Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. a. Tangible 11. a. No
b. Capable of repeated use in the opera- b. No
tions of the business 12. a. An accelerated depreciation method is
e. Long-lived most appropriate for situations in which
2. a. Property, plant, and equipment the decline in productivity or earning
b. Current assets (merchandise inventory) power of the asset is proportionately
3. Real estate acquired as speculation should greater in the early years of use than in
be listed in the balance sheet under the cap- later years, and the repairs tend to in-
tion “Investments,” below the Current Assets crease with the age of the asset.
section. b. An accelerated depreciation method re-
4. $298,500 duces income tax payable to the IRS in
5. Capital expenditures include the cost of ac- the earlier periods of an asset’s life.
quiring fixed assets and the cost of improv- Thus, cash is freed up in the earlier peri-
ing an asset. These costs are recorded by ods to be used for other business pur-
increasing (debiting) the fixed asset account. poses.
Capital expenditures also include the costs c. MACRS was enacted by the Tax Re-
of extraordinary repairs, which are recorded form Act of 1986 and provides for de-
by decreasing (debiting) the asset’s accu- preciation for fixed assets acquired after
mulated depreciation account. Revenue ex- 1986.
penditures are recorded as expenses and 13. No. Financial Accounting Standards No.
are costs that benefit only the current period 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Cor-
and are incurred for normal maintenance rections,” is quite specific about the treat-
and repairs of fixed assets. ment of changes in depreciable assets’ esti-
6. Capital expenditure mated service lives. Such changes should
7. A capital lease is accounted for as if the les- be reflected in the amounts for depreciation
see has purchased the asset and the asset expense in the current and future periods.
is written off over its useful life. An operating The amounts recorded for depreciation ex-
lease is accounted for as a current-period pense in the past are not affected.
expense (rent expense). 14. a. No, the accumulated depreciation for an
8. Ordinarily not; if the book values closely ap- asset cannot exceed the cost of the as-
proximate the market values of fixed assets, set. To do so would create a negative
it is coincidental. book value, which is meaningless.
9. a. No, it does not provide a special cash b. The cost and accumulated depreciation
fund for the replacement of assets. Un- should be removed from the accounts
like most expenses, however, deprecia- when the asset is no longer useful and
tion expense does not require an equiv- is removed from service. Presumably,
alent outlay of cash in the period to the asset will then be sold, traded in, or
which the expense is allocated. discarded.
b. Depreciation is the cost of fixed assets 15. a. Over the shorter of its legal life or years
periodically charged to revenue over of usefulness.
their expected useful lives. b. Expense as incurred.
10. 12 years c. Goodwill should not be amortized, but
written down when impaired.
509
PRACTICE EXERCISES
PE 9–1A
PE 9–1B
PE 9–2A
PE 9–2B
PE 9–3A
510
PE 9–3B
PE 9–4A
a. 5% = [(1/40) × 2]
b. $32,500 ($650,000 × 5%)
PE 9–4B
a. 40% = [(1/5) × 2]
b. $58,000 ($145,000 × 40%)
PE 9–5A
PE 9–5B
511
PE 9–6A
c. Cash................................................................................ 200,000
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment ..................... 141,750
Equipment................................................................. 324,000
Gain on Sale of Equipment...................................... 17,750
PE 9–6B
512
PE 9–7A
PE 9–7B
PE 9–8A
PE 9–8B
513
EXERCISES
Ex. 9–1
Ex. 9–2
a. Yes. All expenditures incurred for the purpose of making the land suitable for
its intended use should be debited to the land account.
Ex. 9–3
Ex. 9–4
Capital expenditures: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10
Revenue expenditures: 3, 7, 9
Ex. 9–5
Capital expenditures: 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9
Revenue expenditures: 1, 3, 5, 10
514
Ex. 9–6
Ex. 9–7
a. No. The $3,175,000 represents the original cost of the equipment. Its replace-
ment cost, which may be more or less than $3,175,000, is not reported in the
financial statements.
b. No. The $3,175,000 is the accumulation of the past depreciation charges on
the equipment. The recognition of depreciation expense has no relationship
to the cash account or accumulation of cash funds.
