Student Learning Outcome Summer 2016

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: SUMMER 2016
©2016
School of Business
Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB)
Assessment Committee, Accreditation Office
Plot 16, Block B, Aftabuddin Ahmed Road, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229

Tel: +88-02-8431645-53, 8432065-76, Extension 2113
Fax: +88-02-8431991
Email: isb@iub.edu.bd
Web: www.sb.iub.edu.bd
Table of Contents
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program Page 3

SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Accounting Page 14
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Finance Page 22
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in International Business Page 30
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Management Information Systems Page 38
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Marketing Page 48
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Management Page 56
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Human Resource Management Page 60
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: MBA Program Page 72
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: MBA in Finance Page 82
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: MBA in Marketing Page 88
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: MBA in Human Resource Management Page 98
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: EMBA Program Page 108
SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BSc in Economics Page 118
2|SLAR/SB/SUMMER 2016
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Program Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Learning Goal Learning Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements Made
Outcome observations
1. 1.1 Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
Communications Communicate Exit Assessment Test Figures 80% students A new structured
knowledge Test, and Exceeds 1,2,3 and should meet or, communication system for
effectively. Course Embedded Expectation: 8% 4 exceed MGT490 was developed. The
Assessment (MGT Meets Expectation: expectation. system required students to
490, integrative 68% Students met the work on varies issues in teams.
capstone course Does Not Meet target for both the Classroom discussion is going
group Expectation:24% formative and to be prioritized at the end of
term projects). summative the each schedule class where
Course-Embedded Assessment. student can grasp the key
Formative: Assessment: points based on the chapter
Course-Embedded Rubric # Trend: contents and build their idea.
Assessment (MGT BBA 1.1.R.2 The percentage of
201 final term (summative), students not Improvements to be Made
projects and MGT R.1 meeting A more standardized approach
examinations). (formative) expectation is for summative assessment in
considerably low MGT 490 will be developed in
in summative Autumn 2016, to ensure
assessment consistency in measurement
compared to that criteria across various sections.
of spring 2016
semester.
FIGURE 1: BBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 2: BBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 3: BBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 4: BBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: TREND: FORMATIVE
Program Student Measurement Techniques Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or
Learning Learning Criteria Results Results and Improvements Made
Goal Outcome observation
s
2. Critical 2.1 Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Thinking Demonstrati Exit Assessment Test, and Test 5,6,7 and 8 80% A new home project outline for
on of Course Embedded Exceeds Expectation: students MGT490 was developed. The
analytical Assessment (MGT 8% should meet project required students to
and critical 490, integrative Meets Expectation: or, exceed work in teams outside of the
capstone course group 68% expectation. class to apply their chapter
thinking
term projects). Does Not Meet Students met knowledge by solving the
ability to the target for
Expectation:24% strategic capsule. Practicing
assess both the this project students not only
simulated Formative: formative going to develop their own
business Course-Embedded Course-Embedded and critical thinking but also they
scenarios. Assessment Assessment: summative understand the complexities
from the Disciplines: FIN Rubric # Assessment. that general managers face in
460 group term projects for FIN BBA 2.1.R.2 strategy development and
students; ACN 405 for ACN (summative), Trend: implementation at various
students, HRM 390 group terms ACN 3.R.5 The phases in a company’s growth
projects for HRM students; INB (formative) percentage cycle.
303 group term projects for INB FIN 3.R.4 of students
students; MIS 405 group term (formative) not meeting Improvements to be Made
projects for MIS students; MGT HRM expectation A more standardized approach
405 for MGT students, and MKT (formative) is for summative assessment in
302 group term projects for INB 3.R.3 considerably MGT 490 will be developed in
MKT students. (formative) low in Autumn 2016, to ensure
summative consistency in measurement
MIS 1.R.2
assessment criteria across various sections.
(formative)
compared to
MGT 1.R.2 that of spring
(formative) 2016
MKT 1.R.2 semester.
(formative)
3. Knowledge 3.1 Application Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
Application of underpinning Exit Assessment Test Figures 80% students A new project (e.g. case
knowledge for Test, and Exceeds 9,10,11,12 should meet or, development/ business plan)
analysis and Course Embedded Expectation: 8% exceed outline for MGT 490 was
Assessment (MGT Meets Expectation: expectation. developed. This project
decision making.
490, integrative 68% Students met the required students to work in
capstone course Does Not Meet target for both the teams to apply their course
group Expectation:24% formative and knowledge what they acquire,
term projects). summative convert and share with each
Assessment. other throughout the semester.
Course-Embedded Moreover, this project will
Formative: Assessment: Trend: provide knowledge to
Course-Embedded Rubric # The percentage of determine the attractiveness of
Assessment (MGT BBA 3.1.R.2 students not various industries and
201 final term (summative), meeting competitive positions of firms
projects and MGT R.1 expectation is within these industries using
examinations). (formative) considerably low various strategic models in the
in summative context of Bangladesh.
assessment
compared to that Improvements to be Made
of spring 2016 A standardized approach for
semester. summative assessment in
MGT490 will be developed in
Autumn 2016, to ensure
consistency in measurement
criteria across various sections.
FIGURE 9: BBA PLG 3, SLO 3.1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 10: BBA PLG 3, SLO 3.1: TREND:SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 9: BBA PLG 3, SLO 3.1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 10: BBA PLG 3, SLO 3.1: TREND:SUMMATIVE
4. Global 4.1 Utilize global Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
Perspective business Exit Assessment Test Figures Target: A new project outline for
information to Test, and Exceeds 13,14,15 80% students MGT490 was developed. This
improve Course Embedded Expectation: 8% and 16 should meet or, project outcome is jointly
Assessment (MGT Meets Expectation: exceed attached with learning goal 3.
decision making
490, integrative 68% expectation. This is a group project and
in an Students met the
capstone course Does Not Meet students should work in teams.
international group Expectation:24% target for both the The strategy student develop,
setting. term projects). formative and craft and made probable
summative suggestion for execution under
Course-Embedded Assessment. the project, it must incline with
Formative: Assessment: the global perspective (e.g.
Course-Embedded Rubric # Trend: benchmark activities) while
Assessment BBA 4.1.R.2 The percentage of prescribing Bangladeshi
(INB301 (summative), students not companies.
final term projects INB R.1 meeting Improvements to be Made
and examinations). (formative) expectation is A standardized approach for
considerably low summative assessment in
in summative MGT490 will be developed in
assessment Autumn 2016, to ensure
compared to that consistency in measurement
of spring 2016 criteria across various sections.
semester.
10 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 13: BBA PLG 4, SLO 4.1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 14: BBA PLG 4, SLO 4.1: TREND:SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 15: BBA PLG 4, SLO 4.1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 16: BBA PLG 4, SLO 4.1: TREND:FORMATIVE
11 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
5. Ethics 5.1 Uphold Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
ethical Exit Assessment Test Figures 80% students A new project outline for
standards in Test, and Exceeds 17,18,19 should meet or, MGT490 was developed. The
every Course Embedded Expectation: 8% and 20 exceed project required students to
Assessment (MGT Meets Expectation: expectation. work in teams. The outcome of
professional
490, integrative 68% Students met the this project will highlight the
practice. target for both the
capstone course Does Not Meet macroeconomic factors (e.g.
group Expectation:24% formative and stakeholders’ right,
term projects). summative government rules), give the
Assessment. students better understanding
Course-Embedded about the ethics and will also
Formative: Assessment: Trend: acknowledge the Bangladeshi
Course-Embedded Rubric # The percentage of laws in doing business.
Assessment (MGT BBA 5.1.R.2 students not
201 final term (summative) meeting Improvements to be Made
projects and MGT R.1 expectation is A standardized approach for
examinations). (formative) considerably low summative assessment in
in summative MGT490 will be developed in
semester.
12 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
13 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN ACCOUNTING
Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Learning Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements to be Made
1. Knowledge Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
of Accounting Exit Assessment Test 21,22,23 80% students A standardized approach for
concepts and Test, and Exceeds Expectation: and 24 should meet or, summative assessment in ACN
application Course Embedded 3% exceed expectation. 301 was developed in Summer
Meets Expectation: Students met the
according to Assessment (ACN 2016, to ensure consistency in
67% target for both the
accounting process 301 examinations) formative and
measurement criteria across
Does Not Meet
summative various sections. This project
Expectation:30%
Assessment. required students to work in
Formative: teams on practical application of
Course-Embedded Trend: accounting concepts according to
Course-Embedded
Assessment (ACN The percentage of accounting process.
Assessment: students not meeting
201 examinations
Rubric # expectation is
and projects) Improvements to be Made
ACN 1.R.2 considerably low in An in-depth analysis of the use of
(summative), summative IFRS and application of it will be
ACN 1.R.1 assessment
developed.
(formative) compared to that of
spring 2016
semester.
14 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 21: BBA IN ACN: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 22: BBA IN ACN: SLO 1: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 23: BBA IN ACN: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 24: BBA IN ACN: SLO 1: TREND: FORMATIVE
15 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2. Analyze Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
financial Exit Assessment Test 25,26,27 80% students A standardized approach for
statements Test, and Exceeds Expectation: and 28 should meet or, summative assessment in ACN
according to Course Embedded 3% exceed expectation. 305 was developed in Summer
accounting Assessment (ACN 2016, to ensure consistency in
principles through 305 group term formative and
Does Not Meet
usage of project) summative various sections. The project
Expectation:30%
appropriate Assessment. required students to work in
technology. teams to analyze financial
Formative: Trend: statements of Bangladeshi
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded The percentage of companies according to
Assessment (ACN accounting principles through
201 examinations usage of appropriate technology.
ACN 2.R.3 considerably low in
and projects)
(summative), summative Improvements to be Made
Industry specific analysis will be
spring 2016
designed to give students a better
semester. understanding of the IFRS in
preparation of financial
statements.
16 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 27: BBA IN ACN: SLO 2: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 28: BBA IN ACN: SLO 2: TREND: FORMATIVE
17 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. Explain cost Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
concepts, Exit Assessment Test 29, 30, 31 80% students A standardized approach for
understand cost Test, and Exceeds Expectation: and 32 should meet or, summative assessment in CAN
accumulation and Course Embedded 3% exceed expectation. 202 and 405 was developed in
apply appropriate Assessment (ACN Summer 2016, to ensure
controlling 405 group term formative and
Does Not Meet
methods and project) summative criteria across various sections.
Expectation:30%
demonstrate Assessment. The project required students to
decision making work in teams on a case that
abilities. Formative: Trend: demonstrated practical
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded The percentage of application of basic costing
Assessment (ACN techniques. Case study focusing
202 examinations on advanced cost concepts and
and projects) application introduced in ACN
(summative), summative 405 for the summative
assessment.
spring 2016
semester. Improvements to be Made
Cases focusing issues in local
companies will be introduced.
18 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 31: BBA IN ACN, SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 32: BBA IN ACN, SLO 3: TREND: FORMATIVE
19 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
4. Ethical Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
issues in Exit Assessment Test Figures 80% students A standardized approach for
Accounting Test, and Exceeds Expectation: 33, 34, 35 should meet or, summative assessment in ACN
Course Embedded 3% and 36 exceed expectation. 403 was developed in Summer
Assessment (ACN 2016, to ensure consistency in
403 group term formative and
Does Not Meet
project) summative various sections. The project
Expectation:30%
teams on a real Bangladeshi
Formative: Trend: company to identify the ethical
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded The percentage of and auditing issues in accounting
Assessment (ACN in these companies and provide
201 examinations suggestions to improve the
and projects) current scenario of these
(summative), summative companies.
spring 2016
Improvements to be Made
semester. Comparative analysis of local and
MNCs will be developed to give
students a better understanding
in the upcoming semesters.
20 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 33: BBA IN ACN, SLO 4: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 34: BBA IN ACN, SLO 4: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 35: BBA IN ACN, SLO 4: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 36: BBA IN ACN, SLO 4: TREND: FORMATIVE
21 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN FINANCE

