TUV SUD - MT Procedure Rev.05

TÜV SÜD MIDDLE EAST LLC
Subsidiary of TÜV SÜD Industry Service GmbH, Munich Germany

Procedure For Magnetic Particle Examination
PROCEDURE NO.: TUV-SUD/NDT/MT/001 Rev. No.: 05 Date: 22-09-2020 PAGE No. Page 1 of 11
TITLE MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE
Copy No.
Issued
to:
Prepared by: Issue for Implementation Approved and accepted to use in TÜV SÜD ME by:
Mr. Farag Abdalla – Level III 238808 Mr. Yasser Hassan –Industry Manager Mr. Salah Safah – Managing Director
Middle East
Magnetic Particle Examination Procedure
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This is an official document of TUV SUD Middle East. Printed copies without the original seal of the company is “Uncontrolled Copy”.
Table of Contents
Section Description
1 Scope
2 Reference Documents
3 Definitions
4 Personnel Qualifications
5 Equipment
6 Materials
7 Surface Preparation
8 Method of Examination
9 Evaluation of Indications
10 Acceptance Criteria
11 Demagnetization
12 Post Examination Cleaning
13 Documentation
14 Attachments
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. SCOPE
1.1. This procedure defines the criteria and general requirements to carry out magnetic particle examination on
welded joints and weld bevels of ferromagnetic materials of boilers, and pressure vessels.
1.2. This procedure specifies the minimum requirements for magnetic particle examination of welds and areas in
ferromagnetic materials, to detect discontinuities open to the surface, employing electromagnetic yoke with
none fluorescent wet systems.
1.3. This procedure shall be demonstrated prior to use to the satisfaction of the Authorized Inspector in accordance
with the requirements of T-150, ASME Code Sec. V. The procedure qualification record shall be attached to
this procedure.
1.4. A change of a requirement in Table T-721 identified as an essential variable from the specified value or range
of values shall require requalification of this written procedure. A change of a requirement identified as
nonessential variable from the specified value, or range of values, does not require requalification of this
procedure. All changes of essential or nonessential variables from the value or range of values, specified by
this procedure shall require revision.
2. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
2.1. This Procedure refers to the following:
2.1.1 ASME Section V, 2019 Edition, Nondestructive Testing.

