Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Parvez Akter, Nadia Mei Lin Tan, Saad Mekhilef & Hirofumi Akagi (2015): Model Predictive Control
of Bidirectional Isolated DC-DC Converter for Energy Conversion System, International Journal of Electronics, DOI:
10.1080/00207217.2015.1028479
Disclaimer: This is a version of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service
to authors and researchers we are providing this version of the accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting,
typesetting, and review of the resulting proof will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication
of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could
affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to this version also.
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained
in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of
the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied
upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall
not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other
liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or
arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/00207217.2015.1028479
Model Predictive Control of Bidirectional Isolated DC-DC Converter
for Energy Conversion System
t
ip
Corresponding author:
r
Parvez Akter
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u
an
E-mail: suzon_cuet06@yahoo.com
Co-authors:
d
Saad Mekhilef
c
Senior Member, IEEE, Power Electronics and Renewable Energy Research Laboratory
Ac
Hirofumi Akagi
t
ip
compared with the references to calculate the cost function. The switching state
that minimizes the cost function is selected for firing the converter in the next
r
sampling time period. The proposed MPC controlled bidirectional DC-DC
sc
converter is simulated with Matlab/Simulink and further verified with a 2.5 kW
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u
that the proposed MPC algorithm of the DC-DC converter reduces reactive
power by avoiding the phase-shift between primary and secondary sides of the
an
high frequency transformer and allow power transfer with unity-power-factor.
Finally, an efficiency comparison is performed between the MPC and dual-
M
phase-shift based PWM controlled DC-DC converter which ensures the
effectiveness of the MPC controller.
Keywords: Predictive control; bidirectional DC-DC converter; unity power
d
1. Introduction
ep
system. Hence, the control algorithm of this DC-DC converter needs to be immensely
Ac
effective, as it consist of two conversion stages (single phase inverter and rectifier)
along with an isolated high frequency transformer (Zhao, Song, Liu, & Sun, 2014).
Several improved control techniques, such as fuzzy-neural control (Cheng, Hsu, Lin,
Lee, & Li, 2007), hysteresis control (Leung & Chung, 2005), sliding-mode control
(Cheng et al., 2007; Tsai & Chen, 2007), have been investigated in power electronic
systems to control power converters. The practical applications of these control methods
are confined to simple configured boost, buck, half-bridge, and full-bridge
unidirectional converters topologies till today. Nevertheless, these controls are aimed to
control more complex-configured converters topologies (Bai & Mi, 2008a; Rivetta,
t
ip
isolation, high power density and low system parasitic sensitivity as has been
investigated in (Bai & Mi, 2008b), (N. M. Tan, T. Abe, & H. Akagi, 2012) and
r
sc
(Naayagi, Forsyth, & Shuttleworth, 2012). A traditional PI-based phase-shift control has
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u
(DeDoncker, Kheraluwala, & Divan, 1991). This method of control has a simple
an
structure and is very easy to implement. Moreover, a phase-shift modulation control has
been applied for high power transfer in (Kheraluwala, Gascoigne, Divan, & Baumann,
M
1992) and (Tan, Inoue, Kobayashi, & Akagi, 2008). The major drawbacks of this phase-
shift modulation control are reactive power losses and existence of dead-time effect.
