You are on page 1of 9

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)

Volume 7 Issue 4, July-August 2023 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470

Revolutionizing Education: How Artificial Intelligence


is transforming the Learning Landscape
Suman Roy1, Sujit Kumar Paul2
1
Student, Department of Education, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2
Head of the Department (HOD), Department of Education,
Aghorekamini Prakashchandra Mahavidyalaya, Bengai, West Bengal, India

ABSTRACT How to cite this paper: Suman Roy |


This research investigates the potential benefits and challenges Sujit Kumar Paul "Revolutionizing
associated with the implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education: How Artificial Intelligence is
the education sector. Through a qualitative content analysis of transforming the Learning Landscape"
scholarly articles and educational policy documents, this study Published in
International
explores perceptions of AI's transformative role in education, ethical
Journal of Trend in
considerations, and recommendations for managing risks and Scientific Research
challenges. Findings suggest that while AI offers numerous and Development
advantages such as personalized learning, immediate feedback, and (ijtsrd), ISSN:
improved administrative efficiency, it also raises concerns related to 2456-6470, IJTSRD59781
data privacy, educational inequity, dehumanization, and the need for Volume-7 | Issue-4,
teacher training. Ethical issues concerning data privacy and security, August 2023, pp.748-756, URL:
fairness and bias, transparency, and accountability were also www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd59781.pdf
identified. The study concludes by underscoring the need for
comprehensive policy guidance and further research to ensure that AI Copyright © 2023 by author (s) and
International Journal of Trend in
is implemented responsibly and equitably in education.
Scientific Research and Development
KEYWORDS: Artificial Intelligence, Education, Benefits, Challenges, Journal. This is an
Ethical Considerations, Policy Recommendations, Personalized Open Access article
distributed under the
Learning
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

INTRODUCTION
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into reducing the workload of educators and
everyday life has been one of the most significant administrators and allowing them to focus more on
shifts of the 21st century. In sectors ranging from the core aspects of teaching and learning (Baker &
healthcare to finance and transportation, AI has Inventado, 2014).
become an indispensable tool, capable of executing
The economic implications of this are considerable.
tasks with a precision and efficiency hitherto unheard
As per a report by Goldstein et al. (2020), the market
of (Russell & Norvig, 2016). One sector where AI's
for AI in education is expected to exceed $6 billion
impact has been particularly profound is education.
by 2025, underscoring the significant role AI is
AI's potential in education is vast and multifaceted. anticipated to play in this sector. However, while the
The promise of AI lies not just in its ability to potential benefits of AI in education are manifold, the
automate tasks but also in its capacity to learn, adapt, integration of these technologies in learning
and provide personalized experiences for learners. environments also brings forth complex challenges
Indeed, AI systems can monitor individual student and concerns.
progress, adapt instructional materials in real-time,
One of the most pressing concerns pertains to data
provide immediate feedback, and create personalized
privacy. As AI systems often require access to a
learning pathways (Luckin et al., 2016).
substantial amount of data to function effectively,
Moreover, the influence of AI extends beyond there is a potential risk that sensitive student
classroom instruction. Administrative tasks, such as information could be misused or improperly secured
grading, scheduling, and tracking student attendance, (Bostrom & Yudkowsky, 2014). The possibility of
can be streamlined with AI technologies, thereby bias in AI algorithms is another major issue. Training