Ex. 9–8
(a) 50% (1/2), (b) 12.5% (1/8), (c) 10% (1/10), (d) 5% (1/20), (e) 4% (1/25), (f) 2.5%
(1/40), (g) 2% (1/50)
Ex. 9–9
Ex. 9–10
$145,000 − $7,000
= $1.84 depreciation per hour
75,000 hours
515
Ex. 9–11
Ex. 9–12
or or
Ex. 9–13
516
Ex. 9–14
Ex. 9–15
Ex. 9–16
517
Ex. 9–18
Ex. 9–19
Ex. 9–20
518
Ex. 9–21
Ex. 9–22
519
Appendix 1 Ex. 9–23
N(N + 1) 20(20 + 1)
Sum of Years of Useful Life = = = 210
2 2
N(N + 1) 8(8 + 1)
Sum of Years of Useful Life = = = 36
2 2
N(N + 1) 10(10 + 1)
Sum of Years of Useful Life = = = 55
2 2
a.
Price (fair market value) of new equipment ...................................... $300,000
Trade-in allowance of old equipment ................................................ 120,000
Cash paid on the date of exchange ................................................... $180,000
b.
Price (fair market value) of new equipment ..................... $300,000
Less assets given up in exchange:
Book value of old equipment ..................................... $115,500
Cash paid on the exchange ........................................ 180,000 295,500
Gain on exchange of equipment ....................................... $ 4,500
520
Appendix 2 Ex. 9–27
a.
Price (fair market value) of new equipment ...................................... $300,000
Trade-in allowance of old equipment ................................................ 120,000
Cash paid on the date of exchange ................................................... $180,000
b.
Price (fair market value) of new equipment ....................... $300,000
Less assets given up in exchange:
Book value of old equipment ....................................... $127,750
Cash paid on the exchange .......................................... 180,000 307,750
Loss on exchange of equipment......................................... $ 7,750
521
Ex. 9–30
Revenue
a. Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio =
Average Book Value of Fixed Assets
$93,469
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio =
($85,294 + $82,356)/2
b. Verizon earns $1.12 revenue for every dollar of fixed assets. This is a low
fixed asset turnover ratio, reflecting the high fixed asset intensity in a tele-
communications company. The industry average fixed turnover ratio is slight-
ly lower at 1.10. Thus, Verizon is using its fixed assets slightly more efficient-
ly than the industry as a whole.
Ex. 9–31
522
PROBLEMS
Prob. 9–1A
1.
Land Other
Item Land Improvements Building Accounts
a. $ 4,000
b. 400,000
c. 2,500
d. 31,750
e. $ 36,000
f. 10,000
g. (3,000)*
h. 15,200
i. 5,400
j. $(600,000)*
k. 9,000
l. 3,000
m. 1,800
n. $ 12,000
o. 14,500
p. 33,000
q. (4,500)*
r. 700,000
s. (450)*
2. $469,450 $ 26,500 $773,950
*Receipt
3. Since land used as a plant site does not lose its ability to provide services, it
is not depreciated. However, land improvements do lose their ability to pro-
vide services as time passes and are therefore depreciated.
523
Prob. 9–2A
Depreciation Expense
a. Straight- b. Units-of- c. Double-
Line Production Declining-Balance
Year Method Method Method
2009 $ 86,000 $129,000 $190,000
2010 86,000 107,500 95,000
2011 86,000 60,200 47,500
2012 86,000 47,300 11,500*
Total $344,000 $344,000 $344,000
Calculations:
Straight-line method:
($380,000 – $36,000)/4 = $86,000 each year
Units-of-production method:
($380,000 – $36,000)/8,000 hours = $43 per hour
2009: 3,000 hours @ $43 = $129,000
2010: 2,500 hours @ $43 = $107,500
2011: 1,400 hours @ $43 = $60,200
2012: 1,100 hours @ $43 = $47,300
Double-declining-balance method:
2009: $380,000 × 50% = $190,000
2010: ($380,000 – $190,000) × 50% = $95,000
2011: ($380,000 – $190,000 – $95,000) × 50% = $47,500
2012: ($380,000 – $190,000 – $95,000 – $47,500 – $36,000*) = $11,500
*Book value should not be reduced below the residual value of $36,000.
