See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/375584577

Unmasking the significance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the curricular and

pedagogical practices of higher education institutions (HEIs) in the era of the
Fourth Industrial R...

Article · November 2023

CITATIONS READS
0 3

2 authors:

Sydney Musipili Mutelo Edmore Mutekwe

University of the Western Cape University of the Western Cape
5 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS 70 PUBLICATIONS 271 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Sydney Musipili Mutelo on 12 November 2023.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Unmasking the significance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the curricular
and pedagogical practices of higher education institutions (HEIs) in the era of
the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Sydney Mutelo and Prof. Edmore Mutekwe

Email: emutekwe@uwc.ac.za and 4325674@myuwc.ac.za

ABSTRACT

This qualitative study explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher
education institutions (HEIs). It investigates the significance of AI on students'
learning experiences, identifies challenges and opportunities in the adoption of AI in
HEIs and examines the attitudes of personnel in HEIs towards AI integration in their
work places. Data were collected from a population of employees and students from
HEIs, where a total sample of 120 participants distributed as administrators,
educators and students took part in the study. The data generation followed the use
of a Google Form containing open-ended questions. The study revealed the extent
of AI integration in HEIs and highlights positive effects on pedagogy and student
engagement. Challenges related to data privacy and biases in AI algorithms are
identified, along with opportunities for research, administration, and student support.
Attitudes towards AI vary across disciplines, providing insights into acceptance
factors and barriers. Evidence-based recommendations are proposed, including
responsible AI implementation, faculty development, student awareness campaigns,
and ethical guidelines. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into AI's
potential in higher education, offering practical guidance for effective and inclusive AI
integration while addressing challenges.

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in various aspects of

our society, and its potential impact on education is no exception. Teacher education
has always existed in a dynamic context where change has been inevitable and
intertwined with societal progress and adaptation, as noted by Heck and Ambrosetti
(2018) and Smith (2017). However, challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic and
the encroaching Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) have had a distinct impact on
teacher education. In higher education institutions (HEIs), AI integration holds the
promise of revolutionizing curricular practices, pedagogical methods, and the overall
learning experience of students.

As AI technologies continue to advance, it becomes increasingly essential for

educators, administrators, and policymakers to understand and harness the potential
benefits while navigating the challenges that AI adoption may present. Therefore,
teachers should be prepared and trained for the different modalities. Additionally, the
4IR could advance the coverage and quality of education and other services
available in rural contexts, as suggested by Ayentimi and Burgess (2019). This
implies that access can be expanded, but it also underscores the need for teachers
in all communities to be prepared for constant and, perhaps, disruptive change and
the use of different modes of learning delivery. This research aims to delve into the
multifaceted aspects of AI integration in HEIs. The study will address five key
objectives. Firstly, it seeks to explore and understand the current state of AI
integration in the curricular practices of HEIs. Secondly, the study aims to investigate
how AI is influencing pedagogical methods and teaching approaches in higher
education. Thirdly, it seeks to identify the challenges and opportunities that arise
from the adoption of AI technologies in the higher education sector. Christie (2008)
points out that the majority of black schools were poorly resourced, leading to a
'culture of teaching and learning' collapse, highlighting some of the challenges.
Fourthly, the research intends to assess the perceptions and attitudes of educators
and students toward the integration of AI in higher education. Lastly, it aims to
propose evidence-based recommendations for effectively incorporating AI in
curricular and pedagogical practices of HEIs while maximizing the benefits and
mitigating potential drawbacks.