1. Identify and Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
classify financial Exit Assessment Test 37, 38, 39 80% students A standardized approach for
information; Test, and Exceeds Expectation: and 40 should meet or, summative assessment in FIN
present and Course Embedded 9% exceed expectation. 301 was developed in Summer
interpret financial Assessment (FIN 2016, to ensure consistency in
statements and 301 group term formative and
Does Not Meet
utilize technology project) summative various sections. The project
Expectation:14%
for application Assessment. required students to work in
purpose. teams on financial statements
Formative: Trend: that demonstrated practical
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded The percentage of application of income statement,
Assessment (FIN balance sheet and cash flows.
201 examinations Interpreting results focusing on
FIN 1.R.2 considerably low in
and projects) advanced understanding and
(summative), summative application introduced in FIN 301
FIN 1.R.1 assessment
for the summative assessment.
spring 2016
Incorporation of detailed
interpretation with focus on
specific areas of improvement
will be introduced.
22 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 37: BBA IN FIN: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 38: BBA IN FIN: SLO 1: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 39: BBA IN FIN: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 40: BBA IN FIN: SLO 1: TREND: FORMATIVE
23 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2. Managing Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
financing and Exit Assessment Test 41, 42, 43 80% students A standardized approach for
investment Test, and Exceeds Expectation: and 44 should meet or, summative assessment in FIN
decision of Course Embedded 9% exceed expectation. 302 was developed in Summer
corporate in order Assessment (FIN 2016, to ensure consistency in
to achieve good 302 group term formative and
Does Not Meet
governance. project) summative various sections. The project
Expectation:14%
teams on a project that
Formative: Trend: demonstrated practical
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded The percentage of application of investment and
Assessment (FIN financing decision making.
201 examinations
and projects) Improvements to be Made
(summative), summative Incorporation of detailed
interpretation with focus on
spring 2016
specific areas of improvement
semester. will be introduced.
24 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
25 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. Able to apply Summative: Exit Assessment See 45, 46, Target: Actions Taken
best investment Exit Assessment Test 47 and 48 80% students A standardized approach for
strategy by Test, and Exceeds Expectation: should meet or, summative assessment in fin 460
analyzing various Course Embedded 9% exceed expectation. was developed in Summer 2016,
investment Assessment (FIN to ensure consistency in
options. 460 group term formative and
Does Not Meet
project) summative various sections. The project
Expectation:14%
Assessment. required students to invest in a
hypothetical scenario with
Formative: Trend: hypothetical funds and apply
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded The percentage of various investing strategies
Assessment (FIN through the analysis for various
201 examinations investment options in
and projects) Bangladeshi Stock market.
(summative), summative
spring 2016
A new area will be introduced in
semester. the assignment whereby students
can compare local investment
options and strategies with that
of cross border investments.
26 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
27 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
4. Able to manage Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
risk and return in Exit Assessment Test 49, 50, 51 80% students A new project outline for FIN460
domestic and Test, and Exceeds Expectation: and 52. should meet or, was developed. The project
global market Course Embedded 9% exceed expectation. required students to invest in a
condition. Assessment (FIN hypothetical scenario with
hypothetical funds and apply
Does Not Meet
project) summative various investing strategies
Expectation:14%
Assessment. through the analysis for various
investment options in
Formative: Trend: Bangladeshi Stock market. This
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded The percentage of required students to apply risk
Assessment (FIN management techniques to
201 examinations ensure successful return in
and projects) domestic market. A basic
(summative), summative comparison to global markets
was included in the assignment.
spring 2016
A more in depth analysis and
comparative analysis to global
markets will be included in the
assignment.
28 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
29 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS

