
- @(& $ ( ! ) MD )
) ; 9 * ( % (U.UH)
- @(& $ ( M ) MD ) 2 $
ZUH < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

) 2 ; 9 * ( % (U.UH)

. A !, (/7 ) - + ; * 6
% (U.UH) - @(& $ MD )
) 2 $ ) ) % 8 2 ; 9 (
!, (/7 ) - ; 2(* 6
. A
% (U.UH) - @(& $ MD )
) 2 $ ) ) % 8 2 ; 9 4D
!, (/7 ) - ; 2(* 6
. A
(U.UH) - @(& $ ( M ) MD )
) ) % 8 2 ; 9 $ 4 ) %
(/7 ) =D - ; (* 6 ) 2 $
$ 6 ) (GUYU) - + 2 A *!,
+ , 2 $ 4 * /7 :( /7 $ % @(&
. $ 4 (GUYI)
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZUI

<<
< <Äq]†¹]
< <íée†ÃÖ]<Äq]†¹]<Vğ÷æ_
@ ) ' $ (GUYG) . 28 & .Y
) = R =D % - '
W 2( ) 2 ) 2
.ÌH – `Y] 2G 5 2H
) 2$A . ) - $ 4 (GUYZ) -3 D. 2_ .G
.ZII – Z`Z 2GUH 5 21 % F ;
3 8 %M % (, :(GUUZ) . 2*>K .Z
.%A :1 % K 21 ٕ
* 0 - $ (GUY`) . 2 .`
* ) 5 -; <! * *
F % ) : ) 28(
.YU] – [] 2Y 5 2YH W 2
2G . ( 8(. (GUUY) . 26, .H
. 7 : )
, 3MD ) ' :(GUYG) # . 2 .I
%, % - * ) * 6 *3
) 2 2) 2 %

.
ZUV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

B * @M * W 0. 2(GUU[) % 8. 2*>K .V

8( * $
4 ) &
. ( -$ $D % - *
.3 ) 2 2'1 > J
D1 8 3 ' <$ (GUYG)% 8. 2*>K .[
% ' -$ =D % -
W 2 F 3 ) : ) 2 $
.GI[ – GUU 2]U 5 2GZ
. - $ - * 6 (GUY`) % 2 .]
) ) 2# ) *
%M %
) 2 /X

.GU[ – YVV 2H 5 2G W 2

4 $ % MD E$ (GUYI) 2_ .YU
- ) 8 B <! * $ $
7 ) : ) 2 ) =D
.G[I – GUZ 2H5 2 D7 %
- * 6 ) (GUY`) ) 2*M 6 % - .YY
* 2'
.GYV – YV] 2H`5 2= % 2

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZU[

<<
:= 2Z 2* ED ( .(GUUY) 2% K.YG

.'
* ) 3 * = W 0. (GUYY) !, 'K 2-31 .YZ
*A S) * 6 * ) <$
2 *
%,9 =D -
/ 3 2'1 > )
.' ) 2
( $ ) 8 B (Y]]I) :( 1 2-3 .Y`
"Z[" 2
) 2 2* 6
.= ( @3 :' 2'1
* 6 < , * * 17 (GUYV) % 2..YH

-0 /0 ( -
% ) : ) 2, .
Y 2Y5 2Y[W 2* / ' F )
.Y[ –
) ' % MD * E$ (Y]]I) 2*M.YI
. - ( ' / . ;!
2] 2
) 2= ( @3
.GU ?
ZU] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

/. ) . ) - $ 4 (GUY[) - =K 2- .YV
F '( ) : 7 '(
.``G – `Y[ 2Y5 2`ZW 2 7
.= :' 2* 6
(.) =K 21.Y[
!3 2G 2 ! (,1 (GUUG) =K 21 .Y]
.' : (
* 3MD * 6 3 (GUYH) ' 2*.GU
) ) 2 0 =D - !
F
1 % ) : )
.`H – YZ 2VY5 2
* 6 < MD $ 3 (GUU]) _ 21 .GY
2% ) : ) 2* )
.(G) 2(YU) )
) .* 6 ( 3 8 (Y]]G) 2*; .GG
.GZ 2= ( @3 :

