You are on page 1of 6

Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery


journal homepage: www.jcmfs.com

Risk of bleeding in anticoagulated patients undergoing dental


extraction treated with topical tranexamic acid compared to collagen-
gelatin sponge: Randomized clinical trial
Sara Juliana de Abreu de Vasconcellos a, b, Raquel Souza dos Santos Marques c,
Elisama Gomes Magalha ~es de Melo c, Camila Silva de Almeida b,
~o Victor de Almeida Go
Joa es Silva b, Liane Maciel de Almeida Souza c,
Paulo Ricardo Martins-Filho a, c, *
a
Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, Sergipe, Brazil
b
Department of Dentistry, Tiradentes University, Sergipe, Brazil
c
Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, Sergipe, Brazil

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: This two-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized clinical trial design evaluated the risk of post-
Paper received 24 February 2023 operative bleeding in anticoagulated patients undergoing dental extraction treated with topical TXA in
Received in revised form comparison to collagen-gelatin sponge. Forty patients were randomly included in one of the study
5 May 2023
groups: (1) topical use of 4.8% TXA solution; and (2) resorbable hydrolyzed collagen-gelatin sponge
Accepted 25 June 2023
Available online 28 June 2023
applied to the surgical alveolus. Primary outcomes were postoperative bleeding episodes and secondary
outcomes were thromboembolic events and postoperative INR values. The relative risk (RR), the absolute
Handling Editor: Prof. Emeka Nkenke risk reduction (RAR) and the number needed to treat (NNT) were used as effect estimates and calculated
from the counting of bleeding episodes observed during the first postoperative week. The bleeding rate
Keywords: under the TXA treatment was 22.2%, while in the collagen-gelatin sponge group it was 45.7%, resulting in
Tranexamic acid a RR of 0.49 (95% CI 0.24e099; p ¼ 0.046), RAR 23.5% and NNT 4.3. TXA was more effective in reducing
Oral surgery bleeding in surgical sites located in the mandible (RR ¼ 0.10; 95% CI 0.01e0.71; p ¼ 0.021) and the
Bleeding posterior region (RR ¼ 0.39; 95% CI 0.18e0.84; p ¼ 0.016). Within the limitations of the study it seems
that topical TXA is more effective in controlling bleeding after tooth extractions in anticoagulated pa-
tients than collagen-gelatin sponge.
Clinical trial registration: RBR-83qw93.
© 2023 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights
reserved.

1. Introduction biotechnology, various agents have become available for providing


local hemostasis in invasive procedures, including resorbable
The appropriate management of anticoagulated patients during agents (such as absorbable hemostatic sponge or gelatin and re-
and after surgery, particularly those who have been on long-term generated oxidized cellulose) and biologically activated topical
warfarin therapy, remains a topic of debate. However, the mainte- solutions (such as tranexamic acid [TXA] and epsilon aminocaproic
nance of anticoagulant therapy has been widely recommended for acid) (Pereira et al., 2018).
patients undergoing minor oral surgery with adequate local he- Several studies have evaluated the TXA as a local hemostatic
mostasis (Al-Belasy and Amer 2004). With advances in agent to control postoperative bleeding in oral surgery, especially in
tooth extraction (Borea et al., 1993; Souto et al., 1996; Sacco et al.,
2007; Queiroz et al., 2018). However, most of these studies have
* Corresponding author. Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Hospital Universita rio, contrasting methods, unclear randomization, and distinct com-
 rio de Patologia Investigativa, Rua Cla
Laborato udio Batista, s/n. Sanato
 rio, Aracaju, parison groups, which may decrease the confidence of oral sur-
Sergipe, CEP: 49060-100, Brazil. geons in the use of TXA in their clinical routine. TXA is a lysine
E-mail address: prmartinsfh@gmail.com (P.R. Martins-Filho).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2023.06.003
1010-5182/© 2023 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
~es de Melo et al.
S.J. de Abreu de Vasconcellos, R. Souza dos Santos Marques, E. Gomes Magalha Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398