1. Demonstrate an Summative: Exit Assessment See Figure 53 Target: Actions Taken
understanding of Exit Assessment Test and 54 80% students A standardized approach for
global cultural Test Exceeds should meet or, formative assessment in INB 301
knowledge through Expectation: exceed expectation. was developed in Summer 2016,
0.00% Students met the
understanding the to ensure consistency in
Meets Expectation: target for both the
core components of Formative: formative and
80%
international Course-Embedded summative various sections. The project
Does Not Meet
business and the Assessment (INB Assessment. required students to work in
Expectation:20%
local and national 301 group projects) teams on a expanding a local
differences. Trend: company globally by conducting
Course- The percentage of in depth country analysis and
students not meeting export import strategies.
Embedded expectation is
Assessment: considerably low in
Rubric # Improvements to be Made
summative The assignment is to be modified
INB 3.R.1 assessment
( formative ), to industry specific expansion
compared to that of
spring 2016
requirements.
semester.
30 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 53: BBA IN INB: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 54: BBA IN INB: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE
31 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2. Understand the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
different factors Exit Assessment Test 55, 56, 57 and 80% students A standardized project outline for
that determine Test, and Exceeds 58 should meet or, INB301 was developed. The
international trade Course Embedded Expectation: exceed expectation. project required students to work
patterns and Assessment (INB in teams on a case that
capital flows and 302 group term formative and
demonstrated practical
80%
their impact on project) summative application of international
Does Not Meet
global business Assessment. business principles. Term paper
Expectation:20%
operations. focusing on gains from trade,
Formative: Trend: classical theories of international
Course-Embedded Course- The percentage of trade, and theories of trade
Assessment (INB students not meeting pattern and trade
301 examinations Assessment: competitiveness was introduced
and projects) considerably low in in INB302 for the summative
Rubric # summative
INB 3.R.2 assessment.
assessment
(summative), compared to that of
INB 3.R.1 spring 2016
(formative) semester.
32 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 55: BBA IN INB: SLO 2: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 56: BBA IN INB: SLO 2: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 57: BBA IN INB: SLO 2: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 58: BBA IN INB: SLO 2: TREND: FORMATIVE
33 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. Identify the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
international Exit Assessment Test 59, 60, 61 and 80% students A standardized project outline for
competitiveness of Test, and Exceeds 62. should meet or, INB 302 was developed. The
nations and their Course Embedded Expectation: exceed expectation. project required students to work
attractiveness for Assessment (INB in teams on a case that
international 302 group term formative and
80%
business. project) summative application of Ricardo’s Model of
Does Not Meet
Assessment. Comparative Advantage and The
Expectation:20%
HO Model, The Product Life Cycle
Formative: Trend: Theory and Porter’s Diamond
Course-Embedded Course- The percentage of Model.
Assessment (INB students not meeting
301 examinations Assessment:
and projects) considerably low in
Rubric # summative
INB 3.R.1 spring 2016
34 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 59: BBA IN INB: SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 60: BBA IN INB: SLO 3: TREND:SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 61: BBA IN INB: SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 62: BBA IN INB: SLO 3: TREND:FORMATIVE
35 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
4. Demonstrate Summative: Exit Assessment See Figure 63 Target: Actions Taken
knowledge on Exit Assessment Test and 64 80% students A standardized project outline for
cross-border Test, and Exceeds should meet or, INB303 was developed. The
communications Course Embedded Expectation: exceed expectation. project required students to work
and managerial Assessment (INB in teams on a case that
issues from an 303 group term formative and
80%
International project) summative application of cross-border
Does Not Meet
business context. Assessment. cultural differences across a wide
Expectation:20%
array of countries and their
Trend: implications in international
Course- The percentage of business practices for the
students not meeting summative assessment.
Rubric # summative
spring 2016
semester.
36 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 63: BBA IN INB: SLO 4: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 64: BBA IN INB: SLO 4: TREND:SUMMATIVE
37 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN MIS
Student Learning Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or Improvements

Outcome Techniques Criteria Results Results and to be Made
observations
1. Apply Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
managerial Exit Assessment Test 65, 66, 67 and 80% students A standardized project outline for
concepts and Test, and Exceeds 68. should meet or, MIS 442 was developed. The
decision theories to Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed expectation. project required students to work
use enterprise Assessment (MIS in teams on a case that
0.00% target for both the
information 405 group term formative and
Does Not Meet
systems. project) summative application of Information
Expectation:0.00%
Assessment. Systems in Business. Case study
and projects are focusing on
Formative: Trend: system analysis and application
Course-Embedded The percentage of introduced in MIS 405 for the
Course- students not meeting
Assessment (MIS summative assessment.
442 examinations
and projects)
Rubric # summative
MIS 1.R.2 assessment
MIS 1.R.1 spring 2016
38 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 65: BBA IN MIS: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE66: BBA IN MIS: SLO 1: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 67: BBA IN MIS: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 68: BBA IN MIS: SLO 1: TREND: FORMATIVE
39 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
observations
2. Demonstrate the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
understanding Exit Assessment Test 69,70, 71 and 80% students Case study and projects are
about systems Test, and Exceeds 72 should meet or, focusing on system analysis and
theory, systems Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed expectation. application introduced in MIS
analysis, systems Assessment (MIS 405 for the summative
design and project 405 group term formative and
assessment.
Does Not Meet
management. project) summative
Expectation:0.00%
Assessment.
Formative: Trend:
Course-
Course-Embedded The percentage of
Embedded students not meeting
Assessment (MIS
Assessment: expectation is
442 examinations
Rubric # considerably low in
and projects)
MIS 2.R.2 summative
(summative), assessment
MIS 2.R.1 compared to that of
(formative) spring 2016
semester.
40 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 69: BBA IN MIS: SLO 2: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 70: BBA IN MIS: SLO 2: TREND: SUMMATIVE
41 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
observations
3. Exhibit the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Improvements to be Made
knowledge on web Exit Assessment Test 73,74, 75 and 80% students A standardized approach for
based information Test, and Exceeds 76 should meet or, summative assessment in MIS
systems in business Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed expectation. 405 will be developed in Summer
context. Assessment (MIS 2016, to ensure consistency in
Does Not Meet
project) summative various sections.
Expectation:0.00%
Assessment.
Formative: Trend:
Course-
Assessment (MIS
442 examinations
and projects)
MIS 3.R.2 summative
semester.
42 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
43 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
observations
4. Develop and Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Improvements to be Made
implement Exit Assessment Test 77,78, 79 and 80% students Project in Autumn 2016 will
information Test, and Exceeds 80 should meet or, include real life applications of
systems with the Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed expectation. information systems and provide
help of latest Assessment (MIS opportunity for students to
business tools. 405 group term formative and
implement the system with the
Does Not Meet
project) summative help of business tools.
Expectation:0.00%
Assessment.
Formative: Trend:
Course-
Assessment (MIS
442 examinations
and projects)
MIS 4.R.2 summative
semester.
44 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE79: BBA IN MIS: SLO 4: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 80: BBA IN MIS: SLO 4: TREND: FORMATIVE
45 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
observations
5. Illustrate the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
familiarity about Exit Assessment Test 81,82, 83 and 80% students A standardized project outline for
computer networks Test, and Exceeds 84 should meet or, MIS 442 was developed. The
and security Course Embedded Expectation: 100% exceed expectation. project required students to work
concepts. Assessment (MIS in teams on a case that
Does Not Meet
project) summative application of Information
Expectation:0.00%
Assessment. Systems in Business. Case study
and projects are focusing on
Formative: Trend: system analysis and application
Course-
Course-Embedded The percentage of introduced in MIS 405 for the
Assessment (MIS summative assessment.
442 examinations
and projects)
MIS 5.R.2 summative
semester.
46 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
47 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN MARKETING