d
te
performance of the system. In order to achieve a higher converter efficiency and expand
ep
algorithm has been applied in (Xu, Zhao, & Fan, 2004) and the effectiveness is verified
c
for soft-switching in (Lee, Ko, & Chi, 2010) and (Xiao & Xie, 2008). On the other
Ac
reactive power in isolated bidirectional full-bridge DC-DC converter (Bai & Mi,
(Bai, Nie, & Mi, 2010) to improve dynamic performance of the converter. Furthermore,
and large extent, separately. There is a trade-off between transient response and
computer aided optimization of DC-DC converter have been carried out by using two
PWM controller integrated circuits (ICs) in (Neugebauer & Perreault, 2003) and
t
ip
The principle feature of MPC scheme is to predict the future behavior of control
variables. This control algorithm has become the most attractive mode of technique to
r
sc
control the bidirectional DC-DC converter comparing with all the classical control
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
techniques discussed above due to its simple and intuitive concept with fast dynamic
u
responses (Cortes, Kazmierkowski, Kennel, Quevedo, & Rodríguez, 2008; Rodriguez et
an
al., 2013). Moreover model predictive control algorithm is easy to configure with
constraints and non-linearity and also very easy for practical implementation. The fast
M
and powerful microprocessors are available today to implement the predictive control
algorithm very easily as it requires higher number of calculations compared with all the
d
te
classical controls stated in (Cortes et al., 2008; Muslem Uddin, Mekhilef, Rivera, &
Rodriguez, 2013). So, the application of model predictive control algorithm in power
ep
converter is increasing day by day. Till to date, this algorithm is proposed for a DC-DC
buck converter (Bibian & Jin, 2002), (Geyer, Papafotiou, & Morari, 2008), boost
c
converter (Bibian & Jin, 2001) and buck-boost converter (Chen, Prodic, Erickson, &
Ac
Maksimovic, 2003). The authors of (Xie, Ghaemi, Sun, & Freudenberg, 2012) proposed
model predictive control for full bridge DC-DC converter. However, this model is
limited only for unidirectional power flow. Although model predictive algorithm is an
efficient and attractive alternative for controlling the power converters, it has not been
Bridge 1 Bridge 2
t
Figure 1. Energy conversion system based on the bidirectional isolated DC-DC
ip
converter (N. M. L. Tan, T. Abe, & H. Akagi, 2012).
r
sc
This paper proposes a MPC algorithm and its application for a bidirectional
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
isolated full-bridge DC-DC converter and is organized in the following manner. The
u
system configuration and working principle of energy conversion system topology are
an
elaborately described in section 2. The formulation of MPC method with discrete time
model, the cost function used for selection of switching state and a detailed explanation
M
of control scheme and algorithm are mentioned in section 3. The efficiency and
tested with Matlab/Simulink and the simulation results are analyzed in section 4.
te
Therefore, the DC-DC converter is further verified with a 2.50 kW experimental set-up,
ep
Figure 1 shows the energy conversion system topology, which bi-directionally converts
the AC power from three-phase AC-grid to low voltage DC bus and is configured with a
three phase bidirectional PWM controlled AC-DC converter and a bidirectional full-
bridge isolated DC-DC converter. The energy conversion system in Figure 1 is similar
to that in (N. M. Tan et al., 2012) because this paper intends to improve the efficiency
and performance of the bidirectional isolated DC-DC converter using MPC algorithm.
Power flow
IDC1 i1 i2 IDC2
Req Leq
Vdc1 DC-AC V1 V2 AC-DC Vdc2
Cdc1 Cdc2
Bridge 1 Bridge 2
t
ip
The bidirectional DC-DC converter consist of two symmetrical structured
r
converters denoted as bridge 1 and bridge 2, which are isolated with a high frequency
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
of the converter contains two IGBTs in series. A snubber capacitor is connected with
u
each of the IGBTs for minimizing the turn-off overvoltage and also achieves zero-
an
voltage switching. Again, bridge 2 is configured with four MOSFET switches (S 5 -S 8 ),
M
as it is operated in low voltage (60 V) condition. To minimize the switching loss, small
Model predictive control (MPC) algorithm is applied to control the power flow of
bidirectional isolated DC-DC converter. The working principle of MPC method is based
ep
on a finite number of possible switching states, which utilizes the discrete behaviour of
a static power converter. In the case of bidirectional isolated DC-DC converter, MPC
c
Ac
the equivalent inductance value of the transformer high side auxiliary inductance (L ah ),
low side auxiliary inductance (L al ) and leakage inductance (L leak ). For the selection of
the appropriate switching state to be applied to the converter, a selection criterion must
be defined with a cost function which measures the error between references and
predicted values. Finally, the state that minimizes the cost function is selected for the
t
0, S1 is off and S 2 is on
ip
1, S3 is on and S 4 is off
r
Sb = (2)
0, S3 is off and S 4 is on
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u
0, S5 is off and S6 is on
an
1, S7 is on and S8 is off
Sd = (4)
0, S7 is off and S8 is on
M
Hence, the switching function (S) for the bridges 1 and 2 of the DC-DC converter can
be expressed as:
d
Sbridge1 = S a − Sb (5)
te
and
ep
Sbridge 2 = Sc − S d (6)
The bidirectional DC-DC converter operates in two modes. First one is buck
c
mode, which allows power transfer from high voltage DC bus to low voltage DC bus.