2%M % :(GUUG) * 2'K .GZ
.%A 2% : 0
6 3MD 0 4 2(GUUV) % 2# .G`
/. ) 28( ) - *
.(Z) 2 2(I) ) 28( ) : A
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZYU

<<
; B 3MD $ .(GUUU) <D 2- 1 .GH

: ) . 0 =D -
.`` 2'( )
- $, 3MD $ .(GUUZ) ( 2 .GI
2'1 > ) .%) % %
. 3 2
1 % ) :'
- :K)c MD * 6 .(GUYH) S( ( 2 >..GV
7 ) 2" *" 0
* F %K D7 A ) :
.G[Z – GVY 2GV5 2 = R
3MD ;! (GUY`) <! 2% ..G[
= %( % - $ K)c
D7 ) 2 2) 2'K>
.('K>)
* # B, = ED (GUYI) % . 2* .G]
-0 =D - * 6 %
2 F . ) : ) 2* (
.YI` – YU] 2Z5 2ZGW
3 F 31 – 3(@(, %M :(GUU`) % 2% .ZU
.' :61 < K 23D1 F
.B : 'K .*3
(GUU`) 2%) .ZY
ZYY < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]
6 MD % * ) <$ (GUY`) D _ 2 K .ZG
T 2 2 ) =D % - *
2YH
2 1 1D
.ZG] – G[V 2`[5
2 00 2 ( * < M (GUUZ) = 2* .ZZ
.' :*
B 3MD A $ .(GUYU) 2*D, .Z`
z`[Y 2I 261 ) ) 2 - (,1
.HY`
- * 6 MD * $ * (GUY`) % 2-, .ZH
> ) 2 0 =D
.KK # ) 2 ' 2'1
$ 3MD ' <$ (GUYH) * % 1 2:1 .ZI
2( ) =D - *A 6 A
. 2( ) 2 2)
2 2% 6
% (GUY`) %, % _ 2*1 .ZV
2 1 1D T
.ZIY – ZG] 2Ì5 2YH
6 $ 3 % 8 A 81 MD (GUU`) .Z[

% - * ) *
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZYG

<<
8 * = / 2@ 0

. ) 2 2* 17 * ) )
.-
:
, 2 ( * (GUUV) * %0 2%..Z]
. 0
.' := 2%7 ( (GUY`) D 2*M .Ù
; B 3MD $ .(GUUY) ) <D 2- 1 .`Y
: ) . 0 =D -
.ZGH – G[I 2`` 2'( )
= :' 2Z 233) =. ' ;! (GUUZ) * 2 .`G
./
- * K 6 * $ .(GUYZ) ' * 2 .`Z
) 2 ) 2 : )
.`YFY 2YUG 5 2 M
- $ '< 3MD 4 .(GUY[) * 2-1 .``
* * / ) .* =D %
= { F
1 % ) 2
.G` – Y 2]E 2Y]5 2
D1 8 3 3MD $ (GUY`) 51 23 .`H
0 * % % @ -
.% 2 2) 2
ZYZ < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]
> )K - * 6 " (GUUU) 21.Ì

0 (,1 - MD )K
.VY ? 2Y 5 2YU 2 :' ."*
- $ MD 8 6M .(GUU]) => 2*,1 .`V
2J .@ ) =D % - S
. 2- . ) 2
' $ % 8 MD * (GUYG) 8 % 2) .`[
> ) 2 0 - )
.'K> 2 D7 ) 2 2'1
B . B, * 4 (GUYZ) % * 2+! .`]
) 2 ) =D % - * =@
2* 1 K F
1 % ) :* 17
.VH – Y 2Z` 5
B . B, * 4 .(GUYY) % * 2+! .HU
. ) =D % - * =@
.. ) 2 .:'1 > )
23 % % 1 =. :(GUUG) % * 2% ).HY
.% :
* ! * = .(GUYV) * 2.HG
@ , TASC * ) 6 * 1 W
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZY`

