You are on page 1of 1

3/30/2021 HRMS

Score list (/team/training/my_lesson/344/exam) / Score

Total Time:
0min 24s

Question Person's Answer Score

They should send a blank form or one with the 0


2.
A researcher writes that she cannot send a form participant’s name redacted, however we need
signed by participants in a research project to see the text that participants were asked to
because revealing the names would violate
sign.
confidentiality. How should you respond? (20')
【20'】

3. The answer should include one of: ethics 0


committee, senior management, COPE
website. May also include experienced MEs,
An anonymous reader informs you that the
authors fabricated some data in their paper. You section leader. It should not include EiC or
have never handled a case like this before, EBMs.
where might you be able to find advice? (20')
【20'】

4. a) Addendum; b) Erratum; c) Addendum; d) 0


What is the appropriate way to update each of Retraction; e) Correction; f) Direct update
the following after publication?What is the
appropriate way to update each of the following
after publication? (20')
a) The author didn’t add a funding grant number.
b) A new author should be added to the
manuscript.
c) A reader is confused by the methods; the
authors decide to add more explanation.
d) It was found that the paper was previously
published in Italian in another journal.
e) Several data points are missing from a graph.
f) The abstract contains five obvious spelling
mistakes.
【20'】

5. They threaten the integrity of the research 0


Why should we update or retract papers that literature: the published paper cannot be relied
include plagiarism or fabricated data? (20') upon.
【20'】

@MDPI (30 Mar 2021 16:43:50 Asia/Shanghai) 😀

blog.mdpi.lab/team/training/review_exam/69082 1/1

You might also like