You are on page 1of 70

Magnetic Particles Testing

AE/GAS/SOP/09/003
Revision: 1
March 10th, 2009

Alduco Energy Limited http://www.alduco.com


No 11 O.J Okpo Street sales@alduco.com
Eliada Estate Phone : + (234) (1) 820 2170
Port Harcourt Fax : + (234) 271 0629
Nigeria.
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 1 / 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

REVISIONS
Revision Date Nature of modification
0 28/07/08 Initial compilation
1 10/03/09 General Improvement

AUTHORIZATION
Stage Names and Titles Company Signature Date

Prepared by: Rixon Maranan : NDT Level II AE


ffffff
Approved by: Alain Simplice Gan : NDT Level III AE
ffffff
Authorized by: Alfredo Jones : Managing Director AE
ffffff

ffffff
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 2/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

CONTENT

Title Page
1. Purpose 3
2. Scope. 3
3. References. 3
4. Related documentation. 3
5. Definitions. 3
6. Responsibilities. 4
7. Operating Procedure. 4
8. Records 11
9. Annexes 11
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 3/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

1. Purpose

This procedure describes the operative mode and acceptance levels to be followed when carrying out the Magnetic Particle
Inspection (MPI) on parent materials, butt welds, fillet welds, weld bevels, excavation, strikes and repair areas on ferromagnetic
materials.

2. Scope

This procedure applies to the detection and evaluation of surface discontinuities, using wet method, AC yoke, visible or
fluorescent magnetic particles.

3. References

 SNT-TC-1A , 1992: ASNT (American Society for Non destructive Testing) recommended Practice for
Qualification of NDT personnel

 ASME Code.

o Section V, Article 7 and Article 25 ( Magnetic Particle Examination)

o Section VIII, Division 1, Appendix 6: Acceptance and Rejection criteria related to Magnetic Particle
Examination

4. Related Documentation

4.1. MPI report form: MT/08/03/1F;

4.2. MPI technique sheet form: MT/08/03/2F.

4.3. Applicable Acceptance/Rejection Criteria

5. Definitions

5.1. ASME: American Society of Mechanical Engineer;

5.2. MPI: Magnetic Particle Inspection;

5.3. Linear Indications: Those indications which length is more than three time the width;

5.4. Rounded Indications: Those indications with circular or elliptical shape, which length is equal or less than three times the
width;

5.5. UV: Ultra Violet.


Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 4/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

6. Responsibilities:

AE:
- Perform the job as requested by the Client and in conformance with this procedure (i.e. use qualified personnel, appropriate
equipment, follow safety regulations);
- Issue on time deliverables (i.e. Reports, drawings, and images).

The Client:
- Provide and/or specify Codes and Standards to apply;
- Determine the Extent of examination and/or Areas to test;
- Provide relevant information related to the component to test (i.e. drawings, material, sizes, and schedule);
- Issue Permit to Work

7. Procedure

7.1. Personnel Qualification.

- All personnel entitled to use this procedure shall be qualified and certified in conformance with AE written practice
N° AE/GAS/SOP/09/008; which is in accordance with The ASNT’s recommended practice SNT TC 1A (2006
Edition).
- Level 2 or Level 3 will perform the test, report, interpret and evaluate results as directed by applicable Codes and
specifications.
- Level 1 personnel will only perform specific RT operations as per written instructions and under adequate supervision
of level 2 or Level 3 personnel.

7.2. Testing equipment and consumables


Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 5/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

7.2.1. Yoke

It is used to longitudinally magnetize the part. A portable alternating current yoke with adjustable legs will be used. It shall be
as describe in T-762 (b) from ASME V, for instance, It shall be capable of lifting a 10 Lb (4.5kg) ferromagnetic block at it
maximum spacing. A yearly lift certificate is required.

Note: Even if a lift test has been passed within a year, the lift test is to be performed before the commencement of the job and
then every 2 hours of continuous work. The job cannot continue if the lift test is not passed and the technician has to redo with
a sound yoke, any job performed after the last successful lift test.

Type used: Manufacturer: GAMMATEC (SA); Model: MY-2

7.2.2. 4.5 Kg MPI Test weight

It is used to test the performance of the alternating current yoke during a lift test. It shall be as described in T-762 (d) from
ASME V, for instance. It shall detain the initial calibration certificate. Other calibration is needed only if the block has been
damaged in a manner that could have caused potential loss of material.

Type used: Manufacturer: GAMMATEC (SA)

7.2.3. Magnetic Particle Field Indicator

It is used to verify that the direction and intensity of the magnetic field are the adequate ones. It shall be as describe in T-
753.1.1 from ASME V.

Type used: ASME Field Indicator (Pie Gauge)


Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 6/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

7.2.4. Magnetic Particle Direction Indicator

It is used to verify that the direction of the magnetic field is the adequate one. It shall be as describe in T-753.1.2 from ASME
V.

Type used: Burmah Castrol Magnetic Flux Indicator, Type 1, Brass

7.2.5. Residual Field Meter

It is used, if demagnetization is required, to verify that part is free from residual magnetic field. It shall be calibrated within a
year.

Type used: Manufacturer: ANNIS, Model: Magnetometer Mod 25

7.2.6. Light Meter (Luxmeter)

It is used to ensure that intensity of light is great enough during the inspection of indications with visible magnetic particles,
and that the background light is small enough during inspection of indications with fluorescent magnetic particles. It shall
possess a calibration certificate to date.

Type used: Manufacturer: Goldilux; Model: GAL- 2H Light Meter - High Range.

7.2.7. Ultra Violet Lamp

It is used only for inspection with fluorescent magnetic particles to produce of black light (Ultra Violet Light) necessary to
visualize indications produce by the fluorescent magnetic particles. Before use, the technician shall inspect its glass for
cracking or breaking.

Type used: Manufacturer: Gammatec; UV100 – 220V


Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 7/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

7.2.8. Black Light Meter (UV meter)

It is used only for inspection with fluorescent magnetic particles, to ensure that intensity of black light (Ultra Violet Light) is
great enough during the inspection of indications. It shall possess a calibration certificate to date.

Type used: Manufacturer: Goldilux; Model: GUVA - 1L UV Light Meter.

7.2.9. Digital Thermometer

It is used to ensure that temperature of the surface remains within the recommended range. It shall possess a calibration
certificate to date.

Type used: Manufacturer: Goldilux; Model: Major Tech.

7.2.10. Miscellaneous Inspection Equipment

7.2.10.1.Lamp
7.2.10.2.Measuring tape
7.2.10.3.Digital Camera
7.2.10.4.Lint free toilet paper or rag
7.2.10.5.Electrical extension cable

7.2.11. Consumables

In this Procedure, visible or fluorescent wet medium on a solvent base will be used. For visible magnetic particles, a
background color may be used for contrast enhancement, and then a background remover is to be used at the completion of the
test. In the later case, the inspection will be completed using components (Background paint, magnetic particles, and
background paint remover) of the same mark and belonging to the same process, according to the indications of the fabricator.
They shall be sulphur and halogen free.

