Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Notes

    Uploaded by

    vtlandingin
    7 views1 page
    The document discusses 5 ways to achieve consubstantiality or common ground between groups when presenting a rhetorical argument: 1) Taking moderate stances to appeal to multiple sides, 2) Explicitly appealing to shared identities, 3) Constructing aspirational group identities for advocacy, 4) Implicitly displaying alignment through appearance/speech, and 5) Strategically using pronouns like "we" to include diverse audiences. It also notes that digital rhetoric allows for speed and wide reach, but these attributes can also constrain the complexity and nuance of arguments if not carefully addressed.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    notes

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses 5 ways to achieve consubstantiality or common ground between groups when presenting a rhetorical argument: 1) Taking moderate stances to appeal to multiple sides, 2) Explicitly appealing to shared identities, 3) Constructing aspirational group identities for advocacy, 4) Implicitly displaying alignment through appearance/speech, and 5) Strategically using pronouns like "we" to include diverse audiences. It also notes that digital rhetoric allows for speed and wide reach, but these attributes can also constrain the complexity and nuance of arguments if not carefully addressed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Notes

    Uploaded by

    vtlandingin
    The document discusses 5 ways to achieve consubstantiality or common ground between groups when presenting a rhetorical argument: 1) Taking moderate stances to appeal to multiple sides, 2) Explicitly appealing to shared identities, 3) Constructing aspirational group identities for advocacy, 4) Implicitly displaying alignment through appearance/speech, and 5) Strategically using pronouns like "we" to include diverse audiences. It also notes that digital rhetoric allows for speed and wide reach, but these attributes can also constrain the complexity and nuance of arguments if not carefully addressed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    ENTREPRENEURS OF IDENTITY

    5 ways to achieve consubstantiality


    1. Taking and avoiding sides
    a. Polyvalent // Rhetorical Dilemma
    b. Polemical not: Strategy suggest that the rhetorical project goes beyond current
    divisive arguments
    2. Explicit appeals to common ingroup membership
    3. Constructing Aspirational Identities
    a. Uses aspirational common identity. Speaker is an advocate for a marginalized
    group.
    b. Constitutive Futurity - refers to a form of representation in which the object of
    politica address
    4. Implicit Displays of Rhetorical Alignment
    a. Social identities flagged by dress, posture, style of speech
    b. Rhetorical Alignment- whatever you say is in line with what you do and your
    identity
    5. Use of Pronouns
    a. Who are “we”? Flexibility and vagueness in the use of first person pronouns.
    b. To display complex political aleig

    Digital Rhetoric
    Speed and Reach can be both an affordance and a constraint
    Speed
    Reach
    - Multiplicity: No. of people who can access the information at the same time
    - Gatekeeping: Anyone can post anything online

    You might also like