<<
4 8 M *

) 2TIMSS ,
2 %0 ' (`) 2
4 % MD .(GUY]) *K % 2 *)
.=!; % D $
- $ ) 3 (GUU]) _ 6 % T 2* .HZ
0 =D % % %M %
2 2'1 > ) 2') 4
.- . )
< <íéfßqù]<Äq]†¹]<V^⁄éÞ^m
54. Ali,M. k. Mwendwa, D. T. Sims, R. C. & Whitfield, K. E.

(2014). Th Association between Mindfulness,
Depressive Symptoms and Neuroticism in
Older African Americans. Depression &
Anxiety, 24. Retrieved February 13,2014from:
http://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/the-
association-between mindfulness-depressive-
symptoms-and-neuroticism-in-older- african-
americans-2167-1044-S1 -001 .php ?
aid=22561.
ZYH < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

55. Allen, N. B., Blashki, G. & Gullone, E. (2006). Mindfulness-

based psychotherapies: a review of conceptual
foundations. Empirical evidence and
practical considerations. The Australian
and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry,
40(4), 285- 294.
56. Allen, N. B., Blashki, G. & Gullone, E. (2006). Mindfulness-
based psychotherapies: a review of conceptual
foundations. Empirical evidence and
practical considerations. The Australian
and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry,
40(4), 285-294.
57. Appel, J. & Kim-Appel, D. (2009). Mindfulness: implications
for substance abuse and addiction, bit J
Mental Health Addiction, 7, 506-512.
58. Appel,J. & Kim-Appel, D. (2009). Mindfulness: implications
for substance abuse and addiction. Int J
Mental Health Addiction, 7, 506-512.
59. Arslan, G. (2017). Psychological maltreatment, forgiveness,
mindfulness, and internet addiction among
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZYI

<<
young adults: A study of mediation effect.

Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 57–66.
60. Babak, M, Froug, S, Behrooz. B & Hamid, A. (2008).
Perceived stress, self Efficacy and Its Relation
to Psychological well-Being Status IN
IRANIN Male high school students .Social and
Behavior Personality. Vol 36 (2). 257 - 266.
61. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., &
Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report
assessment methods to explore facets of
mindfulness. Assessment, 13,27-45.
62. Bandura, A. (2002). Determinates and Structural Relation of
personal efficacy to collective efficacy.
Applied psychology: An International
Review, 51 (1), 107 – 190.
63. Bowen, S,. Enkema, M. (2014). Relationship between
dispositional mindfulness and substance use:
Findings from a clinical sample. Addictive
Behaviors, 39(3), 532-537.
64. Brausch, B, D. (2011). The role of mindfulness in academic
stress, self- efficacy, and achievement in
ZYV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

college students .Unpublished Master, Eastern

Illinois University Charleston, IL.
65. Brausch, Brian D., (2011). The Role of Mindfulness in
Academic Stress, Self-Efficacy, and
Achievement in College Students. Masters
Theses. 147.
66. Browen, P. (2011). Teaching mindfulness to individuals with
schizophrenia, Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation, The University of Montana,
Missoula, MT.
67. Brown, A., Marquis, A.,& Guiffrida, D. (2013). Mindfulness-
Based Interventions in Counseling. Journal of
Counseling & Development, 91, 96-104.
68. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M. & Creswell, J. D. (2007).
Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and
evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological
Inquiry, 18(4), 211-237.
69. Brown, K.W., & Ryan, R.M. (2004). Perils and promise in
defining and measuring mindfulness:
observations from experience. Clinical
Psycholoy: Science and Practice, 11,242-284.
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZY[