Components (7.2.11.1, 7.2.11.2, and 7.2.11.3) for visible magnetic particles

7.2.11.1.Background colour on solvent base

Theses are used to create a contrast between the surface to be tested and the magnetic particles in order to enhance
visibility. They shall be as described in paragraph T-641 from ASME V, article 24 (2001 Edition)

Type used: In aerosol cans, Manufacturer: Chemetall, Model: Ardrox 8903W

7.2.11.2.Wet Visible Magnetic Particles on solvent base

Theses are used to provide a visible indication (indication) by gathering around the flux leakage. They shall be as
described in paragraph T-641 from ASME V, article 24 (2001 Edition).
Type used: In aerosol cans, Manufacturer: Chemetall, Model: Ardrox 800/3.

7.2.11.3.Solvent background paint removers (Solvent cleaner)

Theses are used to remove oil or grease on the surface to be tested before the test and/or to remove the background color
after the completion of the test. They shall be as described in paragraph T-641 from ASME V, article 24 (2001 Edition)
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 8/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

Type used: In aerosol cans, Manufacturer: Chemetall, Ardrox: Model: 5319

Component 7.2.11.4, fluorescent magnetic particles does not require background paint or its remover

7.2.11.4.Fluorescent Penetrants on solvent base

Theses are used, under UV light, to provide a visible image (indication) by gathering around the flux leakage. They shall
be as described in paragraph T-641 from ASME V, article 24 (2001 Edition).
Type used: In aerosol cans, Manufacturer: Chemetall, Model: Ardrox 8530.

7.3. Operating procedure


Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 9/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

7.3.1. Safety

Personnel shall wear standard Personal protective equipment, ie, Coverall, hard Helmet, Safety boot… They shall adhere to
local special regulation that might be required in the specific area, ie, Safety glass, Hear protection, respiratory protection, and
fall arrest…

The working area shall be ventilated in order to avoid concentration of toxic and flammable gases.

The personal will avoid breathing gas and getting in contact with chemicals. Neoprene glove are advised.

Personnel shall wear UV absorbing spectacle while working with UV light and shall avoid touching the housing of the UV
lamp as it will got very hot.

7.3.2. Surface condition

The surfaces to be examined, and the areas adjacent to them in at least 25.4 mm (1 in), will be cleaned and dry using a lint free
rag or toilet paper to ensure it is free from rust, paint, projections, slag, spatters, grease, dirt, and in general, from any medium
or material that could interfere with the correct completion of the examination. If necessary, the solvent cleaner described in
7.2.8 will be sprayed on the surface to ease the cleaning process.

As directed by the manufacturer of consumables to be used, when using black visible magnetic particle, a thin and even layer
of white background color will be applied on the clean and dry surface.

7.3.3. Illumination

With visible magnetic particles, illumination, either natural (sun) or artificial, shall be more than 500 lx to enable proper
inspection of the surfaced to be examined, while with fluorescent particles, the intensity of UV light shall be greater than 1000
w/cm²

7.3.4. Magnetization Technique

A yoke as described in 7.2.1 will be used to magnetize the part.

7.3.5. Examination

The examination will be completed by the continuous method, that is, the magnetic field will remain while applying the
magnetic particles, and while removing their excess.

The examination will consist of two magnetizations. Theirs lines of force must be perpendicular, and an overlap of 10% will
be allowed to ensure the 100% examination of the surface.

7.3.6. Interpretation

Indications are formed by retention of magnetic particles. Only indications appearing while the magnetization force is applied
will be recorded, There can be indications that shouldn’t necessary be considered relevant like the ones that are due to part
geometry, excessive surface rugosity, permeability variation, etc.
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 10/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

Interpretation is only done by Level II or Level III personnel.

7.3.7. Reporting

Only indications interpreted as relevant will be reported.

For each relevant indication, the technician will record on the report (See annexes), its length, width and position traceable to a
reference point marked on the specimen and will qualify it as rounded or linear indication as described in 5.3 and 5.4. Further
description of the indication as, crack, undercut, etc. will be done if so required by the applicable standards. (See annexes).

A drawing or a photographic image of the indication will be attached to the report. In case of photographic image, a measuring
tape will placed close to the indication in order to help assessing its dimensions.

7.3.8. Evaluation

The evaluation will be carried out according to the acceptance criteria applicable in terms of the component and applicable
standards.

Interpretation is only done by Level II or Level III personnel.

7.3.9. Demagnetization

When the residual field can interfere with later fabrication stages or working conditions, the component will be demagnetized
by placing the poles of the yoke on the surface, moving them around the area, and slowly withdrawing the yoke, while it is still
energized.

7.3.10. Post cleaning

When the completion of the test can interfere with later fabrication stages or working conditions, the part will be cleaned by
using flushing background paint and/or wet particles with solvent, brushing and wiping the surface. Other suitable post
examination cleaning techniques may be used, if they will not interfere with subsequent requirements.

7.3.11. Repair

To be performed as per applicable codes and Standards


Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 11/ 11
Date : 10th March 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/003 Approved:
Magnetic Particles Testing

8. Records

It will be made by filling in all the data required in the report form included in annex, especially: client name, component name and
identification number, date of test, NDT technicians’ names and qualification, etc.

9. Annex

- Report Form
- Technique Sheet
- Acceptance Rejection Criteria (Applicable ones to be given to the crew prior to the Job)
Flaws Detection by Ultrasonic Testing

AE/GAS/SOP/08/004
Revision: 1
March 10th, 2009

Alduco Engineering Services http://www.alduco.com


No 11 O.J Okpo Street sales@alduco.com
Eliada Estate Phone : + (234) (1) 820 2170
Port Harcourt Fax : + (234) 271 0629
Nigeria.
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 1 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

REVISIONS

Revision Date Nature of modification


0 10/08/09 Initial compilation

1 25/05/09 General Improvement

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 2 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

AUTHORIZATION

Stage Names and Titles Company Signature Date

Prepared by: Rixon Maranan : NDT Level II AE


ffffff

Approved by: Alain Simplice Gan : NDT Level III AE


ffffff

Authorized by: Alfredo Jones : Managing Director AE


ffffff

ffffff

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 3 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

CONTENT

Title Page

Purpose 3

Scope. 3

References. 3

Related documentation. 3

Definitions. 3

Responsibilities 4

Personnel Qualification 4

Safety 5

Equipment and Consumables 5

Operating Procedure 8

10.1 Area of Interest 8

10.2 Surface Condition 8

10.3 System Calibration 8

10.4 Examination (Scanning) 11

10.5 Interpretation and Evaluation 13

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 4 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

10.6 Final Cleaning 13

10.7 Repair 13

Records 14

Annexes 14

Annex A (A1 to A3) DAC Blocks 15

Annex B UT Report Form 17

Annex C (C1 to C6) Scanning sequences per type of joint 18

Annex D (D1 and D2) DAC plotting and transfer loss determination 22

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 5 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

1. Purpose

This procedure describes the operative mode and acceptance levels to be followed when carrying out the Ultrasonic
test on parent materials, butt welds, and weld build up on ferritic welds or components.

