Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Asumptions
User categories
Discount
Revenue growth Revenue rate
2022 49539
1 2023 3% 51026 1.00%
2 2024 2% 52046 1.20%
3 2025 2% 53139 1.20%
4 2026 2% 54308 1.25%
5 2027 2% 55394 1.12%
6 2028 2% 56502 1.20%
7 2029 2% 57632 1.20%
8 2030 2% 58785 1.20%
9 2031 2% 59961 1.20%
10 2032 2% 61160 1.20%
PROJECT NET PRESENT VALUE
Present
Value Population
9120
50520 9394
50819 9581
51271 9783
51676 9998
52394 10198
52600 10402
53015 10610
53434 10822
53857 11038
54283 11259
523869
GMD 2022
stakeholder management
diverity management
Religion
Nationality Language Skill/Position
India Asia-West English Workers
pakistan Asia-West English Workers
Bangladesh Asia-West English Workers
Nepal Asia-West English Workers
China Asia-East Workers
KOREA Asia-East Supervisor/Expert
Japan Asia-East Supervisor/Expert
Vietnam Asia-East Workers
Uzebek Asia-East Workers
Philipin Asia-East English Workers
Turkish Workers
Germany Supervisor/Expert
French Supervisor/Expert
Italya Supervisor/Expert
BELGIUM Supervisor/Expert
England English Supervisor/Expert
Scotland English Supervisor/Expert
Ireland English Supervisor/Expert
USA English Supervisor/Expert
Zone 1
Constructi Zone 2
on Construction
workers workers
Labor demand Availability 30 35
labor supply 30 35
labor shortage 0 0
India 20 20
pakistan 25
Bangladesh 2 2
Nepal 2 2
China 31 31
KOREA 0.01
Japan 0.01
Vietnam 15 4
Uzebek 10 6
Philipin 15
Turkish 0.01
Germany 0.01
French 0.01
Italya 0.01
BELGIUM 0.01
England 0.01
Scotland 0.01
Ireland 0.01
USA 0.01
Total 120.11
Culture
India style Eating style Dressing style Smell Working quality compliance
India style India style conservative Sensitive 2
India style India style conservative Sensitive 2
India style India style conservative Sensitive 2
Chinese influence India style conservative Sensitive 2
Chinese influence Chinese style more open Sensitive 3
Chinese influence Chinese style more open Sensitive 5
Chinese influence Chinese style more open Sensitive 5
Chinese style more open Sensitive 2
more open Sensitive 4
more open Sensitive 4
Western style Sensitive 4
Western style Western style open/personal stype Sensitive 5
Western style Western style open/personal stype Sensitive 5
Western style Western style open/personal stype Sensitive 5
Western style Western style open/personal stype Sensitive 5
Western style Western style open/personal stype Sensitive 5
Western style Western style open/personal stype Sensitive 5
Western style Western style open/personal stype Sensitive 5
Western style open/personal stype Sensitive 5
Zone 3
Construction Auditor(monitor and
workers Supervior control) W
35 0.5 0.5
35 0 0
0 0.5 0.5
Shifts
25 -5 Issue: Parkistan and Vietnaese/ Philipine
naturally do not go along (differences in
23 religion/language/eating style/etc.)
0 Solution
Ask labor supplies to employ more
-29 workers from Paristan and stop working
31 with Vietnamese workers or vs.
0.01 - religion
- quality/ performance/ efficiency
-3.99 - behavior
9
10 0
15
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
and Vietnaese/ Philipine
go along (differences in
e/eating style/etc.)
es to employ more
ristan and stop working
e workers or vs.
