MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: GEFFREY A. BRABANTE Name of Rater: KAREN P. BALLESTEROS

Position: TEACHER 1 Position: MASTER TEACHER 2
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CAMARINES SUR Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023 (AUGUST 2022 – JUNE 2023)

Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied August 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of 2022 – Tool (COT) rating sheets or
Services and content within and June 2023 Inter-observer agreement
Pedagogy across curriculum forms done through on-site/
teaching areas. face-to-face/ in-person
classroom observation Efficiency

Timeliness
2. Used a range of August 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
teaching strategies 2022 – Tool (COT) rating sheets or
that enhance June 2023 Inter-observer agreement
learner forms done through on-site/
achievement in face-to-face/ in-person
classroom observation Efficiency
literacy and
numeracy skills.

Timeliness
3. Applied a range August 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
of teaching 2022 – Tool (COT) rating sheets or
strategies to June 2023 Inter-observer agreement
develop critical forms done through on-site/
face-to-face/ in-person Efficiency
and creative
thinking, as well as classroom observation
other higher order
 thinking skills. Timeliness

Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed August 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education Environmen classroom structure 2022 – Tool (COT) rating sheets or
Services t and to engage learners, June 2023 Inter-observer agreement
Diversity of individually or in forms done through on-site/
Learners groups, in face-to-face/ in-person
meaningful classroom observation
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency
hands-on activities
within a range of
physical learning
environments.
Timeliness
5. Managed learner August 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
behavior 2022 – Tool (COT) rating sheets or
constructively by June 2023 Inter-observer agreement
applying positive forms done through on-site/
and non-violent face-to-face/ in-person
discipline to ensure classroom observation
learning-focused Efficiency
environments.

Timeliness
6. Used August 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
differentiated, 2022 – Tool (COT) rating sheets or
developmentally June 2023 Inter-observer agreement
appropriate forms done through on-site/
learning face-to-face/ in-person
experiences to classroom observation
address learners’ Efficiency
gender, needs,
strengths, interests
and experiences.
Timeliness
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. 7. Planned, August 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education Curriculum managed and 2022 – Tool (COT) rating sheets or
Services and implemented June 2023 Inter-observer agreement
Planning developmentally forms done through on-site/
sequenced face-to-face/ in-person
teaching and classroom observation
learning processes Efficiency
to meet curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts.
Timeliness
8. Participated in August 7% 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial 2022 – LAC sessions/ FGDs/
discussions that June 2023 meetings/ other collegial
use teacher and discussions
learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC sessions/
enrich teaching FGDs/ meetings/ other
practice. collegial discussions on use
of teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching
practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Efficiency
practices following
participation from LAC Timeliness
sessions/ FGDs/ meetings/
other collegial discussions
that use teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching
practice, with proofs of
attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that highlights
the objective

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification

per KRA Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
 Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
Performance
Results
Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
9. Selected, August 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
developed, 2022 – Tool (COT) rating sheets or
organized and used June 2023 Inter-observer agreement
appropriate forms done through on-site/
teaching and face-to-face/ in-person Efficiency
learning resources, classroom observation
including ICT, to
address learning
goals. Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, August 7% 1. Classroom Observation Quality
Education Assessment selected, organized 2022 – Tool (COT) rating sheets or
Services and and used June 2023 Inter-observer agreement
Reporting diagnostic, forms done through on-site/
formative and face-to-face/ in-person Efficiency
summative classroom observation
assessment
strategies
consistent with Timeliness
curriculum
requirements.
11. Monitored and August 7% Any one (1) of the Quality
evaluated learner 2022 – following:
June 2023
▪
progress and
Individual Learning
achievement using
learner attainment Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
data. ▪ Peer assessment data

▪ Sample of learners’
outputs with reflection/
self-assessment
▪ Progress charts/
anecdotal records
▪ Class/ e-class record/ Efficiency
grading sheets
▪ Lesson plans showing
 index of mastery

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA Performance
Results
Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Timeliness
▪ Frequency of errors

▪ Any equivalent ALS form/

document that highlights
the objective (e.g.
Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
▪ Others (please specify
and provide annotation)

Basic 5. Personal 12. Communicated August 7% Any one (1) of the Quality
Education Growth and promptly and clearly 2022 – following:
Services Professional the learners’ needs, June 2023
Developmen progress and ▪ A sample of corrected
t achievement to key
stakeholders, test paper of a learner
including in a learning area with
parents/guardians. parent’s or guardian’s
signature and date of
receipt
▪ Minutes of meetings
with key stakeholders
(e.g. PTA, SGC, SPT,
CPC) with proof of
attendance
▪ Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
meeting
▪ Communication with
key stakeholders (e.g.
 parents/guardians, co-
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA Performance
Results
Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Efficiency
▪ Anecdotal records
showing entries per Timeliness
quarter
▪ Any equivalent ALS
form/ document that
highlights the
objective (e.g.
Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA),
ALS Assessment
Form 2)
▪ Other documents
showing learners’
needs, progress and
achievement
submitted to other
stakeholders

13. Applied a August 7% A reflection/ journal entry Quality

personal 2022 – that highlights the
philosophy of June 2023 application of a learner-
teaching that is centered teaching
learner-centered. philosophy in the lesson
plan or community work.

Efficiency

Timeliness
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
14. Set August 7% 15. Certification from Quality
professional 2022 the ICT
development goals Coordinator/
based on the School Head/
Efficiency
Philippine Focal Person in
Professional charge of
Standards for e-SAT
Teachers. 2. IPCRF-DP Timeliness
3. Midyear Review Form
(MRF)
4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Phase II

Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed August 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education various related 2022 –
Services works/ activities June 2023 ● Committee involvement
that contribute to
the teaching- ● Involvement as module/
learning process. learning material writer/
validator
● Involvement as a
resource person/
speaker/ learning
facilitator in the RO/
SDO/ school-initiated
TV/Radio-based Efficiency
instruction
● Book or journal
authorship/ co-
 authorship/
contributorship
● Advisorship/
coordinatorship/
chairpersonship
● Participation in
demonstration teaching

Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per KRA Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
● Participation as
Timeliness
research presenter
in a forum/
conference
● Mentoring of pre-
service/ in-service
teachers
● Conducted
research within the
rating period with
annotation on how
it contributed to the
teaching-learning
process.

GEFFREY A. BRABANTE KAREN P. BALLESTEROS

Rater Ratee Approving Authority