Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
1. explain the importance of studying the life and works of Jose Rizal;
2. enumerate the ways and manners by which Rizal is honored; and
3. examine the significance of Rizal’s death.
MODULE OUTLINE:
In the 21st century, the challenge for students is to understand the purpose of studying
Rizal. Scholars and academicians are one in saying that a mandated course on Rizal is as helpful
as any other course that teaches values that a student may carry for the rest of his or her life.
Studying Rizal in the 21st century helps students make sense of the present by looking
back at the past. For instance, Rizal’s illustration of 19th century Philippines in his works may
aid today’s generation in recognizing the ills of present day Philippines.
With students exposed to many foreign influences, studying Rizal may remind and urge
them to understand the real essence of being a Filipino. Significant historical figures like Rizal
help the younger generation navigate Philippine history and understand why being aware of
social issues are important in the formation of one’s national identity.
The practicality of studying Rizal in this day and age is seen in how Rizal’s experiences
and ideologies are instrumental in grasping the current context of Philippine society. The
mandated course on Rizal aids in developing the critical thinking skills of students. The different
challenges and dilemmas that Rizal faced in his life teaches them to be aware of and not
apathetic to the issues happening around them.
And finally, Rizal, then and now, is a worthy role model and a constant inspiration to all
Filipinos. He is considered the father of Filipino nationalism. In every aspect of his being, Rizal
is worthy to emulate especially in the ideals he held as a nationalist. He was not only intelligent,
he was also humane, creative, and innovative. As an inspiration to the Philippine nation, Rizal
will always be a valuable subject inside and outside the classroom in understanding how the
Philippine nation cam to be.
1
In the 1970’s attempts were made to change Rizal with Bonifacio as the national hero by:
Student activists
Militant groups
Labor unions/movements
Black Propaganda:
American sponsored hero – His writings were not against the Americans.
He’s an ultimate symbol of cruelty by the Spaniards, if made one, the Filipinos
would eventually admire him.
He will overshadow the significance of the other heroes especially those who are
revolutionary in nature.
No participation in the 1896 revolution
Chauvinist (sexist; excessive blind patriotism) and Sadist (delight in physical or
mental cruelty)
Father of Adolf Hitler
Mama’s boy
Gay/Homosexual
Small sex organ
Planned his death – because he had a venereal disease (syphilis)
Not a nationalist
Agent of Germany/serving foreign interest
Atheist
• Shrines
- Dapitan
- Fort Santiago, Intramuros
- Ancestral House, Calamba, Laguna
- Luneta Park
- Rizal Park, Ilocos Norte
• Religious Movements
- Aglipayan/Philippine Independent Church (in 1905
canonized Rizal & Gomburza
- Pulajanes ("those wearing red") of Papa Faustino Ablen of
Leyte was part of a revolutionary spiritual movement
known as Dios-Dios.
- Banal - Leyte
- Pantay Pantay - Legaspi (Rizalinas/Rizalinos)
- Rizalina – Tarlac (nunnery for priestess)
- Sambahang Rizal – Nueva Ecija (Gospels – Rizal’s
teachings)
- Rizalista
• Other countries
* There is an exact replica of the Rizal Monument in Madrid,
Spain. There are also monuments of Rizal in Wilhelmsfeld
(Germany), Jinjiang, Fujian (China), Cherry Hill Township (New
Jersey), San Diego (California), and Seattle (Washington),
Reforma Avenue in Mexico City (Mexico), La Molina in Lima
(Peru), Litomerice (Czech Republic), and Singapore.
* Indonesia – newborn babies named after him
* Japan – marker for Fil-Japanese friendship
* Switzerland, England, France - plaque
* USA – Maryland – Rizal Park; Chicago – Statue
3
* Mexico – Rizal monument first to be built outside of the
Philippines.