1. Scope

This procedure is applicable to test welds or components whenever ASME V is called upon.

It refers to the detection, location and evaluation of reflectors within the weld, the Heat Affected Zone and adjacent
material on full penetration ferritic welds of plates or pipes with thickness ranging between 0.250 to 6 in (6 mm to 150
mm). In addition, for pipe, surface diameter shall be equal or greater than 4 in (100 mm).

Note: Whenever actual conditions are different from what is specified herein or the application of this procedure is not
possible, The NDT crew shall stop the job, report to the AE NDT supervisor, and wait for instructions before any
continuation of the job.

2. References

1. SNT-TC-1A, 2006: The ASNT recommended Practice for Qualification and Certification of NDT
personnel;

2. ASME V, Article 4 and Article 5: Articles devoted to “Ultrasonic Testing”

3. BS 3923-Part 1: Ultrasonic examination of welds

4. Related Documentation

5. UT Report Form;

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 6 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

6. AE Written Practice for Qualification and Certification of NDT Personnel n° AE/GAS/SOP/09/008.

7. Definitions

AE: Alduco Engineering Services (The Employer);

NDT: Non Destructive Testing;

ASNT: The American Society of Non Destructive Testing;

ASME: American Society of Mechanical Engineers;

BS: British Standard;

SNT-TC-1A: The ASNT (American Society for Non destructive Testing) recommended Practice for
Qualification of NDT personnel;

UT: Ultrasonic Testing;

DAC: Distance Amplitude Correction

PRL: Primary Reference Level

8. Responsibilities

AE:

1. Perform the job as requested by the Client and in conformance with this procedure (i.e. use qualified
personnel, appropriate equipment, follow safety regulations);

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 7 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

2. Issue on time deliverables (i.e. Reports, drawings, and images).

The Client:

3. Provide and/or specify Codes and Standards to apply;

4. Determine the Extent of examination and/or Areas to test;

5. Provide relevant information related to the component to test (i.e. drawings, material, sizes, and schedule; DAC
block or Calibration block of the material to test);

6. Issue Permit to Work

7. Personnel Qualification

1. All personnel entitled to use this procedure shall be qualified and certified in conformance with AE written
practice N° AE/GAS/SOP/09/008; which is in accordance with The ASNT’s recommended practice SNT TC 1A
(2006 Edition).

2. Level 2 or Level 3 will perform the test, report, interpret and evaluate results as directed by applicable Codes
and specifications.

3. Level 1 personnel will only perform specific Testing operations as per written instructions and under adequate
supervision of level 2 or Level 3 personnel.

4. Safety

1. Basic safety regulation shall be followed, especially the use of Personnel Protective Equipment such as Safety boot,
coverall, helmet, etc;

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 8 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

2. For jobs to be performed at a height higher than 2 meters, the use of convenient access means associated with
convenient fall arrest is mandatory;

3. For specific job site, a joint meeting with Client representative shall be necessary for “Job safety Analysis” that will
conduct to the issuance of “Permit to Work”; then, eventually, specific safety equipment will be used/worn and
additional care will to taken during operations.

4. Equipment and Consumables

1. UT Flaw Detector

A Pulse-Echo, digital instrument, with an “A” scan presentation and an operating frequency between
1.0 MHz to 5.0 MHz shall be used.

The instrument shall be linear in accordance with ASME V, article 5, Section T532 and T533. A valid
calibration certificate shall be issued for the flaw detector used.

Screen height linearity:

The ultrasonic instrument shall provide linear vertical presentation within approximately ±5% of the
Full Screen Height for 20% to 80% of the calibrated screen height (base line to maximum calibrated
screen point/s). This shall be performed at the beginning of each period of extended use (or every 3
months, whichever is less). The procedure for evaluating screen height linearity is provided in ASME V,
article 5, Appendix I.

Amplitude Control Linearity:

The ultrasonic instrument shall utilize an amplitude control accurate over its useful range to
approximately ±20% of the nominal amplitude ratio (±20% of the expected echo’s peak), to allow
measurement of indications beyond the linear range of the vertical display on the screen. This shall be

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 9 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

performed at the beginning of each period of extended use (or every 3 months, whichever is less). The
procedure for evaluating amplitude control linearity is provided in ASME V, article 5, Appendix II.

Type used: Manufacturer: Sonatest (UK) – Model: Sitescan 150.

2. Search Units

1. Transducer frequency:

A frequency range of 2.25 MHz to 5.00 MHz can be employed for both angle (shear wave) and straight beam
(longitudinal wave) testing. Depending on the acoustic properties of the material to test, the highest frequency
transducer that allow appropriate penetration will be employed.

2. Transducer size

A minimum of ¼ in (6.4mm) diameter or ¼ inch square to a maximum of 1 inch (25mm) square or 1 ⅛ (28,6mm)
diameter shall be used for both angle and straight beam transducers. Similar rectangular probe sizes will be
acceptable.

3. Transducer Angles/Type

1. For straight beam testing, a 0° probe may contains either single or dual transducer elements.

2. The nominal beam angle of 45º shall be used but other angles may be used where appropriate for the
configuration being examined angle probe shall be used for shear wave testing.

1. Transducer Types

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 10 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

1. Twin crystal straight beam transducer to be used if Thickness ≤ 1in (25mm).

2. Single crystal straight beam transducer to be used if Thickness >1in (25mm).

3. Only single crystal angle transducer shall be used.

1. Contact wedges

Search units with contoured may be used to aid ultrasonic coupling. Calibration shall be done with the contact
wedges used during the examination.

Types used: Manufacturer: Phoenix – Model: hereunder:

Single normal probe Phoenix SC 4-10 Model : SC 4-10

Twin normal probe Phoenix TC 4-10 Model : TC 4-10

Single 45° angle probe Phoenix GSW 4-45 (8x9) Model : GSW 4-45

Single 60° angle probe Phoenix GSW 4-60 (8x9) Model : GSW 4-60

Single 70° angle probe Phoenix GSW 4-70 (8x9) Model : GSW 4-70

2. Transducer cables

Transducer cables shall be approximately 64 inches – 80 inches (1.6m – 2.0m) in length and shall be free of any
leakage.

3. Couplant

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 11 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

A liquid or semi liquid shall be required. The couplant used shall not be injurious to the material being tested.
Water, oil, grease or cellulose paste can be used for a couplant. The same coupling medium shall be used for
both calibration and examination.

