MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: SOCRATES C. COMBO Name of Rater: EUSEBIO C. GARCIA

Position: TEACHER I Position: MASTER TEACHER II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SAN JOSE PILI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL – DIVISION OF CAMARINES SUR Date of Review: FEBRUARY 13, 2023
Rating Period: SEPTEMBER 2022 – JULY 2023

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of Tool (COT) rating sheets
Services and content within and or Inter-observer
Pedagogy across curriculum agreement forms done Efficiency
teaching areas. through on-site/ face-to-
face/ in-person classroom
observation. Timeliness

2. Used a range of 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality

teaching strategies Tool (COT) rating sheets
that enhance or Inter-observer
learner agreement forms done
through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
achievement in
literacy and face/ in-person classroom
numeracy skills. observation.

Timeliness
3. Applied a range 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheets
strategies to or Inter-observer
develop critical agreement forms done Efficiency
and creative through on-site/ face-to-
thinking, as well as face/ in-person classroom
observation. Timeliness
other higher-order
thinking skills.
 Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education Environment classroom structure Tool (COT) rating sheets
Services and Diversity to engage learners, or Inter-observer
of Learners individually or in agreement forms done
groups, in through on-site/ face-to-
meaningful face/ in-person classroom
exploration, observation. Efficiency
discovery and
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
Timeliness
5. Managed learner 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
behavior Tool (COT) rating sheets
constructively by or Inter-observer
applying positive agreement forms done
and non-violent through on-site/ face-to-
discipline to ensure face/ in-person classroom Efficiency
learning-focused observation
environments.

Timeliness
6. Used 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
differentiated, Tool (COT) rating sheets
developmentally or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
learning through on-site/ face-to-
experiences to face/ in-person classroom
address learners’ observation Efficiency
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.
Timeliness
 Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education and Planning managed and Tool (COT) rating sheets
Services implemented or Inter-observer
developmentally agreement forms done
sequenced through on-site/ face-to-
teaching and face/ in-person classroom
learning processes observation Efficiency
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts.
Timeliness
8. Participated in 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial LAC sessions/ FGDs/
discussions that meetings/ other collegial
use teacher and discussions
learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC
enrich teaching sessions/ FGDs/
practice. meetings/ other collegial
discussions on use of
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of
Efficiency
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Timeliness
practices following
participation from LAC
sessions/ FGDs/
meetings/ other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice, with
proofs of attendance
 4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
9. Selected, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
developed, Tool (COT) rating sheets
organized and used or Inter-observer
appropriate agreement forms done
teaching and through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
learning resources, face/ in-person classroom
including ICT, to observation.
address learning
goals. Timeliness

Weight
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education Assessment selected, organized Tool (COT) rating sheets
Services and and used or Inter-observer
Reporting diagnostic, agreement forms done
formative and through on-site/ face-to- Efficiency
summative face/ in-person classroom
assessment observation
strategies
consistent with Timeliness
curriculum
requirements.
11. Monitored and 7% Any one (1) of the Quality
evaluated learner following:
progress and
▪ Individual Learning
achievement using
learner attainment Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
data. ▪ Peer assessment data

▪ Sample of learners’
outputs with reflection/
self-assessment
 ▪ Progress charts/
anecdotal records
▪ Class/ e-class record/
Efficiency
grading sheets Timeliness
12. Communicated 7% Any one (1) of the Quality
promptly and clearly following:
Efficiency
the learners’ needs,
progress and ▪ A sample of corrected Timeliness
achievement to key test paper of a learner
stakeholders, in a learning area with
including parent’s or guardian’s
parents/guardians. signature and date of
receipt
▪ Minutes of meetings
with key stakeholders
(e.g. PTA, SGC, SPT,
CPC) with proof of
attendance
▪ Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes
meeting
▪ Communication with
key stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
▪ Anecdotal records
showing entries per
quarter
▪ Any equivalent ALS
form/ document that
highlights the objective
 (e.g. Individual
Learning
▪ Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
▪ Other documents
showing learners’
needs, progress and
achievement submitted
to other stakeholders
Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a 7% A reflection/ journal entry Quality
Education Growth and personal that highlights the
Services Professional philosophy of application of a learner-
Development teaching that is centered teaching
learner-centered. philosophy in the lesson Efficiency
plan or community work. Timeliness
14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the Quality
professional ICT Coordinator/ School
development goals Head/ Focal Person in
based on the charge of
Efficiency
Philippine e-SAT
Professional 2. IPCRF-DP
Standards for 3. Midyear Review Form
Teachers. (MRF) Timeliness
4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Phase II
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Educatio various related
n works/ activities ● Committee involvement Efficiency
Services that contribute to
● Involvement as module/ Timeliness
the teaching-
learning material writer/
learning process.
validator
● Involvement as a
resource person/
speaker/ learning
facilitator in the RO/
SDO/ school-initiated
TV/Radio-based
instruction
● Book or journal
authorship/ co-
authorship/
contributorship
● Advisorship/
coordinatorship/
chairpersonship
● Participation in
demonstration teaching
● Participation as
research presenter in a
forum/ conference
● Mentoring of pre-
service/ in-service
teachers
● Conducted research
within the rating period;
● Others (pls specify)
with annotation on how
it contributed to the
teaching-learning
process.

APPROVING AUTHORITY:
EUSEBIO C. GARCIA SOCRATES C. COMBO
MARIJANE B. MATUCAD, EdD
Rater Ratee Secondary School Principal - III