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD59781 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 4 | Jul-Aug 2023 Page 748
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
artificial intelligence systems with inaccurate substantial research has highlighted these aspects,
information can have unintended consequences more studies are required to devise effective
(Crawford & Calo, 2016). strategies to fully leverage the potential of AI while
ensuring equity, privacy, and fairness. By
Moreover, there is the issue of the digital divide,
investigating these areas, this research aims to fill the
where disparities in access to technology can
identified gaps in the literature.
exacerbate existing inequalities in education. Students
without reliable access to AI technologies could be Research Questions
disadvantaged compared to their peers, raising serious 1. What are the perceived benefits of using AI in
equity considerations (Warschauer & Matuchniak, education?
2010). 2. What are the perceived challenges of using AI in
In this context, it is critical to undertake a thorough education?
analysis of the role of AI in education. Thus, this 3. What ethical considerations arise from the use of
study aims to explore how AI is revolutionizing AI in education?
education, analyzing both the opportunities it 4. How do policy documents suggest managing
provides and the challenges it presents. potential risks or challenges associated with AI in
Literature Review education?
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly permeating
Methodology
various sectors, and education is no exception. The The research methodology utilized in this study is
existing body of literature has primarily focused on qualitative content analysis, an approach designed to
three main aspects: the integration of AI into interpret and make sense of textual data. It provides a
educational curricula, the benefits and challenges of systematic and objective means to make valid
using AI in education, and the ethical implications inferences from verbal, visual, or written data (Hsieh
associated with AI usage in educational settings. & Shannon, 2005).
Benefits and Challenges of AI in Education Data Collection
AI technologies offer numerous benefits, including The data for this research will primarily come from
increased administrative efficiency and personalized two sources: scholarly articles and educational policy
learning experiences (Goldstein et al., 2020; Luckin documents. Scholarly articles will be sourced from
et al., 2016). Yet, the implementation is not devoid of academic databases such as JSTOR, ERIC, and
challenges. A significant concern is data privacy since Google Scholar, while policy documents will be
AI technologies often require extensive access to obtained from various education department websites
student data, raising apprehensions about potential and international organizations focused on education,
misuse (Bostrom & Yudkowsky, 2014). Additionally, such as UNESCO and the OECD.
there is a risk of widened educational inequalities due
to the uneven distribution of these technologies Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
(Selwyn, 2016). More research is needed to explore The selection of documents will be governed by
strategies that can counteract these challenges specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The
effectively. inclusion criteria are English-language articles and
policy documents, centred around AI in education.
Ethical Considerations in AI for Education Non-English documents, and documents not
The existing literature has also emphasized the ethical explicitly addressing AI in education will be
implications of AI usage in education. Data privacy excluded.
issues and the potential for algorithmic bias have been
highlighted as critical concerns (Bostrom & Data Analysis
Yudkowsky, 2014; Crawford & Calo, 2016). The selected documents will be read multiple times to
Artificial intelligence systems that are educated on ensure comprehensive understanding. The analysis
biased data may amplify and perpetuate these biases, will be conducted using an inductive approach, where
leading to unequal learning outcomes (Crawford & patterns, themes, and categories will emerge from the
Calo, 2016). However, there remains a paucity of data under close examination (Thomas, 2006).
research exploring practical ways to mitigate such The benefits and drawbacks of AI in education,
inherent biases. ethical concerns, and policy suggestions will all be
Overall, the existing literature affirms that AI is identified as we draw connections between the study
revolutionizing the educational landscape. However, questions. Each theme will be coded, and excerpts
the integration of AI in education brings its own set of from the texts relevant to these codes will be
challenges and ethical considerations. While highlighted.

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD59781 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 4 | Jul-Aug 2023 Page 749
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Data will be managed using NVivo, a qualitative data educational content based on individual student
analysis software, to streamline the coding process needs, enabling a tailored educational experience
and facilitate the organization of emerging themes. (Baker & Siemens, 2020). Using AI systems,
The findings from the analysis will then be used to education providers can provide differentiated
answer the research questions, thus illuminating the instruction to students, fostering a deeper
transformative role of AI in the educational understanding of the subject matter (Luckin, Holmes,
landscape. Griffiths, & Forcier, 2016).
Benefits and challenges of using AI in education Second, AI can provide immediate feedback to
The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the students, enhancing their learning experience. Real-
education sector has ushered in a transformative era, time feedback from AI-based educational tools can
redefining traditional teaching and learning processes. help students identify their weaknesses and work
With benefits spanning from personalized learning towards improvement (Zawacki-Richter, Marín,
experiences to improved administrative efficiencies, Bond, & Gouverneur, 2019). It also enables educators
AI is swiftly altering the education landscape. to keep better track of student progress.
However, challenges associated with data privacy, Third, the predictive analytics capabilities of AI
equity, and the digital divide persist and must be systems can help identify potential learning gaps and
addressed to fully harness AI’s potential. predict future performance. Such predictive abilities
Perceived Benefits of Using AI in Education allow educators to intervene proactively, thus
The first perceived benefit of AI in education is mitigating potential learning difficulties (Woolf,
personalized learning. AI algorithms can customize 2010).