4. Reference/Calibration Blocks.

1. International Institute of Welding (IIW) V1 and V2 Blocks (also called respectively A2 and A4 Blocks):
These blocks are used for distance calibration, for determination of some characteristics of the
ultrasonic examination system, and for evaluation of its performance.

2. Beam Calibration Block (also called A5): It is used to draw the beam profile of each probe.

3. Flat Basic Distance Amplitude Correction (DAC) Blocks (see in annex A): These are used in the
thickness range concerned for sensitivity calibration for flat surfaces or surfaces with diameter greater
than 508 mm (20 in).

Refer to Notes 1 and 2 of the next paragraph for detailed specifications for the block.

4. Curved Basic Distance Amplitude Correction (DAC) Blocks (see in annex A): These are used in the
thickness range concerned for sensitivity calibration for curved surfaces.

Note 1:

1. For materials with the inspection surface diameter greater than 508 mm (20 in.), the calibration
block will be curved, and essentially with the same curvature. Alternatively, a Flat Basic Distance
Block specified in 9.5.3 or a General purpose DAC block specified in 9.5.5 can be used.

2. For materials with the inspection surface diameter equal to 508 mm (20 in.) or less, the
calibration block will be curved. A calibration block can be used to calibrate the inspection of
surfaces with diameters between 0.9 and 1.5 times the block diameter.

Note 2:

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 12 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

3. The material from which the calibration block is fabricated will be of an equivalent P-Number,
according to ASME IX, to that of the material to be examined. P-Numbers 1, 3, 4 and 5 are
considered equivalent.

4. For dissimilar metal welds, the selection of the calibration block material will be made in terms of
the material from the side of the weld from which the inspection is conducted. When it is
conducted from both sides, calibration blocks of both materials are used.

5. When there is two or more base material thicknesses involved, the block thickness is determined
by the average thickness of the weld.

6. The calibration block will receive the same tempering treatment required by the Material
Specification for the corresponding type and grade.

7. Where the component material is clad, the block will be clad by the same welding Procedure, as
production part.

8. The finish on the surfaces of the block will be representative of the surface finishes of the parts to
be examined.

9. The calibration block material will be completely examined with a straight beam search unit.
Areas that contain an indication exceeding the remaining back reflection will be excluded from
the beam paths required to reach the various calibration reflectors.

1. General Purpose Distance Amplitude Correction (DAC) block (see annex A3): made from low
attenuation steel, after some corrections, it may be used as alternate for sensitivity calibration. It will
be used for correction due both to attenuation and surface condition differences. It could be used for
examining flat surfaces or surface with diameter greater than 508 mm

10.Operating Procedure

1. Area of Interest

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 13 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Unless otherwise specified, the areas of interest shall be the weld itself, its Heat Affected Zone (HAZ),
and adjacent surfaces.

2. Surface Condition/Preparation

The base metal on each side of the weld shall be free of weld spatter, surface irregularities, or foreign matter
that might interfere with the examination. The temperature of the examination and basic calibration block
surfaces shall be within 25°F (14°C).

3. System Calibration

Calibration shall include the complete ultrasonic examination system. Each calibration shall be performed from
the surface (clad or unclad) corresponding to the surface of the component from which the examination will be
performed.

Calibration will be performed prior to the use of the system in thickness range under examination.

1. Distance Calibration

The calibration is carried out by means of the standard blocks indicated in 5.4.1, and consists for digital UT
equipment, of introducing the correct delay inside the probe (“Zero” of the probe) and velocity of the sound
inside the material. The “Zero” of the probe is known prior to the testing and the velocity of the sound is
determined by aiming on the standard blocks one reflector with known position.

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 14 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

2. Sensitivity Calibration

Reflectors on the appropriate Distance-Amplitude-Correction Block among those listed in 9.5 will be used to
draw the DAC curve as described in 10.3.3.1.b. The curve will be used as reference for evaluation of echoes,
provided it is adjusted by appropriate correction factor to account specific aspects i.e. difference in block shape
and material, probe work face, etc.

3. Probe Calibration: Points and Techniques

1. Angle Beam.

The calibration is done according to ASME V, article 4, Appendix B; and shall provide the following
measurements:

1. Sweep range calibration:

Using the delay, and range controls, the sweep range shall be set as follows:

When examination is to be done only with the first leg (Half Skip), the range shall be in minimum:

[0 to Half Skip + Quarter Skip]

When examination is to be done with both first and second leg (Half Skip and Full Skip), the range shall be in
minimum: [0 to Full Skip + Quarter Skip]

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 15 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

When examination is to be done only with the second leg (between Half Skip and Full Skip), the range shall
be in minimum: [Half Skip - Quarter Skip to Half Skip + Quarter Skip]

2. Distance – Amplitude – Correction:

As per annex D1, using the Reflectors on the appropriate Distance-Amplitude-Correction Block among
those listed in 9.5, this is what must be done:

1. Consider the reflector which gives the highest amplitude indication, and adjust the sensitivity (gain) until it
reaches 80% (approximately) of the full screen height. Record as Reference.

2. Without varying the gain, search for the maximum amplitudes that can be obtained by the other reflectors and
record the echo.

3. Acknowledge the end of echo recording, and the Distance-Amplitude Correction (DAC) curve is drawn and will
be taken as reference level.

4. When using angle beam search units, the indication of the notch on the opposite surface must also be recorded.

To avoid the corner effect of the hole and wall, the search unit must in all cases be perpendicular to the
reflector axis, and the centre of the search unit will be located at least 38 mm. from the lateral end of the
part.

5. Correction factor to account differences in attenuation and surface condition:

This will be done as shown on Annex D2, alternatively on the General Purpose DAC block (points called
A) and the material under test (points called B) by using two 45° angle probe facing each other operating
as separate transmitter and receiver.

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 16 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

6. Calibrate the time base using one the 45° angle probe.

7. Position the two probes facing each other to get the V path, maximize the echo by adjusting the probes and set
the gain to put the echo at 80 FSH; record the first point (Sound path and gain).

8. Position the two probes facing each other to get the VV then the VVV paths, proceed as above to record the
second and the third point.

9. With three points got from each component, plot their respective curves and extrapolate them to zero range.

10. The transfer loss at the work range is G2-G1

11.Position calibration: Necessary to link sound path to the depth of the reflector. This calibration is not
necessary for digital UT flaw detector with trigonometric calculator when the actual probe angle is
known. The UT flaw detector would help to locate the reflector.

12.Echo amplitude measurement from the surface notch in the basic calibration block: It is used as
reference when evaluating planar reflector at the opposite surface (depth = T).

13.When an electronic distance amplitude correction device is used, the primary reference response may
be equalized at a nominal constant screen height at/or between 40 to 80% of full screen height over the
distance range to be employed in the examination (Time Corrected Gain or TCG).