1. Understanding Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
in-depth marketing Exit Assessment Test 85, 86, 87, 80% students A uniform project outline for
management Test, and Exceeds Expectation: and 88. should meet or, MKT 302 was developed. The
process and its Course Embedded 4% exceed expectation. project required students to work
implementation Assessment (MKT in groups on an assignment that
locally and globally 302 group term formative and
Does Not Meet
for products and project) summative application of basic marketing
Expectation:22%
services. Assessment. management theories for the
summative assessment with
Formative: Trend: special focus on techniques
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded The percentage of pertaining to products and
Assessment (MKT services and their differences.
201examinations
MKT 1.R.2 considerably low in
and projects)
(summative), summative
MKT 1.R.1 assessment
spring 2016
semester.
48 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 85: BBA IN MKT: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 86: BBA IN MKT: SLO 1: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 87: BBA IN MKT: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 88: BBA IN MKT: SLO 1: TREND: FORMATIVE
49 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2. Understand the Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Improvements to be Made
concepts of Exit Assessment Test 89,90, 91 80% students A more in depth and
Marketing Test, and Exceeds and 92 should meet or, standardized approach for
Communications, Course Embedded Expectation: 4% exceed expectation. summative assessment in MKT
ethical Assessment (MKT 302 will be developed in Autumn
consideration and 302 group term formative and
2016, to ensure consistency in
Does Not Meet
branding. project) summative measurement criteria across
Expectation:22%
Assessment. various sections.
Formative: Trend:
Course-
Assessment (MKT
201examinations
and projects)
MKT 2.R.2 summative
MKT 2.R.1 compared to that of
semester.
50 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
51 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. Analyzing Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
consumer behavior Exit Assessment Test 93,94, 95 80% students A uniform project outline for
focusing on Test, and Exceeds and 96 should meet or, MKT 481 was developed. The
psychological Course Embedded Expectation: 4% exceed expectation. project required students to work
aspects. Assessment (MKT in groups on an assignment that
Does Not Meet
project) summative application of basic consumer
Expectation:22%
Assessment. behavior theories for the
summative assessment.
Formative: Trend:
Course-
Assessment (MKT
201examinations
and projects)
MKT 3.R.3 summative
semester.
52 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 93: BBA IN MKT: SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 94: BBA IN MKT: SLO 3: TREND:SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 95: BBA IN MKT: SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 96: BBA IN MKT: SLO 3: TREN D:FORMATIVE
53 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
4. Understanding Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Improvements to be Made
consumer behavior Exit Assessment Test 97,98, 99 80% students A more in depth and
theories and its Test, and Exceeds and 100 should meet or, standardized approach for
implications on Course Embedded Expectation: 4% exceed expectation. summative assessment in MKT
strategy Assessment (MKT 302 will be developed in Autumn
formulation. 481 group term formative and
2016, to ensure consistency in
Does Not Meet
project) summative measurement criteria across
Expectation:22%
Assessment. various sections.
Formative: Trend:
Course-
Assessment (MKT
201examinations
and projects)
MKT 4.R.3 summative
semester.
54 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
55 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN MANAGEMENT

1. Understand the Summative: Exit Assessment
role of Exit Assessment Test
entrepreneurship Test, and Exceeds Expectation:
in business, its Course Embedded 0.00%
benefits and Assessment (MGT Meets Expectation:
drawbacks. 405 group term 0.00%
Does Not Meet
project)
Expectation:0.00%
COURSE NOT OFFERED DUE TO LOW OR ZERO ENROLLMENTS OF
STUDENTS IN THE COURSE.
Formative:
Course-Embedded
Course-Embedded
Assessment:
Assessment (MGT
Rubric #
201 examinations
MGT 1.R.2
and projects)
(summative),
MGT 1.R.1
(formative)
56 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2. Understanding Summative: Exit Assessment
the overall idea Exit Assessment Test
about the Test, and Exceeds
Course Embedded Expectation:
organization and
Assessment (MGT 0.00%
work environment Meets Expectation:
and enlightening 301 group term
0.00%
project)
with organizational Does Not Meet
theories related to Expectation:0.00%
COURSE NOT OFFERED DUE TO LOW OR ZERO ENROLLMENTS OF
motivation, Formative: STUDENTS IN THE COURSE.
communication, Course-Embedded
leadership and Course-
Assessment (MGT Embedded
teams. 201 examinations Assessment:
and projects) Rubric #
MGT 1.R.3
(summative),
MGT 1.R.1
(formative)
57 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
Student Learning Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or
Outcome Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements to be Made
observations
3. Demonstrate in- Summative: Exit Assessment See Target: Actions Taken
depth knowledge Exit Assessment Test, Test Figures 80% students A new project on MGT 330 was
about fundamental and Exceeds 101,102, should meet or, developed where students
theory, techniques Course Embedded Expectation: 0.00% 103 and exceed expectation. required to work on Lean
and mathematical Assessment (MGT 330 104. Awareness in the readymade
calculations of group term project formative and
garments industry of Bangladesh
Does Not Meet
operational and examinations) summative
Expectation:0.00%
management with Assessment. Improvements to be Made
particular focus on A new more standardized
layout planning, Formative: Trend: assignment will be developed in
Course-
forecasting, Course-Embedded The percentage of Autumn 2016 on Productivity
Inventory Assessment (MGT 201 Improvement after
Management, examinations and implementation of Lean
Material projects) Manufacturing Techniques. A
MGT 1.R.4 summative
Requirement continuation from the current
Planning, Capacity semester’s project.
MGT 1.R.1 compared to that of
Management, Lean spring 2016
(formative)
Production, semester.
Scheduling, Staffing
and control in order
to optimize operating
systems in Industrial
and Management
setting.
58 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 101: BBA IN MGT: SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 102: BBA IN MGT: SLO 3: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 103: BBA IN MGT: SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 104: BBA IN MGT: SLO 3: TREND: FORMATIVE
59 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BBA IN HRM