analog that inhibits fibrinolysis by binding to plasminogen (Kim included. During each surgical procedure, only one dental unit was
et al., 2015). Therefore, this agent reduces bleeding by inhibiting extracted (Halfpenny et al., 2001).
the enzymatic degradation of fibrin blood clots by the serine pro- We excluded patients with blood dyscrasia or other pathology
tease plasmin (Draxler et al., 2021). There is evidence that the that interfered with blood clotting; smokers; diabetics; pregnant or
concentration of TXA in saliva after mouth rinsing in hemophilic lactating women; patients with a history of allergy to TXA or
patients undergoing oral surgery is sufficient to decrease the collagen-gelatin sponge; those using medications that could
amount of lysed fibrin and postoperative bleeding (Sindet- interact with medications used in this study; those using anti-
Pedersen et al., 1989; Borea et al., 1993; Sacco et al., 2007). platelet agents such as aspiring and clopidogrel; those with surgical
Despite the widespread use of TXA as a hemostatic agent in procedures with osteotomy of more than one alveolar bone wall;
various types of surgeries (Vasconcellos et al., 2018; Wong et al., and those with an INR above 4.0. Patients who did not return for re-
2021), there is a lack of evidence regarding its efficacy in anti- evaluation appointments, who did not respond to contact with the
coagulated patients undergoing oral surgery compared to other researcher, or who did not follow postoperative recommendations
hemostatic agents commonly used in clinical practice. In a recent were also excluded.
systematic review with meta-analysis, we showed that local he-
mostasis with absorbable hemostatic materials (gelatin sponge, 2.4. Sample size and randomization
fibrin glue or oxidized regenerated cellulose) was not more effec-
tive in preventing bleeding than TXA mouthwash in combination A sample size calculation was performed using the following
with gelatin sponge or oxidized regenerated cellulose. Unfortu- parameters: 80% power at a significance level of 5%; a reported 90%
nately, no studies have compared the efficacy of the topical appli- and 60% efficacy in reducing postoperative bleeding for TXA and
cation of TXA alone versus absorbable hemostatic materials collagen-gelatin sponge, respectively (Vasconcellos et al., 2017);
(Vasconcellos et al., 2017). Since TXA may be a better cost-effective and a 10% loss due to attrition. A total of 36 surgical sites were
option to minimize bleeding risks after minor oral surgeries, needed for each group. A block randomization sequence was
further studies are still necessary to support the superiority of TXA created using the Sealed Envelope Ltda program (www.sealedenve
over absorbable hemostatic materials. This study aimed to evaluate lope.com) to allocate treatment and ensure balance. Surgical sites
the risk of postoperative bleeding in anticoagulated patients un- were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to TXA or collagen-gelatin sponge.
dergoing dental extraction treated with topical TXA in comparison Allocations were made by the attending investigator using opaque
to collagen-gelatin sponge. envelopes.

