EVALUATION OF A COMMUNITY PROJECT
I. PROJECT SUMMARY
This table provides a succinct summary of the perimeter fence project as outlined in the
document provided by Barangay Suarez. When crucial information is absent, it is clearly marked as
"Not specified" for reference in the project overview.
PROJECT TITLE Proposed Barangay Material Recovery Facility Perimeter Fence Phase
1 and Phase 2
PROJECT GOAL/S Based on the given job description:
1. To create a secure and environmentally sustainable barrier around
the Barangay Material Recovery Facility (BMRF).
2. To spend the allocated budget appropriately and construct within
a given time frame.
3. To ensure the quality of the proposed construction in terms of its
integrity, durability, and safety of all the workers in accordance
with DOLE and DPWH standards and laws about safety.
PROJECT Based on the given job description:
OBJECTIVE/S 1.1 Complete the proposed perimeter fence for both phases.
2.1 Liquidation of all expenses for transparency.
3.1 Guarantee the perimeter fence meets stringent quality standards.
PROJECT LOCATION Barangay Suarez, Iligan City
LEAD INSTITUTION Not specified
PROJECT Not specified
LEAD/MANAGER
PROJECT CONTACT Not specified
# OR EMAIL
Phase 1 Phase 2
DATE STARTED Project Proposal: November 5, Project Proposal: May 21, 2020
2019 Project Started: Not specified
Project Started: Not specified
DATE FINISHED After 30 working days After 30 working days
PROJECT BUDGET & PHP 400,000.00 PHP 500,000.00
SOURCE
ACTUAL EXPENSES PHP 399, 997.79 (Based on PHP 499, 979.07(Based on total
total estimated costs) estimated costs)
BENEFICIARIES Name of Group: Residents of Barangay Suarez
No. of Beneficiaries: Not specified
EVALUATION PLAN The ABC Planning - Iligan City conducts both pre-project and
(include evaluator and post-project assessments. These evaluations typically involve two
frequency; was it primary stages: one carried out prior to project execution and another
evaluated?) following the project's conclusion. However, the post-project
assessments were not specified.
II. PROJECT OVERVIEW
The BMRF perimeter fence project comprised two distinct phases. Phase 1 was initially
suggested on November 5, 2019, with an earmarked budget of 400,000 pesos. The completion
timeframe for this phase was estimated at 30 working days, and it entailed the construction of a fence
measuring 48 by 36 linear meters.
Subsequently, Phase 2, which served as a continuation of Phase 1, was proposed on May 31,
2020, with a projected budget of 500,000 pesos. The anticipated construction duration for this phase was
also set at 30 working days, and it encompassed the development of a fence spanning 56 by 26 linear
meters.
Figure 1. Layout Plan of the Proposed Perimeter Fence Phase 1
.
Figure 2. Layout Plan of the Proposed Perimeter Fence Phase 2
Figure 3. Constructed Fence Actual Image (upper top left and down); Aerial view of the project
(right)
Job Description:
1. Staking/ lay-out of lines, elevations, and distances for the proposed construction of perimeter
fence.
2. Fabrication/installation and removal of forms.
3. Fabrication/installation of steel reinforcement for concrete structures as indicated in the plan.
4. Concrete works of the following: CF, columns, WF, and topping. Use Class “A” mixture.
5. Masonry works: Uses 4” thk. CHB for walling with 10 mm. dia. DSB for horizontal and vertical
components space at 0.60 m with plaster finish on exposed surface.
6. Fabrication/installation of 1.5 mm C-purlins for horizontal and vertical framing with GA #26
corrugated GI Sheets
7. Fabrication/installation of 1.2 mm C-purlins for gate framing welded with 3/16” flat bar with
GA#18 Plain GI sheets. (pre-painted and fully welded)
8. Removal and proper disposal of waste materials.
III. PROPOSED EVALUATION DATA
This section outlines the strategic objectives, timelines, expected results, output or outcome
measure descriptions, targets, and monitoring frequencies for the proposed project.
WHAT WHEN RESULTS
STRATEGI OUTPUT OR TARGET FREQUENC Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ANNUAL
C OUTCOME Y
OBJECTIV MEASURE
ES DESCRIPTIO
N
PROJECT GOAL 1: To create a secure and environmentally sustainable barrier around the
Barangay Material Recovery Facility (BMRF).
1.1
Complete
the
proposed
perimeter
fence for
both
phases.
Staking/lay-out 100% Regular
of lines completion Monitoring
within the
specified
time
Fabrication/inst 100% Regular
allation and completion Monitoring
within the
removal of specified
forms time
Fabrication/inst 100% Daily
allation of steel completion monitoring
reinforcement within the
for concrete specified
structures time
Concrete 100% Daily
works: CF, completion monitoring
columns, WF, within the
and topping. specified
Use Class “A” time
mixture
Masonry works 100% Daily
completion monitoring
within the
specified
time
Fabrication/inst 100% Daily
allation of completion monitoring
1.5mm within the
C-purlins specified
time
Fabrication/inst 100% Daily
allation of completion
monitoring
1.2mm within the
C-purlins for specified
gate framing time
Removal and By the end
End of the
proper disposal of the
project
of waste project
materials
PROJECT GOAL 2: To spend the allocated budget appropriately and construct within the
given time frame.
