MS-2 119 considerations that may make one more favorable than another on particular project. ‘These considerations include traffic volume, subgrade suppor, size of the project construction and testing schedules, and any lift thickness variation. * ‘When a specificreference density procedure (laboratory, maximum theoretical, or contol strip)is chosen foraproject, this same reference density process should be used throughout the testing and verification of in-place density. This wll ensure that «valid comparison exists in the determination of density compliance. A higher degree of compaction monitoring is necessary in the initial stages of the construction process regardless of which density specification is used, o ensure optimum results from the compaction process. Th addition to minimam compaction, it is also necessary to avoid too much compactivu, It has been documented in several cases that even though a mix is designed for four percent air voids, a plant-mix sample containing the proper esphalt content and compacted by the same laboratory method may show much less than the design air voids, Many causes for this occurrence have been proposed: moisture may be removed more effectively in the laboratory than in the field «an excessive amount of baghouse fines may have been added highly absorptive aggregates may have been used (field absorption may differ from laboratory absorption) poor sampling may have been used to obtain samples for the laboratory design + materials may have changed between the mix design and field production Iflow density (below 3 percent air voids) in acompacted mixis noted, the cause should be determined and corrected, This problem may also require that the mix be adjusted or redesigned. 8.04 DATA ANALYSIS — Field verification involves two different levels of analysis performed on the HMA. The first involves analyzing the mixture on the first day of full production to compare the mixture tothe job-mix formula. ‘The second ses day-to-day field verification tests performed to determine if the mixture properties have exceeded production tolerance limits. Job-Mix Formula Verification ‘Asphalt content, gradation, and voids analysis tests are performed to compare field- produced mixture properties with the job-mix formula. These tests will indicate ifthe aggregate characteristics have varied since the mix design, and may indicate if problems exist from possible changes in the aggregate after processing through the dryer. "At this point, the field verification results may show that changes are necessary {0 meet the job-mix formula, For example, minor changes in the asphalt content may bring a mixture back within the tolerances of th€ void requirements. Altematively, if the mixture is meeting overall agency specifications but not the mix design targets, the job-mix formula can be adjusted to accept these new targets. Finally, any dramatic differences between the laboratory design and field-produced mixture may necessitate anew mix design using the actual production materials.MS-2 co 62st Upper Control Limit x 8 Target 3 a 3 . = 50 o *.° Lower 2, ——<$$__* Control Limit golLbetriirriritirititt 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Test OO Upper 60 Control Limit Ss < 8 Target g Z Lower Control Limit 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Subgroup Figure 8.2 - Typical quality control charts during mixture production pavement. However, specifying compaction is not sufficient for ensuring the success Of @ paving project. Compaction specifications are the final step in the total quality management of the HMA construction process. Proper mix design, production, field Verification, and construction procedures must be integrated within the projectrequire- ments to achieve a quality product. -tes M | Appendix _| Mix Design Using RAP ‘A.01 GENERAL —This