* Russia – read his novels
* Germany – townhouse, park, a scholarship grant for Filipino
students
* Canada – monuments in Montreal, Earl Bales Park in
Toronto and Ontario
4
MODULE 2 - RIZAL: THE SELECTION OF THE NATIONAL HERO
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
MODULE OUTLINE:
“To die is a fact of life. But the person’s characteristics, his dreams and works can stand
the test of time; his life can be an example for the generations to come. He is worthy to be
honored.”
1
B. Aspirants for the position of National Hero
1. Filipino
2. Dead
3. Ardent love for one’s country
4. A man honored after death by public worship/compassionate and peace loving
Hero:
Why Rizal?
MH Del Pilar;
Napoleon M. Kheil;
Dr. Reinhold Rost;
Fernando Acevedo – sees in him the model Filipino;
Dr. Tomas Arejola - “your moral influence over us is indisputable”
Vicente Barrantes - “the first among the Filipinos”
Ferdinand Blumentritt - “Rizal was the greatest product of the Philippines and that
his coming to the world was like the appearance of a rare comet, whose rare
brilliance appears only every other century; the most prominent man of his own
people but the greatest man the Malayan race has produced.”
2
Other Honors and Acclamations:
* Marcelo H. Del Pilar won according to the votes, but upon knowing that Rizal’s
life and death was more colorful than Del Pilar, the decision was reversed.
His being a martyr of Bagumbayan may arouse feelings of nationhood and of love for
country.
His exile to Dapitan prompted the creation of Katipunan by Andres Bonifacio, which
spread to 8 provinces: Cavite, Bulacan, Bataan, Tarlac, Morong, Batangas, Laguna, and
Nueva Ecija;
Rizal was peace loving. He wanted reforms but not through bloody revolutions (Filipinos
are peaceful and peace loving).
Filipinos are sentimental. Reading his real life story would touch the reader's heart.
Filipinos usually sympathize with the hero that is kind and the underdog. Rizal's death
was the perfect plot.
3
To support the choice, the commission passed the following acts:
Act 137 organized the politico-military district of Morong and named it Rizal Province
Act 243 authorized public subscription for the construction of the Rizal monument in
Luneta
Act 345 set aside December 30 as a national holiday, Rizal Day
Republic Act 1425 – the Rizal Law
4
RIZAL: THE SELECTION
OF THE NATIONAL
HERO
Learning Objectives:
At the end of this module, the students will be able to:
W. Morgan Shuster
Dean Worcester
Jose Luzurriaga
Benito Legarda
Antonio Luna
Was a Filipino army general who fought in the
Spanish–American War, Philippine Revolution, and
Philippine–American War before his assassination in
1899.
Emilio Jacinto
"Utak ng Himagsikan", he was one of the highest-ranking officers in the Philippine
Revolution and was one of the highest-ranking officers of the revolutionary society Kataas-
taasan, Kagalang-galang na Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan, or simply and more
popularly called Katipunan, being a member of its Supreme Council.
Criteria for Selection of
National Hero
Filipino
Dead
Ardent love for one's
country
A man honored after
death by public
worship/compassionate
and peace loving
What makes a hero?
A prominent or central personage taking an
admirable part in any remarkable action or
event.
A person of distinguished valor (bravery) or
enterprise in danger, or fortitude in
suffering.
A man honored after death by public worship,
because of exceptional service to mankind.
WHY RIZAL?
Why RIZAL?
A towering figure in the Propaganda
Campaign
Noli Me Tangere contributed tremendously to
the formation of Filipino Nationality
10. One of Rizal’s unique qualities that makes him our national hero is?
A. Shed blood to fought for our freedom
B. There is a Filipino who can surpass Rizal’s ability
C. His writing fuels and strengthen the nationalism of the Filipinos
D. Insignificant member of any propaganda movements
MODULE 3 - THE RIZAL LAW: REPUBLIC ACT 1425
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
MODULE OUTLINE:
Republic Act No. 1425, known as the Rizal Law, mandates all educational institutions
in the Philippines to teach the life, works, and writings of Jose Rizal. Its primary aim is to
inculcate in students an increased sense of nationalism at a time when the Filipino identity is
threatened by various factors.
