Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NAME OF EXPERIMENT:
Jaw Crasher and Screen Analysis
STUDENT(s) NAME:
Abdullah Alturki
Mohammed Ahmed
Abbas Al-Saleh
Ziyad Al-Muayli
Muath Alwarthan
STUDENT(s) ID:
218011786
218008416
219009679
218010212
218019097
DAY, DATE&TIME:
Monday, May 1, 2023, 1:45 PM
1|Page
MINOR REPORT EVALUATION SHEET
Notes:………………………………………………………………………………………
…….………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
2|Page
Table of Contents
List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... 3
List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... 3
Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 4
Table of measurements ....................................................................................................... 5
Table of results .................................................................................................................... 5
Sample of Calculations ....................................................................................................... 6
Bond’s law: ................................................................................................................. 6
Discussion & Conclusion.................................................................................................... 7
References ........................................................................................................................... 9
List of Tables
List of Figures
Figure 1 Finer% vs Dpi(mm) .............................................................................................. 8
3|Page
Abstract
The Objective was to study the comminution behavior of different materials, using a
primary crusher (jaw crusher) under various conditions, taking into consideration power
requirements. criteria for power for material grinding, a jaw crusher has a fixed plate and
a moveable plate. A mass of 1100 g was added to the jaw crusher, and the operation was
completed within 30 seconds. Take the weight of each sieve before placing the material,
then shake the sieve for 10 minutes to pass the material between the sieves from a size of
2000 µm to 63 µm. Then the weight of each sieve was taken. Then the weight of each sieve
was taken, along with the material that remained in it. Take the weight of the material
retained between the sieves to be measured at 1061.23 g. a loss of 3.52% of the fed mass
was noticed.
4|Page
Table of measurements
Table 1 Raw Data
Mesh No. Mass Of the Mesh and The Parts Mesh Of the Powder Sieves Size
µm
2 390.2 374.38 75
1 400.8 384.46 63
Table of results
Table 2 Results
Mesh Avg. Particle Mass Retained Mass % Cumulative Percent Finer Xi/Dpi
Number Size (Dpi) on Each Sieve Retained on Mass Fraction (Passing)
Mn(G) Each Sieve
5|Page
Table 3 Avg. For different finer%
Dpi
Finer % Dpi (Mm)
0.6 3.52E-02
0.3 3.33E-02
0.1 3.20E-02
Sample of Calculations
The Calculations below were done in the for-mesh number 5.
425 + 300
𝐷 , = = 362.5 µ𝑚
2
𝑀 18.5
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 % 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑒𝑣𝑒 = = = 1.74%
𝑀 1061.23
𝑋 1.74%
= = 4.81 ∗ 10 µ𝑚
𝐷 362.5 µ𝑚
1 1
𝐷 = = = 335.70 µ𝑚
𝑋 2.98 ∗ 10
∑
𝐷
Bond’s law:
𝑃 1 1
= 0.3162 ∗ 𝑊̇ ∗ −
𝑚̇ 𝐿 𝐿
6|Page
4
𝑊 = 12.74 ∗
3
.
𝑃 (𝐾𝑤) = 0.3162 ∗ 12.74 ∗ ∗ 0.132 ∗ − = 1.048 𝑘𝑤
√ . √
𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟 % − 18.492
𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟% = 5.3499 ∗ ln 𝐷 + 18.492 → 𝐷 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝
5.3499
0.6 − 18.492
𝐷 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 = 3.52 ∗ 10 𝑚𝑚 = 35.2 µ𝑚
5.3499
0.3 − 18.492
𝐷 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 = 3.33 ∗ 10 𝑚𝑚 = 33.3 µ𝑚
5.3499
0.1 − 18.492
𝐷 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝 = 3.20 ∗ 10 𝑚𝑚 = 32.0 µ𝑚
5.3499
𝐿 0.3625
𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 = = = 1.208: 100
𝐿 30
7|Page
100.00
y = 5.3499ln(x) + 18.492
R² = 0.922
Finer %
10.00
1.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Dpi (mm)
From Fig.1, it could be observed that the efficiency of the jaw crusher used in the
experiment is not high enough. Most of the fed material was not well-crushed by the device.
This is noticed in Fig.1. Since the higher the finer%, the larger the diameter gets.
1. Jaw Crusher: A jaw crusher is a compression type crusher that breaks up materials
like rocks and ores using a fixed jaw and a moving jaw. The rock is forced against
the stationary plate by the moving jaw, which breaks it into smaller pieces. In the
mining and construction sectors, jaw crushers are frequently employed for the
initial crushing of materials.
2. A cone crusher reduces material by compressing or squeezing the feed material
between a moving piece of steel (the mantle) and a fixed piece of steel. (The bowl
liner). Between the mantle and bowl liner, the material is compressed and squeezed,
which causes it to be crushed. In the mining and aggregate sectors, cone crushers
are frequently utilized for secondary and tertiary crushing applications.
3. Impact Crusher: An impact crusher breaks materials down using the impact
principle. It comprises of a high-speed rotating rotor with hammers or blow bars
that impact the material as it enters the crusher. To fracture the material into tiny
bits, it is flung against curtains or fixed anvils. In the mining, quarrying, and
recycling sectors, impact crushers are frequently used for primary, secondary, and
tertiary crushing operations.
8|Page
References
Crusher - Wikipedia. (2022, November 1). Crusher - Wikipedia. Retrieved April 30,
2023, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusher.
9|Page