2.1.2 ASTM E 709-08 Standard Guide for Magnetic Particle Examination.
2.1.3 ASME Section VIII, 2019 Edition Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels
2.1.4 ASME B31.1, 2018 Edition, Power Piping.
2.1.5 ASME B31.3, 2018 Edition, Process Piping
2.1.6 ASME B31.4, 2018 Edition, Pipeline transportation system for liquids and slurries
2.1.7 ASME B31.8, 2018 Edition Gas transmission and distribution piping systems.
2.1.8 API 1104 – 23st Edition, 2018 Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities
2.1.9 AWS D 1.1,2017 Edition Structural Welding Code – Steel
2.1.10 SAEP-1144, Saudi Aramco Engineering Procedure – magnetic Particle Testing
2.1.11 Client’s specification requirements for acceptance criteria.
2.1.12 TUV SUD ME written Practice for the Qualification and Certification of NDT Personnel complying with
CP-189, 2011 requirements
3. DEFINITIONS
3.1. MPI:Magnetic particle inspection.
3.2. AC: Alternating current.
3.3. DC: Direct current.
3.4. NDE : Non Destructive Examination.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
4.1. All personnel involved in magnetic particle examination shall be qualified in accordance with the requirements
of TUVSUD ME written practice (Written Practice for NDE Personnel Qualification).
4.2. When the written practice is revised, the certification of NDE personnel remains valid to the requirements of
the previous revision until the expiry date of the personnel qualification certificate; then, recertification to the
requirements of the new revision is required.
4.3. Subcontractor’s personnel involved in magnetic particle examination shall be qualified in accordance with the
requirements of subcontractor’s written practice, which shall be reviewed and accepted by TUV SUD ME level
III.
4.4. The certification of personnel shall be checked by the TUV SUD level III prior to work commencement.
5. EQUIPMENT
5.1. Electromagnetic yokes shall be the adjustable leg type giving an AC magnetic field and shall have a lifting
power capable of lifting a test weight of 10 lbs. (4.5 kg) at maximum pole spacing.
5.2. Permanent Magnetic yokes shall have a lifting power of at least 40 lbs. (18 kg) at maximum pole spacing that
will be used.
5.3. Calibration of the said weights shall be in accordance with the relevant calibration procedure (T-762-d).
5.4. Light meters shall be calibrated at least once a year or whenever a meter has been repaired. If meters have
not been in use for one year or more, calibration shall be done before being used.
5.5. The black lights used include the Spectronics B-100, Labino 135, and Magnaflux ZB-100F,
Magnaflux ZB-100 LED UV or equivalent.
6. MATERIALS
6.1. Only materials of a recognized approved commercial quality shall be used, as identified by the manufacturer’s
name i.e. Ardrox, Ely Chemicals, Magnaflux, Bycotest, or as specified by the client. In any case, the specific
type of material to be used shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of A.I. in accordance with ASME Code
Section V, Article 1, T-150, and certificate shall be attached to this procedure upon demonstration.
6.2. Wet black color particles, shall be used, and a suitable white contrast paint background, the consumable
materials shall be obtained from a recognized manufacturer.
6.3. Ready mixed “wet” consumables contained in aerosol can form are considered acceptable.
6.4. Particles shall be used within the temperature range limitations set by procedure demonstration.
7. SURFACE PREPARATION
7.1. Satisfactory results may generally be obtained when the surfaces are: as-welded, as-rolled, as-cast, as-forged,
as-blasted; however, surface preparation by grinding or machining may be necessary in some cases where
surface irregularities would otherwise mask the indications of discontinuities
7.2. Prior to magnetic particle examination the surface shall be examined and all adjacent areas within at least 1 in.
(25 mm) shall be dry and free of any dirt; grease , lint, scale, welding flux, spatter, oil slag or other extraneous
matter that would interfere with the magnetic particles.
7.3. Cleaning may be accomplished using detergents, organic solvents, descaling solutions, paint removers, sand
or grit blasting methods.
7.4. If nonmagnetic coatings are left on the part in the area being examined, it shall be demonstrated that
indications can be detected through the existing maximum coating thickness applied. When AC yoke
technique is used, the demonstration shall be in accordance with Mandatory Appendix I of Article 7.
8. METHOD OF EXAMINATION
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8.1. All examinations shall be conducted with sufficient field overlap to ensure 100% coverage at the required
sensitivity.
8.2. The method of magnetization shall be done using either electromagnetic yoke, with pole spacing to be no
greater than 6 in. (150 mm). Continuous magnetization method shall be utilized.
8.3. For electromagnetic yoke, the yoke is energized after the particles have been applied. The flow of the particles
shall stop with the application of current. Wet particle applied from aerosol spray cans may be applied before
and/or after magnetizing current is applied. With the wet particles method, care shall be exercised to avoid
“flooding” of the area.
8.4. At least two separate examinations shall be performed on each area under examination; during the second
examination the lines of magnetic flux shall be approximately perpendicular to those used during the first
examination in the same area.
8.5. The adequacy or direction of the magnetizing field, when necessary, shall be demonstrated by using the
magnetic particle field indicator. The magnetic particle field indicator described in ASME Section V, Article 7,
Fig. T-764.2.a shall be used.
8.6. Good lighting shall be available to ensure shadows do not obstruct the test areas. A minimum light intensity of
100 foot candles (1000 Lx) is required on the surface to be examined to ensure adequate sensitivity during the
examination and evaluation of indications.
8.7. The light source, technique used, and light level verification is required to be demonstrated one time,
documented, and maintained on file.
9. EVALUATION OF INDICATIONS
9.1. All personnel performing Magnetic particles examination according to this procedure shall be qualified and
certified as per TUV SUD ME written practice. Evaluation of test results shall be employed by personnel
certified to a minimum level II.
9.2. Relevant indications are those that result from mechanical discontinuities:
9.2.1. Linear indications are those indications in which the length is more than three times the width. Only
indications with major dimensions greater than 1.5mm (1/16) shall be considered relevant.
9.2.2. Rounded indication or indications which are circular or elliptical with lengths less than three times
the width.
9.2.3. Any questionable or doubtful indications shall be re-tested to verify whether or not actual defects
are present.
9.2.4. Localized surface imperfections may occur, such as machine marks, surface conditions, or
incomplete bond between base metal and cladding, may produce similar indications which are not
relevant.
10. ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

10.1. Refer to the applicable ASME referencing Code Section:
10.1.1. ASME Code, Section I ……………………. (A260).
10.1.2. ASME Code, Section 8, Div. 1………... (Appendix 6).
10.1.3. ASME Code, Section 8, Div. 2………... (para.7.5.6)
10.1.4. ASME B31.1, paragraph 136.4.3 (B)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10.1.5. ASME B31.3 / table 341.3.2.