Ac
During this buck mode of operation, bridge 1 of the bidirectional isolated DC-DC
frequency transformer while bridge 2 working as AC-DC rectifier. On the other hand, in
case of boost mode, power flows in opposite direction and bridge 2 of the DC-DC
S1 S3 Power flow S5 S7
iC2
6:1
a c
i1 Lah Lal i2
V1 Vdc2
Vdc1 V2 Cdc2
Cdc1
b d
4 kHz
S2 S4 Transformer S6 S8
Bridge 1 Bridge 2
t
Figure 3. Buck mode operation of DC-DC converter.
ip
2.1.1. Buck Mode Operation
r
Buck mode operation of DC-DC converter with MPC method is illustrated in Figure 3,
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
where bridge 1 of the DC-DC converter acts as an inverter and the equivalent
u
inductance L eq , resistance R eq and rest of the part of the circuit act as an equivalent load
an
for the inverter. By applying Kirchhoff’s voltage law at the AC side of inverter (bridge
mentioned in Fig. 3. V dc1 is the DC voltage at high voltage DC bus acting as supply
On the other hand, bridge 2 of the converter is working as a single phase voltage
mode controlled rectifier. The transformer secondary winding voltage (V 2 ) and current
c
Ac
(i 2 ) act as a source voltage and current for this rectifier. Therefore, the model voltage
equation of the rectifier can be obtained by using the Kirchhoff’s current law at the low
dVdc 2
Cdc 2 = i2 Sbridge 2 − I dc 2 (8)
dt
Where, C dc2 is the capacitance connected in parallel with low voltage DC bus; V dc2 and
I dc2 are the DC voltage and DC current respectively at the low voltage DC bus.
IDC1 Boost Mode of DC-DC Converter IDC2
S1 S3 Power flow S5 S7
iC2
6:1
a c
i1 Lah Lal i2
VDC1 V2 Vdc2
V1 CDC2
CDC1
b d
4 kHz
S2 S4 Transformer S6 S8
Bridge 1 Bridge 2
t
Figure 4. Boost mode operation of DC-DC converter.
ip
2.1.2. Boost Mode Operation
r
Figure 4 describes the boost mode operation of the DC-DC converter, in which the
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
energy is transferred from low voltage DC bus to high voltage DC bus. In this case,
u
bridge 2 of the DC-DC converter acts as inverter and bridge 1 as rectifier. Hence,
an
similar to the equations (7) and (8), model of the inverter and rectifier in boost mode
where, V dc2 is the DC voltage at low voltage DC bus acting as supply voltage for the
d
te
bridge 2.
dVdc1
Cdc1 = i1Sbridge1 − I dc1 (10)
ep
dt
where, C dc1 is the capacitance connected in parallel with high voltage DC bus; V dc1 and
c
I dc1 are the DC voltage and DC current respectively at the high voltage DC bus.
Ac
dynamic system of DC-DC converter for both buck and boost mode of operation
represented in equation (7)–(10) into discrete time model at a specific sampling time T s .
