The two arguments present different perspectives on the issue of rising technology in everyday life.

Argument that favor the rise of technology supports that we need to accept that technology is important in
our daily life. Meanwhile, argument that against the rise of technology argue that technology is destroying
our quality of lives and suggest that we have to focus more on spending time with family and on health.
Even though both sides make an acceptable case, it is clear that favoring the rise of technology provides a
strong argument.
First, favoring argument is supported by factual evidence. This highlights the fact that school’s lessons
are combined with technology for making them more interested in their lessons. This argument notes that
in 2014 survey, 83 percent of middle school students support this idea adds more validity to the argument.
Second, this argument is based on real life evidence because technology make easier to communicate
with lovers such as parents, friends and boyfriends or girlfriends when they are away from each other.
Moreover, higher percentage of Americans report also make this argument more valid. This report notes
the technology bring opportunities to them who want to close with their friends and family.
Despite the argument and evidence given by argument that against the rise of technology, it is clear that
favoring the rise of technology’s argument provides a better-supported argument. Favoring the rise of
technology’s idea are backed up by real life evidence, logical explanations and factual information. While
the argument that against the rise of technology may include some facts, it is mainly about unsupported
personal opinions. Even though both sides may very well have best explanations, either position could be
correct, it is clear that the argument that favor the rise technology is a stronger argument.