appendix presents the step-by step process necessary to incorporate reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and reclaimed aggregate materials (RAM) into asphalt mix design. The steps include proportioning the reclaimed materials, selecting the grade and quantity of asphalt cement (plus recycling agent, if needed) and preparing a final design for the recycled mixture, This is the hot-mix method of recycling, using from 10 to 70 percent reclaimed asphalt pavement. Batch plants can handle up to.50 percent (without some auxiliary method ofpreheatingfRAP),” with the most practical range being 10 to 35 percent; drum-mix plants can handle up t0 70 percent, with 10 to 50 percent being a practical range. Due to the variability of RAP material, experience has generally shown that mixture quality can be more easily controlled by using less than 25 percent RAP. Complete details can be found in the ‘Asphalt Institute’s Asphalt Hot-Mix Recycling manual (MS-20). A.02. PREPARATORY STEPS—This mix-design procedure uses either the ‘Marshall or the Hveem method: The material from a reclaimed asphalt pavement is blended with reclaimed aggregate materials and/or new aggregate that is required to obtain @ combined aggregate gradation meeting the specification requirements. Once the relative aggre- gate proportions are determined, a total asphalt demand is calculated. A grade of new asphalt is then selected (plus recycling agent, ifneeded) to restore the aged asphalt and provide a final binder that meets the functional requirements of the asphalt specifica- tions while satisfying the asphalt demand of the mix. Following these determinations, the mix design by either the Marshall or Hveem procedure is performed and the exact quantity of total binder determined. 'A.03 RAP MIX DESIGN—The composition of the reclaimed materials must be determined, This includes the aggregate gradation, the asphalt content, and the properties of the asphalt cement. Viscosity at 60°C (140°F), (ASTM D 2171; ‘AASHTO T 202); is the test measurement used in this procedure to identify asphalt in the reclaimed asphalt pavement and in the recycled mixture. Figure A. lis a flow chart setting forth the steps for this design procedure. The steps are: (1) Combined Aggregates in the Recycled Mixture - Using the gradation of the aggregate from the reclaimed asphalt pavement, the reclaimed aggregate material, if any, and new aggregate, a combined gradation meeting the desired specification requirements is calculated.H i Ms-2 425 After the blend of aggregate (aggregate in the RAP, new aggregates and/or RAM) have been established, the amount of new aggregate (and/or RAM) is expressed as r, in percent. For example, suppose the established blend for a recycled mix was: 60% reclaimed aggregate (RAM) 15% new aggregate 25% RAP aggregate 100% Total The total amount of new aggregate and RAM is 75%. Hence, r=75. Table A.1 contains formulas for proportioning materials for recycled asphalt hot mixes where the blend of aggregates in the mix is kept constant. (2) Approximate Asphalt Demand of the Combined Aggregates -The approximate asphalt demand of the combined aggregates may be determined by the Centrifuge Kerosene Equivalent (CKE) test (See Article 6.03) or calculated by this empirical formula: P=0.035a + 0.045b + Ke+F where: P = approximate total asphalt demand of recycled mix, percent by weight of mix a = percent* of mineral aggregate retained on 2.36mm (No. 8) sieve b = percent* of mineral aggregate passing the 2.36mm (No. 8) sieve and retained on the 75}. m (No. 200) sieve = percent of mineral aggregate passing 751 m (No. 200) sieve K = 0.15 for 11-15 percent passing 75u m (No. 200) sieve 0.18 for 6-10 percent passing 7511 m (No. 200) sieve 0.20 for 5 percent or less passing 75u m (No. 200) sieve F = 0to20 percent. Based on absorption of