Senators Claro M. Recto and Dr. Jose P Laurel Sr., authored and sponsored respectively
this act commonly called the Rizal Law. The law was signed on June 12, 1956 during the
presidency of the late Hon. Ramon Magsaysay & took effect on August 16, 1956. It is of interest
for our students to know that Dr. Recto, a nationalist is an alumnus of CPU, a donor of the Recto
scholarship in our College of Law (CPU) and the President of the Constitutional Convention that
drafted our Philippine Constitution on Feb. 3, 1936. He died in Rome, October 2, 1962.
Senator Laurel, a nationalist is from Tanawan, Batangas, was also a former Secretary of
the Interior and Justice of the Supreme Court and President of the Japanese sponsored Philippine
Republic. He died in 1963.
Senate Bill no. 438, was one of Sen. Claro M. Recto’s major fight in the Senate.
Presented by Sen. Jose P. Laurel, Chair of the Senate Committee on Education, on April
17, 1956, but it was generally known that Recto was the author or main proponent. Sen.
Recto believed that studying the life and works of Rizal would be instrumental in
teaching the youth to stand up for their country, therefore embodying the values and
ideals of Rizal. Sen. Laurel firmly believed that the passing of the bill into law will be
integral to achieving the noble intent of bringing to the Filipinos a sense of nationalism
that would help them understand the importance of sovereignty.
It was bitterly opposed by some senators and by the Catholic Institution – pointing out
that requiring the teaching of Rizal in schools would be a violation of religious freedom.
1
To solve the disunity created by the bill, Laurel sponsored a substitute measure - as a
compromise the word “compulsory” was removed and was stated as … “an act to include in the
curricula of all schools (public or private) courses on the life, works, and writings of Rizal.” –
which was unanimously approved on May 12, 1956.
President Ramon Magsaysay signed this into law as RA 1425 on June 12, 1956.
The National Commission on Education on August 16, 1956 enacted this law.
1956, Education Secretary, Jose E. Romero, allowed schools much leeway in their
implementation of the provisions of the law.
Some schools issued exceptions from the reading of Noli Me Tangere and El
Filibusterismo;
1960, schools offered Rizal either as a three (3) unit course, one (1) unit or integrated
with other subjects in college;
1965, then Education Secretary Alejandro Roces ordered the integration of the Rizal
course with appropriate subjects other than Spanish as practiced;
1969, thirteen (13) years after the passage of Rizal Law, the three (3) unit course was
ordered to be offered as a regular three unit course and a requisite for graduation as
directed by then Education Secretary Carlos P. Romulo.
A digest of the important and pertinent provisions of the Republic Act 1425
1. The teaching of the life, works and writings of Rizal should be included in the
curricula of both public and private schools in the Philippines from Grade 1 to 4th
Year High School.
2. No college or University student should be allowed to graduate or be conferred his degree
without earning units or credits in the course in the study of the life, works and writings
of Rizal.
3. The government should appropriate an amount for the printing and/or publishing of the
Noli and Fili in the dialects of the people and these two books of Rizal will be used in the
classroom teaching.
4. The unexpurgated editions of these two books of Rizal will be used in the classroom
teaching.
5. Encourage every Filipino to have copies of the Noli and Fili as well as other books of
Rizal.