2. Methods 2.5. Interventions

2.1. Trial design Interventions were performed as follows: (1) TXA: intra-
operative irrigation to the surgical alveolus with 4.8% TXA (10 ml),
This study followed a two-arm, parallel-group, double-blind, suture and local compression for 30 min with TXA-soaked gauze,
randomized clinical trial design, in accordance with the Consoli- followed by mouthwash with the same solution (10 ml) for 2 min
dated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement recom- every 6h for seven days; (2) Collagen-gelatin sponge: intra-
mendations (Schulz et al., 2010). The trial was registered at the operative irrigation to the surgical alveolus with 0.9% saline solu-
Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC: RBR-83qw93), and the tion (10 ml), insertion of resorbable hydrolyzed collagen-gelatin
study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at sponge (Hemospon®; Maquira Indústria de Produtos Odon-
 gicos SA - Maring
tolo a/PR, Brasil) in the alveolus, suture and local
the Federal University of Sergipe (UFS) (CAAE 60889416.
0.0000.5546). compression with dry gauze for 30 min, followed by mouthwash
with 0.9% saline solution (10 ml) for 2 min every 6h for seven days.
TXA and saline solution were delivered to patients in identical
2.2. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) packages and had the same color characteristics. Patients were
elements blinded to treatment assignment.
The patients underwent the surgical procedure by a single oral
The trial was based on the following PICO elements: surgeon with 10 years of experience (S.J.A.V.). All patients received
authorization from the assistant cardiologist to undergo the sur-
 Population (P): individuals over 18 years old using oral antico- gical procedure while using oral anticoagulants. The procedures
agulants (vitamin K dependent antagonists) and submitted to were performed under local anesthesia without pharmacological
tooth extraction; sedation, and the doses of oral anticoagulants were not suspended
 Intervention (I): topical use of 4.8% TXA solution; or modified. In cases where antibiotic prophylaxis was necessary,
 Comparison (C): resorbable hydrolyzed collagen-gelatin sponge the American Heart Association protocol was used (https://www.
applied to the surgical alveolus; heart.org/-/media/files/health-topics/infective-endocarditis/infecti
 Outcome (O): postoperative bleeding episodes as the primary ve-endocarditis-wallet-card.pdf). Blood pressure and heart rate
outcome, and thromboembolic events and postoperative inter- were measured prior to all interventions. In all cases, sutures were
national normalized ratio (INR) values as secondary outcomes. performed on the surgical wound with 4e0 nylon (Shalon®; Fios
Cirúrgicos LTDA, Goia ^nia/GO, Brasil). The procedure time was
measured with a chronometer, beginning from the first incision for
2.3. Participants gingival detachment until complete suture. Depending on the
group to which the patient was allocated, hemostasis was achieved
The sample consisted of patients recruited from the School of by local compression with TXA-soaked gauze in the TXA group and
Dentistry at the Federal University of Sergipe and the Center for by compression with a dry gauze in the collagen-gelatin sponge
Dental Specialties, Sergipe state, Brazil. Patients using oral antico- group, as per the randomization protocol.
agulants who required extraction of at least one tooth and who had After the surgical procedure, analgesic medication was pre-
an INR between 1.5 and 4.0 on the day before the procedure were scribed (dipyrone 500 mg every 6 h for 2 days, or dexamethasone
394
~es de Melo et al.
S.J. de Abreu de Vasconcellos, R. Souza dos Santos Marques, E. Gomes Magalha Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398

4 mg every 8 h for 2 days in surgeries with osteotomies). In case of


dipyrone allergy, paracetamol 750 mg was prescribed every 6 h for
2 days, and the postoperative guidelines were explained to the
patient in detail. Transparent bottles (240 ml) containing the sub-
stance to be used in the postoperative oral rinses, along with a
10 ml dosing syringe and instructions, were given to each patient.
In addition, we requested a repeat INR measurement on the 3rd
postoperative day and removed the sutures one week after the
procedure.

