BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MARINE ENGINEERING

(Assessor’s Copy)

COURSE OUTCOMES EXERCISE INSTRUMENT

Electro 1
Electro1-KUPE1-CO1

Exercise Title Schematic symbol of various electrical components

60 minutes
 5 minutes briefing
Duration
 40 minutes Assessment execution
 5 minutes debriefing
Table A-III/1
Specification of minimum standard of competence for officers in charge of an
engineering watch in a manned engine-room or designated duty engineers in a
STCW Table
periodically unmanned engine-room.

KUP: A-III/1 F2.C 2. KUP6: Interpretation of electrical diagrams

Function Electrical, electronic and control engineering at the operational level

Competence  Maintenance and repair of electrical and electronic equipment

CO1: Solve electrical circuit problems using relevant formula applying circuit
Course Outcomes
analysis
At the end of the practical assessment, the assesse must be able to:
Exercise Outcome  have general knowledge of the representative schematic symbol of various
electrical components

Exercise Room Dedicated Laboratory Room

Equipment
Drawing Table
Required
Condition n/a
Scenario
n/a
Description
Ship’s Particulars n/a

Initial Conditions n/a n/a

 Assign assesses to their respective task and dedicated areas.

 Brief assesse for the assessment outcomes.
 Present the scoring system and the use of rubrics during the assessment.
Instructor’s Action
 Give the assessment tasks in random order.
 Gather evidence after completion and presentation of the output.
 Announce if the assessment has met its objectives or not.
Ensure that the following conditions are fully understood by the assesse:
 the specific outcomes of the assessment.
 the enumerated performance criteria.
 the importance of clear and concise communication process.
 the right to stop the assessment when the time limit allowed exceeds and
Exercise Briefing
when malfunction arises.
 the emphasis of assessment which to be treated as if they are performing
on board of the vessel; and
 the relevant clarifications and questions of the practical assessment
instructions.

Title: Revision No: 3 Doc. No. Date Effective: Page No.:

ASSESSMENT TOOL 1 of 30
(ASSESSOR’S COPY) Prepared by: Validated by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
Subject Matter Expert Assessor Department Head C/O Marvin P. Japitana, Ph.D.M.E
CMA -Dean
 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MARINE ENGINEERING
(Assessor’s Copy)
The trainees shall:
Trainees  meet the outcomes stated on the exercise.
Recommended  illustrate the principal structural members of a ship and the proper names
Actions for various parts as presented by the assessor in random order
 familiarize the rubrics presented by the assessor during briefing
Simulator
n/a
Familiarization

Final Conditions n/a

State to the assesses the purpose of debriefing.

Encourage peer review and discussions.
Ask the assesses how they went about with the assessment and what
difficulties were encountered.
Trainees  State whether the specific assessment outcomes were achieved during the
Debriefing assessment.
 State the strength or corrective actions that they had demonstrated,
 Motivate the assesses who failed the assessment to take the Resit.
 Show diplomacy in any objection from the assesses by taking note of their
comments regarding the assessment scenarios.
A Trainees must meet the minimum Performance Criteria to consider “PASSED”
Exercise System
otherwise “FAILED” is recorded and subject to Resit.
The Assessment will conform according to the navigation procedures as per
Practical
Seamanship Procedures Guide and STCW Reg. II/1 (F3-C2 and C7, A-II/1) and
Assessment
other assessment manuals and provisions.
The assessment will be stopped when any of the following incidents occurred:
 assesse behaves beyond the proper decorum.
 assesse arrives late and reach the maximum grace period
Failure State
 assesse poses potential danger to the assessment procedures.
 exceeded time allotment required in the assessment plan; and
 unable to complete all the criteria assigned.

