The document contains the results of a training exam on research integrity topics. It lists 5 multiple choice questions about responding to confidentiality concerns in research, where to find advice on fabricated data, appropriate ways to update publications, and why papers with plagiarism or fabricated data should be retracted. The participant's answers were incorrect for all questions.
The document contains the results of a training exam on research integrity topics. It lists 5 multiple choice questions about responding to confidentiality concerns in research, where to find advice on fabricated data, appropriate ways to update publications, and why papers with plagiarism or fabricated data should be retracted. The participant's answers were incorrect for all questions.
The document contains the results of a training exam on research integrity topics. It lists 5 multiple choice questions about responding to confidentiality concerns in research, where to find advice on fabricated data, appropriate ways to update publications, and why papers with plagiarism or fabricated data should be retracted. The participant's answers were incorrect for all questions.
Score list (/team/training/my_lesson/344/exam) / Score
Total Time: 0min 24s
Question Person's Answer Score
They should send a blank form or one with the 0
2. A researcher writes that she cannot send a form participant’s name redacted, however we need signed by participants in a research project to see the text that participants were asked to because revealing the names would violate sign. confidentiality. How should you respond? (20') 【20'】
3. The answer should include one of: ethics 0
committee, senior management, COPE website. May also include experienced MEs, An anonymous reader informs you that the authors fabricated some data in their paper. You section leader. It should not include EiC or have never handled a case like this before, EBMs. where might you be able to find advice? (20') 【20'】
4. a) Addendum; b) Erratum; c) Addendum; d) 0
What is the appropriate way to update each of Retraction; e) Correction; f) Direct update the following after publication?What is the appropriate way to update each of the following after publication? (20') a) The author didn’t add a funding grant number. b) A new author should be added to the manuscript. c) A reader is confused by the methods; the authors decide to add more explanation. d) It was found that the paper was previously published in Italian in another journal. e) Several data points are missing from a graph. f) The abstract contains five obvious spelling mistakes. 【20'】
5. They threaten the integrity of the research 0
Why should we update or retract papers that literature: the published paper cannot be relied include plagiarism or fabricated data? (20') upon. 【20'】