2.6. Postoperative data collection and outcome assessment

A single examiner, a dentist and specialist in oral and maxillo-


facial surgery (L.M.A.S.), who was blinded to the allocated groups,
performed examinations to assess outcome variables. The evalua-
tions regarding the presence of bleeding and clot formation were
performed 2 h after the procedure (visual inspection), on the 3rd
(patient self-report via telephone contact) and on the 7th (visual
inspection) days. In case of active bleeding, the event was charac- Fig. 1. Flow diagram of the patient selection process.
terized as postoperative bleeding and additional measures for local
hemostasis were performed. Bleeding from the surgical wound was
classified as mild (bleeding that stopped spontaneously or with treated with TXA and three with collagen-gelatin sponge. Only two
local compression with gauze for 20 min) or severe (bleeding that sites required postoperative intervention due to bleeding, both in
did not stop with the previous measures and required new inter- the collagen-gelatin sponge group. No patient had thromboembolic
vention by the researcher) (Souto et al., 1996). events or required hospital admission.
In case of severe bleeding, the hemostatic measurement per- We observed a bleeding rate of 22.2% during the first post-
formed during the surgery was repeated. In case of persistent operative week in the surgical sites treated with TXA, compared to
bleeding, patients would be referred for bleeding control measures 45.7% in those treated with collagen-gelatin sponge. The calculated
in the hospital setting. During the entire first postoperative week, ARR was 23.5%, and the NNT was 4.3. A 51% reduction in the risk of
all patients were instructed to contact the researcher by telephone. bleeding with TXA compared to collagen-gelatin sponge was
observed (RR ¼ 0.49; 95% CI 0.24e0.99; p ¼ 0.046). TXA was more
2.7. Statistical methods effective in reducing bleeding in surgical sites located in the
mandible (RR ¼ 0.10; 95% CI 0.01e0.71; p ¼ 0.021) and the posterior
Categorical variables were expressed as absolute frequencies region (RR ¼ 0.39; 95% CI 0.18e0.84; p ¼ 0.016), but no significant
and percentages, and groups were compared using the Chi-Square differences were observed between groups regarding the use
test. Continuous variables were expressed as median and quartiles (RR ¼ 1.33; 95% CI 0.07e26.15; p ¼ 0.850) or non-use (RR ¼ 0.50;
(Q1 and Q3) and groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney 95% CI 0.24e1.04; p ¼ 0.062) of the flap during the procedure
test. The effect estimates used to compare the efficacy of TXA (Fig. 2). Furthermore, no statistically significant effect was observed
versus collagen-gelatin sponge were the relative risk (RR) with 95% between groups in reducing the risk of bleeding based on INR
confidence interval (CI) and the absolute risk reduction (ARR) with values during the immediate and late postoperative periods
standard error, calculated from the number of bleeding episodes (Table 3).
recorded during the first postoperative week. Additionally, we
calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and the RR (95% CI) for
immediate and late postoperative bleeding according to the INR. 4. Discussion
We performed the analyses using the statistical package R (version
3.2.3) and considered P-values less than 0.05 as statistically In recent years, an increasing number of patients with diverse
significant. systemic conditions requiring continuous anticoagulant therapy
have been observed in dental clinics. Anticoagulants are used to
3. Results prevent thrombus formation and discontinuing them before a
surgical procedure is generally contraindicated due to the risks to
Initially, 46 patients were recruited, and six were excluded due the patient's health (Wahl 2000; Queiroz et al., 2018). However,
to the use of antiplatelet agents or no need for dental extraction. A anticoagulated patients undergoing oral surgical procedures are at
total of 72 surgical procedures were performed on 40 patients, 36 in a high risk of bleeding, and the management approach should
the TXA group, and 36 in the collagen-gelatin sponge group. One consider the risks of bleeding if anticoagulant therapy is main-
patient in the collagen-gelatin sponge group was excluded for not tained, or the chances of thromboembolic complications if it is
returning for postoperative evaluation (Fig. 1). discontinued (Balevi 2010). Many authors assert that tooth ex-
All patients in both groups were under the use of warfarin. There tractions can be performed safely in anticoagulated patients with
were no significant differences between groups in systolic and therapeutic INR values (up to 4.0) without altering their anti-
diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, prothrombin time, partial coagulation therapy (Morimoto et al., 2008; Bajkin et al., 2009;
thromboplastin time, or preoperative INR. Most surgical proced- Bacci et al., 2010; Galinde and Sidana 2011; Svensson et al., 2013;
ures were performed in the mandible (53.5%) in the posterior re- Mingarro-de-Leon et al., 2014).
gion (74.7%), and over 80% of extractions were due to dental caries This study aimed to evaluate the risk of postoperative bleeding
(Table 1). in patients using oral anticoagulants who underwent tooth
Table 2 described all 17 sites with 24 episodes of postoperative extraction and to compare two local hemostatic agents: TXA and
bleeding. Four bleeding sites had INR values above 4.0, one being collagen-gelatin sponge. To our knowledge, there are no head-to-
395
~es de Melo et al.
S.J. de Abreu de Vasconcellos, R. Souza dos Santos Marques, E. Gomes Magalha Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398

Table 1
General characteristics of the study sample.