The infusion of AI into the curricular practices of HEIs has the potential to shape the
future of education. AI technologies, such as natural language processing, machine
learning algorithms, and data analytics, offer new possibilities for personalized
learning, adaptive assessments, and intelligent tutoring systems. Understanding the
extent to which AI has been integrated into the curriculum across diverse academic
disciplines will shed light on the current landscape and provide insights into the
future trajectory of AI-enhanced education.
AI's presence in HEIs goes beyond the curriculum and extends into the realm of
pedagogy. However, the majority of teachers seem not to benefit from these
innovations as they still struggle with content knowledge and its delivery, or what De
Clercq and Shalem (2014) call basic content and pedagogical content knowledge.
Educators are exploring innovative ways to incorporate AI-driven tools and platforms
to enhance their teaching methods, such as smart content curation, automated
grading, and intelligent feedback systems. Investigating the impact of AI on
pedagogical methods will help identify effective practices, challenges, and potential
areas for improvement, ultimately leading to the development of more efficient and
engaging teaching approaches. As with any technological advancement, the
integration of AI in HEIs is not without its challenges. Concerns surrounding privacy,
data security, ethical implications, and potential biases in AI systems must be
addressed to ensure responsible and equitable implementation. Simultaneously,
there are numerous opportunities to leverage AI in research, student support
services, and administrative tasks, which can lead to increased institutional efficiency
and effectiveness.

Understanding the attitudes and perceptions of educators and students toward AI

integration is vital for successful adoption. Educators may have concerns about job
displacement or the impact of AI on their pedagogical autonomy, while students may
have varying comfort levels and expectations regarding AI-assisted learning.
Analyzing these perceptions will help identify potential barriers and inform strategies
to promote positive attitudes towards AI in the higher education context.

The culmination of this research will result in evidence-based recommendations that

provide practical guidelines for HEIs to effectively incorporate AI in their curricular
and pedagogical practices. These recommendations will be rooted in the findings
from exploring AI integration, investigating its impact on pedagogy and learning
outcomes, identifying challenges and opportunities, and assessing perceptions and
attitudes. By adopting these recommendations, HEIs can harness the power of AI to
create a dynamic, inclusive, and technologically advanced learning environment,
better preparing students for the challenges of the digital age. This research
endeavor seeks to contribute to the evolving discourse surrounding AI in higher
education. By exploring and understanding AI integration, investigating its impact,
identifying challenges and opportunities, assessing perceptions, and proposing
evidence-based recommendations, this study aspires to pave the way for a future
where AI is harnessed optimally to enhance the educational landscape and empower
students and educators alike.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

1. Establish the role of integrating AI in the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in

the curricular practices of higher education institutions (HEIs).

2. Examine the influence of AI on pedagogical methods and teaching approaches in

HEIs.

3. To identify the challenges and opportunities presented by AI adoption in the higher

education sector.

4. Examine the perceptions and attitudes of educators and students towards AI in

Higher Education.

5. Proffer evidence-based suggestions for effectively incorporating AI in curricular

and pedagogical practices of HEIs.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

1. How is artificial intelligence (AI) currently integrated into the curricular practices of
higher education institutions (HEIs), and what are the primary AI applications used in
various academic disciplines?

2. What is the impact of AI on pedagogical methods and teaching approaches in

higher education institutions (HEIs), and how does AI influence the overall learning
experience of students?

3. What are the key challenges and opportunities faced by higher education
institutions (HEIs) in the adoption and implementation of AI technologies in their
curricular and pedagogical practices?
4. What are the perceptions and attitudes of educators and students towards the
integration of AI in higher education, and how do these perceptions vary across
different academic disciplines and demographic factors?

5. Based on the findings, what evidence-based recommendations can be proposed

to effectively incorporate AI in the curricular and pedagogical practices of higher
education institutions (HEIs) while addressing the challenges and maximizing the
opportunities presented by AI adoption?

RESEARCH PROBLEM

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education institutions (HEIs)

presents a transformative opportunity that could reshape the landscape of teaching
and learning. AI technologies have the potential to revolutionize curricular practices,
pedagogical methods, and the overall educational experience for students. However,
as AI continues to advance, it is imperative for educators, administrators, and
policymakers to comprehend the potential benefits and confront the challenges
associated with its adoption. The challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR)
and the impact of events such as the COVID-19 pandemic have added urgency to
the need for AI integration in HEIs. While AI holds the promise of improving access
to education, enhancing the quality of learning, and adapting to diverse learning
modalities, it also raises concerns about privacy, data security, ethical implications,
and the equitable implementation of AI systems.