light or heavy aggregate. In the absence of other data, a value of 0.7 is suggested, *Expressed as a whole number, With an approximate asphalt demand established, this will provide a basis for aseries of trial mixes for a mix design. Trial mixes will vary in asphalt content in 0.5 increments on either side of the calculated approximate asphalt demand. For example, suppose that the approxirgate asphalt demand was calculated to be 6.2percent. A series of trial mixes might then range from 5,0 to 7.0 percent or from 5.5 to 7.5 percent.MS-2 127 The percentages of new asphalt for any asphalt content may now be readily determined, Note: The formula is for asphalt content expressed as percent by weight of total mix, If asphalt contents are expressed as percent by weight of aggregate the formula for calculating quantity of new asphalt is: 100. P; Pap = Po COOP (See Table A.1). (4) Select Grade of New Asphalt - Using Figure A.2, a target viscosity of the asphalt blend is selected. A commonly selected target point is the viscosity at the mid- range of an AC-20 asphalt or 2,000 poises. The percent of the new asphalt, Ppp to the total asphalt content, Pp, is expressed by this formula: _ 100 Pap = For example, suppose the mix described in Step (3) is to have an estimated asphalt content of 6.2 percent. The amount of new asphalt to be added (from Step 3)is: Pnb = 1.01 x 6.21.23 = 5.0 percent Then; 100 R = —g5— = 81 percent The grade of new asphalt (and/or recycling agent) is determined using a log-log viscosity versus percent new asphalt blending chart such as Figure A.2. A target viscosity for the blend of recovered asphalt and the new asphalt (and/or recycling agent) is selected. The target viscosity is usually the viscosity of the mid-range of the grade of asphalt normally used depending on type of construction, climatic conditions, amount and nature of traffic. Plot the viscosity of the aged asphtft in the RAP on the left hand vertical scale, Point A, as illustrated in Figure A.2, Draw a vertical line representing the percentage of new asphalt, R, calculated above and determine its intersection with the horizontal line representing the target viscosity, Point B. Then drawa straight line from Point A, through Point B and extend it to intersect the right hand scale,Ms-2 1s Point C, Point C is the viscosity at 60°C (140°F) of the new asphalt (and/or recycling agent) required to blend, with the asphalt in the reclaimed asphalt pavementto obtain the target viscosity in the blend. Select the grade of new asphalt that has a viscosity range that includes or is closet to the viscosity at Point C. To plota point using the vertical scale, consider expressing the viscosity using 10 raised to some power. For example, 75,000 poises would be 7.5 x 104, To plot the point on the vertical scale, 7.5 would be interpolated on the scale between 104 and 105. Note: It is suggested that when selecting a grade of asphalt cement for recycling that the following guide be used: Up to 20% RAP= No change in asphalt grade 21% RAP or More= Do not change more than one grade (ie. from AC-20 to AC-10) (5) Trial Mix Design ~ Trial mix designs are then made using the Marshall or Hveem apparatus, ‘The formulas shown in Table A.l are used for proportioning the ingredients: new asphalt, Pp, reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), Psm, and new and/or reclaimed aggregate (RAM), Phs. Keep in mind that if two different aggregate sources are utilized, such as new aggregate and RAM, the percentages of each of these sources must be determined and the total equal Pps. For example the aggregate blend consisted of: 60% RAM 15% New aggregate 25% RAP aggregate then r= 75 If Pag in a trial mix is to be 61.4 percent, then the percent of RAM (in total mix) will be 61.4 x (60/75) = 49.1 percent and the percent new aggregate will be 