Variables Sample (%) Tranexamic acid (n ¼ 36) Collagen-gelatin sponge (n ¼ 35) p-value

Gender
Male 23 (32.4%) 16 (44.4%) 7 (20.0%) 0.052
Female 48 (67.6%) 20 (55.6%) 28 (80.0%)
Age (years) ¥ 48.0 (35.0e64.3) 48.0 (35.0e60.5) 48.5 (35.0e64.5) 0.908
Race/ethnicity
Brown 21 (29.6%) 10 (27.8%) 12 (34.3%)
White 23 (32.4%) 14 (38.9%) 9 (25.7%) 0.494
Black 27 (38.0%) 12 (33.3%) 14 (40.0%)
Education
Primary school 42 (59.2%) 25 (69.4%) 17 (48.6%)
High school 26 (36.6%) 10 (27.8%) 16 (45.7%) 0.199
Higher education 3 (4.2%) 1 (2.8%) 2 (5.7%)
Reason for the use of anticoagulant therapy
Cardiac arrhythmia 20 (28.2%) 12 (33.3%) 8 (22.9%)
Stroke 18 (25.4%) 9 (25.5%) 9 (25.7%)
Cardiac valvopathy 15 (21.1%) 9 (25.5%) 6 (17.1%) 0.479
Pulmonary hypertension 7 (9.9%) 2 (5.6%) 5 (14.3%)
Others 11 (15.4%) 4 (27.7%) 7 (20.0%)
Anticoagulant therapy
Warfarin 72 (100%) 36 (100.0%) 35 (100.0%) 1.000
SBP (mm/Hg) ¥ 120.0 (110.0e133.3) 120.0 (110.0e130.8) 120.0 (111.5e136.5) 0.853
DBP (mmHg) ¥ 79.0 (70.0e89.3) 75.5 (70.0e90.0) 80.0 (70.0e84.3) 0.937
HR (bpm) ¥ 80.0 (70.0e85.0) 80.0 (71.5e85.0) 75.0 (80.0e85.0) 0.353
PT (sec) ¥ 27.9 (22.6e29.3) 27.9 (22.6e33.2) 27.1 (20.0e28.4) 0.180
PTTa (sec) ¥ 38.7 (34.6e42.6) 39.8 (35.0e42.8) 37.5 (34.4e40.3) 0.342
¥
INR 2.4 (2.2e2.9) 2.4 (2.0e2.7) 2.7 (2.2e2.9) 0.100
Surgical site
Maxilla 33 (46.5%) 17 (47.2%) 16 (45.7%) 0.912
Mandible 38 (53.5%) 19 (52.8%) 19 (54.3%)
Type of teeth
Anterior 18 (25.3%) 8 (22.2%) 10 (28.6%) 0.732
Posterior 53 (74.7%) 28 (77.8%) 25 (71.4%)
Reason for extraction
Dental caries 59 (83.1%) 32 (89.0%) 27 (77.1%)
Periodontal disease 5 (7.0%) 2 (5.5%) 3 (8.6%) 0.388
Others 7 (9.9%) 2 (5.5%) 5 (14.3%)
Surgical procedure
Without flap elevation 60 (84.5%) 28 (77.8%) 32 (91.4%) 0.207
With flap elevation 11 (15.5%) 8 (22.2%) 3 (8.6%)
¥
Time of surgery (min) 8.0 (5.0e12.0) 9.5 (5.0e13.5) 8.0 (5.0e10.5) 0.337

SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; PT, prothrombin time; PTTa, partial thromboplastin time; INR, international normalized ratio. ¥ Data
expressed in median (Q1 e Q3).

Table 2
Description of surgical sites with postoperative bleeding.

Case Age Dental Dental Disease Antithrombotic Hemorrhage (24 INR Group Local Hemostatic Management
(yr) unit therapy episodes)
Extraction Pos- Compression Suture TXA Collagen-gelatin
operative sponge

