SUB-PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

A. General Informations: Name of sub-Project: Sub-project category: Barangay/s covered: Municipal & Class: Province: Date of 1st MIBF: Date of 2nd MIBF: No. of HH served: Date of Inauguration: B. Sub-Project Description: Construction of Pre School Building Public Goods Physical Target:87.35 Sq. M. Barangay Batungan Actual Total Cost: Tungawan, 3rd class KALAHI-Grant Received:522,334.77 Sibugay Total Counterpart Delivered:105,305.08 December 6,2011 Actual Total Direct Cost:560,950.50 Actual Total Indirect Cost:73,900.00 67 Date Started: February 7,2011 June 16,2011 Date Completed: May 18,2011

The sub-project is completed with the following work items and activities constructed/implemented by the concerned community/ies (insert additional rows if work items are more than 5)

Item of work Quantity 1. Site Works 87.35 2. Concrete Works 19.56 3. Reinforcing Steel Bars 1,404.88 4. FormWorks And Scafolding 12 5. Masonry Works 137.61 6. Carpentry Works 471 7. Roofing Works 105.6 8. Doors and Windows 15.32 9. Plumbing Works 2 10. Tile Works 14.76 11. Electrical works 10 12. Painting Works 349.88 13. Facilities and Aminities 1 14. Signages 1 15. Construction Foreman 75 Indirect Cost Total Project Cost C. Method of sub-project implementation:

Unit sq. m. cu. M kgs sq. m. sq. m. bd. Ft sq. m. sq. m. units sq. m. outlet sq. m. lot lot days

Unit Cost 157.71 3,704 55 1,406.25 768.91 141.91 395.12 1,847.75 7,945.50 690.38 2,161.40 82.94 22,295.00 9,500.00 400

Total 13,776.00 72,445.00 76,585.00 16,875.00 105,810.00 66,917.00 41,725.00 28,307.50 15,891.00 10,190.00 21,614.00 29,020.00 22,295.00 9,500.00 30,000.00 560,950.50

c.1. Procurement mode and procedures used in the sub-project implementation. Local Shopping for Goods. The pakyaw Labor will mobilize

mobilize 30% skilled worker, 70% skilled will be scout in the Barangay and 100% unskilled will be also from the brgy
c.2. Please state the major problems encountered during and actions taken by the ACT and the community Volunteers/leaders to solve the issues.

D. Labor Generated: ( labor provided and paid during the construction period) Particular Number Person Days Rate/day Total Amount Paid Skilled (men) Foreman 1 27,000 Skilled 240 46,200.00 Unskilled (men) 18 180 30,704 Unskilled (women) TOTAL PAID LABOR 103,904 E. Project Benefits: Highlight the initial impact provided by the sub-project to the covered community/ies.
E.1. Condition of the community before the project intervention (How long were you deprived of the service? How costly was it to access the service?How Far?

Prior to the project implementation, the barangay has existing elementary school but only selected puroks benefited the said school specially the children those who are in Sitio Phase 5 which is 5 km from the school site and the pupils are just walking to reach that school bacause they dont have enough money to pay the fare of motorcycles. During the conduct of PSA workshop, it rank nthat the priority problem of the community is less school facilities and far distance of school site.
E.2. Condition of the community after the sub-project completion.

After the sub-project implementation, the community have already 1 Unit Pre School Building operational. A total of ____ community members served the sub-project. F.Environmental Aspect:
Discuss any environmental impacts during the contruction and the mitigating measures

provided by the community.(refer to the Environmental Management Plan,EMP Reports). IMPACT-loss vegetation due to land clearing,cutting of trees to used as construction materials that would create damage to the environement MITIGATING MEASURE-limit land clearing as much as possible,re-plant indigenous tree and ornamental plants. avoid cutting of trees,especially endangered type species that could result to environmental risk.

G.Capability Building Impact:What were the trainings provided by the project to the community and the Results observed 1. Community Procurement and Finance Training. 2. O & M training. 3. Criteria Setting Workshop 4. Community Procurement and Finance Training Workshop

H.Community Volunteers:In the recognition of the community volunteers who in one way or another made the sub-project
possible,list their and the corresponding team they were involved.