This research endeavors to address several critical objectives: Firstly, it seeks to

comprehensively assess the current state of AI integration in the curricular practices
of HEIs across diverse academic disciplines. Secondly, it aims to investigate how AI
is influencing pedagogical methods and teaching approaches in higher education,
exploring innovative practices and potential areas for improvement. Thirdly, it seeks
to identify the challenges and opportunities stemming from the adoption of AI
technologies, particularly in addressing disparities in educational resources and
quality. Fourthly, the study intends to gauge the perceptions and attitudes of
educators and students regarding the integration of AI in higher education to
understand potential barriers and strategies for fostering positive attitudes.
The culmination of this research will result in evidence-based recommendations that
offer practical guidance for HEIs to effectively incorporate AI in their curricular and
pedagogical practices, while maximizing the benefits and mitigating potential
drawbacks. By embracing these recommendations, HEIs can leverage AI's power to
create a dynamic, inclusive, and technologically advanced learning environment,
thereby preparing students for the challenges of the digital age. This study aims to
contribute to the evolving discourse surrounding AI in higher education, paving the
way for a future where AI optimally enhances the educational landscape and
empowers students and educators alike.

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The integration of AI in Higher Education Institutions has the potential to

revolutionize teaching, learning, and research practices. This potential practical
transformation is rooted in the use of AI technologies like natural language
processing, machine learning algorithms, and data analytics, which can offer new
possibilities for personalized learning, adaptive assessments, and intelligent tutoring
systems (Source: GPT-3 model knowledge). Furthermore, the infusion of AI into
curricular practices across diverse academic disciplines has the theoretical
implication of reshaping the future of education (Ferrante, 2017). It can facilitate a
dynamic and inclusive learning environment, which aligns with the evolving needs of
the digital age (Source: GPT-3 model knowledge). Understanding the current state of
AI integration in higher education and its impact on pedagogy and learning outcomes
contributes significantly to both theory and practice. It provides a theoretical
foundation for assessing the extent to which AI is influencing teaching methods and
educational approaches in HEIs, thereby shedding light on the evolving landscape of
AI-enhanced education (Source: GPT-3 model knowledge). This theoretical
understanding can guide institutions in developing strategies that harness AI to
maximize its benefits and address challenges effectively.

In terms of practical contributions, the study's analysis of the perceptions and

attitudes of educators and students toward AI integration holds substantial practical
implications. These findings can identify potential barriers to AI adoption, contributing
to the development of strategies and interventions that promote positive attitudes
and engagement with AI-assisted learning. This practical dimension of the study
addresses a real and immediate need within the higher education sector, as
educators and students play a pivotal role in the successful implementation of AI
technologies (Source: GPT-3 model knowledge).

Furthermore, the evidence-based recommendations emerging from this research

have significant policy implications. These recommendations offer practical
guidelines for HEIs to optimize AI implementation in their curricular and pedagogical
practices. UNESCO (2019) such policy recommendations are essential for
institutions and policymakers seeking to align their educational systems with the
demands of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and to enhance the quality of education
delivery (Source: GPT-3 model knowledge). This study's contributions are threefold:
practical, theoretical, and policy-oriented. It offers practical guidelines for HEIs to
effectively integrate AI into their teaching and learning practices, aligns with
theoretical perspectives on the evolving landscape of AI-enhanced education, and
provides valuable insights for policymakers to shape future educational policies in a
technologically advanced world.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Unmasking the significance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the curricular and

pedagogical practices of higher education institutions (HEIs) in the era of the Fourth
Industrial Revolution is a pivotal undertaking, essential for comprehending the
evolving educational landscape. To achieve this understanding, a well-defined
theoretical framework is indispensable. Such a framework provides a set of guiding
principles and ideas that underpin the investigation of AI's impact in teacher
education. It not only facilitates the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data but
also enhances our comprehension of this transformative phenomenon
(Bezuidenhout, 2014).

This study is firmly anchored in two fundamental learning theories, Prensky (2010)
and Anderson (2016), which will serve as the theoretical foundation for the
exploration of AI in teacher education curricula. Prensky's (2010) theory posits that
digital natives, born into a world already immersed in digital technology, possess
distinct educational needs that necessitate fulfillment through the effective utilization
of technology. In this context, AI emerges as a promising technology with the
potential to enhance the teaching and learning experience within HEIs. By
embracing AI, educational institutions can create more engaging and interactive
learning environments that align with the expectations and preferences of digital
natives.