1. Straight Beam.

The calibration is done according to ASME V, article 4, Appendix C; and shall provide the following
measurements:

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 17 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

1. Sweep range calibration (similar to angle beam practice).

Using the delay, and range controls, the sweep range shall be in minimum: [0 to T + T/4]

2. Distance – amplitude correction (similar to angle beam practice).

3. Correction factor to account differences in attenuation and surface condition

This will be done alternatively on the General Purpose DAC block (points called A) and the material
under test (points called B) with the normal probe to use during the test.

4. Calibrate the time base.

5. Position the probe on the DAC block to obtain a series of back walk echoes A1, A2, A3, A4, etc.

6. Note the gain setting (in dB) required to bring each echo up to 80% FSH, the position of the echo in mm, and plot
these values as per curve A in Annex D2.

7. Reposition the probe on the material under test to equally obtain a series of back wall echo B1, B2, B3, B4, etc.
And repeat the step above plotting curve B.

8. Extrapolate them to zero range.

9. The transfer loss at the work range is G2-G1

10.When an electronic distance amplitude correction device is used, the primary reference response may
be equalized at a nominal constant screen height at/or between 40 to 80% of full screen height over the
distance range to be employed in the examination (Time Corrected Gain or TCG).

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 18 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

1. Calibration Confirmation /Check

A calibration confirmation of the system shall be performed prior to use in the thickness range under
examination. A calibration check shall verify the sweep range calibration and Distance – Amplitude – Correction.

Sweep Range Correction: If a point on the DAC curve has moved on the sweep line more than 10% of the sweep
reading or 5% of full sweep, whichever is greater, the sweep range calibration shall be corrected and the
correction noted in the examination record. All recorded indications since the last valid calibration or calibration
check shall be voided and the related area re-examined with the corrected calibration.

DAC Correction:

If a point on the Distance – Amplitude Correction (DAC) curve has decreased 20% or 2 dB of its amplitude, a new
calibration shall be made and recorded, all recorded indications since the last valid calibration or calibration
check shall be voided and the related area re-examined with the corrected calibration.

If any point of the Distance – Amplitude Correction (DAC) curve has increased more than 20% or 2 dB of its
amplitude, a new calibration shall be made and recorded, all recorded indications since the last valid calibration
or calibration check shall be re-examined with the corrected calibration and their values shall be consequently
changed.

2. Examination (Scanning)

1. General

1. The search unit displacement speed will be less than 150 mm/sec (6 in/sec).

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 19 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

2. The sweep of the search unit will be made allowing a 10% minimum overlap of the working
dimension of the search unit.

3. Preliminary Examination of Parent Materials

Before conducting the examination, a straight beam search applied from one or both side (s) of the base
material area through which the ultrasonic beam passes during the examination. If scanning from only
one side or if the material thickness is 1 inch (25mm) or less a twin crystal transducer shall be used. This
examination is meant to locate reflectors that can affect the interpretation of the inspection results
obtained by later search units.

This is done by positioning the probe in an area free from imperfection such that the 2nd back wall echo
(2nd BWE) is at 80% of full screen height (FSH); and scanning the appropriate surface of parent material.
Any area producing a loss of the back wall echo of – 6dB or more, or producing an unexpected echo
greater than 50% FSH would be recorded and marked.

Consequently, alternatives ways should be found to ensure the 100% examination of the area of
interest; if not, this should be marked on the report as limitation.

4. Examination of the weld

The scanning of weld and base metal shall be performed at a gain setting of at least two times (+6dB) the
primary reference level plus or minus applicable corrections. Evaluation shall be performed with respect
to the primary reference level plus or minus applicable corrections.

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 20 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Near field considerations shall be taken into account.

The weld, together with its adjacent base material, will be inspected in these aspects: extension, search
units, and position, according to the indications of Annex C (C1 to C6).

1. Critical Root Examination

This technique shall be done using the half - skip method and the beam targeting the centreline of the
weld at the weld root. It is recommended to place a guide bar or strip to ensure that the transducer is
kept at the constant distance from the weld centreline.

A 45° angle probe will be used, unless because of the weld cap, its beam cannot be directed to the access
to the centreline of the weld at the weld root. Then a 60° angle probe would be used

The probe shall be moved continuously along the weld and all echoes that occur at more or less the path
distance calculated for the weld root shall be investigated. All observed echoes shall be maximised by
moving the transducer forward/backward to determine its position and depth.

Notes:

The DAC curve is not convenient for evaluating these echoes; instead the amplitude got from the
surface notch in the basic calibration block will be used.

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 21 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

This technique shall be used from both sides of the weld. The capability of this technique is severely
reduced when scanning is possible from one side only. This shall be recorded as a limitation on the
ultrasonic report.

1. Weld body examination for longitudinal reflector

45°, 60°, and 70° angle probe will be used. If practical because the weld is ground flushed and etc, a
straight beam probe would also be used.

The angle beam shall be directed at approximate right angles to the weld axis from two directions
where possible. The search unit shall be manipulated so that the ultrasonic energy passes through the
required volumes of weld and adjacent base metal. The scanning shall be performed at a gain setting at
least two times the primary reference level. Evaluation shall be performed with respect to the primary
reference level.

Note:

Particular attention is to be taken for detecting lack of side wall fusion that produces a peculiar echo
when stroke at right angle by the UT beam.

2. Weld body examination for transverse reflector

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 22 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

A 70° angle probe will be used.

The angle beam shall be directed essentially parallel to the weld axis. The search unit shall be
manipulated so that the angle beam passes through the required volumes of weld and adjacent base
metal. The scanning shall be performed at a gain setting at least two times the primary reference level.
Evaluation shall be performed with respect to the primary reference level. The search unit shall be
rotated 180 deg. and the examination repeated.

3. Interpretation and Evaluation

For examination using a Distance–Amplitude Correction curve (DAC), any reflector which causes an indication in
excess of 20% of DAC (DAC + 2dB) shall be investigated in order to determine their shape, dimensions and
location, to the extent that it can be evaluated in terms of the applicable Acceptance and Rejection criteria.

Imperfection sizing will be a 6 dB drop technique for along the length of the weld and maximum amplitude
technique on the transverse direction.

4. Final Cleaning

Once the evaluation has been made, and the results have been recorded, if the completion of the test can
interfere with later fabrication stages or working conditions, the part will be cleaned by using suitable means to
ensure a complete removal of the couplant to prevent later corrosion.

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 23 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

5. Repairs

To be performed as per applicable codes and Standards

11.Records

Report

Reporting of test shall be done on the standard ultrasonic report sheet (see Annex B for typical ultrasonic report).

Map

For complex geometry, a map shall be drawn so that the proper weld and any discontinuity in it can be quickly and
accurately located.