Figure: Showing Benefits of using AI in Education


AI technologies are transforming education identify challenges and reasons for learning, enabling
management and delivery by automating aspects like EMIS to better understand and support learners'
admissions, timetabling, attendance monitoring, and needs.
inspections, building on Education Management
AI also improves administrative efficiency.
Information Systems (UNESCO, 2021). Swift
Automation of administrative tasks like scheduling,
eLearning Services in India developed methods to
grading, and record keeping frees up time for teachers
help the education management information system
to focus more on student interaction and learning
(EMIS) utilize e-learning module data for
facilitation (Balyer, 2020).
personalized learning pathways. This data helps

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD59781 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 4 | Jul-Aug 2023 Page 750
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Adaptive Learning Systems are AI-powered data privacy and security, bias and inequality,
platforms that modify instructional content based on transparency, and accountability.
real-time assessment of learner performance (Woolf,
2008). These digital environments adapt teaching and
learning approaches and materials to individual
learners' capabilities and needs (Luckin & Holmes,
2016).
Challenges of Using AI in Education Figure: Showing four main ethical issues arises
Despite the benefits, the application of AI in from the uses of AI in education
education is not without challenges. One of the Data Privacy and Security
primary concerns pertains to data privacy. AI systems AI systems often rely on large amounts of data to
require significant amounts of data for accurate function effectively. This is particularly true in the
functioning. With the increasing digitization of educational context, where AI may gather sensitive
education, concerns about data misuse and privacy information about students' academic performance,
breaches have escalated (Reichert, 2020). behavior, and personal characteristics. Concerns arise
Another significant challenge is the potential for about who has access to this data, how it is used, and
increased educational inequity due to the digital how it is protected. Failure to properly address these
divide. Not all students have equal access to AI-based concerns could lead to breaches of privacy and the
educational tools, which may exacerbate existing potential misuse of data (Reichert, 2020).
disparities in education (Reich & Ito, 2017). AI Bias and Inequality
implementation in education requires adequate AI systems are trained on data and can therefore
infrastructure, including back-end computing power, reproduce and amplify existing biases. In education,
fast internet access, and devices like laptops, tablets, this can lead to unfair outcomes for certain groups of
or smartphones (Ziesche & Bhagat, 2022). students. For example, an AI system might
Furthermore, the overreliance on AI might lead to a systematically disadvantage students from certain
one-size-fits-all education approach, which could socio-economic backgrounds if it has been trained
limit opportunities for creative and critical thinking. predominantly on data from more affluent students
Dehumanization is the concern that AI could replace (Eubanks, 2018). Moreover, a lack of access to AI-
the human touch that is crucial in teaching and based educational tools can exacerbate existing
learning processes (Selwyn, 2019). inequities in education (Reich & Ito, 2017).
Finally, the lack of understanding of AI among Transparency
educators can hamper its effective implementation. A related ethical issue is transparency, sometimes
Teachers need adequate training and resources to use referred to as the "black box" problem of AI. Many
AI-based educational tools effectively (Zawacki- AI systems function in ways that are not easily
Richter, Marín, Bond, & Gouverneur, 2019). understandable by humans, making it difficult for
educators and students to understand how these
As our findings suggest, AI holds significant potential systems are influencing their learning process. This
for revolutionizing education by facilitating lack of transparency could undermine trust in the
personalized learning, providing real-time feedback, system and affect educational outcomes (Bostrom &
predicting learning gaps, and improving Yudkowsky, 2014).
administrative efficiency. However, the challenges
related to data privacy, the digital divide, Accountability
dehumanization and the lack of adequate teacher With the increasing use of AI in education, questions
training must be addressed to optimize the use of AI about accountability arise. If an AI system fails or
in education. makes a mistake, it can be challenging to assign
responsibility due to the complexity of these systems.
Ethical consideration arises from the use of AI in This issue of accountability also extends to the
education. question of who is responsible for the ethical use of
The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in AI in education: the developers, the educators using
education brings a wealth of opportunities for the tool, or the institutions implementing it? Ensuring
enhancing teaching and learning. However, it also accountability in AI systems in education is a
raises a number of ethical considerations that must be complex issue that requires careful consideration
addressed to ensure a responsible and equitable (Floridi & Cowls, 2019).
implementation of AI-based educational tools. These
ethical issues can be categorized into four main areas:

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD59781 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 4 | Jul-Aug 2023 Page 751
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
While AI holds great promise for transforming the before data collection, and only collect necessary data
educational landscape, careful attention must be paid (EU GDPR, 2016).
to the ethical implications of its use. Addressing
Promoting Equity and Reducing Bias
issues related to data privacy and security, bias and To counter equity issues and bias, policies
inequality, transparency, and accountability will be recommend ensuring access to AI technologies across
critical to ensuring that the revolution brought about diverse socio-economic groups (Reich & Ito, 2017).
by AI in education is a positive one. They also emphasize the need for AI algorithms to be
Suggestions to manage potential risks or trained on diverse datasets to minimize bias. This
challenges associated with AI in education involves including data from students of different
The Beijing Consensus on Artificial Intelligence and ethnicities, socio-economic statuses, and educational
Education emphasizes the importance of ethical, backgrounds (Russell, Dewey, & Tegmark, 2015).
transparent, and auditable use of education data and
Enhancing Transparency and Accountability
algorithms. It emphasizes the need to balance open Policy guidelines recommend increasing transparency
access to data with data privacy protection, legal in AI systems used in education to allow stakeholders
issues, and ethical risks. Emerging AI technologies to understand and challenge the system’s decisions
should be tested and adopted to ensure data privacy (Russell, Dewey, & Tegmark, 2015). Policies also
and security. Comprehensive data protection laws and suggest implementing strict accountability
regulatory frameworks should be developed to mechanisms where the creators of AI systems are
guarantee ethical, non-discriminatory, equitable, held responsible for any harm resulting from system
transparent, and auditable data use. Regulatory malfunctions or errors (OECD, 2019).
frameworks should be adjusted or adopted to ensure
responsible AI tools for education and learning Encouraging Human-Centred Use of AI
(UNESCO, 2018). To address concerns about the dehumanization of
education, policy documents emphasize the
The G20 AI Principles, introduced in June 2019, importance of using AI to complement, rather than
emphasize responsible stewardship of trustworthy AI replace, human teachers. Policies advocate for a
for inclusive growth, sustainable development, and human-in-the-loop approach, where AI supports
well-being. These principles include respecting teachers and enhances their capacity, but crucial
human-centred values, transparency, and decisions about students’ education remain in human
explainability. AI systems should be robust, secure, hands (Bundy, 2016).
and safe throughout their lifecycle, ensuring
traceability, risk management, and accountability. AI applications can empower teachers and enhance
Investing in R&D, promoting a digital ecosystem, teaching by automating tasks like assessment,
strengthening human capacity, and preparing for plagiarism detection, administration, and feedback.
labour market transformation are all G20- However, as AI develops, teachers may need to build
recommended national strategies and international new competencies and undergo professional
cooperation for trustworthy AI (Vincent-Lancrin & development to work effectively with AI. Tools like
Van Der Vlies, 2020). AI-driven discussion forum monitoring and AI-
human 'dual teacher' models can support human
The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence teachers in various tasks (UNESCO, 2021). AI-
(AI) in education has brought numerous potential powered teaching assistants, like automatic writing
risks and challenges. Policy documents have begun to evaluations, challenge existing pedagogies. However,
outline strategies to manage these risks, centred on technical and ethical issues must be overcome before
four main areas: ensuring data privacy and security, they can be effectively used in real-world settings.
promoting equity and reducing bias, enhancing
transparency and accountability, and encouraging the Policy documents suggest a comprehensive approach
human-centred use of AI. to managing the potential risks associated with AI in
education, focusing on data privacy, equity and bias,
Ensuring Data Privacy and Security transparency and accountability, and the human-
Policy documents stress the importance of strong centred use of AI. As AI continues to transform the
regulations and technical safeguards to ensure data educational landscape, it is crucial that these policies
privacy and security in AI systems used in education. are not only implemented but also continually
To avoid misuse and breaches, guidelines from the updated to respond to emerging challenges.
European Union's General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR) recommend that institutions anonymize data, Discussion
obtain informed consent from students or guardians Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to
revolutionize education in numerous ways, including