2
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 1425
AN ACT TO INCLUDE IN THE CURRICULA OF ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
SCHOOLS, COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES COURSES ON THE LIFE, WORKS
AND WRITINGS OF JOSE RIZAL, PARTICULARLY HIS NOVELS NOLI ME
TANGERE AND EL FILIBUSTERISMO, AUTHORIZING THE PRINTING AND
DISTRIBUTION THEREOF, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
WHEREAS, today, more than any other period of our history, there is a need for a re-
dedication to the ideals of freedom and nationalism for which our heroes lived and died;
WHEREAS, it is meet that in honoring them, particularly the national hero and patriot,
Jose Rizal, we remember with special fondness and devotion their lives and works that have
shaped the national character;
WHEREAS, the life, works and writing of Jose Rizal, particularly his novels Noli Me
Tangere and El Filibusterismo, are a constant and inspiring source of patriotism with which the
minds of the youth, especially during their formative and decisive years in school, should be
suffused;
WHEREAS, all educational institutions are under the supervision of, and subject to
regulation by the State, and all schools are enjoined to develop moral character, personal
discipline, civic conscience and to teach the duties of citizenship; Now, therefore,
SECTION 1. Courses on the life, works and writings of Jose Rizal, particularly his novel
Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, shall be included in the curricula of all schools, colleges
and universities, public or private: Provided, That in the collegiate courses, the original or
unexpurgated editions of the Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo or their English translation
shall be used as basic texts.
The Board of National Education is hereby authorized and directed to adopt forthwith
measures to implement and carry out the provisions of this Section, including the writing and
printing of appropriate primers, readers and textbooks. The Board shall, within sixty (60) days
from the effectivity of this Act, promulgate rules and regulations, including those of a
disciplinary nature, to carry out and enforce the provisions of this Act. The Board shall
promulgate rules and regulations providing for the exemption of students for reasons of religious
belief stated in a sworn written statement, from the requirement of the provision contained in the
second part of the first paragraph of this section; but not from taking the course provided for in
the first part of said paragraph. Said rules and regulations shall take effect thirty (30) days after
their publication in the Official Gazette.
3
The Board of National Education shall determine the adequacy of the number of books,
depending upon the enrollment of the school, college or university.
SECTION 3. The Board of National Education shall cause the translation of the Noli Me
Tangere and El Filibusterismo, as well as other writings of Jose Rizal into English, Tagalog and
the principal Philippine dialects; cause them to be printed in cheap, popular editions; and cause
them to be distributed, free of charge, to persons desiring to read them, through the Purok
organizations and Barrio Councils throughout the country.
Published in the Official Gazette, Vol. 52, No. 6, p. 2971 in June 1956.
4
MODULE 4 - RIZAL IN THE CONTEXT OF SPANISH COLONIALISM
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
1. analyze the various factors that affected the Philippines in the 19th century;
2. enumerate the world events that happened in the 19th century; and
3. identify the prevailing philosophies during Rizal’s lifetime.
MODULE OUTLINE:
1. Social Structure
1
2. Political System
The Royal Audiencia, the highest court. It served as the highest court of
appeal for criminal and civil cases and important government affairs were
referred to it as well. The Court and the governor-general, acting separately or
together occasionally made laws called autos acordados.
The Residencia. A body composed of the audiencia and the
incoming governor-general that investigated one’s predecessor for acts of
graft and corruption.
The Visitadores. A body commissioned by the Crown to conduct secret
investigation on graft and corrupt practices of government officials.
2
The cuadrilleros or guardia civil helped maintain peace and order
(police duties). This was headed by the alferez (2nd Lt.), a Spaniard
who heads the corp of Guardia Civil.
> Parish priests could have checked anomalies but they did
not in exchange for favors
> One can’t complain against the Alcalde since he also served as
the provincial judge
3
Gobernadorcillo – no salary except for 2 pesos/month allowance
Responsibilities:
The money collected was not used for the improvement of the town
but was made a means or source of income; honest men had to cover for
deficits or they will be punished or imprisoned.
4. Educational System
4
- Educational Decree of Dec. 20, 1863, which marked a milestone in the
history of Education; to establish one primary school for boys and one
for girls in every major town
- 1865 – schools for male teachers were opened under the supervision of
the Jesuits
- Training was for secondary schools - Medium of instruction was to
be in Spanish
> Absence of academic freedom
> Prejudice against Filipinos in the higher education
- They were often told they had inferior intelligence resulting to lack of personal
confidence and inferiority complex
- Some schools were not open to natives until the later decades
of the Spanish period
- Indios were not considered to be educable
Changes happening in Europe (and elsewhere) in the 19th Century affected, in the positive
and negative way, the political and social life in Spain.