Distribution

Report and map (s) if applicable will be transmitted to Client. AE will keep copies for archiving purposes

12.Annexes

1. Flat, Curved and General purpose Distance-Amplitude-Correction Blocks

2. Ultrasonic Report Form

3. Scanning sequences per type of joint

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 24 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

4. DAC plotting and Correction factor to account differences in attenuation and surface condition

5. Applicable Acceptance/Rejection Criteria (to be provided by the client on a case to case basis)

Annex A1: Flat Basic Distance Amplitude Correction (DAC) Blocks

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 25 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex A2: Curved Basic Distance Amplitude Correction (DAC) Blocks

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 26 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex A3: General Purpose Distance Amplitude Correction (DAC) Blocks

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 27 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 28 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex B

Ultrasonic Testing report

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 29 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 30 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex C1: Scanning of butt weld in plate or pipe

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 31 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 32 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex C2: Set-on connections. Branch welds

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 33 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 34 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex C3: Set-through nozzle welds. Single-sided

Annex C4: Set-through nozzle welds. Double-sided

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 35 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex C5: Structural T-joint

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 36 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex C6: Cruciform-joint

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 37 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex D1: Distance – Amplitude – Correction (DAC) plotting

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 38 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 39 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Annex D2: Transfer loss (Correction factor to account differences in attenuation and surface condition)

Checked:
Revision : 1 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 40 of 23

Date : 25th May 2009 Document: AE/GAS/SOP/08/004 R1 Approved:

Ultrasonic Flaws Detection on Welds

Checked:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray
Generators used in Industrial Radiography

AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001
Revision: 2
September 1st, 2009

Alduco Energy Limited http://www.alduco.com


No 11 O.J Okpo Street info@alduco.com
Eliada Estate Phone : + (240) 09 93 09
Port Harcourt Fax : + (240) 09 43 73
Nigeria.
Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 1 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

REVISIONS
Revision Date Nature of modification
0 10/06/08 Initial compilation
1 11/04/09 General Improvement
2 01/09/09 Corrections and updates

AUTHORIZATION
Stage Names and Titles Company Signature Date

Prepared by Rixon Maranan : NDT Level II AEL


ffffff
Approved by Alain Simplice Gan : NDT Level III AEL
ffffff
Authorized by Alfredo Jones : Managing Director AEL
ffffff

ffffff

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 2 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

Contents

N° Designation Page

1. Purpose 3

2. Scope 3

3. References 3

4. Related Documentation 3

5. Definitions 3

6. Responsibilities 4

7. Procedure 4

7. 1. Personnel Qualification 4

7. 2. Safety 4

7. 3. Equipments 5

7. 4. Technique / Operating Procedure 6

7. 4. 1. Handling of the source (General) 6

7. 4. 2. Storage of the source / Log in and out 7

7. 4. 3. Transport of the source 7

7. 4. 4. Operating the source / Changing a source 7

7. 4. 5. In Case of emergency 8

8. Exploitation of Records and Dose limits 8

9. Conclusion 8

10. Annex 9
A Dose Limits and Delimitation of Areas 10
B Source Log Block 11
C Radiation survey sheet 12
D Quarterly Radiation Dose Record Sheet 13

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 3 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

1. Purpose

1.1. To define the minimum requirements for the safe handling of radioactive sources and/or X-ray generators used
for radiographic testing.

2. Scope

2.1. This procedure applies to transporting, using and storing radioactive sources or X-ray generators used for
radiographic testing.

2.2. This procedure aims to keep the amount of the effective doses and equivalent doses of radiation received by
persons as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA).

3. References

ICRP: International Commission on Radiological Protection

IAEA: International Atomic Energy Agency

IRR 1999: Ionizing radiation regulation

4. Related Documentation

4.1 Dose limits

4.2 Source Log Book.

4.3. Radiation Survey Sheet

4.5. Quarterly Radiation Dose Record Sheet

4.6. AEL Emergency Procedure

4.7. Exposure Device Owner Manual

5. Definitions

5.1. ASNT: American Society of Nondestructive Testing;

5.2. RSO: Radio Safety Officer

5.3. RSA: Radiation Safety Adviser

5.4. Radiation Worker (RW): These are persons trained and authorized to handle radioactive sources. They are
aware of radiation hazards. While operating or handling the source, they must use survey meter and dose rate
alarming dosimeter for environmental survey, they must wear TLD and pocket dosimeter to monitor their
absorbed dose. Their weekly dose limit is 1 mSv. They operate out the restricted area where the maximum
dose rate is 20 µSv/hr. They are subject to health monitoring.

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 4 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

5.5. Non Radiation Worker(NRW): These are persons trained to be aware of radiation hazards, are not authorized
to operate the source. Due to their job, they are moderately exposed to radiation (e.g. drivers, welders,…).
While present in a vicinity of radiation operation. Their weekly dose limit is 0.1 mSv. They are not subject to
health monitoring. The RT crew shall prevent them entering the work area which is to be barricaded using
barrier radiation warning tapes, and the survey meter readings at this barrier shall not exceed 7.5 µSv/hr (0.75
mR/hr)

5.6. Public: These are persons who are not aware of radiation hazards nor being exposed to radiation. Their weekly
dose limit is 0.1 mSv. They are not subject to health monitoring nor wear any dose monitoring device. The RT
crew shall prevent them entering the work area which is to be barricaded using barrier radiation warning tapes,
and the survey meter readings at this barrier shall not exceed 2.5 µSv/hr (0.25 mR/hr)

5.7. TLD: Thermo Luminescent Dosimeter

5.8. AMEC Nuclear UK Limited: Approved Dosimetry Service used by AEL

6. Responsibilities

6.1. The Managing Director is responsible for the proper execution of this procedure and shall designate the RSO
and RPA

6.2. NDT Supervisor is to ensure that only proper qualified personnel as specified in 7.1 are allowed to transport, use
and store radioactive sources and X-ray generators mentioned in this procedure.

6.3. When handling radioactive source, Radiation workers are responsible of their own safety, that of Non Radiation
Workers and of the Public.

7. Procedure

7.1. Personnel Qualification.

This procedure is to be used only by personnel trained according to ASNT training program on radiation safety
and consequently detaining a letter from AEL Managing Director notifying them their status of Radiation Worker.

7.2. Safety

 Apart of what is stipulated on this procedure, personnel shall adhere to local, national and international
regulations related to radiation safety, especially Client safety regulation if any.

 As well, local basic safety regulation shall be followed, especially the use of Personnel protective Equipment such
as Safety boot, coverall, helmet, …

 If the job is to be performed at a height higher than 2 meters, the use of convenient access means associated
with convenient fall arrest is mandatory.