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD59781 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 4 | Jul-Aug 2023 Page 752
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
personalizing learning experiences, providing real- explore these considerations as AI's role in education
time feedback, improving administrative efficiency, continues to evolve.
and identifying learning gaps through predictive
Conclusion
analysis. However, our research has highlighted The transformative power of Artificial Intelligence
critical considerations and challenges associated with (AI) in education has the potential to reshape the
AI implementation in education, including ethical learning landscape in significant ways. This study has
concerns and the potential risks highlighted in policy shed light on its numerous potential benefits, while
documents. equally highlighting the challenges and ethical
Data privacy and security emerged as key concerns in considerations inherent in its implementation. The
our study. AI in education necessitates the collection journey into AI's impact on education paints a picture
and analysis of significant amounts of student data, of remarkable possibilities, such as individualized
which introduces potential risks of misuse and learning experiences and enhanced efficiency, while
breaches. Thus, stringent regulations and safeguards also revealing potential pitfalls in terms of data
are imperative, as suggested by policies such as the privacy, fairness, transparency, and the
EU's GDPR (2016). This aligns with Reichert’s dehumanization of education.
(2020) research, emphasizing the urgent need for The issues unearthed by our exploration of AI in
robust data protection measures in the era of AI. education underscore the importance of a conscious,
Our findings also highlighted potential inequities that human-centric approach. As AI technologies continue
AI might exacerbate. There is a real danger that AI to evolve and permeate educational contexts,
tools may not be equally accessible to all students, stakeholders must ensure that their implementation
potentially deepening existing socio-economic not only yields educational improvements but also
divides. Further, AI systems could inadvertently upholds ethical standards and contributes positively to
replicate and amplify biases if trained predominantly the educational experience. The study indicates that
on data from certain student populations. Policies are policies play a crucial role in managing the potential
therefore recommended to ensure wide access to AI risks associated with AI in education. Policymakers
tools and diverse training data for AI algorithms, must continue to strive for robust data protection, bias
resonating with the studies of Reich & Ito (2017) and mitigation, transparency, and accountability. Equally
Eubanks (2018). important is maintaining the human element in the
education process, ensuring that the role of teachers is
Transparency was another major area of concern.
complemented and augmented, not replaced, by AI.
Given that many AI systems function as "black
boxes,", the lack of clarity about how these systems Future research directions in this field may include
operate can undermine trust and potentially influence empirical studies on the effectiveness of existing
educational outcomes, as highlighted by Bostrom & policy guidelines and regulations in addressing the
Yudkowsky (2014). It's essential for AI systems to be identified challenges and ethical concerns. Moreover,
designed and deployed in a manner that's transparent a focus on the design of AI systems to ensure they are
and accountable. human-centred and promote equity is warranted.
Understanding how AI tools can be used to enhance,
Lastly, there is a risk that an over-reliance on AI
not diminish, the role of teachers in the classroom
could lead to the dehumanization of education. The
would also be a valuable area of inquiry.
critical role of interpersonal relationships in education
emphasizes the need for a human-in-the-loop So, the AI-driven transformation of education holds
approach, where AI aids teachers without replacing great promise but also poses notable challenges. As
them. This perspective aligns with Bundy's (2016) we move forward, we should view this not as a
research, which stresses the importance of hurdle, but as an opportunity to deepen our
maintaining human-centred education despite AI understanding and shape an AI-integrated future in
integration. education that is ethical, fair, and beneficial for all.
The prospects are boundless, and with careful
AI presents numerous opportunities for
navigation, the revolution brought about by AI in
revolutionizing education, but it also introduces
education can lead to a future that is not only
significant ethical and practical challenges that must
transformative but also enriching and inspirational.
be responsibly managed. Our findings underline the
need for strong policies, ethical guidelines, and References
ongoing research to ensure that the benefits of AI are [1] Abdelaziz, H. (2019). The Impact of Artificial
realized while mitigating potential risks and Intelligence (AI) on Curriculum Systems:
challenges. Future research should continue to Towards an Orbit-Shifting Dialogue. On