Among these changes were the French Revolution, the Napoleonic Wars, the advent of the
Industrial Revolution, and the revolt of Spain’s Latin American Colonies and the flourishing
of modern philosophies.
In Spain, conservatives and liberals made a compromise to alternate in the control of
government.
This contract was known as Pacto del Pardo, which later resulted to frequent changes in
leadership in the Philippines.
While the Pacto denied well-intentioned governors-general the chance to carry out their
programs, opportunists among them found their terms of office too short that they engaged
in amassing wealth while in power.
5
The effort to establish reform was thwarted by the succession of inefficient monarchs to the
Spanish throne.
The split created within the royal family finally ended in a civil war in 1936.
England and France became industrialized and powerful nations while Spain was hesitant to
accept the scientific and technological advancements
The French government under Napoleon Bonaparte tried to dominate Spain but they were
able to drive them away in 1814.
The period from 1814-1875 were unstable years for Spain.
Monarchs such as Ferdinand VII and Isabella II, who were unfit to rule ascended the throne.
Monarch - a hereditary constitutional sovereign, as a king or queen, etc.
Monarchy - a state or country in which the supreme power either actually or
nominally placed in the hands of a king, queen, or other monarch; the system of
government in which power is vested in a monarch.
There was a split between the LIBERALS (i.e. they believe that people should enjoy liberty,
equality and opportunity) and CONSERVATIVES (i.e. they believe monarchs should
reign)
Indifference and political ignorance of people which blocked the way to development
Ferdinand VII-did not recognize the liberal reforms; he scorned the Constitution and the
Cortes
There was a conspiracy against the king which ended in civil war in 1936.
Queen Isabella's reign for 35 years ended in a revolution in 1868 which forced her to leave
the country.
Under Isabella:
Monarchy was restored in 1875 with Alfonso XII (Isabella’s son) on the throne.
1876-1931- Second Republic was established.
- A parliamentary monarchy was set up.
- Legislative power and power to change the constitution were given to the king
and the Cortes.
- Sovereignty of the people was a farce.
- Will of the monarch still prevailed.
6
1885-death of Alfonso XII who was replaced by Minister Canovas del Castillo
The political setbacks brought about Spanish masses living in poverty and social misery
Socialism and Anarchism gradually spread in Spain
Spain lost most of her colonies except Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines.
Socialism – a theory in which the means of production and distribution of goods are owned
and controlled collectively by the government
• Frequent changes of governor generals, each serving an average of only one year and three
months
• Political undesirables were put in positions
• Appointment was not through merit that resulted to maladministration and corruption
• No separation of church and state which gave the archbishop the religious, judicial, and
political functions
• Political reforms were done through the representation in the Spanish Cortes
• Racial discrimination was felt
• Violation of human rights such as the right to life, liberty, and security
• Changes in business practices; Manila was open to world trade
World Events
That’s why it is important to know and understand the history and culture of one’s
country
Two major struggles for freedom that influenced the thinking of other nations:
7
Other world events (Other struggles for independence):
1800-1825 – Spain lost its Latin American colonies: Paraguay, Argentina, Chile,
Colombia, Ecuador, Costa Rica, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua,
Venezuela, Peru, Bolivia, Uruguay
1830 – the Greeks gained independence from the Turks
July 8, 1853 – American Commodore, Matthew C. Perry re-opened Japan to the
world after a 214 year seclusion under the Shogunate (1639-1853). It ended Japan’s
isolation.
1858 – Mexico was conquered but fought for independence and later on elected the
first Mexican of pure Indian blood, Benito Juarez, as President
1861 – Italy became a free and united nation from the Austrians and French except
for Rome (Capital City) which was under the Pope and Venetia
The gradual spread of democracy and the fight for human rights and
fundamental freedoms.