1 66 26 Dental caries Warfarin 02h 1.51 2.01 Sponge X


2 65 26 Dental caries Warfarin 02h, 3d, 7d 2.43 3.70 Sponge X X X
3 57 43, 44 Dental caries Warfarin 02h 1.62 2.20 Sponge X
4 49 16 Dental caries Warfarin 02h, 3d 2.18 2.61 TXA X
5 48 28 Prosthetic Warfarin 02h 3.36 2.08 Sponge X
surgery
6 75 11, 12 Abfraction Warfarin 02h 2.72 2.22 TXA X
7 75 21 Abfraction Warfarin 02h 2.72 2.22 TXA X
8 35 14, 16 Dental caries Warfarin 02h 3.25 4.54 TXA X
9 65 46 Dental caries Warfarin 02h, 7d 3.93 4.29 Sponge X
10 65 45 Dental caries Warfarin 02h, 7d 2.93 4.29 Sponge X
11 65 44 Dental caries Warfarin 02h, 7d 2.93 4.29 Sponge X
12 65 41 Dental caries Warfarin 02h 2.87 2.87 Sponge X
13 65 36 Dental caries Warfarin 02h 2.71 2.87 Sponge X
14 65 24 Dental caries Warfarin 02h, 7d 2.97 3.47 TXA X
15 44 44 Dental caries Warfarin 02h 2.09 1.68 Sponge X
16 41 45 Dental caries Warfarin 02h 2.37 2.20 TXA X
17 64 31 Periodontal Warfarin 7d 2.17 2.60 Sponge X X X
disease

396
~es de Melo et al.
S.J. de Abreu de Vasconcellos, R. Souza dos Santos Marques, E. Gomes Magalha Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398

Fig. 2. Risk of bleeding according to the surgical procedure, surgical site, and type of teeth.

Table 3
Assessment of the influence of the INR on the risk of immediate and late postoperative bleeding within each group.

INR Tranexamic acid (n ¼ 36) Collagen-gelatin sponge (n ¼ 35) RR (CI 95%) p-value RAR NNT

Events/n (%) Events/n (%)

Immediate postoperative bleeding


<3.0 5/29 (17.2%) 8/27 (29.6%) 0.58 (0.22e1.56) 0.282 12.4% 8.1
3.0 1/7 (14.3%) 2/8 (25.0%) 0.57 (0.06e5.03) 0.614 10.7% 9.3
Late postoperative bleeding
<3.0 1/29 (3.5%) 1/23 (4.4%) 0.79 (0.05e12.0) 0.867 0.9% 111.2
3.0 1/7 (14.3%) 5/12 (41.7%) 0.34 (0.05e2.37) 0.278 27.4% 3.6

Total 8/36 (22.2%) 16/35 (45.7%) 0.49 (0.24e0.99) 0.046 23.5% 4.3

RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; RAR, absolute risk reduction; NNT, number needed to treat.

head clinical trials comparing the effects of these two hemostatic There have been few clinical trials evaluating the influence of
agents on postoperative bleeding in anticoagulated patients. INR on postoperative bleeding in anticoagulated patients under-
Available evidence shows a reduced risk of bleeding from TXA in going oral surgery. Blinder et al. found no differences in bleeding
placebo-controlled studies (Sindet-Pedersen et al., 1989; Ramstro €m rates for different INR ranges analyzed (Blinder et al., 2001).
et al., 1993) or when compared to the topical use of epsilon ami- However, in the present study, all patients were evaluated for INR
nocaproic acid (Souto et al., 1996). preoperatively and on the 3rd day of follow-up, and the operated
All patients included in the present trial were using sodium sites were categorized into two subgroups (INR <3.0 and INR 3.0)
warfarin, and the median INR was 2.4, which is within the thera- for each follow-up period, which may have generated a type II error
peutic range for coagulation control in oral surgical procedures. The and an insignificant reduction in the risk of bleeding among the
results of the study showed a 51% reduction in the risk of bleeding hemostatic agents analyzed within the INR ranges. Despite these