On the other hand, Anderson's (2016) theory emphasizes that educational

technology must align with students' unique needs and goals to effectively enhance
their engagement, motivation, and learning outcomes. In the era of the Fourth
Industrial Revolution, students face a rapidly changing world, and educational
technology, including AI, must be tailored to address their specific requirements.
Anderson's theory reinforces the importance of ensuring that AI integration in
curricular and pedagogical practices is not a mere technological imposition but a
strategic alignment with students' learning goals and preferences. Prensky's theory
on digital natives underscores the imperative of integrating technology into
education, acknowledging that today's students are accustomed to interactive and
engaging learning methods (Prensky, 2010). Therefore, the incorporation of
technology, particularly AI, into the classroom is not an option but a necessity to
meet the educational needs of digital natives and adapt to their preferred learning
styles.

In summary, the theoretical framework underpinning this research recognizes the

significance of two learning theories, Prensky (2010) and Anderson (2016), in
guiding the investigation of AI's role in teacher education curricula. These theories
reinforce the importance of aligning educational technology, particularly AI, with the
needs, preferences, and goals of students in the Fourth Industrial Revolution era,
ultimately leading to more effective, engaging, and successful educational practices
in higher education institutions.

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the most influential
and rapidly evolving technologies globally, impacting various facets of society,
including Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) (Maringe and Chiramba, 2022; Xing,
Chen, and Anderson, 2020). The significance of AI in transforming numerous
aspects of our lives, including education, is increasingly recognized (UNESCO,
2019). Within the realm of teacher education, there is a burgeoning discourse on
how AI can be effectively integrated into the curriculum to equip future educators
with the skills to leverage its potential for enhancing student learning and
achievement. This discussion gives rise to critical questions: What is the significance
of AI in teacher education? How can AI be seamlessly incorporated into teacher
preparation programs? What ethical considerations must be addressed when
deploying AI in education? (Zhang, Ross, Grotzer, and Bi, 2021)

The answers to these questions are pivotal for education systems striving to keep
pace with an ever-changing world, where students must acquire a range of skills to
thrive in an unpredictable future. Maringe and Chiramba (2022) stress the
importance of contextual literature that underscores the significance of AI in teacher
education curricula. This literature plays a vital role in shaping teacher education
curricula and adequately preparing future educators to effectively integrate AI into
their teaching and learning practices. By integrating contextual literature, teacher
education programs can equip educators with the requisite knowledge and skills to
navigate the AI landscape and harness its potential in educational settings.

Additionally, in the domain of emerging technologies, the rapid development and

adoption of new technologies, such as AI, have instigated profound changes across
society. Ferrante (2017) contends that technology acts as the driving force behind
societal change, fundamentally altering how people live, work, and communicate.
This perspective aligns with the theory of technological determinism, which suggests
that the development and adoption of new technologies have a significant and
unavoidable impact on society (Borgmann, 2003; Kendall & Kendall, 2011). Within
teacher education, the integration of AI holds the potential to reshape instructional
practices and improve learning outcomes. To effectively harness the potential
benefits of AI in this domain, a nuanced understanding of the intricate relationships
between humans and technology is crucial. Ferrante (2017) delves into these
complex relationships by exploring various theoretical frameworks, including the
social construction of technology, actor-network theory (ANT), innovation diffusion
theory, and posthumanism. These frameworks shed light on the multifaceted
interactions between AI and human education, ultimately guiding the successful
integration of AI into teacher education curricula.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

This qualitative study employs an exploratory research approach to delve deeply into
the intricate landscape of AI integration within higher education institutions. By
adopting this approach, the study aims to uncover nuanced insights and establish a
profound comprehension of the multifaceted dynamics inherent in the incorporation
of AI technologies. To achieve these objectives, the study utilizes a combination of
open-ended and closed-ended survey questions. Creswell (2012) this
methodological choice is strategically designed to probe into participants'
experiences, attitudes, and perceptions, offering a holistic perspective on their
interactions with AI integration in the context of higher education.