1. Be able to Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
describe, discuss Exit Assessment Test 105,106,107 80% students A standardized course outline for
Test and Exceeds and 108 should meet or, HRM 390 was developed to
and debate on the exceed expectation.
Course Embedded Expectation: ensure that the course
key terms, and 0.00% Students met the
Assessment (HRM encompasses all the relevant
theories/concepts Meets Expectation: target for both the
theories and contemporary
within the field of 67%
project) summative issues in Strategic HRM. A new
human resource Does Not Meet
Assessment. assignment has been developed
Expectation:33%
management. that focused on formulating new
Formative: Trend: HR strategies for a local company.
Course-Embedded Course- The percentage of
Assessment (HRM students not meeting Improvements to be Made
301 examinations Assessment: A more standardized approach
and projects) considerably low in for summative assessment in
Rubric # summative
HRM 1.R.2 HRM 390 will be developed in
assessment
(summative), Autumn 2016, to ensure
compared to that of
HRM 1.R.1 spring 2016
(formative) semester. criteria across various sections.
60 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 105: BBA IN HRM: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 106: BBA IN HRM: SLO 1: TREND:SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 107: BBA IN HRM: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 108: BBA IN HRM: SLO 1: TREND: FORMATIVE
61 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2. Identify and Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
analyze problems Exit Assessment Test 109,110,111 80% students To make students familiar how
Test and Exceeds and 112 should meet or, HR managers outline alternative
in the field of HRM exceed expectation.
Course Embedded Expectation: approaches to specific policy
and be able to 0.00% Students met the
Assessment (HRM areas, HR practitioners were
devise apposite Meets Expectation: target for both the
brought in to share their
solutions. 67%
project) summative experience.
Does Not Meet
Expectation:33% Assessment.
Formative: Trend: Students were able to contribute
Course-Embedded Course- The percentage of better during the case discussion
Assessment (HRM students not meeting sessions than before.
Rubric # summative
HRM 2.R.2 assessment
62 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 109: BBA IN HRM: SLO 2: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 110: BBA IN HRM: SLO 2: TREND:SUMMATIVE
63 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. be able to outline Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
alternative Exit Assessment Test 113,114,115 80% students To make students familiar how
approaches to Test and Exceeds and 116 should meet or, HR managers outline alternative
Course Embedded Expectation: exceed expectation. approaches to specific policy
specific policy areas, Students met the
Assessment (HRM 0.00% areas, HR practitioners were
such as involvement target for both the
390 group term Meets Expectation: brought in to share their
initiatives or 67% formative and
approaches to project) summative experience.
Does Not Meet
resourcing. Expectation:33% Assessment.
Formative: Trend: Improvements to be Made

Course-Embedded Course- The percentage of Students were able to contribute
Assessment (HRM students not meeting better during the case discussion
301 examinations Assessment: sessions than before.
Rubric # summative
64 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 113: BBA IN HRM: SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 114: BBA IN HRM: SLO 3: TREND: SUMMATIVE
65 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
4. Demonstrate Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
that they can Exit Assessment Test 117,118,119 80% students Students were asked to analyse
Test and Exceeds and 120 should meet or, several business cases during the
critically evaluate exceed expectation.
Course Embedded Expectation: semester, both as a part of class
the strengths and 0.00% Students met the
Assessment (HRM discussion and project to enhance
weaknesses of Meets Expectation: target for both the
their potency in appreciating any
particular human 67%
project) summative particular Human Resource
resource Does Not Meet
Assessment. approach in specific contexts.
Expectation:33%
approaches in
specific contexts. Formative: Trend: Improvements to be Made
Course-Embedded Course- The percentage of Students have performed better
Assessment (HRM students not meeting in project relative to their
301 examinations Assessment: midterm exams.
Rubric # summative
66 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
67 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
5. Exhibit an Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
awareness of the Exit Assessment Test 121,122,123, 80% students In order to ensure that students
Test and Exceeds and 124 should meet or, are capable to understand how
concerns and exceed expectation.
Course Embedded Expectation: wider social, economic and legal
experiences of a 0.00% Students met the
Assessment (HRM aspects of a country affect
range of Meets Expectation: target for both the
Strategic HRM polices, a set of
organizational 67%
project) summative relevant courses have been
stakeholders whilst Does Not Meet
Assessment. selected as prerequisites for
Expectation:33%
identifying the students to take this course from
implications of a Formative: Trend: summer, 2016 semester.
variety of policy Course-Embedded Course- The percentage of
Assessment (HRM students not meeting Improvements to be Made
alternatives for all Embedded expectation is
301 examinations Assessment: Improvement would be
stakeholder and projects) considerably low in measured from Autumn, 2016
groups. Rubric # summative
HRM 5.R.2 semester.
assessment
68 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 121: BBA IN HRM: SLO 5: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 122: BBA IN HRM: SLO 5: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 123: BBA IN HRM: SLO 5: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 124: BBA IN HRM: SLO 5: TREND: FORMATIVE
69 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
Learning Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements Made
6. Be able to Summative: Exit Assessment See Figures Target: Actions Taken
identify and Exit Assessment Test 125,126,127 80% students A standardized project outline for
appreciate the Test and Exceeds and 128 should meet or, HRM 380 was developed. The
significance of Course Embedded Expectation: exceed expectation. project required students to work
ethical and Assessment (HRM in teams on a case that
institutional issues 380 group term formative and
67%
in HR practices and project) summative application of Bangladesh Labor
Does Not Meet
the management of Assessment. Act 2006 and ILO Case study
Expectation:33%
people in the focusing on industrial
workplace. Formative: Trend: relationships and application
Course-Embedded Course- The percentage of introduced in HRM 380 for the
Assessment (HRM students not meeting summative assessment.
and projects) considerably low in Improvements Made
Rubric # summative
HRM 6.R.3 A more in depth and
assessment
(summative), standardized approach for
compared to that of
summative assessment in HRM
(formative) semester. 380 will be developed in
Autumn2015, to ensure
70 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
71 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Learning Goal Learning Techniques Criteria Results Results and Improvements to be Made
1. Managerial 1.1 Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Communications Communicate Exit Assessment Embedded 129,130,131 80% students A new structured
knowledge Test, and Assessment: and 132 should meet or, communication system for
effectively Course Embedded Rubric # exceed MBA550 was developed. The
reflecting Assessment (MBA MBA 1.1.R.2 expectation. system required students to
550 final term (summative), Students met the work on varies issues in teams.
managerial
projects). MBA 1.1.R.1 target for both the Classroom discussion has been
proficiency formative and
(formative) prioritized at the end of the
summative each schedule class where
Formative: Assessment. student can grasp the key
Course-Embedded points based on the chapter
Assessment (MBA Trend: contents and build their idea.
512 final term The percentage of
projects and students not Improvements to be Made
examinations). meeting A standardized approach for
expectation is summative assessment in MBA
considerably low 550 will be developed in
of spring 2016
semester.
72 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 129: MBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 130: MBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 131: MBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 132: MBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: TREND: FORMATIVE
73 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2. Critical 2.1 Effective Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Thinking and decision making Exit Assessment Embedded 133,134,135 80% students A new home project outline for
Decision Making through critical Test, and Assessment: and 136 should meet or, MBA 550 was developed. The
thinking Course Embedded Rubric # exceed project required students to
Assessment (MBA MBA 2.1.R.2 expectation. work in teams outside of the
strategies and
550 final term (summative), Students met the class to apply their chapter
determine target for both the
projects). MBA 2.1.R.1 knowledge by solving the
effective (formative) formative and strategic capsule. Practicing
solution for summative this project students not only
management Formative: Assessment. going to develop their own
dilemmas with Course-Embedded critical thinking but also they
the use of Assessment (MBA Trend: understand the complexities
extensive 512 final term The percentage of that general managers face in
internal and projects and students not strategy development and
external examinations). meeting implementation at various
information expectation is phases in a company’s growth
considerably low cycle.
analysis.
in summative
assessment Improvements to be Made
compared to that A standardized approach for
of spring 2016 summative assessment in MBA
semester. 550 will be developed in
74 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
75 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. Application of 3.1 Application Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Managerial of Managerial Exit Assessment Embedded 137,138,139 80% students A new project (e.g. case
Knowledge and Knowledge and Test, and Assessment: and 140 should meet or, development/ business plan)
Skills Skills to explain Course Embedded Rubric # exceed outline for MBA 550 was
Assessment (MBA MBA 3.1.R.2 expectation. developed. This project
composite
550 final term (summative), Students met the required students to work in
management target for both the
projects). MBA 3.1.R.1 teams to apply their course
issues and (formative) formative and knowledge what they acquire,
provide summative convert and share with each
informed Formative: Assessment. other throughout the semester.
business Course-Embedded Moreover, this project will
improvements. Assessment (MBA Trend: provide knowledge to
512 final term The percentage of determine the attractiveness of
projects and students not various industries and
examinations). meeting competitive positions of firms
expectation is within these industries using
considerably low various strategic models in the
assessment
semester. summative assessment in MBA
550 will be developed in
76 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 137: MBA PLG 3, SLO 3.1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 138: MBA PLG 3, SLO 3.1 TREND: SUMMATIVE
77 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
4. Global 4.1 Utilize global Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Perspectives business Exit Assessment Embedded 141,142,143 80% students A new project outline for MBA
information to Test, and Assessment: and 144 should meet or, 550 was developed. This
enhance Course Embedded Rubric # exceed project outcome is jointly
Assessment (MBA MBA 4.1.R.2 expectation. attached with learning goal 3.
decision making
550 final term (summative), Students met the This is a group project and
in a global target for both the
projects). MBA 4.1.R.3 students should work in teams.
perspective. (formative) formative and The strategy student develop,
summative craft and made probable
Formative: Assessment. suggestion for execution under
Course-Embedded the project, it must incline with
Assessment (MBA Trend: the global perspective (e.g.
514 final term The percentage of benchmark activities) while
projects and students not prescribing Bangladeshi
examinations). meeting companies.
expectation is Improvements to be Made
considerably low A standardized approach for
in summative summative assessment in MBA
assessment 550 will be developed in
compared to that Autumn 2016, to ensure
of spring 2016 consistency in measurement
semester. criteria across various sections.
78 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
79 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
5. Ethical 5.1 Evaluate Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Considerations and articulate Exit Assessment Embedded 145,146,147, 80% students A new project outline for MBA
ethical Test, and Assessment: and 148 should meet or, 550 was developed. The project
considerations Course Embedded Rubric # exceed required students to work in
Assessment (MBA MBA 5.1.R.2 expectation. teams. The outcome of this
in managerial
550 final term (summative), Students met the project will highlight the
decision making target for both the
projects). MBA 5.1.R.4 macroeconomic factors (e.g.
and in (formative) formative and stakeholders’ right,
enterprise summative government rules), give the
management. Formative: Assessment. students better understanding
Assessment (MBA Trend: acknowledge the Bangladeshi
515 final term The percentage of laws in doing business.
projects and students not
examinations). meeting Improvements to be Made
expectation is A standardized approach for
considerably low summative assessment in MBA
in summative 550 will be developed in
semester.
80 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
81 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: MBA IN FINANCE