<<
70. Cacciatore, J. & Flint, M. (2012). Attend: toward a

mindfulness- based bereavement car model.
Death Studies, 36(1), 61-82.
71. Charles, Leland (2010). Mindfulness, Self-Compassion, Self-
Efficacy, and Locus of Control: Examining
Relationships between Four Distinct but
Theoretically Related Concepts. Master's
thesis, Pacific University.
72. Crnic, K., Neece, C., McIntyre, L., Blacher, J.,& Baker, B.
(2017). Intellectual disability and
developmental risk: Promoting intervention to
improve child and family well-being. Child
Development, 88(2), 436-445.
73. Davis, .D. M. & Hayes, J. A. (2011). What are the benefits of
mindfulness? a practice review of
psychotherapy-related research.
Psychotherapy, 48(2), 198-208.
74. Deurr, M. (2008). The use of meditation and mindfulness
practice to support military care providers: a
prospectus. Report prepared to center for
ZY] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

contemplative mind in society Northampton,

MA.
75. Eklund, K., O’Malley, M., & Meyer, L. (2017). Gauging
mindfulness in children and youth: School-
based applications. Psychology in the
Schools, 54(1), 101-114.
76. Franco, C, Manas, I., Cangas, A. & Gallego, J. (2011).
Exploring the effects of a mindfulness
program for students of secondary school.
International Journal of Knowledge Society
Research, 2(1), 14-28.
77. Frank. Pajares (1998): Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic
Settings, Review of Educational Research, 66,
4, 542 - 578.
78. Gillham & Seligman, (1999). Positive Psychology, Positive
Prevention, and Positive Therapy. Martin E.
P. Seligman.
79. Graepel, J. (2015). Mindfulness Attributes as Predictors of
Treatment Outcomes in Children Who Stutter.
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZGU

<<
requirements for the degree of Master of

Science in Speech Language Pathology
Department of Communication Sciences &
Disorders College of Behavioral and
Community Sciences, University of South
Florida.
80. Grossman, P., & Van Dam, N.T. (2011). Mindfulness, by any
other name: trials and tribulations of sati in
western psychology and science.
Contemporary Buddhism, 12,219-239.
81. Groves, P. (2016). Mindfulness in psychiatry - where are we
now?. BJPsych Bulletin, 40, 289-292.
82. Guendelman, S., Medeiros, S., & Rampes, H. (2017).
Mindfulness and emotion regulation: Insights
from neurobiological, psychological, and
clinical studies. Frontiers in psychology,
8(220), 1-23.
83. Hadjlkakou,K;Nicolaou,N;Antonopoulou,K&Stampoltzis,
A.(2010). Psychological Adjustment And
Emotional Well- Being Of Hearing Siblings
Of Children Who Are Deaf Of Hard Or
ZGY < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]
Hearing In Cyprus. Deafness& Education

International, Vol.l2,No.4, PP. 180-203.
84. Harris, K. I. (2017). A Teacher’s journey to mindfulness:
Opportunities for joy, hope, and compassion.
Journal of Childhood Education, 93(2), 119-
127.
85. Hartigan, B. F. (2017). Mindfulness in Teacher Education: A
Constructivist Approach to Stress Reduction
for Teacher Candidates and Their Students.
Journal Childhood Education, 93(2), 153-158.
86. Hasker, S. M. (2010). Evaluation of the mindfulness-
acceptance-commitment (mac) approach for
enhancing athletic performance. Unpublished
Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University of
Pennsylvania.
87. Hassed, C. (2016). Mindful learning: Why attention matters in
education. International Journal of School &
Educational Psychology. 4(1), 52-60.
88. He, J. & Freeman, L. (2010). Are men more Technology-
Oriented Than Woman? The role of gender on
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZGG

