The document analyzes the music video for the song "Fake Plastic Trees" by Radiohead using various general conventions of film analysis. It summarizes that the video uses a mixture of performance and narrative footage to depict the song's theme of plastic in a jarring, voyeuristic style through editing and lighting. While the narrative is unclear, it represents various societal roles and includes postmodern elements like ambiguous meaning and references to other works to encourage multiple viewings.
The document analyzes the music video for the song "Fake Plastic Trees" by Radiohead using various general conventions of film analysis. It summarizes that the video uses a mixture of performance and narrative footage to depict the song's theme of plastic in a jarring, voyeuristic style through editing and lighting. While the narrative is unclear, it represents various societal roles and includes postmodern elements like ambiguous meaning and references to other works to encourage multiple viewings.
The document analyzes the music video for the song "Fake Plastic Trees" by Radiohead using various general conventions of film analysis. It summarizes that the video uses a mixture of performance and narrative footage to depict the song's theme of plastic in a jarring, voyeuristic style through editing and lighting. While the narrative is unclear, it represents various societal roles and includes postmodern elements like ambiguous meaning and references to other works to encourage multiple viewings.
General Conventions Analysis GC1: Lyrics and Visual Narrative • The video is a mixture of performance and concept • There is narrative enigma as the narrative remains unclear, but there are Proppian archetypes and stock characters present • The overall video effect is very jarring, seen in the bright lighting and chosen editing • A sense of voyeurism (Goodwin) is present through the surveillance footage • The plastic themes of the song are reflected in the mise-en-scene • There is a sense of childishness and playfulness towards the end, which makes the video quirky and relatable GC2: Genre Characteristics • The genre of the song is alternative indie, and the oddness is reflected in the video, as well as a meaningful message • The singer appears as unkept and edgy • There is an abnormal studio setting • The singer is emotional when performing the song, sticking to the serious tone of the genre GC3: • There is little narrative established as it is too Intertextuality elliptical (Vernallis) and • The ending is polysemic, and encourages Postmodernism rewatching GC4: Representations • The singer appears unkempt which makes him relatable, a key element to the indie genre • The singer performs unconventionally, and is not appealing to the mainstream • There is a hint of Proppian archetypes, and many different societal roles represented (wider appeal) • The theme of plastic is represented through the lighting, mise-en-scene, and costume • There is a shot clearly showing a woman’s chest, which appeals to the male gaze (Mulvey) • The camera uses a lot of wide angles and ELS to show the scene, as well as appearing distorted • The editing is intended to match the tempo but is slightly GC5: off key Cinematography • There are jump cuts used which look very jarring, but achieve the intended effect and Editing • There are several POV shots and tracking shots for the viewer to feel immersed • The lighting is high-key, reflecting the artificial theme Notable Marketing • Acoustic version featured in film “Clueless” and appealed to American market Possible Influences • The use of a single set • Representing many characters/ archetypes • Surrounding the visuals around a main theme • The poly-semy narrative