Lab No.

: 1146649 UHID : MR/23/017683

Patient Name : Miss. MANISHA GUPTA Req. Date & Time : 23-Jul-2023 11:31 AM
Age/Sex : 32.6 YRS Sex : Female Sample Collection : 24-Jul-2023 03:59 PM
OPD/IPD No. : OPD Reporting Date/Time : 25-Jul-2023 04:30 PM
Doctor : Dr. ST STEPHEN S HOSPITAL

CT SCAN
CT - WHOLE ABDOMEN WITH CONTRAST
STUDY PROTOCOL: SECTIONS OF APPROPRIATE THICKNESS WERE DONE AT ADEQUATE INTERVALS IN STATE OF ART MULTI DETECTOR CT SCANNER SO AS TO COVER THE
ENTIRE REGION FROM DIAPHRAGMATIC DOMES TO THE PUBIC SYMPHYSIS AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION OF NEGATIVE ORAL (MANNITOL) AND I.V. CONTRAST (NON-IONIC). FEW
PLAIN CUTS WERE ALSO OBTAINED THROUGH THE REGION OF INTEREST.

FINDINGS:

Liver is normal in size, shape with smooth contour and normal contrast enhancement. No focal mass lesion seen.
Intra hepatic biliary radicals are normal.

Hepatic veins, IVC, portal vein and splenoportal axis are patent.

Aorta and its mesenteric branches are patent.

Gall Bladder is distended. No mass or calcified calculus seen. (Many gall bladder calculi are radiolucent and cannot be
detected on CT scan hence and ultrasound correlation is advised to look for such radiolucent calculi, if clinically
suspected).

CBD is normal in course and caliber.

Spleen is normal in size, shape and attenuation. No focal or diffuse lesion seen.

Pancreas is normal in size and attenuation. No obvious calcifications seen. MPD is not dilated. Peripancreatic
planes are preserved with no abnormal fat stranding or collection noted.

Bilateral suprarenal glands are normal in size, shape and attenuation. No focal mass lesion seen.

Both Kidneys are normal in size, shape and attenuation. No calculus, mass lesion or hydronephrosis seen.

Urinary Bladder is normally distended. No obvious mass lesion or calculus seen.

Uterus is normal in size, shape and attenuation. No focal mass lesion is seen. (Advised: Ultrasound correlation of
pelvis).

Cervix is mildly bulky & hypoenhancing, measuring 36 mm in maximum AP diameter, however no differential
enhancing mass lesion is seen - likely cervicitis. (Advice: Pap smear correlation).

Both ovaries appear normal. No mass lesion is seen. (Advised: Ultrasound correlation of pelvis).

Note:- This report is not valid for medico-legal purpose. Please contact for any typographical errors at front desk within 7 days of receiving the report.
*These Tests are under NABL SCOPE

Page 1 of 2
Lab No. : 1146649 UHID : MR/23/017683
Patient Name : Miss. MANISHA GUPTA Req. Date & Time : 23-Jul-2023 11:31 AM
Age/Sex : 32.6 YRS Sex : Female Sample Collection : 24-Jul-2023 03:59 PM
OPD/IPD No. : OPD Reporting Date/Time : 25-Jul-2023 04:30 PM
Doctor : Dr. ST STEPHEN S HOSPITAL
Stomach, duodenum, rest of small and large bowel loops are normal. Ileocecal junction or caecum appear normal.

Subtle mucosal enhancing short segment thickening seen in distal descending colon & adjacent sigmoid colon
with maximum thickness 5.9 mm without significant luminal narrowing or proximal dilatation of bowel loops.

Appendix is fluid-filled, however no significant dilatation or periappendiceal fat stranding is seen.

No significant retroperitoneal or mesenteric lymphadenopathy noted.

Minimal free fluid is seen in pelvis.

Few lytic foci are seen diffusely scattered in lumbar vertebrae, however no significant bony erosion or
destruction is seen

Rest of visualized bones and joints are normal.

IMPRESSION: - CECT findings reveal:-

Subtle mucosal enhancing short segment thickening in distal descending colon & adjacent sigmoid colon
as described above - likely inflammatory.
Cervicitis as described above. (Advice: Pap smear correlation).
Few lytic foci in lumbar vertebrae as described above. (Advice: MRI L.S spine with hematological
evaluation for further characterization).
Other findings as described above.

Please correlate clinically.

vr

Disclaimer : This report is prepared on the basis of entire series of sequences and not the images provided. (A CD of entire series may be requested if
required). This is only a professional opinion based on interpretation of patient images and not the final diagnosis. The findings herein above must be
correlated with clinical profile and other investigations. In a case of any major discrepancy, please contact our centre immediately. Differences between
opinion based on CT findings and that of MRI is radiologically expected and accepted. Non-contrast scans have their own limitations, therefore, a contrast
based study is advised in case of a strong persistent clinical suspicion.

Note:- This report is not valid for medico-legal purpose. Please contact for any typographical errors at front desk within 7 days of receiving the report.
*These Tests are under NABL SCOPE

Page 2 of 2