<<
the development of general computer self –

efficacy of college Students. Journal of
information systems education, 21 (2), 203-
212.
89. Hill , H. M.& Updegraff J. A. (2012).Mindfulnessandits
relationship toemotional regulation,
Emotion,12(1), 81-90.
90. Hou, J., Wong, S. Y., Lo, H. H. & Ma, H. S. (2013). Validation
of a Chinese Version of the Five Facet
Mindfulness Questionnaire in Hong Kongand
Development of a Short Form. Assessment,
published online Apr 16, retrieved November
14, 2013 from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/235962
71.
91. Hourston, S., & Atchley, R. (2017). Autism and Mind–Body
Therapies: A Systematic Review. The Journal
of Alternative and Complementary Medicine,
23(5), 331-339.
ZGZ < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

92. http://web3.untedu/honors/eaglefeather/w
content/2010/08/Kettler-Kristen-072910-
FINAL.pdf
93. Kettler, K. M. (2013). Mindfulness and cardiovascular risk in
college students. Retrieved January 5, 2013

from:
94. Keye, M. D & Pidgeon, A. M .(2013). An Investigation of the
Relationship between Resilience,
Mindfulness, and Academic Self- Efficacy.
Open Journal of Social Sciences, 1(6), 1-4.
95. Keye, M. D & Pidgeon, A. M .(2013). An Investigation of the
Relationship between Resilience,
Mindfulness, and Academic Self- Efficacy.

Open Journal of Social Sciences, 1(6), 1-4.
96. Kong, F. Wang, X. & Zhao, J. (2014). Dispositional

mindfulness and life satisfaction: The role of
core self-evaluations. Personality and
Individual Differences, 56,165-169.
áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< ZG`
<ÐÊ]çjÖ]<ïçjŠÚæ<íéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ]<°e<íÎøÃ×Ö<îffŠÖ]<tƒçÛßÖ]
< <høŞÖ]<ï‚Ö<l]„Ö]<íé×Â^Êæ<îŠËßÖ]
< <íèçÞ^nÖ]<í×u†¹ê<D^⁄éµ+^Ò_<°ÎçËj¹]<'Ææ<°ÎçËj¹]E
‫
א‬.−** ‫
א‬.− *
‫ א‬.
***
< <ovfÖ]<“~×Ú

& '( "
% " $ # " !
) $ 122 ' "0 ./ , - , + )*
# " ! # 3 , - , $
. 9 7 08 ) 6 5 - 4
* , + 4(
"0 "0 ./ , -
9

: $ , - 9- 7 08
# @
(1×1×=) 6 9 ;
' "(
$

(F /
') D
C 9' &7 0 9
4B A '

)$ # / 9# " (!"
% /!" ) '6
. 4
:# .7 "H'
.4 *
.3 * J
' J " 0 , # ( **
.3 * J
' J 0 -
, # ( ***
p^ù]<l^’~×Ú<<<<<<<<<< << << << << << <<íée†ÃÖ]<íéeÖ]<ØfÏjŠÚ<í×¥
(#
" 6 ' *
) * # A :(
# ( '6 M ) $ )$ " " !

C O : ( &N( .7
H . 4
C L2,TK) '6 (F S PR,P=

' PK,RK) ' 3*
M # *
*
H (!" =2T,K= "
. 3 # *
'
4B A ' , A U . '6

C *
C 9# " &7 0 V
4B &N( A '
.(2,2R) 6 # 3 # A
H
4B '6
áæ†ÃÖ]æ<Œ
^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<<<<<<<< KLL
The Causal of the
Relationship Between
Mindfulness, Adjustment
Psychosocial Level, and Self-
Efficacy Among Studients
(Outstatanding and Not
Academically Excellent) In
the Secondary Stage
Randa Mahmoud Juma * - Dr. Sahar Mansour Al-Qatawi**
Dr. Ahmed Said Zidan***
Abstract:
The current study aimed to study the causal model of the
relationship between mental alertness and the level of psychological
compatibility and self-efficacy among students(outstanding and not
academically excellent) students in South Sinai Governorate. The
descriptive approach was used and the sample consisted of 200 male
and female students. A measure of mental alertness, self-efficacy and
* Researcher.
** Acting Head of Psychology Department – Faculty of Education –
University of Suez.
***
Acting Head of Psychology Department – Faculty of Education –
University of Suez.
Abstracts Future of Arab Education
psychological compatibility was used by the researcher and has been