1. Critical analysis Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
of financial Exit Assessment Embedded 149 and 150 80% students A standardized course outline for
information for Test and Assessment: should meet or, FIN 541was developed to ensure
Course Embedded Rubric # exceed that the course encompasses all
managerial
Assessment (FIN FIN 1.R.2 expectation. the relevant theories and
decision making. 541 group term (summative), Students met the contemporary issues in
project) FIN 1.R.1 target for both the Corporate Finance. A new
(formative) formative and assignment has been designed to
summative focus on the learning outcomes
Formative: Assessment. and the assignment focused on
Course-Embedded comparison of capital structure of
Assessment (MBA Trend: various organizations in
511 examinations The percentage of Bangladesh.
and projects) students not
meeting Improvements to be Made
negligible in both summative assessment in FIN
formative and 541will be developed in Autumn
summative 2016, to ensure consistency in
assessments. measurement criteria across
various sections.
82 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 149: MBA IN FIN: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 150: BBA IN FIN: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE
83 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2.Managing Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
financing and Summative: Embedded 151 and 152 80% students A standardized course outline for
investment Exit Assessment Assessment: should meet or, FIN 541was developed to ensure
Test and Rubric # exceed that the course encompasses all
decision of
Course Embedded FIN 2.R.2 expectation. the relevant theories and
corporate in order Assessment (FIN (summative), Students met the contemporary issues in
to achieve good 541 group term FIN 2.R.1 target for both the Corporate Finance. A new
governance. project) (formative) formative and assignment has been designed to
Assessment. and the assignment focused on
Formative: comparison of capital structure of
Course-Embedded Trend: various organizations in
Assessment (MBA The percentage of Bangladesh.
511 examinations students not
and projects) meeting Improvements to be Made
various sections.
84 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 151: MBA IN FIN: SLO 2: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE152: MBA IN FIN: SLO 2: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE
85 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. Be able to apply Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
best investment Exit Assessment Embedded 153 and 154 80% students A standardized course outline for
strategy by analyzing Test and Assessment: should meet or, FIN 542was developed to ensure
various investment Course Embedded Rubric # exceed that the course encompasses all
options. Assessment (FIN FIN 3.R.3 expectation. the relevant theories and
542 group term (summative), Students met the contemporary issues in
project) FIN 3.R.1 target for both the Investment Management. A new
(formative) formative and assignment has been designed to
Formative: Assessment. and the assignment focused on
Course-Embedded comparison of capital structure of
Assessment (MBA Trend: various organizations in
511 examinations The percentage of Bangladesh.
meeting Improvements to be Made
various sections.
86 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 153: MBA IN FIN: SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 154: MBA IN FIN: SLO 3: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE
87 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: MBA IN HRM

1. To understand Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
the role of HR Exit Assessment Embedded 155 and 156 80% students A standardized course outline for
department and HR Test and Assessment: should meet or, HRM 546 was developed to
Course Embedded Rubric # exceed ensure that the course
professionals.
Assessment (HRM HRM 1.R.2 expectation. encompasses all the relevant
546 group term (summative), Students met the theories and contemporary
project) HRM 1.R.1 target for both the issues in Strategic HRM.
(formative) formative and
summative Improvements to be Made
Formative: Assessment. A standardized approach for
Course-Embedded summative assessment in HRM
Assessment (MBA Trend: 546 will be developed in Autumn
509 examinations The percentage of 2016, to ensure consistency in
and projects) students not measurement criteria across
meeting various sections.
expectation is
comparatively high
in both formative
and summative
assessments.
88 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 155: MBA IN HRM: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 156: MBA IN HRM: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE
89 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2. Be able to apply Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Industrial Exit Assessment Embedded 157 and 158 80% students To make students familiar how
Organization(I/O) Test and Assessment: should meet or, HR managers outline alternative
Course Embedded Rubric # exceed approaches to specific policy
and Resource
Assessment (HRM HRM 2.R.2 expectation. areas, HR practitioners were
Based View(RBV) 546 group term (summative), Students met the brought in to share their
model to SHRM. project) HRM 2.R.1 target for both the experience.
summative Improvements to be Made
Formative: Assessment. Students were able to contribute
Course-Embedded better during the case discussion
Assessment (MBA Trend: sessions than before.
509 examinations The percentage of
meeting
expectation is
comparatively high
in both formative
and summative
assessments.
90 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
91 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. Demonstrate the Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
influence of Summative: Embedded 159 and 160 80% students To make students familiar how
information Exit Assessment Assessment: should meet or, HR managers outline alternative
technology on HRM. Test and Rubric # exceed approaches to specific policy
Course Embedded HRM 3.R.2 expectation. areas, HR practitioners were
Assessment (HRM (summative), Students met the brought in to share their
546 group term HRM 3.R.1 target for both the experience. The HR practitioners
project) (formative) formative and mentioned the need and use of
summative HRIS in carrying out various
Assessment. tasks of HR in the organizations.
Formative:
Course-Embedded Trend:
Assessment (MBA The percentage of Improvements to be Made
509 examinations students not Students were able to contribute
and projects) meeting better during the case discussion
expectation is sessions than before.
comparatively high
in both formative
and summative
assessments.
92 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
93 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
4. Be able to Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
apply HR Metrices Exit Assessment Embedded 161 and 162 80% students Students were asked to analyze
in particular Test and Assessment: should meet or, several business cases during the
Course Embedded Rubric # exceed semester, both as a part of class
organization.
Assessment (HRM HRM 4.R.2 expectation. discussion and project to enhance
546 group term (summative), Students met the their potency in appreciating any
project) HRM 4.R.1 target for both the particular Human Resource
(formative) formative and approach in specific contexts.
summative
Formative: Assessment. Improvements to be Made
Course-Embedded Students have performed better
Assessment (MBA Trend: in project relative to their
509 examinations The percentage of midterm exams.
meeting
expectation is
comparatively high
in both formative
and summative
assessments.
94 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
95 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
5. Be able to Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
predict /anticipate Exit Assessment Embedded 163 and 164 80% students In order to ensure that students
future human Test and Assessment: should meet or, are capable to understand how
Course Embedded Rubric # exceed wider social, economic and legal
resource
Assessment (HRM HRM 5.R.2 expectation. aspects of a country affect
requirements. 546 group term (summative), Students met the Strategic HRM polices, a set of
project) HRM 5.R.1 target for both the relevant courses have been
(formative) formative and selected as suggested
summative prerequisites for students to take
Formative: Assessment. this course from summer, 2016
Course-Embedded semester.
Assessment (MBA Trend:
509 examinations The percentage of Improvements to be Made
and projects) students not Improvement would be
meeting measured from Summer, 2016
expectation is semester.
negligible in both
formative and
summative
assessments.
96 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
97 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: MBA IN MARKETING

