Assignment I

Employee Before After B -

Ad
=

(d-dbar) standard Deviation (Before

6.545.09 1.5 0.695556

2 3.95 3.82 0.13 0.287296

n= x)
3 7.50 3.56 1.P4 1.623076 H -
1

46.26 5.56 0.7 0.601156 0.72

=

57.76 6.21 1.55 0.781456

66.466.080.380.081796 standard Deviation (After)

⑰xi
7 3.564.91 0.65 0.000256
(

8 3.956.21 -
0.260.837476

93.82 5.17 0.65 0.000256 H -

1

105.66 5.25 0.410.065536 0.458

=

11 6.10 5.7 0.33 0.112896

Sum 69.6161.637.334.306756 1 -
2 0.02
= 1 -
p(z
<30.01) 0.01
=

1.4(30.01)
Mech 6.32813.60270.666 0.404705 2 0.0)
= 0.01
=

2 130.01) =
0.99

From the table 2.32 2.33 +

0.4898 < 0.94 0.4 p0)

2.325
<

① (2.32)<0(30.0)<4(2.33) =

IN -

N (6.3281
=
-
5.6027) =2.325x 0.42. 0.458?
+

11
(0.7254)
=
= 0.59819
=
(0.12721,1.32359)
1. Vd=the mean difference is the drivers

H.:Nd =
0

Ha.Nd =0

x 0.0
=

Test statistic I 0
= -

n 15,5 2.08, 5
= =
= 132

S/V
1.32
=

2.08 / I

2.457834816
=

P-value 0.492p
= > 0.01

We do not
reject to and conclude there is not
difference between
significant
unleaded
regular unleaded and premium
3. n 23 =
N= 315 standard Deviation

5 x)
3x
=

333.5652774
= u =

H -
1

31.409064
=

H.:N 3/5 =

Hq:N > 3/5

Criticalvalue: +(0.05,22) 1.717

=

df n
=
-

1
22
=

Teststatistic:
tt =

s/NT
333.563
=

315 -

31.409/23
= 2.834684716

calculated value - Critical value

of
We
reject to and we conclude that at5% level
significance
there is sufficient evidence to support the claim the
average
size of farms has now increased from call mean
figure of
315 ha
4.51 =

1.84 n 35 =

5 0.38
=

x 1 1.99
=
n 4/
=

5 0.51
=

C) 98% confidenceinterval

Since 2=
0.02, I score
2.33, Pointestimate:A.-X2
=

(1.84 1.99)
=
-

= -
0.15

C.F. (X,
=
-

52) = 2x
i+ 12

(1.84 1.94)
2.33x(038770.
=
e
=
-

=- 0.15 12.33 0.00412571

x + 0.0063439

= -
0.15 I 2.33 x 0.10232112
= -
0.15 =0.238408219
( 0.388,0.0884)
=
-

b) H0 :
m vz =
test statistic:

H,.M,Fv t 5
=
-

X, =
-
0.15
0.102 p.value
r1 +

-
=

1.47 =0.0708

p-value is fail to
since greater then 1=0.02 we
reject
H0.

there is not sufficientevidence to conclude that there is

a statistical difference in hourlyrates employers pay for
insurance between
managers
and professionalspecialty
Workers