2.1 To
spend the
allocated
budget
appropriatel
y and
construct
within a
given time
frame.
Maintain clear Liquidation Periodic
records of all and
financial accountabil
transactions ity
and require
receipts and
invoices for all
expenses.
Maintain a Adherence Regular
realistic project to the monitoring
timeline to project
prevent rushed timeline
work that can
compromise
quality
PROJECT GOAL 3: To ensure the quality of the proposed construction in terms of its integrity,
durability, and safety.
3.1
Guarantee
the
perimeter
fence meets
stringent
quality
standards.
Hire skilled Ensure At the start
and quality of the
experienced workmansh project; As
workers ip needed-basis.
Use of standard Quality of Periodic
materials materials
meets the
standards
Use of Prioritize Daily
Personal worker monitoring
Protective safety by
Equipment enforcing
(PPE) of the safety
workers standards
and
providing
the
necessary
protective
equipment
IV. DISCUSSION
The proposed evaluation outlined in section III is a crucial step in ensuring transparency,
accountability, and the effective use of resources for the barangay's perimeter project. While it's
important to note that the post-evaluation report of the project is currently unavailable, this does not
diminish the significance of conducting a comprehensive assessment based on the available data.
Under project goal 1, the emphasis is on creating a secure and environmentally sustainable
barrier around the Barangay Material Recovery Facility (BMRF). The objectives include completing
various construction phases, ensuring structural integrity, and addressing waste disposal at the end of the
project. Continuous monitoring is conducted to ensure project progress and quality.
Under project goal 2 centers on spending the allocated budget appropriately and staying within
the specified timeframe. This involves maintaining transparent financial records and adhering to the
project timeline. Periodic checks and regular monitoring are vital for financial accountability and
tracking project progress.
Under project goal 3, the primary objective is to ensure the quality of proposed construction in
terms of integrity, durability, and safety. Key strategies include hiring skilled workers, using standard
materials, and enforcing the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for worker safety. The timing
of hiring skilled workers varies, occurring both at the project's outset and on an as-needed basis. Daily
monitoring ensures PPE compliance, while material quality is assessed periodically.
The most common challenges faced by barangays during project execution often revolve around
budget constraints, quality control, and resource allocation. Budget limitations can impede progress,
necessitating strategies like prioritization of project components or seeking additional funding sources.
Quality control issues may arise, requiring regular inspections and adherence to established quality
standards. Effective resource allocation, including labor, materials, and equipment, is vital, and proper
management involves the development of resource allocation plans and resource monitoring. These
common challenges require proactive planning, open communication with stakeholders, and an adaptive
approach to address unforeseen issues, ensuring the project's successful completion and alignment with
its goals.
V. CONCLUSION
The project can be unequivocally deemed a success as it met its primary goals and objectives of
establishing a secure and environmentally sustainable barrier around the Barangay Material Recovery
Facility (BMRF).
The construction of the perimeter fence has provided residents with enhanced security for the
Barangay Material Recovery Facility (BMRF) while also contributing to a more sustainable and
environmentally friendly community. This achievement extends beyond the physical structure, instilling
a sense of pride and trust within the community.
The impact is twofold, encompassing both tangible and intangible aspects. Tangibly, effective
management of budget constraints, resource allocation, and quality standards ensured the project's
physical success, with a robust and secure perimeter in place. Intangibly, the community's trust in the
barangay's project management capabilities and their satisfaction with the project's outcome have
strengthened the relationship between the community and stakeholders.
VI. RECOMMENDATION
Though the current document lacks the necessary data for making precise, evidence-based
recommendations, we can offer an initial suggestion based on the available information. The primary
concern is the absence of comprehensive post-project evaluation data, which should encompass detailed
records of all project activities, including objectives, their respective timeframes, and whether they were
successfully achieved. Our recommendation is to prioritize the establishment of a robust post-project
evaluation system that encompasses these critical elements. This will not only enhance transparency and
accountability but also provide a solid foundation for future project planning and decision-making
within the barangay.
As an environmental engineering student, I would further emphasize the importance of rigorous
post-project evaluation in ensuring that projects, especially those with environmental components, meet
sustainability and environmental impact goals. The absence of such data can hinder our ability to assess
the long-term environmental effects of the project, making it challenging to gauge its ecological and
community sustainability. Therefore, my recommendation, as an environmental engineering student, is
to not only establish a comprehensive post-project evaluation system but also to place a strong emphasis
on the assessment of environmental impacts and sustainability in future projects. This approach will help
ensure that the barangay's initiatives align with both short-term and long-term environmental goals,
contributing to a more resilient and eco-friendly community.
Submitted by:
Joseph Cyron E. Solidum
Name of Student
This report is correct.
Confirmed by:
Marcilino A. Gellica, Jr.
In-charge