with the use of TXA compared to collagen-gelatin sponge and a results, it is plausible to support the clinically relevant benefit of
NNT of 4.3, reflecting the significant benefit of TXA for anti- TXA, as it showed an ARR of bleeding of 27.4% compared to
coagulated patients undergoing dental extraction. Furthermore, the collagen-gelatin sponge in the late postoperative period and cases
use of TXA was effective in reducing bleeding in posterior jaw ex- where INR was out of the safety range. Furthermore, the calculated
tractions, which are considered more traumatic due to the pre- NNT demonstrated a large magnitude of effect for sites treated with
dominance of very thick cortical bone. TXA.
Although numerous treatment regimens and concentrations Several limitations of this study should be noted, including: (1)
have been proposed, topical TXA within the first two days after the sample size was calculated based on surgical sites rather than
surgery has proven to be effective and safe in controlling bleeding patients, which was challenging due to the complexity of selecting
(Carter and Goss 2003). The local inhibition of fibrinolysis when eligible patients with comorbidities that may preclude the pro-
using TXA as a mouthwash provides several advantages, including cedure; (2) data collection on the 3rd postoperative day relied on
simple administration and reduced systemic absorption, which self-reporting via telephone, which may have influenced the
minimizes adverse events such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmo- reporting of bleeding episodes; (3) the assessment of postoperative
nary embolism, and myocardial infarction. This drug maintains bleeding was based on visual analysis, which lacks a standardized
high concentrations in saliva and has an action that lasts up to 8 h, definition of severity and makes comparison between studies
with almost undetectable serum concentration when used for difficult. Future studies should aim to validate bleeding assessment
rinsing (Silva et al., 2018). methods for reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity, as this area
In the current study, no thromboembolic events were reported of research is currently limited in the literature.
in patients treated with TXA or collagen-gelatin sponge, indicating
that these hemostatic agents are safe to use in anticoagulated pa- 5. Conclusions
tients undergoing minor oral surgery. However, while no adverse
effects were observed with the use of collagen-gelatin sponge, this Within the limitations of the study it seems that topical
hemostatic agent was found to be less effective than TXA in TXA is more effective in controlling bleeding after tooth extractions
reducing the risk of postoperative bleeding. Two sites treated with in anticoagulated patients than collagen-gelatin sponge.
collagen-gelatin sponge required postoperative intervention due to
severe bleeding. Nevertheless, local hemostatic measures were Funding source
sufficient to control postoperative hemorrhage, with no need for
hospital intervention. None.
397
~es de Melo et al.
S.J. de Abreu de Vasconcellos, R. Souza dos Santos Marques, E. Gomes Magalha Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 51 (2023) 393e398