61.4 x (15/75) = 12.3. The total equals 61.4 percent. (©) Select Job-Mix Formula Design Example 1 - “The reclaimed asphalt pavement has an asphalt content of 5.4 percent by weight of total mix. The viscosity of the asphalt recovered from the reclaimed asphalt pavement is 46,000 poises at 60°C (140°F). The grade of asphalt cement normallyMs-2 131 STEP 2- Approximate Asphalt Demand of Combined Aggregates 0.035 + 0.045b + Ke +F 0.035 x 72.9 + 0.045 x 24.1 + 0.20x 3.0 + 1.0 5.2 percent P und STEP 3 - Estimated Percent of New Asphalt in Mix ae (1002 —r Psp) Pb ab = “TOO (L00— Psp) _ (0002-70 5.4) Pp _ (100-70) 5.4 = "700 (100-5.4) ~ — 100-5.4 = 102P,-1.71 For an approximate asphalt demand of 5.2 percent: Ppp = 1.02 (5.2) - 1.71 = 3.6 percent ‘The percent of new asphalt, Ppp, to total asphalt, Pp, will then be: 10089 6 percent STEP 4 - Select Grade of New Asphalt On Figure A.3, Point A is the viscosity of the aged asphalt at 46,000 poises (4.6x104), Point B is located from a target viscosity of 2,000 poises (2.0x103) and R=69. The projected line from Point A through Point B to Point C indicated that the viscosity of the new asphalt is 7.0 x 102 poises (700). Since AC-20 is the normal grade of asphalt cement used in the area of construction, climate and traffic, an AC-10 will be chosen for this project. The ‘AC-10 when blended with the aged asphalt in the RAP should result in an AC-20 within acceptable tolerances. STEP 5 - Trial Mix Design Using an aggregate blend of 60 percent RAM, 10 percent new aggregate and 30 percent RAP aggregate, trial mixes of different asphalt contents (varying in 0.5 percent increments) are prepared according to standard Marshall or Hveem mix design procedures.erence MS-2 133 The formulas in Table A.1 may be used to determine the percentages of each ingredient in the trial mixes. Since the formula for Pnj was calculated in Step 3, the formulas for proportioning the Pym and Png are: 100(100~r) — (100~r) Py fe g100=Prpe ean 100= Pon _ 100(100-70) _ (100-70) Py = j00- 54 10 = 31.71-032Pp rP, Pas =~ 96 = 70- PP =70-070P Asphalt Content, Py 45 | 50] 55 | 60] 65 Py = 1.02B, - 71 29 | 34 | 39 | 44 | 49 Poy, = 31.71 0.32P, 303 | 30.1 | 299 | 298 | 296 Pe =70-0.70P, 668 | 665 | 662 | 658 | 655 Total 190.0 [100.0 |100.0 [100.0 [i000 *% RAM =P, (60/70) 373 | 570 | 56.7 | 564 | soi Ge New Ager =P.. (10/70) 95 | 95 | 95 | 94 | 94 *The percentages of new aggregate and RAM as a blend were determined as P,,. However, 60 percent RAM and JO percent new aggregate are to be used in the aggregate blend. The amount of RAM will then be Pg, X 60/70 and the new aggregate willbe P,, x 10/70. When preparing trial mixes in the laboratory, it is suggested that the RAP be heated to mixing temperature, The new aggregate and RAM are normally heated to 30°C (50°F) above the mixing temperature. When the aggregate and RAP have been weighed out, dry mixing should begin to thoroughly blend the materials before adding new asphalt. Keeping the RAP at elevated temperatures should be held to 2 minimum. Otherwise, normal mix design procedures are followed. STEP 6 - Select Job-Mix Formula The design, total asphalt content andthe mix design are determined according to established standard Marshall or Hveem mix design criteria (as is used for virgin materials),MS-2 Viscosity, Poises, 140°F (60°C) 0 10°20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9 New Asphalt or Recycling Agent in Blend, R, Percent by Weight Figure A.4 — Asphalt viscosity blending chart (Design example 2 135 100Ref. TMZL/1B/ME/07 Date: 07 February 99 To, ‘The Resident Engineer Contract 1B TMZL Dear Sir, Subject: Approval of Concrete Mix Designs for Classes A, C, Cl and Scteed Mix ‘All aggzegates, water, cement used for concrete mix designs are tested in site and independent laboratories are found complying with Specification requirements. ‘Trial mixes have been cattied out at site laboratory and in batching plant erected at site to check the consistency and compressive strength of the mixes and found the results aze complying with Specification requirements. Approval may be granted provided : The source of aggregates water and cement should be remain unchanged ‘The manufacturers certificate should be submitted, with every load of cement. Admixture “Core Mix P4” only to be used. ‘The tests on concrete during the works should be in compliance with the relative standards and Contract Specification. 