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD59781 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 4 | Jul-Aug 2023 Page 753
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Current and Critical Issues in Curriculum, [12] Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified
Learning and Assessment, 32. framework of five principles for AI in society.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf00003 Harvard Data Science Review.
71258.locale=en https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
[2] Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). [13] Freeman, A. J., Becker, S. A., & Cummins, M.
Educational Data Mining and Learning (2017). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2017 K-
Analytics. In Springer eBooks (pp. 61–75). 12 Edition. CoSN.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4 http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED588803.pdf
[3] Baker, R. S., & Siemens, G. (2014). [14] General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) –
Educational Data Mining and Learning Official Legal Text. (2022, September 27).
Analytics. In Cambridge University Press General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
eBooks (pp. 253–272). https://gdpr-info.eu/
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139519526.016 [15] Giannini, S. (2023). Generative AI and the
[4] Becker, S. A., Freeman, A., Hall, C. D., future of education. UNESCO.
Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B. (2016). [16] Gordon, F. (2019). Virginia Eubanks (2018)
NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools
Edition. ERIC, 1–52. Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York:
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED570463.pdf Picador, St Martin’s Press. Law, Technology
[5] Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and Humans, 162–164.
and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.v1i0.1386
China, and India: A systematic review using a [17] Gray, S. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence in
Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers & schools: Towards a democratic future. London
Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068. Review of Education, 18(2).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068 https://doi.org/10.14324/lre.18.2.02
[6] Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The [18] High-level expert group on artificial
ethics of artificial intelligence. In Cambridge intelligence. (2023, June 30). Shaping Europe’s
University Press eBooks (pp. 316–334). Digital Future. https://digital-
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139046855.020 strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/expert-group-
[7] Crawford, K., & Calo, R. (2016). There is a ai
blind spot in AI research. Nature, 538(7625), [19] Holmes, W., Persson, J., Chounta, I.-A.,
311–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/538311a Wasson, B., & Dimitrova, V. (2022). Artificial
[8] Devedžić, V. (2004). Web Intelligence and intelligence and education - A critical view
Artificial Intelligence in Education. Ontologies through the lens of human rights, democracy
and the Semantic Web for E-learning, 7(4). and the rule of law. Council of Europe
https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.7.4.2 Publishing. https://book.coe.int/en/education-
9 policy/11333-artificial-intelligence-and-
[9] Digital Media & Learning Research Hub. education-a-critical-view-through-the-lens-of-
(2017, November 3). From Good Intentions to human-rights-democracy-and-the-rule-of-
Real Outcomes: Equity by Design in Learning law.html
Technologies - DML Hub. DML Hub. [20] Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three
https://dmlhub.net/publications/good- Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.
intentions-real-outcomes-equity-design- Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–
learning-technologies/index.html 1288.
[10] D’Mello, S. K., & Graesser, A. C. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
AutoTutor and affective autotutor. ACM [21] JET Education Services. (2022). Letrus Writing
Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, Skills Program, Letrus (Centro de Autoria e
2(4), 1–39. Cultura LTDA): improving students’ writing
https://doi.org/10.1145/2395123.2395128 skills through using artificial intelligence.
[11] DURAIAPPAH, A. K. (Director). (2018). UNESCO.
Artificial Intelligence and the Future of https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf00003
Education. The Blue Dot, 9. 80194.locale=en
https://mgiep.unesco.org/the-blue-dot-issue-9

