Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This two-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized clinical trial design evaluated the risk of post-
Paper received 24 February 2023 operative bleeding in anticoagulated patients undergoing dental extraction treated with topical TXA in
Received in revised form comparison to collagen-gelatin sponge. Forty patients were randomly included in one of the study
5 May 2023
groups: (1) topical use of 4.8% TXA solution; and (2) resorbable hydrolyzed collagen-gelatin sponge
Accepted 25 June 2023
Available online 28 June 2023
applied to the surgical alveolus. Primary outcomes were postoperative bleeding episodes and secondary
outcomes were thromboembolic events and postoperative INR values. The relative risk (RR), the absolute
Handling Editor: Prof. Emeka Nkenke risk reduction (RAR) and the number needed to treat (NNT) were used as effect estimates and calculated
from the counting of bleeding episodes observed during the first postoperative week. The bleeding rate
Keywords: under the TXA treatment was 22.2%, while in the collagen-gelatin sponge group it was 45.7%, resulting in
Tranexamic acid a RR of 0.49 (95% CI 0.24e099; p ¼ 0.046), RAR 23.5% and NNT 4.3. TXA was more effective in reducing
Oral surgery bleeding in surgical sites located in the mandible (RR ¼ 0.10; 95% CI 0.01e0.71; p ¼ 0.021) and the
Bleeding posterior region (RR ¼ 0.39; 95% CI 0.18e0.84; p ¼ 0.016). Within the limitations of the study it seems
that topical TXA is more effective in controlling bleeding after tooth extractions in anticoagulated pa-
tients than collagen-gelatin sponge.
Clinical trial registration: RBR-83qw93.
© 2023 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights
reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2023.06.003
1010-5182/© 2023 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
~es de Melo et al.
S.J. de Abreu de Vasconcellos, R. Souza dos Santos Marques, E. Gomes Magalha Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398
analog that inhibits fibrinolysis by binding to plasminogen (Kim included. During each surgical procedure, only one dental unit was
et al., 2015). Therefore, this agent reduces bleeding by inhibiting extracted (Halfpenny et al., 2001).
the enzymatic degradation of fibrin blood clots by the serine pro- We excluded patients with blood dyscrasia or other pathology
tease plasmin (Draxler et al., 2021). There is evidence that the that interfered with blood clotting; smokers; diabetics; pregnant or
concentration of TXA in saliva after mouth rinsing in hemophilic lactating women; patients with a history of allergy to TXA or
patients undergoing oral surgery is sufficient to decrease the collagen-gelatin sponge; those using medications that could
amount of lysed fibrin and postoperative bleeding (Sindet- interact with medications used in this study; those using anti-
Pedersen et al., 1989; Borea et al., 1993; Sacco et al., 2007). platelet agents such as aspiring and clopidogrel; those with surgical
Despite the widespread use of TXA as a hemostatic agent in procedures with osteotomy of more than one alveolar bone wall;
various types of surgeries (Vasconcellos et al., 2018; Wong et al., and those with an INR above 4.0. Patients who did not return for re-
2021), there is a lack of evidence regarding its efficacy in anti- evaluation appointments, who did not respond to contact with the
coagulated patients undergoing oral surgery compared to other researcher, or who did not follow postoperative recommendations
hemostatic agents commonly used in clinical practice. In a recent were also excluded.
systematic review with meta-analysis, we showed that local he-
mostasis with absorbable hemostatic materials (gelatin sponge, 2.4. Sample size and randomization
fibrin glue or oxidized regenerated cellulose) was not more effec-
tive in preventing bleeding than TXA mouthwash in combination A sample size calculation was performed using the following
with gelatin sponge or oxidized regenerated cellulose. Unfortu- parameters: 80% power at a significance level of 5%; a reported 90%
nately, no studies have compared the efficacy of the topical appli- and 60% efficacy in reducing postoperative bleeding for TXA and
cation of TXA alone versus absorbable hemostatic materials collagen-gelatin sponge, respectively (Vasconcellos et al., 2017);
(Vasconcellos et al., 2017). Since TXA may be a better cost-effective and a 10% loss due to attrition. A total of 36 surgical sites were
option to minimize bleeding risks after minor oral surgeries, needed for each group. A block randomization sequence was
further studies are still necessary to support the superiority of TXA created using the Sealed Envelope Ltda program (www.sealedenve
over absorbable hemostatic materials. This study aimed to evaluate lope.com) to allocate treatment and ensure balance. Surgical sites
the risk of postoperative bleeding in anticoagulated patients un- were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to TXA or collagen-gelatin sponge.
dergoing dental extraction treated with topical TXA in comparison Allocations were made by the attending investigator using opaque
to collagen-gelatin sponge. envelopes.