mance/ efficiency
Intergration process
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Philipines
Myanma
India
Bangladesh
Parkistan
Mexico
INVESTMENT ANALYSIS
ASSUMPTIONS
Investment
Year 0
Alternative A $ -350
Alternative B $ -250
PRESENT VALUE
Discount rate
Alternative A % 0.1
Alternative B % 0.1
Investment
Year 0
Alternative A $ -350
Alternative B $ -250
Investment
Year 0
Alternative 1 $ -350
Alternative 2 $ -250
Investment
Year 0
Alternative A $ -350
Alternative B $ -250
STEP 1%
Discount rate NPV B NPV A better
5% 66 82 Alternative A
6% 60 71 Alternative A
7% 54 59 Alternative A
8% 48 48 Alternative A
9% 42 38 Alternative B
10% 37 27 Alternative B
11% 32 18 Alternative B
12% 26 8 Alternative B
13% 22 -1 Alternative B
14% 17 -10 Alternative B
15% 12 -18 Alternative B
16% 8 -26 Alternative B
17% 3 -34 Alternative B
18% -1 -41 Alternative B
19% -5 -49 Alternative B
20% -9 -56 Alternative B
21% -13 -62 Alternative B
Operations period CASHFLOWS
1 2 3 4 IN OUT
50 100 150 200 500 350
125 100 75 50 350 250
time
discount rate
Operations period
1 2 3 4
NPV
45 83 113 137 27
Criteria to determine the
114 83 56 34 37 -risk degree: 1 is risker tha
A1/A2 -26% - > inflation
-interest rate for loans fro
Best alternative Alternative B -capital cost
-exchange rate
-opportunitiy cost
-political risk
-monetary policies
- size of investment
Operations period
1 2 3 4
0.0603 0.072 0.0875 0.063 NPV
47 87 117 157 57
118 87 58 39 52
A1/A2 110%
Operations period
1 2 3 4
NPV
44 78 104 123 0
106 72 46 26 0
A1/A2
Best alternative Alternative A
IRR
12.9%
17.8%
loss-making
profit profit
profit profit
profit profit
profit profit
profit profit
profit profit
profit profit
profit profit
profit loss
profit loss
profit loss
profit loss
profit loss
loss loss
loss loss
loss loss
loss loss
MARGIN ($) MARGIN (%)
150 43%
100 40%
discount rate
term 0.5 1
interest rate
Criteria to determine the discount rate
-risk degree: 1 is risker than 2 TPB 4.80%
- > inflation Vietcom 6.90% 8.10%
-interest rate for loans from banks
-capital cost Viettin 6.75% 7.75%
-exchange rate Techcom 5.65% 5.75%
-opportunitiy cost
-political risk prevalance lending rate 6.03% 7.20%
-monetary policies
- size of investment
NPVA-NPVB
5
-335544.32
2 5 10
6.30% 7.90%
10.0% 7.70%
8.0% 7.70%
7.49%
9.0% 6.30% 7.63%
Management information system
SH category Nationality
SHC code SHC name N code Nation
1 ownership 1 Vietnam
2 customer 2 Japan
3 supplier 3 Singapor
4 state authorities 4 India
5 PM workers 5 Indonesia
6 partnership 6 Thailand
7 MISC 7 US
8 Public 8 Multination
9 third party 9
10 10
11
12
stakeholders
SH CODE SH name Sh category Nationality
if the company increases the salary for workers, it has lee retained earning; TV
want workers to work more for less salary while the workers want to work less
for higher salary; the workers tend to cheat; workload may have negative impacts
to the health of the worker;
to fight again tax fraudulend, the TV has less money less to invest into the factory
and then quality go down
Process management
Toyota Vietnam car plant
PLANNING
Project Process Categories
20
Predecesso
Task Duration
rs
ES EF LS LF
Start
A 2 1 2 1 2
B 5A 3 7 3 7
C 7A 3 9 13 19
D 3B 8 10 13 15
E 4B 8 11 8 11
F 2E 12 13 12 13
G 2F 14 15 14 15
H 3 D, G 16 18 16 18
I 1H 19 19 19 19
J 5F 14 18 15 19
K 1 C, I, J 20 20 20 20
FLOATING Critical path
0A
0 A-B
10 A-B-
5 A-B--
0 A-B---E
0 A-B---E-F
0 A-B---E-F-G
0 A-B---E-F-G-H
0 A-B---E-F-G-H-I
1 A-B---E-F-G-H-I-
0 A-B---E-F-G-H-I--K