MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY

ILIGAN INSTITUTE OF
TECHNOLOGY
Department of Marketing

THESIS PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM

Thesis Title : EXPLORING INTER-GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN TIKTOK

MOTIVATIONS OF ENGAGEMENT: A USES AND GRATIFICATION THEORY
APPROACH: Cabatuan, Lumansok, Pagsiat
Proponents :
Directions: Analyze the research output based on the following criteria below. Check the appropriate column ( 5 as
the highest and I as the lowest) indicating your evaluation.
INTRODUCTION
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory discussion of the problem x
2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed x
3. The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and specifically stated to convince x
the readers of the need to conduct such stud
4. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly presented. x
5. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has global impact in x
educational

LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

Indicators 5 4 3 2
I. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to the research problem. x
2. The Literature Review is comprehensively done by the researchers, and they only x
stated researches relevant to their stud
3. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and skeletal framework of x
the stud
4. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main problem or the title of the x
stu
5. Related literature and studies are recent (five years ago to present year of the x
stud
6. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-organized, concise (not x
too long nor too short) and is based on the researchers' logical analysis of the
cited materials.
7. The sources of the cited literatures and studies are appropriately acknowledged x
and or credited.
8. The researchers were able to determine the construct and variable of their study x
from the theo resented.
9. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of the theory x
appropriately.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD

 Indicators 5 4 3 2
1. The research methodology is well-described and is suitable or fitting to the x
research roblem.
2. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of the sample profile, x
sam le size and sam Iin techni ue and or rocedure.
3. The research locale is described in terms of its location, historical background, u x
ses and ob•ectives and or mission and vision of the instruction or o anization
4. The procedure and or techniques of gathering data are explained in complete x
detail beginning from the time the researchers sought permission to conduct
the stud
Indicators 5 4 3 2
5. The research instrument is presented and discussed in terms of its validity and x
reliabili in case of self-made instrument)
6. The research design and method employed by the researchers are correct and x
relevant to the fulfillment of the accurate results of the stud
7. The statistical tool selected is appropriate to gather the needed data and answer x
the roblem of the stu
8. The statistical tool is brief and accurately used to answer the queries or x
objectives of the stu
95
GRAND TOTAL
ORAL PRESENTATION:
Undevelo ed Develo in Satisfacto Outstandin
Criteria Score Comments
0—10 oints 11 —20 oints 21 — 30 ints 31-40 points
Organization Speaker/s Speaker/s Presentation Speaker's highly 36
disorganized; adequately follows logical organized, easy
jumps from organized sequence to follow,
one to ic to smooth
another transitions
Delivery Paper was read Some parts of In most Speech was
or seemed the instances, the smooth, clear,
memorized. presentation presentation and articulate.
Speech was too was delivered went There was voice
smoothly. projection and
fast/too well, other parts 36
There were the pacing was
slow/too soft. were not. effective. There
minor snags in
No eye contact. Attempts were was eye contact.
delivery.
Delivery stiff made to adjust Delivery was
and unsure. pace of delive oised.
Content Presentation Content was Presentation A general 37
was not apt adequate. was sufficient. audience could
to topic nor There were In most understand the
audience. attempts to instances, the presentation. Key
Background provide content was terms were
information background appropriate. defined and
and/or information. background
assumptions information
were lackin provided.
Media and Media and There were Satisfactory Excellent media 37
Resources format were many media media format for
poor choice glitches. Some presentation. content. All
for content. slides were There were, materials were
Materials very however, clear and
were distracting. some lapses. information was
confusing or
 distracting . pertinent.
Response to Misunderstands Some Group was Group was able 35
Questions questions; questions able to answer to answer
cannot answer misunderstood most of the questions well
convincingly. and questions well. and with
There was a lot inadequately There were reference to own
of fumbling addressed. occasions, work. Showed
about. Group was though, when knowledge of
easily rattled group was not subject matter.
abut managed too confident
to sail throu h. about the sub-
ect matter.

Signatuæ over printed name