2.1. Trial design Interventions were performed as follows: (1) TXA: intra-
operative irrigation to the surgical alveolus with 4.8% TXA (10 ml),
This study followed a two-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, suture and local compression for 30 min with TXA-soaked gauze,
randomized clinical trial design, in accordance with the Consoli- followed by mouthwash with the same solution (10 ml) for 2 min
dated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement recom- every 6h for seven days; (2) Collagen-gelatin sponge: intra-
mendations (Schulz et al., 2010). The trial was registered at the operative irrigation to the surgical alveolus with 0.9% saline solu-
Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC: RBR-83qw93), and the tion (10 ml), insertion of resorbable hydrolyzed collagen-gelatin
study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at sponge (Hemospon®; Maquira Indústria de Produtos Odon-
gicos SA - Maring
tolo a/PR, Brasil) in the alveolus, suture and local
the Federal University of Sergipe (UFS) (CAAE 60889416.
0.0000.5546). compression with dry gauze for 30 min, followed by mouthwash
with 0.9% saline solution (10 ml) for 2 min every 6h for seven days.
TXA and saline solution were delivered to patients in identical
2.2. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) packages and had the same color characteristics. Patients were
elements blinded to treatment assignment.
The patients underwent the surgical procedure by a single oral
The trial was based on the following PICO elements: surgeon with 10 years of experience (S.J.A.V.). All patients received
authorization from the assistant cardiologist to undergo the sur-
Population (P): individuals over 18 years old using oral antico- gical procedure while using oral anticoagulants. The procedures
agulants (vitamin K dependent antagonists) and submitted to were performed under local anesthesia without pharmacological
tooth extraction; sedation, and the doses of oral anticoagulants were not suspended
Intervention (I): topical use of 4.8% TXA solution; or modified. In cases where antibiotic prophylaxis was necessary,
Comparison (C): resorbable hydrolyzed collagen-gelatin sponge the American Heart Association protocol was used (https://www.
applied to the surgical alveolus; heart.org/-/media/files/health-topics/infective-endocarditis/infecti
Outcome (O): postoperative bleeding episodes as the primary ve-endocarditis-wallet-card.pdf). Blood pressure and heart rate
outcome, and thromboembolic events and postoperative inter- were measured prior to all interventions. In all cases, sutures were
national normalized ratio (INR) values as secondary outcomes. performed on the surgical wound with 4e0 nylon (Shalon®; Fios
Cirúrgicos LTDA, Goia ^nia/GO, Brasil). The procedure time was
measured with a chronometer, beginning from the first incision for
2.3. Participants gingival detachment until complete suture. Depending on the
group to which the patient was allocated, hemostasis was achieved
The sample consisted of patients recruited from the School of by local compression with TXA-soaked gauze in the TXA group and
Dentistry at the Federal University of Sergipe and the Center for by compression with a dry gauze in the collagen-gelatin sponge
Dental Specialties, Sergipe state, Brazil. Patients using oral antico- group, as per the randomization protocol.
agulants who required extraction of at least one tooth and who had After the surgical procedure, analgesic medication was pre-
an INR between 1.5 and 4.0 on the day before the procedure were scribed (dipyrone 500 mg every 6 h for 2 days, or dexamethasone
394
~es de Melo et al.
S.J. de Abreu de Vasconcellos, R. Souza dos Santos Marques, E. Gomes Magalha Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398
Table 1
General characteristics of the study sample.