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 5 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

7.3. Equipment

7.3.1. Gamma Ray Projector: It is the exposure device carrying the source. It shall have up to date leak test
certificate and maintenance report. The dose rate at any part of the device shall not exceed 2 mSv/hr
when the source is at a locked position.
Type used: Gammamat TSI 5/1

7.3.2. Survey Meter: For collective radiation safety : shall have an up to date calibration certificate and be
capable of measuring range of levels from 0.2 µSV/hr to 100 mSv/hr, with a maximum error of no more
than 20%.
Type used: GAM-RAD 2006 Radiation Survey Meter

7.3.3. Dose Rate Alarming Dosimeter (DRAD): For individual radiation safety: It emits audible beep warning at
a frequency that increases with the dose rate. Can display dose rate as well as absorbed dose. Shall
always be used in conjunction with a survey meter.
Type used: SM3 Personal Radiation Alarm (beep only)

7.3.4. Direct Reading Dosimeter (DRD): For individual radiation safety: It is used to record the dose absorbed
from the last charging. It shall have a current calibration certificate and be able to record up to 2 mSv
doses.
Type used: Arrow-Tech W138 pocket dosimeter

7.3.5. Electronic Pocket Dosimeter (EPD): For individual radiation safety: It is used to record the daily dose
absorbed. It emits audible beep warning at a frequency that increases with the dose rate. Can display
dose rate as well as absorbed dose. Can replace both DRAD and DRD. Shall always be used in
conjunction with a survey meter. It shall have a current calibration certificate and be able to record up to 2
mSv doses.
Type used: Sentry EPD (beep, vibrate and record dose)

7.3.6. Thermo Luminescent Dosimeter (TLD): For individual radiation safety: The reading is indirect as the
TLD has to be processed in order to obtain the absorbed dose. It has the ability of recording greater
absorbed dose and can therefore be used for a longer period of time.
Type used: AMEC (UK) is our Approved Dosimeter Service

7.3.7. Barrier Rope: They are used to demarcate a controlled area for the purposes of radiographic exposure.
They shall be easily visible and can have radiation warning signs associated with the instructions “keep
out”.
Type used: Yellow or Magenta barricading tape with radiation warning signs and instruction “radiation
danger-keep out”

7.3.8. Radiation Warning Signs: If barrier ropes dot not have radiation signs, radiation warning signs are used
in order to give the reason of the barricade.
Type used: 400mm x 500mm colored “danger radiation” signs

7.3.9. Directional Shield (collimators): They are used to direct the radiation beam on the area of interest while
attenuating the beam in others directions
Type used: GAM799 (made of tungsten)

7.3.10. Emergency Container: It is used to secure the source after the emergency recovery operation.
Type used: 01 channel pot

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 6 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

7.3.11. Long Handled Tongs: Shall be 1.5 m long at least and It is used to handle the source during the
emergency recovery operation.
Type used: 2.0 m long

7.3.12. Flashing Warning Light: They are put at the barricade during night work to enhance the visibility of
Warning signs and instructions.

7.3.13. Lead Shots Bag: They are used to shield the source during the emergency recovery operation.
Type used: 2 kg bags of 2 mm diameter shots

7.3.14. Personnel Protective Equipment For Retrieval: Double sided X ray protective Apron of 0.25mm of
Lead; 0.5mm Lead lined collar; Anti X ray spectacle and Lead lined protective gloves.

7.4. Technique / Operating Procedure

7.4.1. Handling of the Source (General)

It is reminded that when handling the source, each Radiation Worker is responsible for his own safety, as well as
that of his colleagues, Non Radiation Workers and the Public.

It is also reminded that in the vicinity of radioactive sources, each Radiation worker shall wear radiation safety
equipment as defined in 5.3 and shall also ensure that Non Radiation Workers wear their own as defined in 5.4.

Before approaching the source, the pocket dosimeter has to be charged and set at Zero. And then after the job is
completed and the source stored, the individual absorbed dose recorded by the pocket dosimeter has to be
written in the Radiation Survey Sheet Sheet (see Annex C). The sheet is then transmitted to the Radiation Safety
Officer, via the NDT Supervisor. At any time, if it noticed that the pocket dosimeter quartz fiber electrometer is out
of scale, assuming that the absorbed dose is greater than 200 mR or (2 mSv), the radiation worker shall stop the
job and report to the Radiation Safety Officer who will sent the TLD to AMEC for reading and will investigate the
event.

Every three months, the TLD of Radiation worker and Non radiation worker are sent to AMEC (UK) for reading.
Results are then sent to the Radiation Safety Officer for exploitation and record. The base of analysis is dose
limits mentioned in 8.

Provision is made for Quarterly where no activity related to ionizing rays is involved; The TLD will be collected by
the RSO and kept to be sent later to AMEC along with used ones, with the mention “Not used Dosimeters”.

Even is dose limits are established, Radiation worker must keep in mind these two statements:

- Every unnecessary exposure is excessive


- Always, keep the absorbed dose As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA)

For that issue, he must use the three basic means of protection: Time, Distance and Shielding

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 7 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

7.4.2 Storage of the source / Log in and Log out

Source projector or source container shall be stored in a pit of at least one meter deep. The pit must be lockable
and the weekly dose rate on the top shall not exceed 0.1 mSv. The dose is calculated by using the following
formula: Dose = Dose rate x Time of occupancy.
The storage pit must be encircled by a permanent and solid wall or fence in order to avoid access by
unauthorized person. The wall or fence shall be labeled with radiation warning signs and writings.
The source must be permanently kept at the locked position if walls are not designed for radiation exposure
operations.

For temporary storage of the source for example during offshore job, an Iron box, lockable can be used, the dose
rate at any part of the surface of the iron box shall not exceed 20 µSV/hr.

Each source stored shall have its own Log book (see Annex B) where all the entries and exits are to be
monitored. The survey meter is to use after exiting the camera from the pit and before entering it to ensure the
source is in fully shield position.

7.4.3 Transport of the Source

 During transportation, the source shall be escorted by a certified Radiation Worker (RW) in possession of TLD,
Pocket dosimeter, Survey meter and Dose rate alarming dosimeter.
 The locked projector is to be placed in a secured storage compartment in a transport vehicle.
 For transportation i.e by boat offshore, the source is to be placed in a secured box as defined in 7.4.2. and firmly
strapped in the boat.
 The dose rate shall not exceed 20 µSv/hr in any normally occupied position in the vehicle and 0.1 mSv/hr at any
point two meters from the outside of the vehicle.
 At least 01 radiation warning sign is to be placed each side of the vehicle (front, rear, left and right).
 The vehicle shall be kept attended at all time during the transportation.