Name of community volunteers Sitio/Barangay Designation/Team Jocelyn Saga Batungan PPT Marites Salazar Btungan BRT Daylyn Sotto Batungan BAC Patricio Lumacad Batungan AIT Jeremy Via Batungan O&M Hasel Rivera Batungan PT Laurencio Sotto Batungan PIT Vergelio Villar Batungan MIT Alberto Pejedero Batungan BSPMC Chairman Isabelita Eullaran Batungan Bookkeeper Helen Anting Batungan BSPMC Treasurer Myrna Cruz Batungan BSPMC Secretary I.General Assessment: I.1 General Effectiveness:Actual overall cost compared to similar project in the locality.Indicate cost of similar project
constructed by other agency,as to what%(Higher/Lower) Compared to KC completed?

I.2. Plan vs. Actual: Did you incurred cost overrun or savings? By how much? If savings incurred,how was it disbursed? Savings was disbursed by using as administrative expenses and office supply and grant was returned to LBP-Batasan. I.3.Financial Aspect: On-time releases of KC Grant (On the average,how many days did it take from the ACT receipt of
community requests to the date of fund release to the community account?)

Three months I.4.Describe the clients/users that the KC sub-project will serve ( State if they are an IP,Predominantly Women
sector etc.) The client users or direct beneficiaries are the community members.

I.5.Participation:On the average,How many household representative participated in delberations of the Sub-project
and its endorsement to the municipal Inter-Barangay Forum?

Six I.6.Governance :
a.LCC as % of total -100% b.Was LCC on time? Yes c.Commitments vs. deliveries/fulfillment of all LCC Commitments. d.Supporting ordinances for O&M activities: Supported by a Barangay Resolution in support for the O and M and BLGU resolution recognizing the agreed tarrif. e.Technical Assistance provided by the LGU? ( such as during Implementation ). Joint Inspection, Monitoring and supervison of the SP implementation, provide technical inputs.

I.7 Multi-Stakeholdership: Name other organizations, agencies and individuals that provided contributions to the subproject Please indicate amount cash and in-kind. PLGU provided cash counterpart.

BLGU(IK)-3,375.00 MLGU Cash and In Kind)-789,686.74 Community(In Kind)- 22,243.34 I.8 External Monitoring: ( Name external monitors that visited the sub-project ) a. WB missions_________________________ Date/s______________________ b. NGO Monitors________________________ Date/s______________________ c. Others,specify Regional Project Management Team (RPMT), Sanitary Inspector(PLGU). I.9.If there was any Grievance/Complaint that arose during Implentation,how was it resolved? 1. Take immediate action to grievance filed and settle it in the barangay level. J.Lessons Learned: Please share any lesson/s and good practice/s learned from your implementation, of the sub-roject and
the KC in general.

community members learned that among all unity perseverance is most important in achieving development. Community members have learned how to manage a project.According to them KC-MT has brought changes not only tro the community as a whole but most importantantly to the individuals who became part of the of the success of the project in the community. They all know that process of the project that were implemented was very usefull because they saw the full participation and cooperation in decision making and tranparency in procurement anf finance. They all now shared to other community members the pattern and process of KC-MT.

Prepared by: ALBERTO PEJEDERO BSPMC CHAIRMAN BSPMC- Chairperson Date:___________________________ JUSTIFICATION/CONFIRMATION: 1.Project Signboard Updating and Reporting

Certified Correct: HON. LUVISMINDA ENESANDO Barangay Chairperson Date:____________________

a. Billboard Yes____/____ No ________ b. Statement of expenditures posted in community board? Yes__/__ No___ c. Expenditures reported to Barangay Assembly? Yes___/____ No ___ HYRIA M. QUE Name/Signature,CF 2.Did community meet basic financial reporting standard in FM & A manual? Yes__/__ No____ MARDY V. V. AUZA AQUILES AREVALO Name/Signature,FA 3.Did the community Implement the Sub-project as per technical specifications? YES Was it within the budget?YES ROGERMARY JOY MACAHILO ENGR. A. TUBOG Name/Signature,DAC Noted by: FLORDELIZA Y. ALAR JOSE VENCHITO EGO Name/Signature,AC