Variables Sample (%) Tranexamic acid (n ¼ 36) Collagen-gelatin sponge (n ¼ 35) p-value
Gender
Male 23 (32.4%) 16 (44.4%) 7 (20.0%) 0.052
Female 48 (67.6%) 20 (55.6%) 28 (80.0%)
Age (years) ¥ 48.0 (35.0e64.3) 48.0 (35.0e60.5) 48.5 (35.0e64.5) 0.908
Race/ethnicity
Brown 21 (29.6%) 10 (27.8%) 12 (34.3%)
White 23 (32.4%) 14 (38.9%) 9 (25.7%) 0.494
Black 27 (38.0%) 12 (33.3%) 14 (40.0%)
Education
Primary school 42 (59.2%) 25 (69.4%) 17 (48.6%)
High school 26 (36.6%) 10 (27.8%) 16 (45.7%) 0.199
Higher education 3 (4.2%) 1 (2.8%) 2 (5.7%)
Reason for the use of anticoagulant therapy
Cardiac arrhythmia 20 (28.2%) 12 (33.3%) 8 (22.9%)
Stroke 18 (25.4%) 9 (25.5%) 9 (25.7%)
Cardiac valvopathy 15 (21.1%) 9 (25.5%) 6 (17.1%) 0.479
Pulmonary hypertension 7 (9.9%) 2 (5.6%) 5 (14.3%)
Others 11 (15.4%) 4 (27.7%) 7 (20.0%)
Anticoagulant therapy
Warfarin 72 (100%) 36 (100.0%) 35 (100.0%) 1.000
SBP (mm/Hg) ¥ 120.0 (110.0e133.3) 120.0 (110.0e130.8) 120.0 (111.5e136.5) 0.853
DBP (mmHg) ¥ 79.0 (70.0e89.3) 75.5 (70.0e90.0) 80.0 (70.0e84.3) 0.937
HR (bpm) ¥ 80.0 (70.0e85.0) 80.0 (71.5e85.0) 75.0 (80.0e85.0) 0.353
PT (sec) ¥ 27.9 (22.6e29.3) 27.9 (22.6e33.2) 27.1 (20.0e28.4) 0.180
PTTa (sec) ¥ 38.7 (34.6e42.6) 39.8 (35.0e42.8) 37.5 (34.4e40.3) 0.342
¥
INR 2.4 (2.2e2.9) 2.4 (2.0e2.7) 2.7 (2.2e2.9) 0.100
Surgical site
Maxilla 33 (46.5%) 17 (47.2%) 16 (45.7%) 0.912
Mandible 38 (53.5%) 19 (52.8%) 19 (54.3%)
Type of teeth
Anterior 18 (25.3%) 8 (22.2%) 10 (28.6%) 0.732
Posterior 53 (74.7%) 28 (77.8%) 25 (71.4%)
Reason for extraction
Dental caries 59 (83.1%) 32 (89.0%) 27 (77.1%)
Periodontal disease 5 (7.0%) 2 (5.5%) 3 (8.6%) 0.388
Others 7 (9.9%) 2 (5.5%) 5 (14.3%)
Surgical procedure
Without flap elevation 60 (84.5%) 28 (77.8%) 32 (91.4%) 0.207
With flap elevation 11 (15.5%) 8 (22.2%) 3 (8.6%)
¥
Time of surgery (min) 8.0 (5.0e12.0) 9.5 (5.0e13.5) 8.0 (5.0e10.5) 0.337
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; PT, prothrombin time; PTTa, partial thromboplastin time; INR, international normalized ratio. ¥ Data
expressed in median (Q1 e Q3).
Table 2
Description of surgical sites with postoperative bleeding.
Case Age Dental Dental Disease Antithrombotic Hemorrhage (24 INR Group Local Hemostatic Management
(yr) unit therapy episodes)
Extraction Pos- Compression Suture TXA Collagen-gelatin
operative sponge
396
~es de Melo et al.
S.J. de Abreu de Vasconcellos, R. Souza dos Santos Marques, E. Gomes Magalha Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398
Fig. 2. Risk of bleeding according to the surgical procedure, surgical site, and type of teeth.
Table 3
Assessment of the influence of the INR on the risk of immediate and late postoperative bleeding within each group.
INR Tranexamic acid (n ¼ 36) Collagen-gelatin sponge (n ¼ 35) RR (CI 95%) p-value RAR NNT
Total 8/36 (22.2%) 16/35 (45.7%) 0.49 (0.24e0.99) 0.046 23.5% 4.3
RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; RAR, absolute risk reduction; NNT, number needed to treat.
head clinical trials comparing the effects of these two hemostatic There have been few clinical trials evaluating the influence of
agents on postoperative bleeding in anticoagulated patients. INR on postoperative bleeding in anticoagulated patients under-
Available evidence shows a reduced risk of bleeding from TXA in going oral surgery. Blinder et al. found no differences in bleeding
placebo-controlled studies (Sindet-Pedersen et al., 1989; Ramstro €m rates for different INR ranges analyzed (Blinder et al., 2001).
et al., 1993) or when compared to the topical use of epsilon ami- However, in the present study, all patients were evaluated for INR
nocaproic acid (Souto et al., 1996). preoperatively and on the 3rd day of follow-up, and the operated
All patients included in the present trial were using sodium sites were categorized into two subgroups (INR <3.0 and INR 3.0)
warfarin, and the median INR was 2.4, which is within the thera- for each follow-up period, which may have generated a type II error
peutic range for coagulation control in oral surgical procedures. The and an insignificant reduction in the risk of bleeding among the
results of the study showed a 51% reduction in the risk of bleeding hemostatic agents analyzed within the INR ranges. Despite these
with the use of TXA compared to collagen-gelatin sponge and a results, it is plausible to support the clinically relevant benefit of
NNT of 4.3, reflecting the significant benefit of TXA for anti- TXA, as it showed an ARR of bleeding of 27.4% compared to
coagulated patients undergoing dental extraction. Furthermore, the collagen-gelatin sponge in the late postoperative period and cases
use of TXA was effective in reducing bleeding in posterior jaw ex- where INR was out of the safety range. Furthermore, the calculated
tractions, which are considered more traumatic due to the pre- NNT demonstrated a large magnitude of effect for sites treated with
dominance of very thick cortical bone. TXA.
