PRESENTATION

PEER FEEDBACK: FEEDBACK SESSION (Table 2A) AND WRITTEN FEEDBACK (Table 2B)

Instructions for the feedback givers (FGs):

· make sure you have the table below (the electronic version or you can print it out)
· read through the table below
· observe the presentation
· make notes on the criteria listed in the table – depict details (examples, chunks of language,
descriptions of some behaviours, etc.) to be able to justify your points during the feedback
session

After the Q&A:

- leave the classroom (you will not play Kahoot 🙁 )

- get together and prepare to lead a feedback session and give feedback to the presenters (Ps),
i.e.
o decide/agree on which TWO MAJOR strengths and TWO MAJOR weaknesses you want to point
out to Ps
o get ready for the feedback session: i.e. prepare/rehearse a conversation with Ps:
o follow Feedback giving Models A and B: e.g.
§ Start the conversation – state the aim of the feedback session
§ Ask Ps what the major strength of the presentation was, in their view
§ Ps: what went well (situation-behaviour-impact)
§ FGs: add one more different thing that went well (situation-behaviour-impact)
§ Ask Ps what the major weakness of the presentation was, in their view.
§ Ps: what went wrong (situation-behaviour-impact)
§ FGs: add one more different thing that went wrong (situation-behaviour-impact)
§ FGs: suggest improvement, ie. elicit or say what could be done differently
§ Conclude: (you can ask if Ps need you to clarify something/if you can be of any help/how you
can be contacted, etc.) … finish on a positive note.
§ Thank the presenters for their presentation and effort.
o make sure that each of you contributes, each of you has to speak and provide an equal amount
of language
o rehearse
o return to the classroom and lead a 5-minute feedback session with the Ps
o be tactful and positive so that Ps leave the session motivated to perform better next time they
present

Table 2A

PEER FEEDBACK ON A TEAM‘S PRESENTATION

Listen and make detailed notes to be able to justify your points. Record behaviours accurately,
remember, feedback receivers may disagree with you.

© This work is protected by copyright law. The copyright is held by the Prague University of Economics and Business.
 YES PARTLY NO

NOTES NOTES NOTES

TEAMWORK NO

Each presenter Lucy and Xenie spoke

contributed on an more than the others
equal basis.

Other presenters were YES

attentive while
individuals spoke.

The presenters YES

cooperated and
communicated well
within their team.

The presenters PARTLY

communicated well
with the audience (Lucy asked the
during the audience a question
presentation. during the presentation)

PRESENTATION YES

The topic was useful.

The introduction got YES

our attention.

The presentation was PARTLY

gripping.

The presentation flew PARTLY

smoothly.
(A little bit of stuttering)

The Q&A was well- YES

shared and well-led.

MAJOR STRENGTHS

1. DESIGN OF THE PRESENTATION

2. VERY INFORMATIVE PRESENTATION ON INTERESTING TOPIC

MAJOR WEAKNESSES

© This work is protected by copyright law. The copyright is held by the Prague University of Economics and Business.
 1. TOO MUCH TEXT ON 1 SLIDE

2. READING FROM NOTES AND LACK OF EYE CONTACT

After the feedback session:

- reflect on the feedback session

- write the written feedback (collectively) - follow the instructions below
- write 10 – 15 sentences
- submit your written feedback, i.e. table 2B within 24 hours after the presentation
o upload it to Assignments: Written_FB_from_Tnumber_to_Tnumber
o upload it to the relevant team´s folder in Students´Works
- you can score 5 points max

PRESENTATIONS. WRITTEN FEEDBACK: Table 2B - to be submitted

Structure: this should be regarded as a message to the presenters. Start with Dear team, ...
1. Thank for the presentation on …(topic) …. that you observed on ….date.... . (1 - 2 sentences)
2. Describe what you liked (situation-behaviour-impact) (4 – 6 sentences)
3. Describe the weakness (situation-behaviour-impact) (4 – 6 sentences)
4. Suggest improvement, i.e., give advice/recommendations/tips. What can your peers do to
perform better? (4 – 6 sentences)
5. Conclude and make a positive remark. (1-2 sentences)

FEEDBACK ON TEAM 4 ´S PRESENTATION

Part 1
Dear team 4,
Thank you for the presentation on Culinary tourism that you observed on 2nd March, that you divided
into 3 main topics: France, Peru and Vietnam.

Part 2:
What we liked the most was your knowledge about the topic and that you were so informative,
which helped you answer the questions easily. We also mentioned the great chosen visual of your
presentation. It seemed that you really worked on it. Furthermore, what we liked was involving the
audience.

Part 3:
In our opinion, one of your weaknesses was the fact that you most of the time read from your notes,
so there was not enough eye contact with the audience. The second one there was too much text on
one slide. Then the audience is lost in the given information. Also, that leads to disorientation.

Part 4
For the next time our advice for improvement is to divide text into more than just one slide. The
second tip is to be more relaxed. It helps to build a good impression. Taking a deep breath calms
you down and helps you to focus on your speech.

© This work is protected by copyright law. The copyright is held by the Prague University of Economics and Business.
Part 5
In conclusion, we really liked your presentation. It had a few flaws, but overall we gained a lot of
interesting knowledge from it and it convinced us to try some of the foreign meals.

© This work is protected by copyright law. The copyright is held by the Prague University of Economics and Business.