8
3. The effects of the Industrial Revolution
* Started in England
Positive Effects
Machines (such as the spinning jenny, cotton gin, and sewing machine)
hastened the revolution in manufacturing
Establishment of factories
The use of steel, discovery of oil, gasoline, and electricity, and invention of
the internal combustion engine heralded the advent of the motorized age
The revolution in transportation (steam boats, locomotives, airplanes, etc) and
Communication (telephone, telegraph, and cable facilities enabled man to
conquer time and distance
Increased demands for raw materials and markets for finished products
Increase in employment and national income
Improved the standard of living
Increase in population
Improvement in medicine and public hygiene
Nationalism was stimulated, the modern means of communication and
transportation brought the people close to each other; they began to realize
their common problems and aspirations and the need to solve these problems
and attain their goals
Growth of liberalism was fostered (laissez-faire)
Clash of the capitalists and the laborers
Negative Effects
Suggested solutions:
3. The poor and the helpless have claim to a special consideration whenever there is a
question of protecting the rights of individuals;
4. Since private property is as universal as human nature, the state has the right to
regulate the use of private property and to protect it;
5. The preservation of life is the bounden duty of each and all members of society.
The worker is entitled to a just and decent living wage which will enable him to
live in reasonable comfort as a human being, to develop his faculties, and to attain
his ultimate goal in life;
6. The state has the duty to provide favorable working conditions; and
10
5. Imperialism and Expansion
Imperialism – the activity of a nation in extending its control and authority beyond its
territorial boundaries through the acquisition of new territories; the desire of civilized
nations to rule over the “weak nations.”
Specific Events:
Techniques used:
1. Engage in business
2. Political control to protect economic interest
sanitation
education
transportation
communication
improved way of living
government
recreation
enriched culture
abolished cannibalism, suttee, and slavery
11
6. Growing Confidence on Progress Inspires Optimism
7. The new current in the movement of thought and the growing confidence on
progress
Modern philosophy came to a close around the end of the 18th and 19th
centuries and upon its end began contemporary philosophy that is
characterized by political and religious outlooks.
Many political thinkers emerged brought about by changes then taking place
in Europe.
Among these thoughts was the deviation from the divine right theory, which
was the basis of absolute monarchies in Europe and in Asia.
Foremost among the proponents of these new political ideologies were: John
Locke, Rousseau, Hegel, Charles Darwin, Hobbes, Bakunin, Marx, and
Edmund Burke.
Exposed to their writings and teachings, Rizal (1861-1896) developed his
own philosophy and political thoughts.
Europe became his social and political laboratory while his countrymen the
Indios, as referred to by the Spanish community became his patients.
The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 allowed liberal ideas to flow into the
archipelago.
Among others were the ideas of the French revolution, anti-clericalism,
secularism and nationalism.
The socio-economic and political conditions provide a fertile ground in the
country for the seeds of revolution to flourish.
The Industrial Revolution brought unprecedented economic progress around
the world, and with this, the confidence that things are becoming better.
The average of the world’s great civilizations before they decline has been
200 years. These nations have progressed in this sequence:
From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage;
from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance
to selfishness; from selfishness to complacency; from complacency to
apathy; from apathy to dependency; from dependency back again to
bondage.
- Alexander Tyler 1770, Cycle of Democracy
12
The Prevailing Philosophies
Rizal was born at the advent of the Industrial Revolution. Many changes were happening in
Europe where Spain is located during those times, and these changes somehow had effects on
people’s lives. These are the prevailing philosophies during Rizal’s lifetime:
1. Conservatism is an ideology that seeks to preserve the status quo whèrein, when change
becomes necessary in tested institutions and practices, prefers that it come slowly, and in
moderation (William Safire’s New Political Dictionary).