Although numerous treatment regimens and concentrations Several limitations of this study should be noted, including: (1)
have been proposed, topical TXA within the first two days after the sample size was calculated based on surgical sites rather than
surgery has proven to be effective and safe in controlling bleeding patients, which was challenging due to the complexity of selecting
(Carter and Goss 2003). The local inhibition of fibrinolysis when eligible patients with comorbidities that may preclude the pro-
using TXA as a mouthwash provides several advantages, including cedure; (2) data collection on the 3rd postoperative day relied on
simple administration and reduced systemic absorption, which self-reporting via telephone, which may have influenced the
minimizes adverse events such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmo- reporting of bleeding episodes; (3) the assessment of postoperative
nary embolism, and myocardial infarction. This drug maintains bleeding was based on visual analysis, which lacks a standardized
high concentrations in saliva and has an action that lasts up to 8 h, definition of severity and makes comparison between studies
with almost undetectable serum concentration when used for difficult. Future studies should aim to validate bleeding assessment
rinsing (Silva et al., 2018). methods for reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity, as this area
In the current study, no thromboembolic events were reported of research is currently limited in the literature.
in patients treated with TXA or collagen-gelatin sponge, indicating
that these hemostatic agents are safe to use in anticoagulated pa- 5. Conclusions
tients undergoing minor oral surgery. However, while no adverse
effects were observed with the use of collagen-gelatin sponge, this Within the limitations of the study it seems that topical
hemostatic agent was found to be less effective than TXA in TXA is more effective in controlling bleeding after tooth extractions
reducing the risk of postoperative bleeding. Two sites treated with in anticoagulated patients than collagen-gelatin sponge.
collagen-gelatin sponge required postoperative intervention due to
severe bleeding. Nevertheless, local hemostatic measures were Funding source
sufficient to control postoperative hemorrhage, with no need for
hospital intervention. None.
397
~es de Melo et al.
S.J. de Abreu de Vasconcellos, R. Souza dos Santos Marques, E. Gomes Magalha Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398
Declaration of competing interest Pereira, B.M., Bortoto, J.B., Fraga, G.P., 2018. Agentes hemosta ticos to
picos em cir-
urgia: revis~ ao e perspectivas. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 45.
Queiroz, S.I.M.L., Silvestre, V.D., Soares, R.M., Campos, G.B.P., Germano, A.R., da
None. Silva, J.S.P., 2018. Tranexamic acid as a local hemostasis method after dental
extraction in patients on warfarin: a randomized controlled clinical study. Clin.
References Oral Invest. 22, 2281e2289.
Ramstro €m, G., Sindet-Pedersen, S., Hall, G., Blomb€ €
ack, M., Alander, U., 1993. Pre-
vention of postsurgical bleeding in oral surgery using tranexamic acid without
Al-Belasy, F., Amer, M., 2004. Hemostatic effect of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (histo- dose modification of oral anticoagulants. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 51, 1211e1216.
acryl) glue in warfarin-treated patients undergoing oral surgery. J. Oral Max- http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0278239110802915. (Accessed 8
illofac. Surg. 61, 1405e1409. November 2015).
Bacci, C., Maglione, M., Favero, L., Perini, A., Lenarda, R Di, Berengo, M., et al., 2010. Sacco, R., Sacco, M., Carpenedo, M., Mannucci, P.M., 2007. Oral surgery in patients on
Management of dental extraction in patients undergoing anticoagulant treat- oral anticoagulant therapy: a randomized comparison of different intensity
ment. Thromb. Haemostasis 104, 972e975. targets. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 104, e18ee21.
Bajkin, B.V., Popovic, S.L., Selakovic, S.D.J., 2009. Randomized, prospective trial http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482846. (Accessed 8 November 2015).
comparing bridging therapy using low-molecular-weight heparin with main- Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., 2010. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated
tenance of oral anticoagulation during extraction of teeth. J. Oral Maxillofac. guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340 c332ec332.