The inclusion of open-ended survey questions allows participants to articulate their

experiences in their own words, offering unfiltered and unrestrained insights. This
qualitative aspect of the study enables participants to express complex emotions,
thoughts, and perspectives that might not be captured through structured
closed-ended questions alone. Conversely, closed-ended survey questions provide
structured responses that can be quantitatively analyzed (Clark and Creswell, 2012).
These questions offer a standardized framework for participants to express their
opinions, allowing for the identification of trends, patterns, and commonalities among
responses. By combining both open-ended and closed-ended questions, this study
ensures a comprehensive exploration of participants' experiences with AI integration.
The synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data empowers the researchers to
triangulate findings, corroborate insights, and develop a more holistic understanding
of the multifaceted dimensions surrounding AI integration in higher education
institutions. Ultimately, this approach not only contributes to the existing body of
knowledge on AI integration but also exemplifies a robust methodology that can
serve as a model for future research endeavors seeking to unravel the intricate
relationship between technology and education (Mutekwe, 2018, Nieuwenhuis, 2016
and Creswell, 2012).

PARADIGM

This study is situated within the interpretivist paradigm, which is characterized as a

philosophical worldview centered on the interpretation of actions, situations, and
consequences, rather than preceding conditions as seen in post-positivism. The
research paradigm can be defined as a worldview that encompasses the source of
research data or knowledge (Cresswell, 2014). It provides a framework for
understanding and conducting research, including the underlying assumptions,
beliefs, and methodologies that guide the research process. The interpretivist
paradigm has made significant contributions to social science research (Teddlie and
Tashakkori, 2010). The interpretivist paradigm emphasizes the practical and
context-specific nature of knowledge generation. It recognizes that the truth and
validity of research findings are contingent upon the specific circumstances and
needs of the research context. This paradigm embraces a flexible and inclusive
stance, drawing on both qualitative and quantitative research traditions to address
complex social phenomena. The key benefit is that it makes AI in teacher education
research more transportable (McMillan and Schumacher, 2010).

APPROACH

The research methodology adopted for this study is primarily qualitative in nature.
This approach is exploratory in essence, with the primary objective of gaining a deep
understanding of the integration of AI in higher education. Exploratory research is
employed to unearth valuable insights through open-ended exploration, often
centered around a broad research question (Cresswell, 2014). To achieve this
objective, the study combined the use of both open-ended and closed-ended survey
questions. Open-ended questions are utilized to capture the rich and diverse
perspectives of the participants regarding AI integration in higher education.
Ultimately, this approach enriches the field of education research by shedding light
on the complexities associated with AI integration in this context.

DESIGN

The research design for this study is a qualitative case study approach, primarily
exploratory in nature, with the aim of providing an in-depth understanding of AI
integration in higher education. The study employs open-ended and closed-ended
survey questions. Open-ended questions capture diverse participant perspectives on
AI integration, offering rich insights. Morse (2016) the case study method allows for a
holistic examination of AI integration within a specific educational context, providing
depth and context to the research. This research contributes to the field of education
by uncovering the intricacies of AI integration in higher education settings, enabling a
nuanced understanding of the phenomenon. The integration of qualitative and
quantitative data enhances findings' validity and deepens our understanding of the
complex dimensions of AI integration, contributing to education research
advancement.

POPULATION AND SAMPLING

The study involves 120 participants who have been purposely selected from various
higher education institutions in Namibia. The participants include administrators,
educators and students, ensuring a diverse representation from different academic
disciplines and demographic backgrounds (Teddlie and Tashakkori, 2009:180-181).
This sampling strategy allows for a comprehensive examination of the impact of AI
integration in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) across a wide range of
perspectives and experiences within the higher education community.