used Some statistical methods for analysis
Using analytical and comparative descriptive method during

the statistical treatment through the use of arithmetic averages,
standard deviations, the Pearson correlation coefficient, the Alpha
Cronbach equation, and the mono-variance analysis (1 x 2 x 2) to see
if there is a statistically significant effect of each type variable (male /
Female) and academic level (outstanding and not academically
excellent) and their interaction on mental alertness of secondary
school students
Results of the Study:
The results of the present study revealed that: There is a

positive correlation between mental alertness (total score and sub-
dimensions) and psychological compatibility and self-efficacy among
male and female students (academic excellence) at the secondary
level. The results also indicate that the arithmetic averages in mental
alertness according to gender variables were ( 84.54 for males, 85.81
for females), and academic level were (60.94 for non-excelling,
109.41 for excelling), indicating a high level of mental alertness for
academic excellence. However, there was no significant effect of
gender on the mental alertness scale. There was also a statistically
١٧ Volume 26
Abstracts Future of Arab Education
significant effect of the interaction of gender and academic variables

in their combined effect on the mental alertness scale at the
significance level (0.05).
Volume 25 ١٨
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

النموذج السببي للعلاقة بين اليقظة الذهنية ومستوى التوافق النفسي وفاعلية الذات لدى (الطلاب المتفوقين وغير المتفوقين أكاديميا) بالمرحلة الثانوية

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

النموذج السببي للعلاقة بين اليقظة الذهنية ومستوى التوافق النفسي وفاعلية الذات لدى (الطلاب المتفوقين وغير المتفوقين أكاديميا) بالمرحلة الثانوية

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

‫]‪<ÐÊ]çjÖ]<ïçjŠÚæ<íéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ]<°e<íÎøÃ×Ö<îffŠÖ]<tƒçÛßÖ‬‬

%   9 8 ,R B  2  (   * 6  .

2(Eland St. Charles, 2010) "%) 1."   W@ 1. % *

- ' . % 2 $   * 6    $ 4 0  4 

GHV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

  #$ 2 (Kong, Wang, & Zhao, 2014)   *  ' %

 $   B , *& (GUYZ) " 8 "   W@ 1. /

=D B %. 4  0 

GH] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

* 6    $ 4 % 8 % * E$ <   & % 1 FG

< < VovfÖ]<æ‚u

$& .J   *   2%3  %! 3 . *  $ 4 "#" 

34 *  , *  3 9  $ 4 "

* ? 'K T + %  3 . * "_  " 3 % *

8 J   *  %  3 9 :  $ 4  %. 0 %

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GIU

2  @ +   %K  % 5  . * * 6  

* * %K  %   9 :@

(Self – Efficacy) l]„Ö]<íéÖ^ÃÊ IO

M *   'M" 3 . *  $   :%,\ -)"  

& Maghsoodi, H., 2015 92)

GIY < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

)  2 % '( A ) 3 9 : $   0 

(Student Exceling Academically) ÑçË{{jÖ] IP

% * 8( -$ =  9 :

Gullone, 2006, 288)

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GIG

  * N      / B * 3  

(Vago & Silbersweig, 2012) ï‚Ö íéßâ„Ö]<í¿ÏéÖ]<l^ÞçÓÚ

GIZ < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

Intention and Motivation: 

.  $ , 4 D )  $; 4  3 ( %

Attention regulation:  

Emotion Regulation:   

8D, %     4   . * ( * ) =. 

Improving Social cognition:    

Non- attachment and non-de- centering: #$   !"   

 %! 25! F  $ @ 0   2 $ *   * 

* ,  $ 4 *   D, %. *& Mace 1. M

2' ') % 2  ;! B  . B , *&  $ 4 -T

Choy, & Lam, 2011, 165-166)

GIH < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GII

.  ') 6 <1A * 4 * ' *   $ 4 2-,. '

GIV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

2006, 379 – 380).