In his classic treatise Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes argued that man’s natural state
was war. Governments, particularly a monarchy, was necessary to restrain man’s bestial
tendencies because life without government was a “state of nature.” Without written,
enforceable rules, people would live like animals – foraging for food, stealing and killing
when necessary. To escape the horrors of the natural state and to protect their lives, Hobbes
argued men must give up to government certain rights. Without government, life would
basically be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short”—a constant struggle to survive against
the evil of others. For this reason, governments had to intrude on people’s rights and liberties
to control society and provide the necessary safeguards for property.
Niccolo Machiavelli contended that to get power and stay in power, a ruler had to
forget his ideals. He learned that by nature, humans are not good, kind, loyal or honest. So
he advised “A wise ruler … cannot and should not observe faith when it is to his
disadvantage and the causes that made him give his promise have vanished. If men were all
good, this advice would not be good, but since men are wicked and do not keep their
promises to you, you likewise do not have to keep yours to them.”
Machiavelli believed that the state should be all-powerful. He said that every
political act had only one means of measure – success. In his book ‘The Prince,” he seemed
to approve the use of any possible means to get and keep power. Lying, cheating and murder
were acceptable if a ruler need them to gain to gain his ends. The rights of citizens were only
those that the ruler allowed for the benefit of the state. People were viewed simply as clay to
be molded by the ruler. Machiavelli felt that the state must be stable at all costs.
Divine Right Theory which was the driving force behind conservative ideology
holds that the state is of divine creation and the ruler is ordained by God to govern the
people. Advocates of this theory have made reference to the laws, which Moses received at
Mount Sinai.
2. Liberalism (from the Latin liberalis) is a political ideology or worldview founded on ideas
of liberty and equality. It is based on the premise that man by nature is good.
Liberalism is a political view held by those who “seek to change the political,
economic, or social status quo to foster the development and well-being of the individual.”
(Jack C. Plano & Milton Greenberg, The American Political Dictionary 9th Edition)
The early liberal thinker John Locke, who is often credited for the creation of
liberalism as a distinct philosophical tradition, employed the concept of natural rights and
the social contract to argue that the rule of law should replace absolutism in government, that
rulers were subject to the consent of the governed, and that private individuals had a
fundamental right to life, liberty, and property.
The revolutionaries in the American Revolution and the French Revolution used
liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of tyrannical rule.
Social Contract Theory is the belief that people are free and equal by God-given
right and that this in turn requires that all people give their consent to be governed.
As basis for liberal thoughts asserts that states may have been formed by deliberate
and voluntary contract among people to form a society and organize a government for their
common good. This theory justifies the right of the people to revolt against a bad ruler.
14
According to this theory, kings derived their power from the people. While rulers
have an obligation to look after their people’s welfare, the people have the obligation to
support their rulers. When governance is oppressive, it is the right of the people to overthrow
such a government.
John Locke in two of his works (Essay Concerning Human Understanding1690, and
Second Treatise on Civil Government 1689) responded to King James II abuses of power,
which were largely directed at the Anglican Church and Parliament. Locke not only denied
the divine rights of kings to govern, but argued that men were born equal and with rights in
nature that no king had the power to void. Under what Locke termed as Social Contract
Theory, the consent of the people is the only true basis of any sovereign rights to rule.
According to him, men formed governments largely to preserve life, liberty, and property,
and to assure justice. If governments act improperly, they break their “contract” with the
people and therefore no longer enjoy the consent of the governed.
Jean Jacques Rousseau claimed that man is inherently good but the false values of
society corrupt him. He claimed that a people’s consent alone legitimizes government and
the processes of decision-making must be participated by all. He said that it is the right of
the people to stage civil disobedience or to take up arms when a government breaks its
covenant with them. He prescribes eternal vigilance on the part of the governed against their
government.
3. Anarchy. A theory that is anchored on the belief that all forms of government are wrong and
unnecessary. It is characterized by the absence or utter disregard of government, lawless
confusion and disorder.
Anarchism is an ideology that stresses belief in the ability of men and women to
establish functioning communities without the need for the apparatus of state. It advocates
the destruction of the existing society by revolution for the birth of a new and better one.
