You are on page 1of 18

PHILOSOPHY &

CURRENT ISSUES
TOPIC 3 :
LOGIC
HASIL PEMBELAJARAN KULIAH
Explain the role, position and relationship of Logical
Science with Philosophy and explain various errors in
thinking and argumentation or Fallacy

Describe the development, uses and differences of the two main


approaches in Logic namely Deduction and Induction

Describe the variety of methodologies that enrich the


development of more complex knowledge
THE ROLE OF LOGIC AND
PREVENTION OF FALLATION
(ERROR OF THINKING)
THE ROLE OF LOGIC AND THE PREVENTION OF
FALLATION
• LOGIC:
– the Greek word is logos, which means word, discussion, intellect, rule and reason
– distinguish between good and bad reasoning by investigating normative criteria
for valid conclusions and demonstrations
– logic is the study of an argument consists of premise and conclusion

• Arguments consist of a sequence of premises in which a conclusion is


attempted to be made from the premise of the premise

– Premise 1: All human beings will die (p1)


– Premise 2: I am human (p2)
– Conclusion I will die (k)
ARGUMENT
Premise Premise Conclusion

• Arguments are not the same as opinions.

• An argument contains a sequence of statements in which one of


the statements is a conclusion drawn.

• A proposition is an assertion, or a proposition or a declaration in a


statement whether true or false.

• If all the premises are true, and the conclusions drawn are true,
then the argument is valid.
DEDUCTION AND
INDUCTION
DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION
DEDUCTION INDUCTION
• Arguments in which obligatory • Arguments in which a conclusion
conclusions are drawn from the appears likely to be drawn from the
premise. premise.
• Specific conclusions are drawn • General conclusions are drawn from
from general statements specific statements

• Premise 1: All human beings will • Premise 1: 90% of UA students are


die not proficient in English
• Premise 2: I am a human being. • Premise 2: UA student Zubaidah.
• Conclusion: So, I'm going to die • Premise 3: Therefore, Zubaidah may
not be proficient in English
ABDUCTION
• In philosophy there are other methods of thinking such as the Abduction method and the Heuristic
method.

• Abduction or also referred to as inference to the best explanation - the occurrence of a


phenomenon and we can see the occurrence of a phenomenon. From there a conclusion is made
about what happened before the existence of the phenomenon which can explain why the
phenomenon exists or occurs.

• That is, we try to give the best explanation based on the phenomenon that exists. In this case we
think by thinking backwards or thinking backwards.

• For example, we see a phenomenon, for example observing a car moving on the road and we ask:
• How can this happen?
• What makes the car move?

• What must exist? That is, conditions or conditions that must exist to allow a phenomenon such as a
moving car to occur.
HEURISTIC
Inductive logic, deductive and even abduction are ways of thinking logically where there are rules
applicable thinking.

However, for the heuristic method it is different from the deductive, inductive and abductive
methods. This is because, heuristic methods do not have systematic or orderly rules that can be
applied as in deductive and inductive logic.

This differentiates or makes heuristics a different kind of thinking than other logical thinking.

Although this heuristic logic does not have specific rules yet there are guidelines to implement
heuristic thinking.

Heuristic thinking is exploratory. It is not of an evaluation nature as found in deductive and inductive
logic where the method of logic is used to evaluate whether an argument or proposition or the
argument can be accepted as valid or invalid.
strawman false cause
a p lto the fallacy
emotion fallacy
Misrepresentingsomeone's argument to Presuming that a real or perceived Manipulating an emotional response in Presuming that because a claim has b e e n

Logical Fallacies
make it easier to attack. relationship between things means t place of a valid or compelling argument. poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made,
Alter Will said that we shruld!>JI m ore money into
one Is the cause of the other. Luke didnl want to eat his sheep's brains with chopped that it is necessarily wrong.
health and education Warren responded by sayB>g that Pointing to a fancy chart. Roger show.; how liver and brussels sprouts, but his father told him to Recognising that Amanda had committed a fallacy in
he was surprised that \rViD hates our country so much temperatures have been rising over the past few think about the poor. starving children in a third world arguing that we should eat healthy fcxxi because a
that he wants to leave it defenceless by rutting centuries, whilst at the same time lhe numben; c counby who weren't fortunate enough to have any nutrillonist said tt was popular. Alyse said we should
military spending pirates have been decreasing; thus pirates coolti food at all therefore eat bacon double cheeseburgers every day.
'WOrld and global warming is a hoax.