3.1 Discrete Time Model for Prediction Horizon
The discrete time model is used to predict the future values of currents and voltages in
the next sampling interval (k+1), from the measured currents and voltages at the kth
dx
sampling instant. The system model derivative from Euler approximation can be
dt
expressed as:
t
dx x(k + 1) − x(k )
ip
≈ (11)
dt Ts
r
Using the above approximation, the discrete time model of predictive currents and
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
voltages for the next (k+1) sampling instant of the bidirectional full-bridge DC-DC
u
converter in buck and boost mode can be derived. an
3.1.1. Buck Mode
During the buck mode operation of the system, bridge 1 of the DC-DC converter is
M
working as inverter and it is controlled in current mode. On the other hand, bridge 2 is
controlled with voltage mode as it is working as a rectifier. Hence the discrete time
d
model of predictive currents at the next sampling instant (k+1) for the inverter (bridge
te
1) of the DC-DC converter can be evaluated from equation (7) and (11) as:
ep
Ts
i1 (k + 1) = i1 (k ) + {Sbridge1Vdc1 (k ) − nV2 (k )} (12)
Leq
c
and the discrete time model of predictive voltage at the next sampling instant (k+1) for
Ac
the rectifier (bridge 2) can also be presented from equation (8) and (11) as follows:
Ts
Vdc 2 (k + 1) = Vdc 2 (k ) + {Sbridge 2i2 (k ) − I dc 2 (k )} (13)
Cdc 2
In boost mode operation, the DC-DC converter operates in reverse mode corresponding
to buck one. Therefore, bridge 1 of this converter works as rectifier and bridge 2 as
inverter. Then, discrete time model of predictive voltage and current for the inverter and
Ts
Vdc1 (k + 1) = Vdc1 (k ) + {Sbridge1i1 (k ) − I dc1 (k )} (14)
Cdc1
and
Ts V1 (k )
i2 (k + 1) = i2 (k ) + Sbridge 2Vdc 2 (k ) − (15)
Leq n
t
ip
3.2. Cost function:
r
sc
The main objective of model predictive control algorithm is to minimize the error with
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
fast dynamic response between the predicted and reference values of the discrete
u
variables. To achieve this objective, an appropriate cost function is defined with a
an
measurement of predicted input error. Hence, the cost function for inverter and rectifier
can be expressed with the absolute error between the predictive and reference values for
M
g i = i ref (k + 1) − i p (k + 1) (16)
d
te
and
ep
g r = V ref (k + 1) − V p (k + 1) (17)
where, g i and g r are the cost function for inverter and rectifier respectively. iref(k+1) and
c
ip(k+1) are the reference and predicted current for the inverter. On the other case,
Ac
Vref(k+1)and Vp(k+1)are the reference and predicted voltage for the rectifier.
Figure 5 shows the proposed control strategy of model predictive control (MPC)
algorithm. At first, the operating mode is selected depending on the direction of power
flow. During buck mode of operation, the input current i 1 (k) is measured and the future
value of this current i 1 (k+1) is predicted by using the discrete time equation (12) for
each one of four possible switching vector (S bridge1 ) of bridge 1 which is act as a
inverter. Simultaneously, for bridge 2, the present value of output voltage V dc2 (k) is
measured and the prediction of its future voltage V dc2 (k+1) is also generated for four
possible switching vector (S bridge2 ) by using the equation (13). These future currents and
voltages are compared with the reference current (bridge 1) and voltage (bridge 2) by
t
ip
utilizing the cost function equation (16) and (17). Finally, the switching states of bridge
1 and bridge 2, which minimizes the cost functions, are selected for the next interval.
r
sc
Similarly, in boost mode of operation, the future value of input current i 2 (k+1)
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
for bridge 2 and output voltage V dc1 (k+1) for bridge 1 is predicted by using the discrete
u
time equation (15) and (14). Hence, the optimizing switching sates are selected for
an
firing the switches by using cost function equation (16) and (17).
The amount of power transfer by the DC-DC converter is controlled with the
M
reference currents and voltages of the inverter and rectifier bridges respectively for both
buck and boost mode. In buck mode, the power transferred to the low voltage DC bus is
d
te
where, P dc2 is the transferred power by the converter. V dc2 and I dc2 are the DC voltage
ep
Low DC bus voltage (V dc2 ) is controlled precisely at the giving reference voltage (Vref)
c
Ac
for bridge 2, while an accurate value of current I dc2 is achieved by fixing an optimum
Similarly in boost mode, power transfer (P dc1 ) is also controlled with the
where, V dc1 and I dc1 are the DC voltage and DC current respectively at the high DC bus.