.  +  % K : %1 %! 3  :6  %. *& * 1

< < ÐÊ]çjÖ]<“ñ^’}

6  %. 2   (,1 J  % c 4 % %. *    %

< <VíéÚ^ßè<íé×ÛÂ<ÐÊ]çjÖ] <IN

GI] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

< <Víéñ^Ïi…]<íé×ÛÂ<ÐÊ]çjÖ] <IO

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GVU

(School of Psychoanalysis: íè‚é×ÏjÖ]E îŠËßÖ]<Øé×vjÖ]<í‰…‚Ú +

GVY < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

< <Vì‚è‚¢]<îŠËßÖ]<Øé×vjÖ]<í‰…‚Ú <IN

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GVG

 *  'M  . * 6  *& 4  * J) %& 8 %

  " *  $   %a (Bandura, 1986, 193)    

 . %!  $   . %. He & Freeman "% *" -

:* 3   $   ; . 0D0 "  " 

3& %  A 2 31 M  *&   M 8 * 

3  / % 2 1 A ) 8D, %   %. "  " T

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GV`

% 9 8 ,R B 2 ( * 6 .

2(Eland St. Charles, 2010) "%) 1." W@ 1. % *

- ' . % 2 $ * 6 $ 4 0 4

GHV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

#$ 2 (Kong, Wang, & Zhao, 2014) * ' %

$ B, *& (GUYZ) " 8 " W@ 1. /

=D B %. 4 0

GH] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

6 $ 4 % 8 % E$ < & % 1 FG

< < VovfÖ]<æ‚u

$& .J * 2%3 %! 3. * $ 4 "#"

34 , 39 $ 4 "

? 'K T + % 3. "_ " 3 % *

8 J * % 39 : $ 4 %. 0 %

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GIU

2 @ + %K % 5 . 6

%K % 9 :@

M 'M" 3. $ :%,\ -)"

GIY < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

) 2 % '( A ) 39 : $ 0

% * 8( -$ = 9 :

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GIG

N / B 3

GIZ < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

Intention and Motivation:

. $ , 4D ) $; 4 3( %

Attention regulation:

Emotion Regulation:

8D, % 4 . ( ) =.

Improving Social cognition:

Non- attachment and non-de- centering: #$ !"

%! 25! F $ @0 2 $ * *

, $ 4 D, %. *& Mace 1. M

2' ') % 2 ;! B . B, *& $ 4 -T

GIH < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GII

. ') 6 <1A 4 ' * $ 4 2-,. '

GIV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

. + % K : %1 %! 3 :6 %. & 1

6 %. 2 (,1 J %c 4 % %. * %

< <VíéÚ^ßè<íé×ÛÂ<ÐÊ]çjÖ] <IN

GI] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GVU

GVY < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GVG

'M . 6 & 4 J) %& 8 %

" * $ %a (Bandura, 1986, 193)

. %! $ . %. He & Freeman "% *" -

:* 3 $ ; . 0D0 " "

3& % A 2 31 M & M 8

3 / % 2 1A ) 8D, % %. " " T

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GV`

', <! $ 'M %. & Bandura " " 1.

GVH < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< GVI

GVV < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

(Napora., 2013) IP

GV] < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G[U

G[Y < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G[G

) ' $ 2 % MD :

:*R / B 0 >( 0 %

$ * 6 % 8 $ 4 % MD ) FY

G[Z < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

$ 2* 6 % 8 $ 4 % MD ) FG

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G[`

./7 $ % -

(YUU) =% /7 (YUU) =% $

G[H < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

%((, % (YU) * ) A (

.M # :! * 2 !;

?@(, = *

G[V < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

% ' 8 % D +) %. 8) % :! /

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G]U

= 2*0D0

G]Y < <áæ† ÃÖ]æ<<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]

. 8 = ( @K) = 6 %

áæ† ÃÖ]æ<Œ^ŠÖ]<‚×]<<< G]G