slippery slope adhominer tuquoque personal


incredulity
Asserting that if we allow A to happen.
then Z will consequently happen too,
therefore A should not happen.
Attacking your opponent's character
or personal traits in an attempt to
undermi ne their argument.
Errorsin Avoiding having to engage with criticism
by turniiig it back on the accuser -
answering criticism with criticism.
Saying that because one finds something
difficult to understand that it's therefore
not true.

reasoning
The blue candidate accused the red candidate of Kirk drew a picture of a fish and a hLOYlan andwith
Colin Closet asserts that if -.ve allow same-sex couples After Sally presents an eloquent and compelting
to marry, then the next thing we know we'llbe for a mor e equitable taxation system. Sam asks t 0 committing the tu quoque fallacy The red candidate effusive disdain asked Richard if he really thought we
responded by accusing the blue candidate of the same. were stupid enough to believe that a fish somehow
allowing people to marry their parents. their cars and audience whether we should believe anything h
after whi ch ensued an hour of backand forth criticism turned into a human through jusl like. random things

that
€\/en monkeys. woman who isn't married was once arrested, ar
with not mu.ch progress. happening over time.
smells a bit weird

special loaded burden ambiguity


pleading question invalidatethe of proof
argument
Moving the goalposts to create exceptions Asking a question that has an Saying that the burden of proof lies not Using double meanings or ambiguities of
when a claim is shown to be false. assumption built into it so t ha t it ca1 with the person making the claim. but language to mislead or misrepresent the
answered without appearing guilty. with someone else to disprove. truth.
Edward Johns d.aimed to be psychic, but when his
'abilities' were tested under proper scientific corrlitions.. Grace and Helen were both romantically intere: Bertrand.declares that a teapot is. at this very moment W hen the judge asked the defendant why he hadrit
they magically disappeared Edward explained this Brad One day. with Brad sitting within ears.hot. in orbit around the Sun between the Earth and Mars. paid his parking f i n e h e said that he shouldn:t have to
saying that one had to have faith in his abilities. for and that because no one c.an prove him wrong his pay them because the sign said 'Fine for parking' here·
asked in an inquisitive tone whether Helen was
them to work. claim is therefore a-valid one. and so he naturally presumed that it would be fine to
any problems with a fungal infection.
park there.

the gambler's appeal comp:,sition no true \.


bandwagon to authority /division scotsman genetic
fallacy
Believing that 'runs' occur to statistically Appealing to popularity or the fact that Using the opinion or position of an Assuming that what's true about one part Making what could be called an appeal to Judging something good or bad on the
independent pheno m e na such as roulette many p e o p le d o something as an authority figure, or institution of of something has to be applied to all, or purity as a way to dismiss relevant basis of where it comes from, or from
wheel spins. attempted form of validation. authority, in place of an actual argument. other, parts of it. criticisms or flaws of an argument. whom it comes.
Shamus pointed a drunken finger at Sean and asked Not able to defend his position that evoh.Jtion 'isn't true' Daniel was a precocious chikl and had a hl<ing for logic Angu<;. declares that Scotsmen do not put sugar on Accused on the 6 o'clock news of corruption and taking
Red had come up six times in a row on the roulette
him to explain how so many people could believe in Bob says that he knows a scientist who also questions He reasoned that atoms are invisible. and that he was t heir :midge. towhich l..adi.lan pointsout that he is a bribes. the senator .said that we should an be very wary
wheel so Greg knew that it was close to certain that
leprechauns if they're only a silly old superstition evolution (and presumably isn't a primate) made of atoms and therefore invisible too Scotsman and puts sugar on his porridge Furious. like a of the things we hear in the media, because we all
black woul d b e next up_Suffering an economic form of
Sear\ how-ever. had had a few too many Guinness Unfortunately. despite his thinky skills, he lost the game true Scot Angus yells that no true Scotsman sugars his knov 'l how very unreliable the media can be.
natural selection with this thinking. he soon lost all of
his savings_
himself and feD off his chair. of hide and go seek porridge.

