Jamilah Acuna

OMGT 3101

Justice and fairness by Kant’s Philosophy

Research shows that achieving justice and fairness requires individuals to do exterior actions that
have the potential to impact others, either directly or indirectly. Other people's wants or wishes
are ignored. To be fair or just is another definition of justice. When there is a violation of
established ethics, this idea of moral righteousness—which is founded on the values of equality
and ethics—is attached to the word punishment. Indeed, there is a relationship between
punishment and justice. Punishment is a fundamental idea for those who violate the law if justice
is to prevail within that society. Retribution is the foundation of punishment, according to Kant.
Retribution is the rightful punishment for wrongdoing committed by individuals. As a result, I
concur with Kant's assertion that disciplining wrongdoers is necessary.

After considering a number of important factors, I came to the conclusion that justice and
fairness might coexist with equitable punishment. Actually, punishment is based on the equality
principle, which states that the suffering endured by the offender and the victim should be equal.
Kant's theory of justice and fairness demonstrates convincingly that improving society is the
ultimate aim of justice. It was explained that punishment may also create chaos and unrest in
society, though justice is done. Moreover, the concept of retribution is important because they
may intermingle the two terms, revenge and retribution, which can be extremely critical for the
sound health of a society. Throughout, Kant's justice and fairness philosophy paved the way for
me to understand that justice and fairness flow like a river that never runs dry. Fairness is what
justice really is.