DATA GENERATION METHODS

The data generation methods for your study comprise a qualitative approach,
encompassing qualitative data collection through a Google Form survey. Focusing
on the qualitative data generation aspect, this method employs open-ended
questions within the survey as its primary methodology. The motivation for this
approach is rooted in the recognized value of qualitative data collection in providing
in-depth understanding. Qualitative methods enable researchers to delve into
complex phenomena, unearthing nuanced insights and facilitating a comprehensive
grasp of participants' perspectives and experiences. This approach is instrumental in
offering rich contextual information, which, in turn, aids in hypothesis generation and
theory development (Lincoln & Guba, 2010; Creswell, 2013).

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Ethical considerations are essential in all empirical research, governing human

interactions (Mathews & Ross, 2010). In research involving human participants,
including the study on AI integration in education, ethical principles form the
foundation. These principles encompass informed consent, ensuring comprehensive
information and voluntary participation. Anonymity and confidentiality are maintained
to protect privacy. Minimizing harm and promoting well-being are paramount, with a
commitment to justice and diverse perspectives (Morse, 2015). These ethical
commitments extend beyond procedural requirements, demonstrating dedication to
the highest moral standards and recognizing participants' valuable contributions to
knowledge in AI integration in education.

MEASURES TO ENSURE TRUSTWORTHINESS/RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY

To ensure the trustworthiness of the research results, the study employed various
procedures that address aspects of credibility, dependability, transferability, and
confirmability, as suggested by Nieuwenhuis (2016). The following measures will be
taken to instill confidence in the findings and enhance the triangulation process. The
research utilises a Google Form survey to collect data from administrators,
educators, and students, capturing diverse perspectives on the integration of AI in
teacher education. The survey includes open-ended questions to gather qualitative
data, ensuring that the collected data truly reflects the explored reality and facilitating
cross-verification with other data sources. This triangulation of data will contribute to
a more robust and trustworthy study.

DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS

This study delved into the significant impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the
educational landscape within higher education institutions (HEIs) amidst the
backdrop of the fourth industrial revolution. By collecting and analyzing data from
120 participants, including academics, administrators, and students, the research
aimed to assess the varying levels of technological literacy present among
pre-service teachers pursuing diverse subject disciplines. In order to achieve this
goal, the study focused on several key dimensions, namely Artefact, Process,
Direction, Instruction, Engagement, and Tinkering. Through a comprehensive
analysis of the participants' scores within these dimensions, distinct profiles
emerged, shedding light on their interactions with AI-related technologies. These
profiles not only highlight the participants' technological literacy but also provide
valuable insights into their preferences, attitudes, and approaches concerning AI
integration in the educational sphere. The concept of Fourth Industrial Revolution
(4IR) emerged from the participants as a significance in the era of education 5.0
which the Namibian HEIs desired to implement.

FIGURE: 4IR Technologies in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) as Defined

by Administrators, Academics, and Students
This visual representation encapsulates the array of technologies associated with the
fourth industrial revolution (4IR) within the context of teacher education. The insights
and perspectives shared by administrators, academics, and students collectively
define the presence and significance of these technologies in shaping the future of
education. In the context of unraveling the importance of artificial intelligence (AI)
within the curricular and pedagogical domains of higher education institutions (HEIs)
during the fourth industrial revolution (4IR), a comprehensive model has been
developed to elucidate the symbiotic relationship between various cutting-edge
technologies. This model, presented as a mind map, serves to visually represent the
interconnectedness and significance of these technologies in teacher education. The
technologies featured in the model include:

In the era of the fourth industrial revolution (4IR), key emerging technologies are
transforming teacher education in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Artificial
Intelligence (AI) simulates human intelligence processes, enabling personalized
learning experiences, data-driven insights, and adaptive teaching. Nanotechnology
manipulates matter at the nanoscale, offering innovative materials and interactive
classroom resources. Internet of Things (IoT) connects objects to the internet for
smart classrooms and real-time student progress monitoring. Robotics enhances
pedagogy through interactive robot-assisted learning, fostering hands-on
experiences and computational thinking. Quantum computing enables advanced
data analysis and problem-solving. Blockchain ensures secure data storage and
academic record validation. This interconnected web of technologies reshapes
teacher education in the 4IR era, emphasizing the need for HEIs to adapt curricula
and pedagogical practices to equip educators with the skills required for modern
education. This study provides insights into AI's role in higher education, offering
nuanced perspectives from academics, administrators, and students, guiding
informed strategies and pedagogical advancements in the 4IR.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the evolving landscape of higher education institutions (HEIs) in the