10.1.6. AWS D1.1 Table d1.1
10.1.7. NBIC / the acceptance standard shall be as specified in the original code of construction.
11. DEMAGNETIZATION
11.1. When residual magnetism in the part could interfere with subsequent processing or usage, the part shall be
demagnetized any time after completion of the exanimation.
12. POST EXAMINATION CLEANING

12.1. Upon completion of the test, in cases where residual penetrant or developer could interfere with subsequent
processing or with service requirements, a suitable technique, such as a water rinse or solvent soak for
cleaning may be employed.
13. DOCUMENTATION
13.1. Non-rejectable indications shall be recorded as specified by the referencing Code Section.
13.2. Rejectable indications shall be recorded. As a minimum, the type of indications (linear or rounded), location
and extent (length or diameter or aligned) shall be recorded.
13.3. As a minimum the report shall give the following information:
13.3.1. Procedure identification and revision;
13.3.2. Magnetic particle equipment and type of current;
13.3.3. Magnetic particles (visible or fluorescent, wet or dry);
13.3.4. Examination personnel identity and if required by referencing Code Section, qualification level;
13.3.5. Map or record of indications as per T-792;
13.3.6. Material and thickness;
13.3.7. Lighting equipment; and
13.3.8. Date examinations were performed.
14. RECORDS:
14.1. Magnetic Particles Examination shall be documented on Magnetic Particles Examination Report form.
15. ATTACHMENTS:
15.1. Magnetic Particles Examination Report form.
15.2. Procedure qualification record and demonstration report.
15.3. Acceptance Criteria.
15.4. UV Intensity log.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
MAGNETIC PARTICLES INSPECTION REPORT

REPORT NO.
CLIENT: LOCATION :
PROJECT TYPE:
ITEM : ACC. CRITERIA:
MATERIAL : SURFACE CONDITION:
TEST TEMP. : Yoke Type / Manufacture: /
VIEWING CONDITION : SERIAL NO. / Model: /
CONSUMABLE : MT SET BRAND NAME :
White Contrast : Magnetic Particles :
Observation &Evaluations :
Approved by,
Division Manager,
INSPECTED BY : Client:
LEVEL : II NAME:
SIGNATURE : SIGNATURE:
DATE: DATE:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment # 2 Acceptance Criteria

Code Acceptance Criteria
Only indications which have any dimension greater than
1/16”
(1.5 mm) shall be considered relevant
ASME , Section VIII, Div. 1 All surfaces to be examined shall be free of
Mandatory Appendix 6 a. Relevant linear indications
b. Relevant rounded indications greater than 3/16” (5 mm)
c. Four or more relevant rounded indications in a line
separated by 1/16” (1.5 mm) or less edge to edge.
1/16”
ASME Code, Section 8, Div. All surfaces to be examined shall be free of
2 para.7.5.6 a. Relevant linear indications
1/16”
All surfaces to be examined shall be free of
ASME B 31.3
a. Relevant linear indications
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Any indication with a maximum dimension of 1/16 inch (1.6

mm) or less shall be classified as non-relevant
Relevant Indications shall be considered defects should any of
the following conditions exist:
a. Linear indications evaluated as crater cracks or star
cracks exceed 5/32 inch (4 mm ) in length
b. Linear indications are evaluated as cracks other than
API 1104
crater cracks or star cracks
c. Linear indications evaluated as IF and exceed 1 inch in
total length in a continuous 12 in (300 mm)length of weld
or 8% of the weld length
For evaluation of rounded indications, the maximum
dimension
shall be considered its size.
- Welds that are subject to MT shall be evaluated on the basis of the applicable
requirements for visual inspection criteria as detailed in Table 6.1 of AWS D1.1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment 3, UV Intensity Log.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

TUV SUD - MT Procedure Rev.05

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TUV SUD - MT Procedure Rev.05

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TÜV SÜD MIDDLE EAST LLC

Subsidiary of TÜV SÜD Industry Service GmbH, Munich Germany

Magnetic Particle Examination Procedure

12 Post Examination Cleaning

2.1.1 ASME Section V, 2019 Edition, Nondestructive Testing.

10. ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

10.1.5. ASME B31.3 / table 341.3.2.

12. POST EXAMINATION CLEANING

MAGNETIC PARTICLES INSPECTION REPORT

Attachment # 2 Acceptance Criteria

Any indication with a maximum dimension of 1/16 inch (1.6

Attachment 3, UV Intensity Log.

You might also like