524
Prob. 9–3A
a. Straight-line method:
2008: [($48,600 – $3,000)/3] × 1/2 ............................................... $ 7,600
2009: ($48,600 – $3,000)/3 ........................................................... 15,200
2010: ($48,600 – $3,000)/3 ........................................................... 15,200
2011: [($48,600 – $3,000)/3] × 1/2 ............................................... 7,600
b. Units-of-production method:
2008: 1,800 hours @ $6.08* ........................................................ $10,944
2009: 2,600 hours @ $6.08 .......................................................... 15,808
2010: 2,000 hours @ $6.08 .......................................................... 12,160
2011: 1,100 hours @ $6.08 .......................................................... 6,688
*($48,600 – $3,000)/7,500 hours = $6.08 per hour
c. Double-declining-balance method:
2008: $48,600 × 2/3 × 1/2 ............................................................. $16,200
2009: ($48,600 – $16,200) × 2/3 ................................................... 21,600
2010: ($48,600 – $16,200 – $21,600) × 2/3 .................................. 7,200
2011: ($48,600 – $16,200 – $21,600 – $7,200 – $3,000*) ............ 600
*Book value should not be reduced below $3,000, the residual value.
525
Prob. 9–4A
1.
Accumulated
Depreciation Depreciation, Book Value,
Year Expense End of Year End of Year
a. 1 $33,300* $ 33,300 $110,700
2 33,300 66,600 77,400
3 33,300 99,900 44,100
4 33,300 133,200 10,800
*[($144,000 – $10,800)/4]
b. 1 $72,000 [$144,000 × (1/4) × 2] $ 72,000 $ 72,000
2 36,000 [$72,000 × (1/4) × 2] 108,000 36,000
3 18,000 [$36,000 × (1/4) × 2] 126,000 18,000
4 7,200 [$144,000 – $126,000 – $10,800] 133,200 10,800
526
Prob. 9–5A
2008
Jan. 7 Delivery Equipment ...................................................... 45,600
Cash ......................................................................... 45,600
2009
Jan. 8 Delivery Equipment ...................................................... 75,000
Cash ......................................................................... 75,000
527
Prob. 9–5A Concluded
2010
July 1 Delivery Equipment ............................................. 82,000
Cash.................................................................. 82,000
528
Prob. 9–6A
529
Prob. 9–1B
1.
Land Other
Item Land Improvements Building Accounts
a. $ 1,500
b. 300,000
c. 20,000
d. 5,000
e. (3,600)*
f. 15,800
g. $ 4,200
h. 17,500
i. 18,000
j. $(750,000)*
k. 4,500
l. $15,000
m. 9,000
n. 1,100
o. 1,500
p. (6,000)*
q. 800,000
r. 45,000
s. (350)*
2. $356,200 $25,100 $866,850
*Receipt
3. Since land used as a plant site does not lose its ability to provide services, it
is not depreciated. However, land improvements do lose their ability to pro-
vide services as time passes and are therefore depreciated.
530
Prob. 9–2B
Depreciation Expense
a. Straight- b. Units-of- c. Double-
Line Production Declining-Balance
Year Method Method Method
2008 $ 21,000 $ 30,240 $ 45,000
2009 21,000 22,680 15,000
2010 21,000 10,080 3,000
Total $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 63,000
Calculations:
Straight-line method:
($67,500 – $4,500)/3 = $21,000 each year
Units-of-production method:
($67,500 – $4,500)/25,000 hours = $2.52 per hour
2008: 12,000 hours @ $2.52 = $30,240
2009: 9,000 hours @ $2.52 = $22,680
2010: 4,000 hours @ $2.52 = $10,080
Double-declining-balance method:
2008: $67,500 × 2/3 = $45,000
2009: ($67,500 – $45,000) × 2/3 = $15,000
2010: ($67,500 – $45,000 – $15,000 – $4,500*) = $3,000
*Book value should not be reduced below the residual value of $4,500.
