Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Curriculum Alignment (Authentic Assessment)
Curriculum Alignment (Authentic Assessment)
References:
Kleinheksel, A. J., Rost, K., & Kumar, D. D. (2016). Assessing authentic learning:
The impact of alignment on student achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in
Higher Education, 41(2), 225-237.
Chen, W., Cao, Y., & Duanmu, S. (2018). The importance of curriculum
alignment in authentic assessment for English language learners. Journal of
Language Teaching and Research, 9(4), 855-862.
Research has consistently shown that curriculum alignment is a critical factor in improving student
achievement (e.g. Webb, 1997; Popham, 2003). For example, a study by Black and Wiliam (1998)
found that when teachers aligned their assessments with the curriculum, students' learning outcomes
improved significantly.
Moreover, authentic assessment, which emphasizes the assessment of real-world skills and
knowledge, requires curriculum alignment to be effective. According to Darling-Hammond and
Snyder (2000), "authentic assessment demands that the assessments used be closely aligned with the
instructional goals and the curriculum."
In summary, curriculum alignment is a crucial component of authentic assessment that can improve
student achievement by ensuring that assessments accurately measure intended learning outcomes.
The importance of curriculum alignment has been demonstrated in numerous studies, and it is an
essential element of effective teaching and learning.
References:
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education:
Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and
teacher education, 16(5-6), 523-545.
Popham, W. J. (2003). Test Better, Teach Better: The Instructional Role of Assessment. ASCD.
Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and
science education. In Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices
for the New Millennium (pp. 231-250). National Academies Press.
When curriculum and assessments are aligned, students are more likely to understand
what is expected of them and be able to demonstrate their learning in a meaningful
way. In a study conducted by Black and Wiliam (1998), it was found that "assessment
functions most effectively when it is closely aligned with the curriculum and instruction"
(p. 140).
References:
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom
assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
Curriculum alignment is the process of ensuring that what is being taught in the
classroom is aligned with the learning objectives of a particular curriculum or set of
standards. Authentic assessment, on the other hand, involves evaluating students'
knowledge and skills in a way that closely mirrors real-world situations.
Research has shown that there is a positive correlation between curriculum alignment
and student achievement. For example, in a study by Beatty and Brewster (2004), they
found that students who were taught using an aligned curriculum and assessments
performed better on standardized tests than those who were not taught using an
aligned curriculum.
Furthermore, in a report by the National Research Council (NRC) titled "Knowing What
Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment," the authors note
that "alignment of curriculum, instruction, and assessment is necessary for valid
interpretations of assessment results" (p. 103). The report goes on to say that when
there is alignment between these three components, "assessment results provide
meaningful information about what students know and can do" (p. 103).
Reference: Beatty, A., & Brewster, C. (2004). Curriculum alignment and student
achievement. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 18(1), 21-29.
National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design
of educational assessment. National Academies Press.