7.4.4 Field Operation/Source Transfer

 Before operating the exposure device in the field, the radiographic crew shall obtain from the client a work permit
that authorizes to use ionizing radiation at the concerned place at concerning hours.
 Assuming that there is no shielding material, the radiographic crew shall calculate the distance needed to erect
the barricade so that a dose rate at boundaries does not exceed 20 uSV/hr. The crew could then adjust this
distance in taking advantage of shielding materials surrounding the place.
 Where it is not possible to visually monitor the area, the crew shall erect the barricade and label it with radiation
warning signs. Flashing warning light shall be added for night time job.
 Where an area is beyond the control of the crew (e.g. a property line such as a wall or ceiling), the dose rate at
the perimeter of the area within which the crew has control must not exceed 2.5 uSv/hr.
 During exposure, the crew must confirm with a survey meter that the placement of the signs and barriers
described above does not allow inadvertent entry into the area where the dose rate is higher than 20 uSv/hr
 Use appropriate collimating shields for every exposure to limit the size of the radiation beam to the area being
radiographed.
 After each exposure the operator must perform a radiation survey designed to ensure that the sealed source has
returned to a fully shield position in the exposure device.

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 8 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

7.4.5 In case of Emergency

7.4.5.1. Prevention:

It is reminded that to prevent emergency case, Radiation Worker must handle with care exposure device
and accessories, must checks equipment before and after each use and must be sure that its
maintenance is up to date.

7.4.5.2. Recognizing an Emergency Occurrence:

- It is reminded that Radiation Worker must use and/or wear radiation safety equipment mentioned in 5.3
for instance the survey meter.
- If the source fails to go back at it fully shielded position, the dose rate alarming dosimeter and the survey
meter will let the Radiation workers recognize the situation and he can even guess the location of the
source (in the collimator, the guide tube or the entrance of the exposure device).

7.4.5.3. Barricading the area and reporting:


If is confirmed that the source fails to go back in the fully shielded position, the radiation worker must
consequently widen the barricade, permanently inspect it and report to the Radiation Safety Officer.

7.4.5.4. Retrieval:

After analyzing the event, the Radiation Safety Officer, will mobilize necessary emergency equipment
listed in 7.3 and will proceed to retrieval as per AEL Emergency procedures, taking into account the
limitation of absorbed doses in case of emergency control and remedial work mentioned in Chapter 8.

8. Records / Interpretation / Dose limits

 The NDT Supervisor exploits records of Source Log book in order to plan maintenance operation.
 The Radiation Safety Officer exploits absorbed doses of each individual mentioned in 7.1. It is daily doses
recorded on the “Radiation Survey Sheet” at Annex C, and quarterly doses recorded on the “Quarterly radiation
Dose record Sheet” at Annex D.
 During any work session, if it noticed that the pocket dosimeter’s quartz fiber electrometer is out of scale,
assuming that the absorbed dose is greater than 200 mR or (2 mSv), the radiation worker shall stop the job and
report to the Radiation Safety Officer who will the TLD to AMEC for reading and will investigate the event.
 Dose limits per category of individual and per period are shown on a table Annex A. It also states dose limits in
case of emergency control and remedial work.

9. Conclusion

The following procedure, if applied properly by qualified personnel will assist in preventing unnecessary irradiation and
prevent occurrence of emergency situation.

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 9 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

10. Annexes (see the following pages)

Annex A: Dose Limits Table

Annex B: Source Log Book Format

Annex C: Radiation Survey Sheet

Annex D: Quarterly Radiation Dose Record Sheet

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 10 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

Annex A: Dose Limits Tables and Delimitation of Areas

See the next page (non numbered)

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 11 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

Annex B: Source Log Book Format

See the next page (non numbered)

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 12 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

Annex C: Radiation Survey Sheet

See the next page (non numbered)

Radiation Protection Procedure


Revision : 2 Alduco Quality Management System Page : 13 of 13
st
Date : 1 Sept. 2009 Document: AEL/GAS/SOP/08/001 Approved:
Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography

Annex D: Quarterly Radiation Dose Record Sheet

See the next page (non numbered)

Radiation Protection Procedure


Alduco Quality Management System SOP N°: AEL/GAS/SOP/09/001 - R0 Form
SOP Title: Safe Handling of Radioactive Sources and X ray Generators used in Industrial Radiography
Document Title : Quarterly Radiation Dose record Sheet

Part of the body monitored: Period monitored Year: Quarter:

Name and Surname : Position : Date of Birth:

Age: Years Previous Permissible Total Accumulated Dose : rems or mSv

Previous Total Absorbed Dose : rems or mSv

Maximum Permissible Dose for the Quarter: rems or mSv

Method of Monitoring Daily Monitoring by: and Quarterly monitoring by:

Records and Follow-up


Running Total
Period of Exposure Location of the Absorbed Dose
Absorbed Dose Relate Sheet
Beginning End exposure (mR or mrem)
(mR or mrem)

Total of the Quarter’s Daily dose Whole Body (mR or mrem) (mSv)
Whole Body Deep (mR or mrem) (mSv)
Total of the Quarterly dose recorded
Whole Body Skin (mR or mrem) (mSv)
Total Accumulated Dose at the end of the Quarter Whole Body ( R or rem) (mSv)
Permissible Accumulated Dose: 5x (N-18) Whole Body ( R or rem) (mSv)
Permissible Dose for the next Quarter Whole Body ( R or rem) (mSv)

Remarks and Comments

Validation
Name of the Person in Charge: Title:

Date of Signature: Signature:


Revision N°: 2
Alduco Energy Limited Dose Limits and Delimitation of Areas

Doses limits table

Exposure Area Vs. Non Radiation


Radiation Worker Public
Exposure Interval Worker

Exposure Exposure
Exposure Intervals Control of an
Intervals Intervals
Exposed area (Unrestricted Area for emergency and
(Restricted Area to (Restricted Area
RW) remedial work
NRW) to public)
Year: 12 mSv Year: 5 mSv Year: 1 mSv
Quarter: 6 mSv
Week: 1 mSv Week: 0.1 mSv Week: 0.1 mSv
Whole-body Hour: 20 µSv 0,2 Sv Hour: 7.5 µSv Hour: 2.5 µSv
D=5(N-18)

D : Cumulated dose
Any lens of the eye 0,15 Sv 0,15 Sv 15 mSv 15 mSv
Skin 0,5 Sv 0,3 Sv 50 mSv 50 mSv
Hands and Feet 0.5 Sv 0.6 Sv 50 mSv 50 mSv

* Dose limit for Embryos and Foetus is 5 mSv (evenly absorbed during 9 months)
* Monthly dose limit for Fertile female workers is 2.5 mSv to ensure that doses absorbed by embryos and Fetus during the two first
month of pregnancy do not exceed 5 mSv. Pregnant worker shall then avoid or reduce radiation occupational exposure

Delimitations of areas

Legend

Source : Public

NRW

RW

20 µSv/hr

7.5 µSv/hr

2.5 µSv/hr
Revision N°: 2
Alduco Energy Limited Dose Limits and Delimitation of Areas

You might also like