5. The mix proportion, gradation and mix properties should maintain according to design and the specified tolerances throughout the project. eRe This is for your kind information and approval please. Thanking you. Yours faithfully, Proge M.M. Naseem. Matetials Engineer ‘TMZL 1BEMIRATE OF ABU DHABI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Consultant: Ove Arup Pattness Intl. Contractor: HILALCO Project: The New Road Tatif - Madinet Zayed - Liwa Contract 1B lass "AM i n B: n ACI Code (ACI 211.1.91) Cement TypeV SRC. Cement Content 400 kg Water Cement Ratio (ACI - A2.3.4.3) 0.43 Required Compressive Strength after 28 days 40N/mm? Max Size of Aggregate 20 mm Source of Course Aggregate (20 mm, 10 mm) UTC. Si Source of Fine Aggregate (5 mm) Wadi al Rawda Crusher Sousce of Dune Sand Madinet Zayed Admixture P4 (Cormix) Average Bulk SP: Gravity of Aggregate 2697 Dry Rodded Density of Course Aggregate (69%+31%) 1.609 - Fineness Modulus 28 Bulk SP: Gravity of 20 mm 2m Bulk SP: Gravity of 10 mm 2738, Bulk SP: Gravity of 5 mm 2.580 Bulk SP: Gravity of Dune Sand 2.643 Absorption of 20 mm Aggregate 0.563. _- Absorption of 10 min Ageregat 0.805 Absorption of 5 mm Aggregate 1751 Absorption of Dune Sand 0.55 20 mim Crushed Agerepate 42.8% 10 mm Crushed Aggregate 19.2% 05 mm Crushed Aggregate 32.3% Dune Sand 5.1% ‘Weight of Fresh Concrete ACI Formula A.1.5.3.7 2462 kg Weight of Cement 400 kg/cm* ‘Weight of Water 172 litters Weight of Course Aggregate 998 kg ‘Wieght of Fine Aggregate 892 kg Absorbed Water 21 Hitters cont/2Ingre Cement ‘Water (including absorption) 20 mm Crushed Aggregate 10 mm Crushed Aggregate 05 mm Crashed Sand Dune Sand Admixtare P4 Total Weight crete For Trial Mix 0.0375 m’ Cement Water 20 mm Crushed Aggregate 10mm Crushed Aggregate 05 mm Crushed Sand ‘Dune Sand Admixture Total Weight ‘Temperature of Water Used to Mix Stump 0 min Slump 15 min Slump 30 min ‘Slump 1 hour Skump 1 1/2 Hour Compressive Strength after 7 days Compressive Strength after 28 days Requited Strength Ae Contractor op PARA: 400 kg’ 193 litters / 689ke — FIFXO gj 309 kg = beY 758 kg — 134 kg 2.480 litters 2485 kg 15.000 kg 7.238 litters 25.838 ke 11,588 kg 28.425 kg. 0.093 litter 93.207 kg 17°C Slump Temp Collapse 22°C 150 mm, 22°C 120 mm 23°C 80 mm 26°C 50 mm 27°C 31.N/mm? 39. N/mm? 51 N/mm* Bobi Consultant's MEConsultant ARUP (OVE ARUP & PARTNERS INT'L. EMIRATES OF ABU DHABI Contractor Public Works Department Project THE NEW ROAD TARIF-MADINAT ZAYED-LIWA HILAL BIL BADI & PARTNERS CONTRACT 1B CONTRACTING CO (WEL) [HILALCO} Location £ ‘Slump (mr) g9) Name of Test : CONCRETE COMPRESSION TESTS (0s iaa7 D Date : 46.12.98 Conerete Class ‘A Aanlyst Type of Cement S.R.C LAB TRIAL_MIX_NO:t_400 kg CEMENT Laboratory No. ae ‘Ambient Temp. Concrete Temp. Pe Date of casting Fae Testing date Faas ice Atdays 3 bays | TEST RESULTS : Failing load KN i fe ‘Compressive 7 strength N / mm? pen laeso Average Compressive Strength 7 N/mm? ae 295 Ko/Or? ) Required Strength ‘Weight of the specimen (gen) emoo | 8360 Volume ofthe specimen (em) BA | GTB Density (gm /em) 2.089 | 2.47 Remarks :- & Ce tractor Lo Consultan Consultan ~ ae ghoConsultant ARUP ovmanup eparrners wrt, | PDR aaa OAD TARIPMADINAT 2AYEDAIWA EMIRATES OF ABU DHABI , Public Works Department Contractor HILAL