Idc1(k) i1(k) i2(k) Idc2(k)
AC
Supply 3-Phase
DC-AC AC-DC
3 PWM V1(k) V2(k) Vdc2(k)
Vdc1(k) Bridge 1 Bridge 2
Converter
4 kHz
Transformer
Sa Sb Sc Sd
Vdc1(k) Vdc2(k)
Predictive Model
t
Idc1(k) Idc2(k)
ip
i1(k) V1(k) V2(k) i2(k)
r
Figure 5. Proposed control scheme of MPC algorithm for the bidirectional isolated DC-
sc
DC converter.
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u
The control algorithm of model predictive control (MPC) is presented in Figure 6. The
an
whole predictive control process completes the following steps for selecting the
optimized switching state of the converter in the next sampling interval (k+1).
M
• The control algorithm starts with measuring and sampling the high DC bus
voltage V dc1 (k), current I dc1 (k); low DC bus voltage V dc2 (k), current I dc2 (k);
d
transformer high side voltage V 1 (k), current i 1 (k) and transformer low side
te
voltage V 2 (k) and current i 2 (k) for the kth sampling period.
ep
• Then the reference currents iref and reference voltages Vref for inverter and
rectifier are calculated and fixed up correspond with the amount of power flow.
c
V dc2 (k+1) and for boost mode of operation predicted currents i 2 (k+1), predicted
voltages V dc1 (k+1) are determined for each one of four (j = 4, where j denotes
• Then the cost functions of inverter (g i ) and rectifier (g r ) is calculated with the
selected for firing the converter in the next sampling time period (k+1).
Start
t
Initialization of Cost Function, gopt
ip
for j=1:4,
r
sc
Prediction of Currents and Voltages
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u No
an j≥4?
Yes
the feasibility of the proposed control algorithm. To verify the proposed method in
Ac
system, both the buck and boost mode operations have been investigated for 2.34 kW
and 1.91 kW power transfer respectively. The parameters shown in Table I, are used for
simulation in both buck and boost modes. In addition, the high frequency transformer
model parameters are given in Table II. Sampling time for the inverter bridge (T si ) and
t
Capacitance across low voltage DC bus C dc2 22 mF
ip
Auxiliary inductance at the high side of transformer L ah 5 µH
Auxiliary inductance at the low side of transformer L al 0.14 µH
r
IGBT internal resistance R on 1 mΩ
sc
Snubber capacitor across IGBTs C sh 10 nF
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u
Snubber capacitor across MOSFET C sl 141 nF
an
TABLE II
M
Simulation parameters of the 4 kHz transformer
Parameter Symbol Value
Nominal Power P 6.5 kW
d
In buck mode of operation, bridge1 operates as a voltage source inverter with current
mode control, hence current is precisely controlled during the operation of bridge 1. On
the other hand, bridge 2 works as a current source rectifier with voltage mode control
fed by the power from bridge 1. In this case, voltage is controlled precisely to the low
side transformer voltage. Due to the current mode and voltage mode control of the
bridge 1 and bridge 2 during the buck operation, some expected behaviours appears in
winding current (i 1 ) with the secondary winding current (i 2 ) and primary winding
t
ip
shows the value of primary winding current i 1 = 10 A (peak) and secondary winding
current i 2 = 60 A (peak), which exactly follow the high frequency transformer turn ratio
r
sc
of 6:1. Again, in the same mode, the high side primary winding voltage V 1 = 360 V and
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
low side secondary winding voltage is V 2 = 59.60 V, where a slight amount of voltage
u
is dropped across the equivalence inductance (L eq ), which is expected due to current
an
mode control of bridge 1.
modulation. In Figure 7, it shows the zero displacement angles between the primary
d
te
winding voltage (V 1 ) and current (i 1 ) and also appears to same zero phase-shift between
minimized and unity power factor is controlled in the power conversion through the
In the voltage mode control, low DC bus voltage is 60 V and current has a value
Ac
of 39.0 A throughout the simulation time except the transient period, which is consistent
u
an
Figure 7. Voltages and current waveforms for 2.34 kW power transfer at the buck mode
of operation; transformer (a) primary winding voltage, (b) secondary winding voltage,
M
Figure 8. Waveforms of (a) high DC bus voltage V dc1 and current I dc1 and (b) low DC
bus voltage V dc2 and current I dc2 , at buck mode operation for 2.34 kW power transfer.