Title: Revision No: 3 Doc. No. Date Effective: Page No.:

ASSESSMENT TOOL 2 of 30
(ASSESSOR’S COPY) Prepared by: Validated by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
Subject Matter Expert Assessor Department Head C/O Marvin P. Japitana, Ph.D.M.E
CMA -Dean
 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MARINE ENGINEERING
(Assessor’s Copy)

COURSE OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT SCORING SYSTEM

Electro 1
Electro1-KUPE1-CO1

Function Electrical, electronic and control engineering at the operational level

Competence  Maintenance and repair of electrical and electronic equipment

STCW Table KUP: A-III/1 F2.C 2. KUP6: Interpretation of electrical diagrams

At the end of the practical assessment, the assesse must be able to:
Exercise Outcome - have general knowledge of the representative schematic symbol of various electrical
components

POINT SYSTEM
Draw the schematic symbol of various (Based on the standard rubrics below)
electrical components
CONF PROF PRES SCORE

1. Electrical Wire

2. Connected Wire

3. Not Connected Wires

4. SPST Toggle Switch

5. SPDT Toggle Switch

6. Pushbutton Switch (N.O.)

7. Pushbutton Switch (N.C.)

8. SPST Relay

9. SPDT Relay

10. Jumper

11. Earth Ground

12. Chassis Ground

13. Resistor

14. Potentiometer

15. Variable Resistor / Rheostat

16. Thermistor

Title: Revision No: 3 Doc. No. Date Effective: Page No.:

ASSESSMENT TOOL 3 of 30
(ASSESSOR’S COPY) Prepared by: Validated by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
Subject Matter Expert Assessor Department Head C/O Marvin P. Japitana, Ph.D.M.E
CMA -Dean
 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MARINE ENGINEERING
(Assessor’s Copy)

17. Capacitor

18. Variable Capacitor

19. Inductor

20. AC Voltage Source

21. Battery

22. Voltmeter

23. Ammeter

24. Ohmmeter

25. Wattmeter

26. Lamp

27. Diode

28. Zener Diode

29. Light Emitting Diode (LED)

30. NPN Bipolar Transistor

31. PNP Bipolar Transistor

32. JFET-N Transistor (N-channel field effect

transistor_
33. JFET-P Transistor (P-channel field effect
transistor)
34. NMOS Transistor (N-channel MOSFET
transistor)
35. PMOS Transistor (P-channel MOSFET
transistor)

36. Electric Motor

37. Transformer

38. Electric Bell

39. Fuse

40. Bus

41.Operational Amplifier

42. Analog-to-digital converter (ADC)

43. Digital-to-Analog converter (DAC)

Title: Revision No: 3 Doc. No. Date Effective: Page No.:

ASSESSMENT TOOL 4 of 30
(ASSESSOR’S COPY) Prepared by: Validated by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
Subject Matter Expert Assessor Department Head C/O Marvin P. Japitana, Ph.D.M.E
CMA -Dean
 BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MARINE ENGINEERING
(Assessor’s Copy)

44. Direct Current

45. NOT Gate (Inverter)

46. AND Gate

47. NAND Gate

48. OR Gate

49. NOR Gate

50. XOR Gate

An trainees must meet the minimum Performance

Criteria to consider “PASSED” otherwise “FAILED” is TOTAL SCORES
Total number of points / Total number of
recorded and subject to Resit. All items must have items x 100
scores. Passing score is 70%.
TOTAL RATING
LEGEND: (Encircle rating appropriately)
PASSED FAILED
CONF – Conformity; PROF – Proficiency. NOTE: Attached the output of the
PRES – Presentation assessment

ACTIVITY RUBRICS
RUBRICS ON AN OUTCOMES BASED EVALUATION
Remarks Score
Performance Standards
Assessment (Scores to be reflected are within the range of (Write
Discussion on the task given in ratings accordingly)
Criteria: scores w/n
the assessment range)
1 2 3 4

CONFORMITY (60%)
Accuracy and conformity with the 15% 30% 45% 60%
Discuss the requirements of the activity
following
items
PROFICIENCY (20%)
required in
Familiar with the use of equipment 5.0% 10% 15% 20%
the
or tools used for the activity
assessment
form
PRESENTATION (20%)
Presentation is neat and well 5.0% 10% 15% 20%
organized
Check the appropriate box:
Passing score is 70% Pass Fail TOTAL RATING
Total number of points / Total number of items x 100

Legend: 1 – Does not meet the standards; 2 – Partially meets the standards; 3 – Meets the standards; 4 – Exceeds the standards
Every Resit done; the highest scores are indicated accordingly by percentage of the result

Student Date of Assessment Instructor

Title: Revision No: 3 Doc. No. Date Effective: Page No.:

ASSESSMENT TOOL 5 of 30
(ASSESSOR’S COPY) Prepared by: Validated by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
Subject Matter Expert Assessor Department Head C/O Marvin P. Japitana, Ph.D.M.E
CMA -Dean