531
Prob. 9–3B
a. Straight-line method:
2008: [($15,660 – $600)/3] × 1/2 ................................................ $2,510
2009: ($15,660 – $600)/3 ........................................................... 5,020
2010: ($15,660 – $600)/3 ........................................................... 5,020
2011: [($15,660 – $600)/3] × 1/2 ................................................ 2,510
b. Units-of-production method:
2008: 3,750 hours @ $0.80* ...................................................... $3,000
2009: 7,500 hours @ $0.80 ....................................................... 6,000
2010: 5,000 hours @ $0.80 ....................................................... 4,000
2011: 2,575 hours @ $0.80 ....................................................... 2,060
c. Double-declining-balance method:
2008: $15,660 × 2/3 × 1/2 ........................................................... $5,220
2009: ($15,660 – $5,220) × 2/3 .................................................. 6,960
2010: ($15,660 – $5,220 – $6,960) × 2/3.................................... 2,320
2011: ($15,660 – $5,220 – $6,960 – $2,320 – $600*) ................ 560
*Book value should not be reduced below $600, the residual value.
532
Prob. 9–4B
1.
Accumulated
Depreciation Depreciation, Book Value,
Year Expense End of Year End of Year
a. 1 $24,000* $ 24,000 $107,250
2 24,000 48,000 83,250
3 24,000 72,000 59,250
4 24,000 96,000 35,250
5 24,000 120,000 11,250
*[($131,250 – $11,250)/5]
b. 1 $52,500 [$131,250 × (1/5) × 2] $ 52,500 $ 78,750
2 31,500 [$78,750 × (1/5) × 2] 84,000 47,250
3 18,900 [$47,250 × (1/5) × 2] 102,900 28,350
4 11,340 [$28,350 × (1/5) × 2] 114,240 17,010
5 5,760 [$131,250 – $114,240 – $11,250] 120,000 11,250
533
Prob. 9–5B
2008
Jan. 6 Delivery Equipment ...................................................... 24,000
Cash ......................................................................... 24,000
2009
Jan. 2 Delivery Equipment ...................................................... 69,000
Cash ......................................................................... 69,000
534
Prob. 9–5B Concluded
2010
July 1 Delivery Equipment ...................................................... 70,000
Cash ......................................................................... 70,000
Prob. 9–6B
535
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Activity 9–1
Activity 9–2
You should explain to Faye and Pat that it is acceptable to maintain two sets of
records for tax and financial reporting purposes. This can happen when a
company uses one method for financial statement purposes, such as straight-line
depreciation, and another method for tax purposes, such as MACRS depreciation.
This should not be surprising, since the methods for taxes and financial state-
ments are established by two different groups with different objectives. That is,
tax laws and related accounting methods are established by Congress. The
Internal Revenue Service then applies the laws and, in some cases, issues
interpretations of the law and congressional intent. The primary objective of the
tax laws is to generate revenue in an equitable manner for government use.
Generally accepted accounting principles, on the other hand, are established
primarily by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The objective of general-
ly accepted accounting principles is the preparation and reporting of true eco-
nomic conditions and results of operations of business entities.
You might note, however, that companies are required in their tax returns to rec-
oncile differences in accounting methods. For example, income reported on the
company’s financial statements must be reconciled with taxable income.
Finally, you might also indicate to Faye and Pat that even generally accepted ac-
counting principles allow for alternative methods of accounting for the same
transactions or economic events. For example, a company could use straight-line
depreciation for some assets and double-declining-balance depreciation for other
assets.