4.2. Boost Mode Operation
current mode of control. Therefore, current is precisely controlled during the operation
of bridge 2. On the other hand, bridge 1 is operating as a current source rectifier with
voltage mode of control linked by the power from bridge 2 and voltage is controlled
precisely to the high side voltage of the transformer. Because of the current mode and
t
ip
voltage mode control of the bridge 2 and bridge 1 during the boost operation, the
r
sc
In current mode control, the relations of high frequency transformer primary
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
winding current (i 1 ) with the secondary winding current (i 2 ) and primary winding
u
voltage (V 1 ) with the secondary winding voltage (V 2 ) are presented in Figure 9. The
an
Figure 9 shows that the primary winding current i 1 = 75 A (peak) and secondary
winding current i 2 = 12.5 A (peak), which exactly follows the high frequency
M
transformer turn ratio of 6:1. Again, in the same mode, the high side voltage V 1 = 360 V
d
In voltage mode control, high bus DC voltage follows the transformer secondary
values around the 360 V. Figure 10 shows the DC current at the values of -5.29 A (
ep
negative sign denotes the opposite direction of power flow), in the whole simulation
Besides, similar to the buck operation, the boost operation also shows the unity
power factor control. In Figure 9, it shows the unity power factor between the primary
winding voltage (V 1 ) and current (i 1 ). It also maintains the same phenomena of zero
reactive power is minimized and unity power factor is maintained in the power
u
an
Figure 9. Voltages and current waveforms for 2.1 kW power transfer at the buck mode
M
of operation; transformer (a) secondary winding voltage, (b) primary winding voltage,
(c) secondary winding current and (d) primary winding current.
d
te
c ep
Ac
Figure 10. Waveforms of (a) low DC bus voltage V dc2 and current I dc2 and (b) high DC
bus voltage V dc1 and current I dc1 , at the boost mode operation for 1.6 kW power transfer.
t
ip
Figure 11. Experimental system of bidirectional DC-DC converter with MPC control.
r
5. Experimental Verification and Efficiency Comparison
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u
converter has been developed. The schematic layout of the experimental setup is
an
presented in Fig. 11. The parameters taken for experiment are provided in Table I.
During the experimentation, a portable DC voltage source [TDK-Lamda] was used for
M
voltage supply. INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER–IGBT, TO-247AC, 600V, 60A and
bidirectional isolated DC-DC converter is carried out by using the rapid prototyping and
ep
real-time interface system dSPACE with DS1104 control card which consist of Texas
Instruments TMS320F240 sub processor and the Power PC 603e/250 MHz main
c
The voltage is measured with differential probe [PINTEK DP-25] and the current with
secondary winding voltages and currents at the buck mode of operation. It shows the
value of primary winding voltage V 1 = 360 V and low side secondary winding voltage
t
ip
is V 2 = 60V. Again, the transformer primary winding current i 1 = 10 A (peak) and
r
sc
which ensures the minimization of reactive power.
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
In the voltage mode control, low DC bus output voltage is 60 V and current has
u
a value of 37.0 A throughout the experimental time except the transient period, which
an
ensures the stability of the proposed MPC method of bidirectional isolated DC-DC
Figure 12. Waveforms of the transformer primary and secondary winding voltages.
t
r ip
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
Figure 13. Waveforms of the transformer primary and secondary winding currents at the
buck mode of operation.
u
an
M
d
te
c ep
Ac
Figure 14. Waveforms of low DC bus voltage (V dc2 ) and current (I dc2 ), at buck mode.
secondary winding voltages and currents at the boost mode of operation. It shows the
value of primary winding voltage V 1 = 360 V and low side secondary winding voltage
t
r ip
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u
Figure 15. Waveforms of transformer primary & secondary side voltages at boost mode.
an
M
d
te
c ep
Ac
Figure 16. Waveforms of the transformer primary and secondary winding currents at the
boost mode of operation.
t
r ip
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
Figure 17. Output waveforms of high DC bus voltage (V dc1 ) and current (I dc1 ), at the
u
boost mode of operation.
an
In the voltage mode control, the high DC bus output voltage is 360 V and
current has a value of 5.0 A throughout the experimental time except the transient
M
period, which ensures the stability of the proposed MPC method of bidirectional
93
92
Converter Efficiency η [%]
ep
91
90 MPC Algorithm
c
89
Ac
88
Dual-Phase-Shift
87 Control
86
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Power transfer [kW]
Figure 18. Efficiency comparison between MPC and dual-phase-shift control method.
