RLA_CET-5

Both arguments about the rise of technology are supported by both facts and
opinions. The arguments in favor of the rise of technology encourage the people
to use technology widely because of its benefits, while the arguments against the
rise of technology mention that people should reduce the use of technology as it
disrupts our quality of life. While both sides make an acceptable case, the
arguments against the rise of technology provide the better supported argument.

One example of the against argument of technology is the practical explanation

that how we are living with the technology with too much adaptation, while we
could not have breakfast with our family comfortably. As it states, as soon as we
wake up, we use our phone whether to use social media or to check the new
information of our work. While the favor arguments of technology say that we
have to adapt to the latest technology revolution as an opinion, the against
arguments of technology support that we have already adapted to it extremely by
facts. As a result, our daily lives are influenced a lot by technology in negative
ways.

Another example of the stronger argument is that technology leads to

multitasking such as texting, emailing, handling phone call at jobs, and it is not as
efficient or effective as doing a single task. This is a valid argument also, according
to a recent study of Finn University, multitasking decreases the ability of complex
problem-solving skills, and it causes large number of mistakes at work. Although
favor argument reports that technology makes communicating faster and easier at
work and social life, it is just an opinion. Then the studies they reported is not
strong and is not an expert source.

Another example of the favor argument is the report of the U.S. Department of
Labor, “over 70 percent of American workers report using cell phones or other
devices to stay in touch with their workplaces outside of work hours.” It is clear
that employees need to be available all the time for their work lacking their
privacy. Because of this kind of problem, France passed a law forbidding managers
from contacting their employees outside of work hours by cell phone or emails. By
Lacking private time and working all time, it is more likely to be unhealthy
physically, mentally, and emotionally. It is a proven fact according to the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention.

Whereas the arguments in favor of the rise of technology mostly provide opinions
with weak sources, the arguments against the rise of technology offers a stronger
case. They are backed up by practical and logical explanations and facts with
expert sources. Although both position presents the best with evidences and
opinions, it is obvious that the argument against the rise of technology is a better-
supported argument.

Both arguments about the rise of technology are supported by both facts and opinions.
The arguments in favor of the rise of technology encourage people to use technology
widely because of its benefits, while the arguments against the rise of technology
mention that people should reduce the use of technology as it disrupts our quality of life.
While both sides make an acceptable case, the arguments against the rise of
technology provide the better supported argument.

One example of the arguments against the technology is the practical explanation of
how we are living with the technology with too much adaptation, while we could not
have breakfast with our family comfortably. As it states, as soon as we wake up, we use
our phone whether to use social media or to check the new information of our work.
While the arguments in favor of technology say that we have to adapt to the latest
technology revolution as an opinion, the arguments against technology support that we
have already adapted to it extremely by facts. Instead of waking up naturally, we wake
up with alarms and start checking email messages. As a result, our daily lives are
influenced a lot by technology in many negative ways. Therefore, the argument against
technology is a stronger argument.

Another example of the better supported argument of opponents is that technology

leads to multitasking such as texting, emailing, handling phone calls at work, and it is
not as efficient or effective as doing a single task. This is a valid argument also,
according to a recent study of Finn University, multitasking decreases the ability of
complex problem-solving skills, and it causes a large number of mistakes at work.
Although the argument in favor reports that technology makes communication faster
and easier at work and social life, it is just an opinion. In addition, the studies they
reported are not strong and are not from an expert source. Thus, opponents of the
technology provides a better argument.

Another example of the argument against technology is the report of the U.S.
Department of Labor, “over 70 percent of American workers report using cell phones or
other devices to stay in touch with their workplaces outside of work hours.” It is clear
that employees need to be available all the time for their work which leads to lack of
personal time. Because of this kind of problem, France passed a law forbidding
managers from contacting their employees outside of work hours by cell phone or
emails. By Lacking private time and working all the time, it is more likely to be unhealthy
physically, mentally, and emotionally. It is a proven fact according to the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention which is supported by the argument against
technology.

Whereas the arguments in favor of the rise of technology mostly provide opinions with
weak sources, the arguments against the rise of technology offer a stronger case. They
are backed up by practical and logical explanations and facts with expert sources.
Although both positions present valid arguments with evidence and opinions, it is
obvious that the argument against the rise of technology is a better- supported
argument.

ChatGPT
Both arguments regarding the rise of technology are supported by a combination of
facts and opinions. Proponents of the rise of technology advocate for its extensive use
due to the numerous benefits it offers, while opponents argue that technology should
be used more sparingly as it negatively affects our quality of life. While both sides
present compelling cases, the arguments against the rise of technology provide a
stronger and more well-supported perspective.

One significant argument against the rise of technology revolves around the excessive
adaptation to technological devices, which hinders our ability to have comfortable
family breakfasts. For instance, upon waking up, many individuals immediately reach for
their phones, either to engage in social media or to check work-related information.
Contrary to the proponents' opinion that we should adapt to the latest technological
revolution, it is an indisputable fact that we have already become overly reliant on
technology. Consequently, our daily lives are profoundly influenced by technology in
detrimental ways.

Another compelling argument is that technology promotes multitasking, such as texting,

emailing, and taking phone calls while working. However, research conducted by Finn
University reveals that multitasking actually diminishes our complex problem-solving
skills and leads to a higher number of errors in the workplace. Although proponents
argue that technology facilitates faster and easier communication at work and in social
life, such claims are mere opinions. Moreover, the studies they cite lack robustness and
fail to provide expert perspectives.

On the other hand, proponents of the rise of technology often point to the report by the
U.S. Department of Labor, which states that over 70 percent of American workers use
cell phones or other devices to stay connected with their workplaces outside of working
hours. This data suggests that employees are expected to be available at all times,
compromising their privacy and personal time. In response to this issue, France has
enacted a law forbidding managers from contacting their employees outside of work
hours via cell phones or emails. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has also
established that the lack of private time and constant work engagement can lead to
adverse physical, mental, and emotional health effects.

In conclusion, while arguments on both sides are supported by evidence and opinions,
the case against the rise of technology is better substantiated. It offers practical and
logical explanations supported by factual evidence from reliable sources. Conversely, the
arguments in favor primarily rely on opinions and weak sources. Considering the weight
of evidence and the strength of the presented arguments, it is evident that the
argument against the rise of technology is more compelling and well-supported.