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD59781 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 4 | Jul-Aug 2023 Page 754
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
[22] Kim, N., & Kim, E. K. (2022). Teacher’s https://www.oecd.org/publications/shaping-
perceptions of using an Artificial Intelligence- digital-education-bac4dc9f-en.htm
Based educational tool for scientific writing. [32] OECD. (2023b). Is Education Losing the Race
Frontiers in Education, 7. with Technology? Educational Research and
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914 Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1787/73105f99-
[23] Koedinger, K. R., Baker, R. S., Cunningham, en
K. W., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., & Stamper, J. [33] OECD. (2023c). Putting AI to the test.
C. (2010). A Data Repository for the EDM https://doi.org/10.1787/2c297e0b-en
Community: The PSLC DataShop. In CRC
Press eBooks (pp. 65–78). [34] Okubo, T., Houlden, W., Montuoro, P.,
https://doi.org/10.1201/b10274-10 Reinertsen, N., Tse, C. S., & Bastianic, T.
(2023). AI scoring for international large-scale
[24] Lesgold, A. M. (2019). Learning for the age of assessments using a deep learning model and
artificial intelligence. In Routledge eBooks. multilingual data. In OECD Education Working
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429399664 Papers (No. 287). OECD.
[25] Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. A. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1787/9918e1fb-en
Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in [35] Proceedings of the 2nd International
Education. The Open Uiversity. Conference on Learning Analytics and
http://oro.open.ac.uk/50104/ Knowledge. (2012).
[26] Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601
Forcier, L. B. (2017). Intelligence Unleashed: [36] Reich, J., & Ito, M. (2017). From Good
An argument for AI in Education. In Pearson. Intentions to Real Outcomes: Equity by Design
Pearson. in Learning Technologies. In The Digital Media
https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/corporat + Learning Research Hub Report Series on
e/global/pearson-dot- Connected Learning. Connected Learning
com/files/innovation/Intelligence-Unleashed- Alliance. https://clalliance.org/wp-
Publication.pdf content/uploads/2017/11/GIROreport_1031.pdf
[27] Mohan, P. (2021, December 10). Artificial [37] Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining
Intelligence in education. Times of India Blog. in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1),
/newtech/artificial-intelligence-in-education- 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1075
39512/
[38] Romero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., &
[28] Murphy, R. F. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Baker, R. S. (2010). Handbook of Educational
Applications to Support K–12 Teachers Data Mining. CRC Press.
and Teaching: A Review of Promising
Applications, Challenges, and Risks. In RAND [39] Russell, S. D., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M.
Corporation eBooks. (2015). Research Priorities for Robust and
https://doi.org/10.7249/pe315 Beneficial Artificial Intelligence. Ai Magazine,
36(4), 105–114.
[29] Nye, B. D. (2014). Intelligent Tutoring Systems https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577
by and for the Developing World: A Review of
Trends and Approaches for Educational [40] Russell, S. D., & Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial
Technology in a Global Context. International intelligence: a modern approach. Choice
Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Reviews Online, 33(03), 33–1577.
25(2), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-1577
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6 [41] Scoping the OECD AI Principles:
[30] OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): Deliberations of the Expert Group on Artificial
What Students Know and Can Do. Programme Intelligence at the OECD (AIGO). (2019).
for International Student Assessment. [42] Selwyn, N. (2016). Is Technology Good for
https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en Education.
[31] OECD. (2023a). Shaping Digital Education: https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/is-
Enabling Factors for Quality, Equity and technology-good-for-education
Efficiency. In oecd.org. OECD Publishing
Paris.