Declaration of competing interest Pereira, B.M., Bortoto, J.B., Fraga, G.P., 2018. Agentes hemosta ticos to
 picos em cir-
urgia: revis~ ao e perspectivas. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 45.
Queiroz, S.I.M.L., Silvestre, V.D., Soares, R.M., Campos, G.B.P., Germano, A.R., da
None. Silva, J.S.P., 2018. Tranexamic acid as a local hemostasis method after dental
extraction in patients on warfarin: a randomized controlled clinical study. Clin.
References Oral Invest. 22, 2281e2289.
Ramstro €m, G., Sindet-Pedersen, S., Hall, G., Blomb€ €
ack, M., Alander, U., 1993. Pre-
vention of postsurgical bleeding in oral surgery using tranexamic acid without
Al-Belasy, F., Amer, M., 2004. Hemostatic effect of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (histo- dose modification of oral anticoagulants. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 51, 1211e1216.
acryl) glue in warfarin-treated patients undergoing oral surgery. J. Oral Max- http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0278239110802915. (Accessed 8
illofac. Surg. 61, 1405e1409. November 2015).
Bacci, C., Maglione, M., Favero, L., Perini, A., Lenarda, R Di, Berengo, M., et al., 2010. Sacco, R., Sacco, M., Carpenedo, M., Mannucci, P.M., 2007. Oral surgery in patients on
Management of dental extraction in patients undergoing anticoagulant treat- oral anticoagulant therapy: a randomized comparison of different intensity
ment. Thromb. Haemostasis 104, 972e975. targets. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 104, e18ee21.
Bajkin, B.V., Popovic, S.L., Selakovic, S.D.J., 2009. Randomized, prospective trial http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482846. (Accessed 8 November 2015).
comparing bridging therapy using low-molecular-weight heparin with main- Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Moher, D., 2010. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated
tenance of oral anticoagulation during extraction of teeth. J. Oral Maxillofac. guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340 c332ec332.
Surg. 67, 990e995. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19375008. (Accessed Silva, R.V., Gadelha, T.B., Luiz, R.R., Torres, S.R., 2018. Intra-alveolar epsilon-
12 August 2014). aminocaproic acid for the control of post-extraction bleeding in anti-
Balevi, B., 2010. Should warfarin be discontinued before a dental extraction? A coagulated patients: randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 47,
decision-tree analysis. Oral Surgery. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endo- 1138e1144.
dontol. 110, 691e697. Sindet-Pedersen, S., Ramstro €m, G., Bernvil, S., Blomba €ck, M., 1989. Hemostatic effect
Blinder, D., Manor, Y., Martinowitz, U., Taicher, S., 2001. Dental extractions in pa- of tranexamic acid mouthwash in anticoagulant-treated patients undergoing
tients maintained on oral anticoagulant therapy: comparison of INR value with oral surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 320, 840e843. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu
occurrence of postoperative bleeding. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 30, 518e521. bmed/2648144. (Accessed 8 November 2015).
Borea, G., Montebugnoli, L., Capuzzi, P., Magelli, C., 1993. Tranexamic acid as a Souto, J.C., Oliver, A., Zuazu-Jausoro, I., Vives, A., Fontcuberta, J., 1996. Oral surgery in
mouthwash in anticoagulant-treated patients undergoing oral surgery. Oral anticoagulated patients without reducing the dose of oral anticoagulant: a
Surgery. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 75, 29e31. prospective randomized study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 54, 27e32 discussion
Carter, G., Goss, A., 2003. Tranexamic acid mouthwash–a prospective randomized 323. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8530996. (Accessed 8 November
study of a 2-day regimen vs 5-day regimen to prevent postoperative bleeding in 2015).
anticoagulated patients requiring dental extractions. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Svensson, R., Hallmer, F., Englesson, C.S., Svensson, P.J., Becktor, J.P., 2013. Treatment
32, 504e507. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14759109. (Accessed 12 with local hemostatic agents and primary closure after tooth extraction in
August 2014). warfarin treated patients. Swed. Dent. J. 37, 71e77.
Draxler, D.F., Zahra, S., Goncalves, I., Tran, H., Hanafi, G., Ho, H., et al., 2021. Tra- Vasconcellos, SJ. de A., do Nascimento-Júnior, E.M., de Aguiar Menezes, M.V.,
nexamic acid rapidly inhibits fibrinolysis, yet transiently enhances plasmin Tavares Mendes, M.L., de Souza Dantas, R., Martins-Filho, P.R.S., 2018. Preop-
generation in vivo. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 32, 172e179. https://journals.lww. erative tranexamic acid for treatment of bleeding, edema, and ecchymosis in
com/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001008. patients undergoing rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA
Galinde, J., Sidana, S., 2011. Contemporary management of patients on warfarin, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 144, 816e823. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu
aspirin and clopidogrel requiring dentoalveolar surgery. J. Contemp. Dent. 1, bmed/30098161.
22e25. Vasconcellos, SJ. de A., de Santana Santos, T., Reinheimer, D.M., Faria-e-Silva, A.L., de
Halfpenny, W., Fraser, J.S., Adlam, D.M., 2001. Comparison of 2 hemostatic agents for Melo, M. de FB., Martins-Filho, P.R.S., 2017. Topical application of tranexamic
the prevention of postextraction hemorrhage in patients on anticoagulants. acid in anticoagulated patients undergoing minor oral surgery: a systematic
Oral Surgery. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 92, 257e259. review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J. Cranio-Maxillofacial
Kim, C., Park, S.S.-H., Davey, J.R., 2015. Tranexamic acid for the prevention and Surg. 45, 20e26.
management of orthopedic surgical hemorrhage: current evidence. J. Blood Wahl, M.J., 2000. Myths of dental surgery in patients. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 131, 77e81.
Med. 6, 239e244. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26345147. Wong, J., George, R.B., Hanley, C.M., Saliba, C., Yee, D.A., Jerath, A., 2021. Tranexamic
Mingarro-de-Leon, A., Chaveli-Lopez, B., Gavalda-Esteve, C., 2014. Dental manage- acid: current use in obstetrics, major orthopedic, and trauma surgery. Can. J.
ment of patients receiving anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet treatment. J. Clin. Anaesth. 68, 894e917. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33993459.
Exp. Dent. e155ee161.
Morimoto, Y., Niwa, H., Minematsu, K., 2008. Hemostatic management of tooth
extractions in patients on oral antithrombotic therapy. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
66, 51e57.

398

You might also like