536
Activity 9–3
1. a. Straight-line method:
2008: ($200,000/5) × 1/2 ....................................................................... $20,000
2009: ($200,000/5) ................................................................................ 40,000
2010: ($200,000/5) ................................................................................ 40,000
2011: ($200,000/5) ................................................................................ 40,000
2012: ($200,000/5) ................................................................................ 40,000
2013: ($200,000/5) × 1/2 ....................................................................... 20,000
b. MACRS:
2008: ($200,000 × 20%) ........................................................................ $40,000
2009: ($200,000 × 32%) ........................................................................ 64,000
2010: ($200,000 × 19.2%) ..................................................................... 38,400
2011: ($200,000 × 11.5%) ..................................................................... 23,000
2012: ($200,000 × 11.5%) ..................................................................... 23,000
2013: ($200,000 × 5.8%) ....................................................................... 11,600
537
Activity 9–3 Continued
2.
b. MACRS Year
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Income before depreciation .......... $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
Depreciation expense ................... 40,000 64,000 38,400 23,000 23,000 11,600
Income before income tax ............ $460,000 $436,000 $461,600 $477,000 $477,000 $488,400
Income tax ...................................... 184,000 174,400 184,640 190,800 190,800 195,360
Net income ..................................... $276,000 $261,600 $276,960 $286,200 $286,200 $293,040
538
Activity 9–3 Concluded
3. For financial reporting purposes, Mike should select the method that provides
the net income figure that best represents the results of operations. (Note to
Instructors: The concept of matching revenues and expenses is discussed in
Chapter 3.) However, for income tax purposes, Mike should consider select-
ing the method that will minimize current taxes. Based on the analyses in (2),
both methods of depreciation will yield the same total amount of taxes over
the useful life of the equipment. MACRS results in fewer taxes paid in the ear-
ly years of useful life and more in the later years. For example, in 2008 the
income tax expense using MACRS is $184,000, which is $8,000 ($192,000 –
$184,000) less than the income tax expense using the straight-line deprecia-
tion of $192,000. Lonesome Dove Construction Co. can invest such differ-
ences in the early years and earn income.
Activity 9–4
Note to Instructors: The purpose of this activity is to familiarize students with the
differences in cost and other factors in leasing and buying a business vehicle.
Activity 9–5
Note to Instructors: The purpose of this activity is to familiarize students with the
procedures involved in acquiring a patent, a copyright, and a trademark.
539
Solution Manual For Financial & Managerial Accounting, 10th by Carl S. Warren James M. R
Activity 9–6
Revenue
a. Fixed Asset Turnover =
Average Book Value of Fixed Assets
$348,650
Wal-Mart: = 4.16
$83,865
$30,379
Alcoa Inc.: = 2.10
$14,495
$24,966
Comcast Corporation: = 1.25
$20,009
b. The fixed asset turnover measures the amount of revenue earned per dollar of
fixed assets. Wal-Mart earns $4.16 of revenue for every dollar of fixed assets,
while Alcoa only earns $2.10 and Comcast Corporation only earns $1.25 in
revenue for every dollar of fixed assets. This says that Alcoa and Comcast
require more fixed assets to operate their businesses than does Wal-Mart, for
a given level of revenue volume. Does this mean that Wal-Mart is a better
company? Not necessarily. Revenue is not the same as earnings. More likely,
Wal-Mart has a smaller profit margin than do Alcoa and Comcast. Although
not required by the exercise, the income from operations before tax as a per-
cent of sales (operating margin) for the three companies is: Comcast, 14.3%,
Alcoa, 9.9%, and Wal-Mart, 5.3%. Thus, the difference between the fixed asset
turnovers seems reasonable. Generally, companies with very low fixed asset
turnovers, such as aluminum making and cable communications, must be
compensated with higher operating margins.
Note to Instructors: You may wish to consider the impact of different fixed
asset turnover ratios across industries and the implications of these differ-
ences. This is a conceptual question designed to have students think about
how competitive markets would likely reward the low fixed asset turnover
companies for embracing high fixed asset commitments.
540