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD59781 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 4 | Jul-Aug 2023 Page 755
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
[43] Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf00003
teachers?: AI and the future of education. 70308.locale=en
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED599636 [52] UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: guidance
[44] Seo, K. W., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, for policy-makers. In UNESCO eBooks.
D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence https://doi.org/10.54675/pcsp7350
on learner–instructor interaction in online [53] UNESCO. (2022). International forum on AI
learning. International Journal of Educational and education: Analytical report. Steering AI to
Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). Empower Teachers and Transform Teaching.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9 https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/internationa
[45] Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. (2012). Learning l-forum-artificial-intelligence-and-education-
analytics and educational data mining. 2022
https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661 [54] UNESCO IITE. (2020). AI in Education:
[46] Stone, P., Brooks, R. A., Brynjolfsson, E., Change at the Speed of Learning. UNESCO
Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G. D., Hirschberg, IITE Policy Brief.
J., Kalyanakrishnan, S., Kamar, E., Kraus, S., https://iite.unesco.org/publications/ai-in-
Leyton-Brown, K., Parkes, D. C., Press, W. H., education-change-at-the-speed-of-learning/
Saxenian, A., Shah, J. A., Tambe, M., & Teller, [55] VanLehn, K., Lynch, C. F., Schulze, K. G.,
A. (2016). Artificial intelligence and life in Shapiro, J. H., Shelby, R. M., Taylor, L.,
2030: the one hundred year study on artificial Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., & Wintersgill, M. C.
intelligence. Stanford University. (2005). The Andes Physics Tutoring System:
https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource- Lessons learned. In Artificial Intelligence in
files/2016-09/apo-nid210721.pdf Education (Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 147–204).
[47] Talan, T. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in https://doi.org/10.5555/1434930.1434932
Education: a Bibliometric study. International [56] Vincent-Lancrin, S., & Van Der Vlies, R.
Journal of Research in Education and Science, (2020). Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI)
822–837. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2409 in education. OECD Education Working
[48] Tan, S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/a6c90fa9-en
education: Rise of the Machines. Journal of [57] Woolf, B. P. (2008). Building Intelligent
Applied Learning and Teaching. Interactive Tutors: Student-centered strategies
https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.17 for revolutionizing e-learning.
[49] Thomas, D. (2006). A general inductive http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB18546989
approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation [58] Yeung, K. (2020). Recommendation of the
data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD).
237–246. International Legal Materials, 59(1), 27–34.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748 https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2020.5
[50] UNESCO. (2018). Beijing Consensus on [59] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., &
artificial intelligence and education. In Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of
UNESCO. International Conference on research on artificial intelligence applications in
Artificial Intelligence and Education, Planning higher education – where are the educators?
Education in the AI Era: Lead the Leap, International Journal of Educational
Beijing, 2019, Beijing, China. Technology in Higher Education, 16(1).
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf00003 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
68303
[60] Ziesche, & Bhagat, K. K. (2022). State of the
[51] UNESCO. (2019). Artificial intelligence for education report for India, 2022: artificial
Sustainable Development: synthesis report, intelligence in education; here, there and
Mobile Learning Week 2019. Retrieved July 25, everywhere. UNESCO New Delhi.
2023, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf00003
82661.locale=en

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD59781 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 4 | Jul-Aug 2023 Page 756

You might also like