1. Communicate Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
the knowledge of Exit Assessment Embedded 169 and 170 80% students A standardized course outline for
Strategic Marketing Test and Assessment: should meet or, MKT 544 was developed to
concepts with
Assessment (MKT MKT 1.R.2 expectation. encompasses all the relevant
appropriate 544 group term (summative), Students met the theories and contemporary
lexicons both in project) MKT 1.R.1 target for both the issues in Strategic Marketing.
written and visual (formative) formative and
format. summative Improvements to be Made
Formative: Assessment. A standardized approach for
Course-Embedded summative assessment in MKT
and projects) students not measurement criteria across
meeting various sections.
expectation is
negligible in both
formative and
summative
assessments.
98 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 169: MBA IN MKT: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 170: MBA IN MKT: SLO 1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE
99 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2.Effective decision Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
making through Exit Assessment Embedded 171 and 172 80% students A standardized course outline for
critical thinking in Test and Assessment: should meet or, MKT 544 was developed to
the areas of over
Assessment (MKT MKT 2.R.2 expectation. encompasses all the relevant
demanding 544 group term (summative), Students met the theories and contemporary
consumers, project) MKT 2.R.1 target for both the issues in Strategic Marketing.
aggressive local (formative) formative and
and global summative Improvements to be Made
competitors, Formative: Assessment. A standardized approach for
disruptive Course-Embedded summative assessment in MKT
technologies,
relevant and projects) students not measurement criteria across
environmental meeting various sections.
factors, and firm’s expectation is
competitive edges. comparatively high
in both formative
and summative
assessments.
100 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
101 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. Able to solve (un) Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
structured problems Exit Assessment Embedded 173 and 174 80% students To make students familiar how
and provide effective Test and Assessment: should meet or, Marketing managers outline
solutions by Course Embedded Rubric # exceed alternative approaches to specific
appropriate Assessment (MKT MKT 3.R.2 expectation. policy areas, Marketing
marketing strategies. 544 group term (summative), Students met the practitioners were brought in to
project) MKT 3.R.1 target for both the share their experience.
summative
Course-Embedded Students were able to contribute
Assessment (MBA Trend: better during the case discussion
506 examinations The percentage of sessions than before.
meeting
expectation is
negligible in
formative but
relatively higher in
summative
assessments.
102 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
103 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
4. Able to adapt Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
marketing strategy Exit Assessment Embedded 175 and 176 80% students Students were asked to analyse
to the global Test and Assessment: should meet or, several business cases during the
Course Embedded Rubric # exceed semester, both as a part of class
environment.
Assessment (MKT MKT 4.R.2 expectation. discussion and project to enhance
544 group term (summative), Students met the their potency in appreciating any
project) MKT 4.R.1 target for both the particular Human Resource
(formative) formative and approach in specific contexts.
summative
Course-Embedded Students have performed better
Assessment (MBA Trend: in project relative to their
506 examinations The percentage of midterm exams.
meeting
expectation is
comparatively high
in both formative
and summative
assessments.
104 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
105 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
5. Have an Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
understanding of Exit Assessment Embedded 177 and 178 80% students In order to ensure that students
ethical compliance Test and Assessment: should meet or, are capable to understand how
Course Embedded Rubric # exceed wider social, economic, ethical
at the time of
Assessment (MKT MKT 5.R.2 expectation. and legal aspects of a country
formulating 544 group term (summative), Students met the affect Strategic Marketing polices,
marketing project) MKT 5.R.1 target for both the a set of relevant courses have
strategies. (formative) formative and been selected as a suggested
summative prerequisite for students to take
Formative: Assessment. this course from autumn, 2016
Course-Embedded semester.
Assessment (MBA Trend:
506 examinations The percentage of Improvements to be Made
and projects) students not Improvement would be
meeting measured from Autumn, 2016
expectation is semester.
negligible in both
formative and
summative
assessments.
106 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
107 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: EXECUTIVE MASTER OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION

1. Managerial 1.1 Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Communications Communicate Exit Assessment Embedded 179,180,181 80% students A new structured
knowledge Test, and Assessment: and 182 should meet or, communication system for
effectively Course Embedded Rubric # exceed EMBA550 was developed. The
reflecting Assessment (EMBA EMBA 1.1.R.2 expectation. system required students to
550 final term (summative), Students met the work on varies issues in teams.
managerial
projects). EMBA 1.1.R.1 target for both the Classroom discussion is going
proficiency formative and
(formative) to be prioritized at the end of
summative the each schedule class where
Formative: Assessment. student can grasp the key
Course-Embedded points based on the chapter
Assessment (EMBA Trend: contents and build their idea.
512 final term The percentage of
projects and students not Improvements to be Made
examinations). meeting A standardized approach for
expectation is summative assessment in MBA
considerably low 550 will be developed in
of spring 2016
semester.
108 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE 1790: EMBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SUMMER 2016: SUMMATIVE FIGURE 180: EMBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: TREND: SUMMATIVE
FIGURE 181: EMBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 182: EMBA PLG 1, SLO 1.1: TREND: FORMATIVE
109 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
2. Critical 2.1 Effective Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Thinking and decision making Exit Assessment Embedded 183, 184, 80% students A new home project outline for
Decision Making through critical Test, and Assessment: 185 and 186 should meet or, EMBA 550 was developed. The
thinking Course Embedded Rubric # exceed project required students to
Assessment (EMBA EMBA 2.1.R.2 expectation. work in teams outside of the
strategies and
550 final term (summative), Students met the class to apply their chapter
determine target for both the
projects). EMBA 2.1.R.1 knowledge by solving the
effective (formative) formative and strategic capsule. Practicing
solution for summative this project students not only
management Formative: Assessment. going to develop their own
dilemmas with Course-Embedded critical thinking but also they
the use of Assessment (EMBA Trend: understand the complexities
extensive 512 final term The percentage of that general managers face in
internal and projects and students not strategy development and
external examinations). meeting implementation at various
information expectation is phases in a company’s growth
considerably low cycle.
analysis.
in summative
assessment Improvements to be Made
compared to that A standardized approach for
of spring 2016 summative assessment in MBA
semester. 550 will be developed in
110 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
111 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
3. Application of 3.1 Application Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Managerial of Managerial Exit Assessment Embedded 187,188,189 80% students A new project (e.g. case
Knowledge and Knowledge and Test, and Assessment: and 190 should meet or, development/ business plan)
Skills Skills to explain Course Embedded Rubric # exceed outline forEMBA 550 was
Assessment (EMBA EMBA 3.1.R.2 expectation. developed. This project
composite
550 final term (summative), Students met the required students to work in
management target for both the
projects). EMBA 3.1.R.1 teams to apply their course
issues and (formative) formative and knowledge what they acquire,
provide summative convert and share with each
informed Formative: Assessment. other throughout the semester.
business Course-Embedded Moreover, this project will
improvements. Assessment (EMBA Trend: provide knowledge to
512 final term The percentage of determine the attractiveness of
projects and students not various industries and
examinations). meeting competitive positions of firms
expectation is within these industries using
considerably low various strategic models in the
assessment
semester. summative assessment in
EMBA 550 will be developed in
112 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
113 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
4. Global 4.1 Utilize global Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Perspectives business Exit Assessment Embedded 191,192,193 80% students A new project outline for EMBA
information to Test, and Assessment: and 194 should meet or, 550 was developed. This
enhance Course Embedded Rubric # exceed project outcome is jointly
Assessment (EMBA EMBA 4.1.R.2 expectation. attached with learning goal 3.
decision making
550 final term (summative), Students met the This is a group project and
in a global target for both the
projects). EMBA 4.1.R.3 students should work in teams.
perspective. (formative) formative and The strategy student develop,
summative craft and made probable
Formative: Assessment. suggestion for execution under
Course-Embedded the project, it must incline with
Assessment (EMBA Trend: the global perspective (e.g.
514 final term The percentage of benchmark activities) while
projects and students not prescribing Bangladeshi
examinations). meeting companies.
expectation is Improvements to be Made
considerably low A standardized approach for
in summative summative assessment in
assessment EMBA 550 will be developed in
compared to that Autumn 2016, to ensure
of spring 2016 consistency in measurement
semester. criteria across various sections.
114 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
115 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
5. Ethical 5.1 Evaluate Summative: Course- See Figures Target: Actions Taken
Considerations and articulate Exit Assessment Embedded 195,196,197 80% students A new project outline for EMBA
ethical Test, and Assessment: and 198 should meet or, 550 was developed. The project
considerations Course Embedded Rubric # exceed required students to work in
Assessment (EMBA EMBA 5.1.R.2 expectation. teams. The outcome of this
in managerial
550 final term (summative), Students met the project will highlight the
decision making target for both the
projects). EMBA 5.1.R.4 macroeconomic factors (e.g.
and in (formative) formative and stakeholders’ right,
enterprise summative government rules), give the
management. Formative: Assessment. students better understanding
Assessment (EMBA Trend: acknowledge the Bangladeshi
515 final term The percentage of laws in doing business.
projects and students not
examinations). meeting Improvements to be Made
considerably low summative assessment in
in summative EMBA 550 will be developed in
assessment Summer 2016, to ensure
semester.
116 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FIGURE197: EMBA PLG 5, SLO 5.1: SUMMER 2016: FORMATIVE FIGURE 198: EMBA PLG 5, SLO 5.1: TREND: FORMATIVE
117 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
SUMMER 2016 STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: BSc IN ECONOMICS
Program Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

1. Demonstrate Summative:
knowledge of basic Exit Assessment
economic Test, and
principles, theories Ecn 490 { Research
and usage of project/Thesis)
theories, models to course embedded
explain real world
phenomenon and
assessment COURSE NOT OFFERED IN SUMMER DUE TO
their policy LOW OR ZERO ENROLLMENTS.
implications. Formative:
Course-Embedded
Assessment ECN
330 Development
Economics
Coursework
118 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
knowledge of Exit Exam and Ecn
quantitative and 490 {Research
research skill for project/Thesis)
theoretical and course embedded
empirical analyses
using appropriate
assessment COURSE NOT OFFERED IN SUMMER DUE TO
methodology LOW OR ZERO ENROLLMENTS.
Formative: Ecn
486 Coursework
(Literature review
and Economic
modeling section)
119 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
communication Ecn 490 { Research
skill for project/Thesis)
dissemination of course embedded
research findings assessment
COURSE NOT OFFERED IN SUMMER DUE TO

Formative:
Course embedded LOW OR ZERO ENROLLMENTS.
assessment Ecn 486
Research
Methodology
(Communication
section)
120 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
FACULTY MEMBERS CONTRIBUTING TO THIS REPORT
Dr. Sarwar Uddin Ahmed Mr. Md Rajib Rahman
Dr. A.N.M Shibly Noman Khan Ms. Sumita Das
Dr. Samiul Parvez Ahmed Ms. Sadia Haque
Dr. Rushdi Md. Rezaur Razzaque Dr. Ikramul Hasan
Mr. Abul Bashar Mr. Maqbool Kader Quraishi
Mr. Mohammed Sohel Islam Mr. Suman Prosad Saha
Mr. Hanif Mahtab Mr. Monzoor Morshed
Mr. A.B. Emran Salahuddin Mr. Iftekhar Mahfuz
Mr. Abul Khair Jyote Mr. Mohammad Fahad Noor
Mr. Latiful Khabir Mr. G.M. Wali Ullah
121 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6
Mr. Md. Aynul Hoque Ms. Bushra Sanjana
Mr. Naheem Mahtab Mr. Hasan Md. Mahmood Ul Haque
Ms. Zakia Binte Jamal Mr. Md. Safiuddin
Mr. Shafiqul Alam Ms. Zaima Ahmed
Ms. Sariat Rafa Khan Mr. Arifur Rahman Khan
122 | S L A R / S B / S U M M E R 2 0 1 6

Student Learning Outcome Summer 2016

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Student Learning Outcome Summer 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT: SUMMER 2016

Plot 16, Block B, Aftabuddin Ahmed Road, Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229

SUMMER 2016 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program Page 3

Program Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Learning Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or Improvements

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Formative: Trend: Improvements to be Made

Program Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Program Student Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

Program Measurement Measurement Current Analysis of Action Taken or

COURSE NOT OFFERED IN SUMMER DUE TO

Dr. A.N.M Shibly Noman Khan Ms. Sumita Das

Dr. Samiul Parvez Ahmed Ms. Sadia Haque

Dr. Rushdi Md. Rezaur Razzaque Dr. Ikramul Hasan

Mr. Abul Bashar Mr. Maqbool Kader Quraishi

Mr. Mohammed Sohel Islam Mr. Suman Prosad Saha

Mr. Hanif Mahtab Mr. Monzoor Morshed

Mr. A.B. Emran Salahuddin Mr. Iftekhar Mahfuz

Mr. Abul Khair Jyote Mr. Mohammad Fahad Noor

Mr. Latiful Khabir Mr. G.M. Wali Ullah

Mr. Naheem Mahtab Mr. Hasan Md. Mahmood Ul Haque

Ms. Zakia Binte Jamal Mr. Md. Safiuddin

Mr. Shafiqul Alam Ms. Zaima Ahmed

Ms. Sariat Rafa Khan Mr. Arifur Rahman Khan

You might also like