Surg. 67, 990e995. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19375008. (Accessed Silva, R.V., Gadelha, T.B., Luiz, R.R., Torres, S.R., 2018. Intra-alveolar epsilon-
12 August 2014). aminocaproic acid for the control of post-extraction bleeding in anti-
Balevi, B., 2010. Should warfarin be discontinued before a dental extraction? A coagulated patients: randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 47,
decision-tree analysis. Oral Surgery. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endo- 1138e1144.
dontol. 110, 691e697. Sindet-Pedersen, S., Ramstro €m, G., Bernvil, S., Blomba €ck, M., 1989. Hemostatic effect
Blinder, D., Manor, Y., Martinowitz, U., Taicher, S., 2001. Dental extractions in pa- of tranexamic acid mouthwash in anticoagulant-treated patients undergoing
tients maintained on oral anticoagulant therapy: comparison of INR value with oral surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 320, 840e843. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu
occurrence of postoperative bleeding. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 30, 518e521. bmed/2648144. (Accessed 8 November 2015).
Borea, G., Montebugnoli, L., Capuzzi, P., Magelli, C., 1993. Tranexamic acid as a Souto, J.C., Oliver, A., Zuazu-Jausoro, I., Vives, A., Fontcuberta, J., 1996. Oral surgery in
mouthwash in anticoagulant-treated patients undergoing oral surgery. Oral anticoagulated patients without reducing the dose of oral anticoagulant: a
Surgery. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 75, 29e31. prospective randomized study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 54, 27e32 discussion
Carter, G., Goss, A., 2003. Tranexamic acid mouthwash–a prospective randomized 323. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8530996. (Accessed 8 November
study of a 2-day regimen vs 5-day regimen to prevent postoperative bleeding in 2015).
anticoagulated patients requiring dental extractions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Svensson, R., Hallmer, F., Englesson, C.S., Svensson, P.J., Becktor, J.P., 2013. Treatment
32, 504e507. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14759109. (Accessed 12 with local hemostatic agents and primary closure after tooth extraction in
August 2014). warfarin treated patients. Swed. Dent. J. 37, 71e77.
Draxler, D.F., Zahra, S., Goncalves, I., Tran, H., Hanafi, G., Ho, H., et al., 2021. Tra- Vasconcellos, SJ. de A., do Nascimento-Júnior, E.M., de Aguiar Menezes, M.V.,
nexamic acid rapidly inhibits fibrinolysis, yet transiently enhances plasmin Tavares Mendes, M.L., de Souza Dantas, R., Martins-Filho, P.R.S., 2018. Preop-
generation in vivo. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 32, 172e179. https://journals.lww. erative tranexamic acid for treatment of bleeding, edema, and ecchymosis in
com/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001008. patients undergoing rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA
Galinde, J., Sidana, S., 2011. Contemporary management of patients on warfarin, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 144, 816e823. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu
aspirin and clopidogrel requiring dentoalveolar surgery. J. Contemp. Dent. 1, bmed/30098161.
22e25. Vasconcellos, SJ. de A., de Santana Santos, T., Reinheimer, D.M., Faria-e-Silva, A.L., de
Halfpenny, W., Fraser, J.S., Adlam, D.M., 2001. Comparison of 2 hemostatic agents for Melo, M. de FB., Martins-Filho, P.R.S., 2017. Topical application of tranexamic
the prevention of postextraction hemorrhage in patients on anticoagulants. acid in anticoagulated patients undergoing minor oral surgery: a systematic
Oral Surgery. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 92, 257e259. review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J. Cranio-Maxillofacial
Kim, C., Park, S.S.-H., Davey, J.R., 2015. Tranexamic acid for the prevention and Surg. 45, 20e26.
management of orthopedic surgical hemorrhage: current evidence. J. Blood Wahl, M.J., 2000. Myths of dental surgery in patients. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 131, 77e81.
Med. 6, 239e244. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26345147. Wong, J., George, R.B., Hanley, C.M., Saliba, C., Yee, D.A., Jerath, A., 2021. Tranexamic
Mingarro-de-Leon, A., Chaveli-Lopez, B., Gavalda-Esteve, C., 2014. Dental manage- acid: current use in obstetrics, major orthopedic, and trauma surgery. Can. J.
ment of patients receiving anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet treatment. J. Clin. Anaesth. 68, 894e917. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33993459.
Exp. Dent. e155ee161.
Morimoto, Y., Niwa, H., Minematsu, K., 2008. Hemostatic management of tooth
extractions in patients on oral antithrombotic therapy. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
66, 51e57.
398