5.2. Efficiency Comparison
with FLUKE 1735 Power Logger. The accuracy of this power logger is ±0.2% of its full
scale. The efficiencies of the bidirectional DC-DC converter are measured in MPC
method against the power transfer ranges from 0.5 kW to 2.0 kW. In order to confirm
t
ip
converter are compared with dual-phase-shift controlled DC-DC converter (Bai & Mi,
2008a), presented in Fig. 18. The dual-phase-shift PWM control method is applied in
r
sc
the 2.0 kW bidirectional isolated high frequency linked DC-DC converter topology with
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
u
Although, MPC algorithm has variable switching frequency problem, the efficiencies
an
associated with the MPC control are higher compared to the dual-phase-shift based
PWM control method due to the elimination of reactive power and minimized DC
M
voltage ripple. From Fig. 18, it is clear that the maximum efficiency is achieved at 1.60
kW power transfer for both control methods, where the converter efficiency using MPC
d
te
method is 92.52 %, while the efficiency is 89.56% using dual-phase-shift based PWM
control method.
ep
6. Conclusions
Predictive control is a powerful control algorithm in the DC-DC power converters for
c
energy conversion system, which utilizes the discrete behaviour of the DC-DC
Ac
the proposed MPC algorithm in this investigation are zero phase shift between the
primary and secondary voltage of the transformer and unity power factor between the
primary voltage and primary current, also secondary voltage and secondary current,
hence minimizing the reactive power in the DC-DC converter. As a result, the
efficiency of the power improved up to 92.52%. The results associated with the
predictive algorithm in this investigation are very much encouraging and will continue
to play a strategic role in the improvement of modern high performance DC-DC power
converters in energy conversion system and will open a new prospect in the power
electronics research.
t
ip
References
Bai, H., & Mi, C. (2008a). Eliminate reactive power and increase system efficiency of isolated
r
bidirectional dual-active-bridge DC–DC converters using novel dual-phase-shift control. Power
Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, 23(6), 2905-2914.
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
Bai, H., & Mi, C. (2008b). Eliminate reactive power and increase system efficiency of isolated
bidirectional dual-active-bridge DC–DC converters using novel dual-phase-shift control. IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., 23(6), 2905-2914.
u
Bai, H., Nie, Z., & Mi, C. C. (2010). Experimental comparison of traditional phase-shift, dual-phase-shift,
an
and model-based control of isolated bidirectional dc–dc converters. IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., 25(6), 1444-1449.
Bibian, S., & Jin, H. (2001). Digital control with improved performance for boost power factor
M
correction circuits. Paper presented at the IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. (APEC), 2001.
Bibian, S., & Jin, H. (2002). High performance predictive dead-beat digital controller for DC power
supplies. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 17(3), 420-427.
d
Chen, J., Prodic, A., Erickson, R. W., & Maksimovic, D. (2003). Predictive digital current programmed
control. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 18(1), 411-419.
te
Cheng, K.-H., Hsu, C.-F., Lin, C.-M., Lee, T.-T., & Li, C. (2007). Fuzzy–neural sliding-mode control for
DC–DC converters using asymmetric Gaussian membership functions. IEEE Trans. Ind.
ep
Cortes, P., Kazmierkowski, M. P., Kennel, R. M., Quevedo, D. E., & Rodríguez, J. (2008). Predictive
control in power electronics and drives. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 55(12), 4312-4324.
c
De Breucker, S., Engelen, K., Tant, P., & Driesen, J. (2010). Adaptive control scheme for a practical
Ac
bidirectional DC-DC converter with a 80 kHz switching and a 10 kHz sampling frequency.