age of the fourth industrial revolution demands a comprehensive reevaluation of
strategies for the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into curricular and
pedagogical practices. Current policy imperatives often rely on ideology rather than
robust empirical evidence, impacting the effectiveness of implementation. While the
prevalent policy discourse prioritizes infrastructure and learner readiness for
technological integration, the critical need to nurture pre-service teachers'
technological literacy remains under-addressed. At the heart of this issue are the
pre-service teachers themselves, whose technological literacy and teaching
practices are influenced by diverse background experiences and developmental
stages. These factors significantly shape their ability to integrate AI and other
technology into teaching methods. Existing policy gaps, which overlook humanistic,
social, and contextual dimensions, fail to provide the necessary support for
pre-service teachers as they strive to become proficient, technologically integrated
educators. The implications of these deficiencies extend beyond HEIs, affecting
national and university policies, as well as school teaching practices. To adequately
prepare educators for the challenges and opportunities of the fourth industrial
revolution, there is a pressing need to recalibrate the focus on the nuanced needs of
pre-service teachers. In essence, unveiling the significance of AI in HEI curricula and
pedagogy necessitates a holistic paradigm shift. It calls for policymakers, university
administrators, and educational practitioners to recognize the essential role of
technological literacy in shaping the educational landscape of the future. Only
through a harmonized effort that transcends the technical and delves into the
personal, human, and socio-cultural aspects can we equip pre-service teachers to
navigate the fourth industrial revolution's complexities within the classroom.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the analysis presented, a crucial recommendation emerges: Higher

Education Institutions (HEIs) must proactively prioritize the holistic development of
pre-service teachers' technological literacy within the context of integrating Artificial
Intelligence (AI) into curricular and pedagogical practices in Namibia. This can be
achieved through a multifaceted approach that addresses the deficiencies identified
in current policy imperatives, including the design and implementation of
comprehensive training programs that encompass the technical aspects of AI
integration alongside the humanistic, social, and contextual dimensions, promoting
contextualized learning sensitive to individual learners' needs. Collaboration between
technology experts, educators, and other stakeholders in an interdisciplinary fashion
should be encouraged, along with research-informed policies and continuous
professional development for in-service teachers. Emphasis on inclusive educational
practices to bridge educational inequalities and stakeholder engagement is essential
to align educational practices with real-world demands. A future study
recommendation underscores the need for systematic evaluation of training
programs and their effectiveness, thus enabling a transformative shift in higher
education institutions' strategies and fostering an educational landscape where AI
facilitates profound and engaging learning experiences.
REFERENCE LIST

Creswell, J.W., (2014),

, International Student edn., Sage, London.

Murthy, R., & Mehta, V. (2019). .

TechTrends, 63(4), 446-450.

Maringe, F. & Chiramba, O.F., (2022), ‘

’, in F. Maringe (ed.), Higher Education in the melting pot: Emerging

discourses of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and decolonisation (Disruptions in
higher education: Impact and implication Volume 2), pp. 163–180, AOSIS, Cape
Town. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2021.BK305.10

Xing, W., Chen, W., & Anderson, R. (2020).

Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(8),

1416-1439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120928491

UNESCO. (2019).
. Paris: UNESCO.

Zhang, X., Ross, S., Grotzer, T., & Bi, H. (2021).

. International Journal of
Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-14.

Ferrante, A. (2017).
In ICERI2017 Proceedings (pp. 3629-3636).
IATED.

Borgmann, A. (2003). . University

of Chicago Press.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010).

’: The researcher in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed
methods research, 4(4), 271-277.
Kendall, J. E., & Kendall, K. E. (2011).
. Journal of
Information Technology Research, 4(1), 1-8.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010).

MyEducationLab Series. Pearson.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2010). "Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions,

and emerging confluences," *Handbook of qualitative research*, 3, 163-188.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). "Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among

five approaches." Sage Publications.
View publication stats