Mikhail Bakunin (1814-1876) and Peter Kropotkin (1842-1921) claim that the state is a
parasite and an enemy of the people. They encouraged the abolition of private property and
the exposition of fraud in the guise of religion. They glorify revolution as the only way to
effect change.
4. Communism. A theory of government and social order according to which property and the
instruments of production belong to the people and are held as a common trust and the
profits arising from all labor devoted to the general good. Any social theory that calls for the
abolition of private property and control by the community over economic affairs.
Karl Marx (1818-1883), (who, along with Friedrich Engels, 1820-1895 founded
the modern communist ideology) argued that government was simply a manifestation of
underlying economic forces and could be understood according to types of economic
production. In Das Kapital (1867), Marx argued that capitalism would always be replaced by
socialist states in which the working class would own the means of production and
distribution and be able to redistribute the wealth to meet its needs. Marx believed that it was
inevitable for each society to pass through the stages of history: feudalism, capitalism,
socialism, and then communism. He theorized that when society reached communism, all
class differences would be abolished and government would become unnecessary.
Marx along with G. H. W. Hegel (1770-1831, one who has great influence in the
political thoughts of Marx) believes that progress occurs “dialectically” in leaps and through
conflicts not through evolutionary processes. Labor is a source of contentment, happiness
and an expression of man’s physical and mental energy. On the other hand, alienation
transforms labor to an object, existing outside the worker, hampering entrepreneurship, self-
expression and self-actualization. Hegel and Marx advocated the destruction of something
old to create something new with certainty that the new set-up will be better than it was
before. They share the theory that as progress takes place, conflicts are inevitable, and
advancement is in leaps and bounds, surging forward. Engels hated capitalism. Along with
Marx, he predicted tragic economic crises as the result of a revolution and the ultimate
success of the proletariat.
The Greek classical thoughts on materialism postulate that the world is made up of
matter, motion and empty space and the human mind is the by-product of the behavior of
matter. Based on this premise, Marx refutes the existence of God and any other supernatural
spirits. He claims that the guiding principle of production is “From each according to his
ability, to each according to his needs." Flowing from his human nature and his need to
express himself through work and production, man, therefore, should work on his own
volition rather than out of necessity or compulsion. Marx assumes that once there is freedom
to answer one’s calling and freedom of expression in one’s work, man will no longer
denounce work as drudgery.
To change the socio-economic and political structure, Marx points out the necessity
of revolution. While Bakunin and Kropotkin believe that revolution would immediately
destroy the state, Marx on the contrary, argues that the state will not be instantly abolished,
rather, it will just wither away, dying a natural death, giving way to a stable, harmonious,
property-less, classless and stateless society. Mikhail Bakunin one of the chief advocates of
17
anarchism hated all forms of authority, believing that society must be organized from the
bottom upwards by a spontaneous cooperation or association.
5. Deism is often referred to as “the new theology” of the enlightened philosophers, which
constructed the theory of natural revelation as a substitute for the Christian notion of
supernatural revelation. The deists believed that God made the universe set it up to work by
natural laws, and then left it alone. The deists believed that God stayed out of people’s daily
lives and praying was useless. Deism is a movement or system of thought advocating natural
religion, emphasizing morality and denying the interference of the Creator with the laws of
the Universe. Rituals were viewed as unimportant, and religious differences were viewed as
silly. They deny the occurrence of miracles and mysteries and encourage man to see and feel
the message of the Supreme Being through nature.
6. Humanism began in 14th century Italy. The humanist way of looking at life is marked by an
interest in people. The beauties and chances of life on earth are important. Humanists taught
people to live a full life and welcome new experiences. Humanists wanted people to have a
better life in this world, rather than waiting for the next.
The most noted humanists in history were Francesco Petrarca (Petrarch), Giovanni
Boccaccio, Erasmus, who was thought to be the greatest humanist, and Sir Thomas More
who wrote the book Utopia (Nowhere).
18
19