black-or-white beggip.g the appeal :anecdotal , thetexas middle


question to nature sharpshooter ground
Where two alternative states are A circular argum e nt in which the Making the argume nt that because Using personal experience or an isolated Cheny-picking d a t a clusters to suit an Saying that a compromise, or middle
presented as the only possibilities, when conclusion is included in the premise. something is 'natural' it is therefore valid, example instead of a valid argument, argume nt, or finding a pattern to fit a point, between two extTemes is the truth.
in fact more possibilities exist The word Of Zorbo the Great is flawless and perfect We justified, inevitable, good, or ideal especially to dismiss statistics. presumption. Holly said that vaccinations caused autism in children, but
Whilst rallying support for h\5 plan to fundamentally knO\IV this because it says so in The Great and Infallible T he medicine man rolled into town on his bandwagon Jason said that that was an cool and everything. but his T he makers of Sugarette Candy Drinks JX)int to her scientific.ally well-read friend caleb said that this claim
undermine citizens' rights. the Supreme Leader told Book of Zcrlxis Best and Most Truest Things that are offering various natural remedies. such as very special grandfather smoked. bl<e, 30 cigarettes a day and hved research showing that of the five countries where hadbeendebunked and proven false.Their friend Alice
the people they v,,ere either ()fl his side. or on the side Definitely True and Should Not Ever Be Questioned. plain water. He said that it was only natural that until W - so d()fl't believe everything you read at:out Sugarette drinks sen the most units. three of them are in offered a compromise that vaccinations cause some
of the enemy. people should be wary of 'artificial' medicines such meta analyses of sound studies showing proven the top ten healthiest countries on Earth therefore autism
as antibiotics. causal relationships. Sugarette drinks are healthy

Category of Fallacy
GENERAL FALLACY FALLACY BASED ON
EMOTIONS
• Accident Fall • Fallacy of Novelty
• Fallacy Ad Nauseam • Fallacy of Compassion
• Trap Question Fallacy • Fallacy of Special Appeal
• Middle Way Fallacy
• Black and White
Fallacy/Dilemma
• Fallacy of Ignorance GENETIC FALL
• Fallacy of Label
• Fallacy Ad Honimem
• Fallacy of Abuses Principle
• The Fallacy of a Convoluted • Fallacy Ad Populum
Argument • Fallacy of Authority
• Figurative Fallacy
• Fallacy of Inference
• Fallacy of Coincidence
• Fallacy of Cliché • Composition Fallacy
• Division Fallacy
TITLE OF EACH PHILOSOPHY COURSE LECTURE AND CURRENT ISSUES BASED ON THE
DOMAIN OF PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS
LECTURE: LOGIC & METHODOLOGY
LECTURE CONCEPT QUESTION REFERENCE
5
LOGIC
THE ROLE OF LOGIC Logic What is the purpose of ALatifS, “Logik” (ms 2-4)
AND THE PREVENTION Fallac Logic Science? AJalilH “Kedudukan Ilmu Mantiq
OF FALLACY - y What is the Meaning of dalam Falsafah” (ms 6-7)
Fallacy? ASariyan, Logika (ms 50 – 58)
MISTAKES OF Hashim Musa (ms 33-54)
THINKING
DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION Deducti Can you give an example of a ALatifS, Asas-Asas Penaakulan Sains
on Deduction approach and an (ms 14-33)
Inducti example of an Induction ALatifS, Bentuk-Bentuk Penerangan
on approach obtained? Sains dan Kaedah Formal (ms 34-58)
VARIOUS METHODOLOGIES OF Various Methodologies of Apart from the Deduction and ALatifS, Asas-Asas Penaakulan Sains
KNOWLEDGE GENERATION Knowledge Induction approaches, can you give (ms 14-33)
other examples of Science ALatifS, Bentuk-Bentuk Penerangan
Methodology? Sains dan Kaedah Formal (ms 34-58)
KNOWLEDGE Construction Methodology of What is the relationship of ShaharirMZ, Apakah Sains? (ms 33-
CONSTRUCTION Knowledge Development Methodology with the generation 46)
METHODOLOGY of new sciences? ShaharirMZ, Anggapan, Andaian,
Postulat, Aksiom, Hipotesis, Teori
dan Fakta (ms 87-100)

You might also like