BOL BADI & PARTNERS Name of Test : CONCRETE COMPRESSION TESTS (os i887 } Date :20.12.98 Conerete Class: Location ae Laboratory No. | AS iGo | | ‘bien Tom ‘Concrete Temp. 26 C Dat of casting a la | oe Testing date me 20 12 98, atdays 7 Da ‘TEST RESULTS: Failing load Kn |. | 885 _ Compressive strength N / mm? 38.9] 39.3 | | Tverage Conpreive Seng a N/mm? 39 399 Kg/Cm » | Reguied Stengh 7 Weight ofthe specimen (gm) 44g | 8470 ‘Volume of the specimen (cm3) 3375 | 3375) Density (gm /em3) 2.503] 2.511 pemats: Aengs qe is OK. Ab dogs wtGett anne - Consultant Consultant CONTRACTING CO (WLL) [HILALCO}RATES UD a partment Project THE NEW ROAD TARIF-MADINAT ZAYED-LIWA HILAL BIL BADI &: PARTNERS OVE ARUP & PARTNERS INT'L CONTRACT 1B CONTRACTING CO (WL) (HILALCO] Consultant ARUP Name of Test : CONCRETE COMPRESSION TESTS (as iaa7 i [ Location = ee Slump (er) 69 ue ten. aie Type of Cement: Laboratory No alee | ; ‘Abie Temp. Concrete Temp. c ; Date of easing a |e |e Testing date wo |o | 9 Atdays | | 128 Days. TEST RESULTS : 7 7 Failing oad Ky | aias dates | ——— | th NJ mm? 50.9 | 51.8 "Average Compressive Suength a N/mm? St 524 Kg/Orr ) Required Strength eight ofthe specimen ( Weigh ofthe specinen (gm) a ee Volume of the specimen (em?) 3375. | 3375 | Density (gm /em3) zee | 2.482 | i I | Remarks:- olf Aays yest vs Se rh Tee ari Cam Le approved. 7 Consultant Constant Sener a ML ME. yy « \ _ ~ BS .EMIRATES OF ABU DHABI Contractor Consultant Public Works Department PEGI TARIFMADINAT: HILAL BIL BADI & PARTNERS ARUP Project THE NEW ROAD TARIF-MADINAT ZAYED-LIWA OVE ARUP &PARTNERSINTL | CONTRACT 1B CONTRACTING CO (WL) [HILALCO] ‘Name of Test : CONCRETE COMPRESSION TESTS (88 188 ) Date 18.12.98 Conerete Class :A Location Aanlyst ante Stump (mm) 90 PLAT TRIAL MIX_NO:1__ 400 Kg CEMENT Mek Laboratory No. 1 | 2 “Ambient Temp. OO Concrete Temp. 25C | 15 12 | % Testing date 1a | 12 | 98 At days Ae ‘TEST RESULTS: T T T T Failing load | KN | 700 | 710 ‘Compressive a a strength Nf mm? HA | 3.6 | | “Average Compressive Strength ~ ee Nian a 320 K/on? } Required Strength Weight of the specimen (gm) pmo | ees Volume ofthe specimen (m3) 3375 | 3375 Density (gm /em3) ee ee Remarks + gator Consultant Consultant ZZ ML M.E. a C \ Cele a BBCons MIRATES OF ABUDHARI Coneacor ARUP ., | Project THE NEW ROAD TARIE-MADINAT ZAYED-LIWA HILAL BIL BADI & PARTNERS _ OVE ARUP & PARTNERS INT'L CONTRACT 1B CONTRACTING CO (WLL) {HILALLCO} Namo of Test : CONCRETE COMPRESSION TESTS (es iaan 7 Date 22.42.98 Location Concrete Class: Aanlyst : ‘Type of Cement :S.R.C eee PLANT TRIAL MIX_NO:t 400 Kq_CEVENT S.Re Laboratory No. ema ested “Ambient Temp. Concrete Temp. %C T T ) Date of casting ws. | 12 | 98 “Testing date z 12 %8 Atdays | a 7 days | ‘TEST RESULTS : Failing load KN 2 e90_| 910 Compressive strength N/mm? 6 | 40.4 ‘Average Compressive Strength N/mm? 40 410 Ka/en Required Strength ‘Weight of the specimen (gm) 885 ) 920 Volume ofthe specimen (em3) 3375 | 3375 { a | Density (gm fem?) 2.505 | 2.495 Remarks Ganpressive Strength ayer 7 haus [% aeceplable. 2g Aang See anrelip . ractor CZ BO pi S \ poe aConsultant EMIRATES ee Contractor ublie Works Departmen nue ., | Prot THE NEW ROAD TARIP-MADINAT ZAYED-LTWA HILAL BIL BADI & PARTNERS |OVE ARUP & PARTNERS INT'L CONTRACT 1B CONTRACTING CO (WLI) [HILALCO} ‘Name of Test: CONCRETE COMPRESSION TESTS (es iat 7 Date ; 12.01.99 cocation rete A Loation: ‘Aan Cone Gass: A Slump (mm) PLAT TRIAL MIX NO:1 400 Kg CENT Type of Cement: Laboratory No ea “Ambient Temp. ~ Concrete Temp, 7 Date of casting 15 12 8 Testing cate wz]a | 9 ee b8 bays | ‘TEST RESULTS: Failing load «NT se | 10 Compressive steength N /ma? wea | 82.4 | ‘Average Compressive Strength ; N/mm? 52 535. Kg/Ont ) Required Strength | Weight ofthe specimen (gm) peg ie Volume ofthe specimen (em?) 3375 | 3075 | Density (gm /em3) 2.511 | 2.499 tems: Compredeive Shag test Z Pans re = Qe days “B OB. The an [ treeP ale Goon be Abproval. Consultant Consultant ME.EMIRATE OF ABU DHABI a PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Consultant: Ove Arup Partners Int! Contractor: HILALCO Project: The New Road Tarif - Madinet Zayed - Liwa Contract 1B Class "C"" Concrete Mix Design Based on ACI Code (ACI 211.1.91) Cement Cement Content Water Cement Ratio (ACI -.A2.3.4.3) Required Compressive Strength after 28 days ‘Max Size of Aggregate Source of Course Aggregate (20 mm, 10 mm) Source of Fine Aggregate (5 mim) Source of Dune Sand Admixture Average Bulk SP: Gravity of Aggregate Dry Rodded Density of Course Aggregate (69% +31%) Fineness Modulus Bulk SP: Gravity of 20 mm Bulk SP: Gravity of 10 mm. Bulk SP: Gravity of 5mm Bulk SP: Gravity of Dune Sand Absorption of 26 mm Aggregate Absoxption of 10 mm Aggregat Absorption of 5 mm Aggregate Absorption of Dune Sand 20 mm Crushed Aggregate 10 mm Crushed Aggregate 05 mm Crushed Aggregate Dune Sand Weight of Fresh Concrete ACI Formula A.1.5.3.7 Weight of Cement Weight of Water ‘Weight of Course Aggrepate Wieght of Fine Aggregate Absorbed Water TypeV SRC. 300 kg\, 0.62 25 N/mm? 20mm UT... Siji Wadi al Rawda Crusher Madinet Zayed P4 (Cormix) 2.697 “ : 1.609" _— / 2.80 ~ 2.773 XS 2.738. 2.580 — 2.643 — u 0.563 0.805 1751 088 coDy 428% 119% 19.2%: 9 $26 323% 0-833 5.7%" 2423 kg /' iP 300 kg/ m* 64 186 litters 998 kg 6.6 Ne 939 kg p 24 litters 0 0 L& cont/2nts of 1 m' Cement 300 kg ‘Water Gncluding absorption) 207 litters 20 mm Crushed Aggregate 689 kg, 10 mm Crushed Aggregate 309 kg 05 mm Crushed Sand 98 kg Dune Sand 141 kg Admixture P4 1.5 litters ‘Total Weight 2445 keg For Trial Mix 0,0375 m? Cement 11.250 kg, ‘Water 7.163 littess 20 mm Crushed Aggregate 25.838 kg 10 mm Crushed Aggregate 11.588 kg 05 mm Crushed Sand 29.925 kg Dune Sand 5.288 kg Admixture 0.056 litter Total Weight 91.708 kg o7°c “Temperature of Water Used to Mix Slump Temp Slump 0 min Collapse 24°C Slump 15 min 130 mm 25°C Slump 30 min 95mm 27°C Slump 1 hour 80mm 28°C Slump 1 1/2 Hour 65mm 29°C Compressive Strength after 7 days 23. N/mm” Compressive Strength after 28 days Bou Reguized Strength om yet Ae Gx Cont Consultant's MI jonsultant’s MEConsultant Era Tis OF ABU DHABI Contractor enue _,_| Project THE NEW ROAD TARIF-MADINAT ZAYED-LIWA Leet OVE ARUP & PARTNERS INT'L. CONTRACT 1B CONTRACTING CO (WLL) [HILALCO} Namo of Test: CONCRETE COMPRESSION TESTS Coded zi Date: 19.12.98 Location ‘Aanlyst Conerete Class: Sump(mm) 95 LAB TRIAL No. I 300 kg CEMENT Type of Cement: S.R-C. Laboratory No. ‘Ambient Temp. Concrete Temp. 25 oo 7 Date of casting Testing date ro -| 12 -| 98 At days 4 deyal~ TEST RESULTS : Failing load KN | 415 | 395 Compressive 7 7] strength N/mm? 18.4 | 17.6 | Average Compressive Strength = N/mm? 18 184.0 kg/cm2 Required Strength Weight of the specimen (gm) 8245 | 8235 Volume of the specimen (em3) 3375 | 3375 Density (gm /em3) 2.443] 2.440) | Remarks:- Acceptable - . a (aceEMIRATES OF ABU DHABT Contractor ‘ublic Works Department HILAL BIL BADI & PARTNERS Consultant ae Project THE NEW ROAD TARIF-MADINAT ZAYED-LIWA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS INTL CONTRACT 1B CONTRACTING CO (WLI, [HILALCO} ‘Name of Test : CONCRETE COMPRESSION TESTS (@s 1687 2 Date: 14.12.98 Location ‘Aanlyst: Concrete Cla 300 kg CEMENT Type of Cement: 5 ng Slump(mm) 95 LAB TRIAL_N Laboratory No 9 | 10 ‘Ambient Temp. Conerete Temp. 25 06 Date of casting o7-|12- | 98 - Testing date w-}12- | 987 At days Tdays 7 | TEST RESULTS : Falig a ww 20 |3us Compressive = 4 strength N / mm? 23.1 | 22.9 ‘Average Compressive Stength a N/mm? 23 235° kg/om2 Required Strength Weight of the specimen (gm) e295 | 8325 Volume of the specimen (m3) 3375 | 3375 Density (gm /em3) 2.458 | 2.464 senunis: cceplable - lpricior ae Consultant Consultant x ye a : lee