Paper presented at the IET Int. Conf. Power Electron., Machines and Drives (PEMD 2010),.
DeDoncker, R. W., Kheraluwala, M. H., & Divan, D. M. (1991). Power conversion apparatus for dc/dc
conversion using dual active bridges: Google Patents.
Garcia, O., Zumel, P., de Castro, A., & Cobos, A. (2006). Automotive DC-DC bidirectional converter
made with many interleaved buck stages. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 21(3), 578-586.
Geyer, T., Papafotiou, G., & Morari, M. (2008). Hybrid model predictive control of the step-down DC–
DC converter. IEEE Trans. Cont. Systems Tech., 16(6), 1112-1124.
Kheraluwala, M., Gascoigne, R. W., Divan, D. M., & Baumann, E. D. (1992). Performance
characterization of a high-power dual active bridge dc-to-dc converter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.,
28(6), 1294-1301.
Lee, Y.-S., Ko, Y.-P., & Chi, C.-A. (2010). Multiple output zero-current switching switched-capacitor
bidirectional dc–dc converter. International Journal of Electronics, 97(8), 957-971.
Leung, K. K.-S., & Chung, H. S.-H. (2005). Dynamic hysteresis band control of the buck converter with
fast transient response. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., 52(7), 398-402.
Muslem Uddin, S., Mekhilef, S., Rivera, M., & Rodriguez, J. (2013). A FCS-MPC of an induction motor
fed by indirect matrix converter with unity power factor control. Paper presented at the Industrial
Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), 2013 8th IEEE Conference on.
t
ip
Naayagi, R., Forsyth, A., & Shuttleworth, R. (2012). Bidirectional control of a dual active bridge DC–DC
converter for aerospace applications. IET Power Electronics, 5(7), 1104-1118.
Neugebauer, T. C., & Perreault, D. J. (2003). Computer-aided optimization of DC/DC converters for
r
automotive applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 18(3), 775-783.
sc
Downloaded by [University of Malaya] at 20:42 05 April 2015
Rivetta, C. H., Emadi, A., Williamson, G. A., Jayabalan, R., & Fahimi, B. (2006). Analysis and control of
a buck DC-DC converter operating with constant power load in sea and undersea vehicles.
Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, 42(2), 559-572.
u
Rodriguez, J., Kazmierkowski, M., Espinoza, J., Zanchetta, P., Abu-Rub, H., Young, H., & Rojas, C.
an
(2013). State of the Art of Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control in Power Electronics.
IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 9(2).
Tan, N. M., Abe, T., & Akagi, H. (2012). Optimal design of a high-efficiency bidirectional isolated DC-
M
DC converter across a wide range of power transfer. Paper presented at the IEEE Int. Conf.
Power and Energy (PECon), 2012.
Tan, N. M., Inoue, S., Kobayashi, A., & Akagi, H. (2008). Voltage Balancing of a 320-V, 12-F Electric
Double-Layer Capacitor Bank Combined With a 10-kW Bidirectional Isolated DC--DC
d
Tan, N. M. L., Abe, T., & Akagi, H. (2012). Design and performance of a bidirectional Isolated DC–DC
converter for a battery energy storage system. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 27(3), 1237-1248.
ep
Tsai, J.-F., & Chen, Y.-P. (2007). Sliding mode control and stability analysis of buck DC-DC converter.
International Journal of Electronics, 94(3), 209-222.
Xiao, H., & Xie, S. (2008). A ZVS bidirectional DC–DC converter with phase-shift plus PWM control
scheme. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 23(2), 813-823.
c
Xie, Y., Ghaemi, R., Sun, J., & Freudenberg, J. S. (2012). Model Predictive Control for a Full Bridge
Ac
Xu, D., Zhao, C., & Fan, H. (2004). A PWM plus phase-shift control bidirectional DC-DC converter.
IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 19(3), 666-675.
Zhao, B., Song, Q., Liu, W., & Sun, Y. (2014). Overview of Dual-Active-Bridge Isolated Bidirectional
DCDCConverter for High-Frequency-Link Power-ConversionSystem. IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., 29(8), 4091-4106.