Template For Opcrf of School Heads 1

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW F
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICA
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY
● Supervised regularly all school 65 (and above)teachers are

teaching personnel supervised and analyzed result of
5 supervision
BASIC KRA 1: 50-64 teachers are supervised

EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL 4 and analyzed result of
SERVICES LEADERSHIP supervision
(40%)
April 2017 to 35-49 teachers are supervised
10%
March 2018 3 with out analysing the supervision
result
20-34 teachers are supervised

2 with out analysing supervision
result
19 (and below) teachers are

1 supervised with out analysing
supervision result
● Managed Instructional System 100% of the instructional
supervisory plans were
5 implemented/achieved as
planned
85-99% of the instructional
planned
April 2017 to 3 implemented/achieved as
10%
March 2018
planned
planned
54%and below of the

instructional supervisory plans
1 were implemented/achieved as
planned
● Inspected regularly Daily 100% of the teachers submitted
Lesson Plans/ Logs (DLL) neat and accurate DLP/DLL. As
5 reflected in a logbook or
monitoring sheet.
85-99% of the teachers submitted
neat and accurate DLP/DLL.as
monitoring sheet
April 2017 to neat and accurate DLP/DLL. As
10% 3 refelcted in a logbook or
March 2018
monitoring sheet
Name of Employee: ● Inspected regularly Daily
Position: Lesson Plans/ Logs (DLL)
Review Period:
PERFORMANCE INDICA
April 2017 to WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE 10%
PER KRA
March 2018 QUALITY

neat and accurate DLP/DLL.as
monitoring sheet
54% and below of the teachers

submitted neat and accurate
1 DLP/DLL as reflected in a
logbook or monitoring sheet.
● Monitored teachers upkeep of 100% of the learners records

students records were analyzed and utilized result
5
for improvement
85-99% of the learners records

4 were analyzed and utilized result
for improvement
70-84% of the learners records
April 2017 to were analyzed and utilized result
10%
March 2018 3
for improvement
55-69 % of the learners records

2 were analyzed and utilized result
for improvement
54%and below of the learners
1 records were analyzed and
utilized result for improvement
● Provided a safe and child 100% of the classrooms were
friendly learning environment painted,lighted,well
for learners ventilated ,structured and
5
secured as supported by pictures
KRA 2: 85-99% of the classrooms were

LEARNING painted,lighted,well
ENVIRONMENT 4
ventilated ,structured and
(15%)
70-84% of the classrooms were

painted,lighted,well
April 2017 to ventilated ,structured and
5% 3
March 2018 secured as supported by pictures
55-69% of the classrooms were

painted,lighted,well
2 ventilated ,structured and
KRA 2:
LEARNING
ENVIRONMENT OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW F
Name of Employee: (15%)
Position:
Review Period:
April 2017 to
Department of Education/Misamis Oriental
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: 5%
March 2018
PERFORMANCE INDICA
WEIGHT
QUALITY
54% and below of the classrooms

were painted,lighted,well
ventilated ,structured and
1 secured as supported by pictures
● Evaluated the school plant, Submitted valid,accurate and

physical facilities, safety and authentic physical plant inventory
sufficiency with the assistance 5 and design proposals/
of specialist intervention
Submitted valid and accurate

physical plant inventory and
4 design proposals/ intervention
Submitted valid,accurate but not

authentic physical plant inventory
April 2017 to 3 and design proposals/
5% intervention
March 2018
Submitted not accurate and not

authentic physical plant inventory
2 and without proposals/
intervention
Submitted physical plant

inventory without
1 proposal/intervention
BASIC ● Formulated intervention Formulated 4 or more intervention

EDUCATION program to determine the 5 programs based from the SWOT
SERVICES strength, weakness, attached
opportunities, threats (SWOT)
of the school Formulated 3 or more intervention
4 programs based from the SWOT
attached
Formulated 2 or more intervention
April 2017 to 3 programs based from the SWOT
5%
March 2018 attached
Formulated 1 or more intervention

programs based from the SWOT
2
attached
Formulated no intervention
1 programs based from the SWOT
attached
EDUCATION
SERVICES
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
PERFORMANCE INDICA
WEIGHT
QUALITY
● Organized and conducted Conducted 4 or more school

School-based In-Service based trainings/LAC Sessions
Training/LAC Sessions 5 within a year supported with
training matrix,attendance and
pictures
KRA 3: Conducted 3 school based
HUMAN RESOURCE trainings/LAC Sessions within a
MANAGEMENT AND 4 year supported with training
DEVELOPMENT matrix,attendance and pictures
(15%)
Conducted 2 school based
April 2017 to trainings/LAC Sessions within a
4%
March 2018 3 year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures
Conducted 1 school based

trainings/LAC Sessions within a
2 year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures
Organized but Conducted no

school based trainings/LAC
1 Sessions within a year.
● Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers to

best fit to teach the areas,grades they best fit
(grades/learning areas, special 5 within a year supported by
assignments) approved class program
Assigned 85-99% of the teachers

to the areas,grades they best fit
4 within a year supported by
approved class program
Assigned 70-84% of the teachers

to the areas,grades they best fit
April 2017 to
4% 3 within a year supported by
March 2018 approved class program
Assigned 55- 69% of the

teachers to the areas,grades they
2 best fit within a year supported by
Assigned 54% and below of the

teachers to the areas,grades they
1 best fit within a year supported by
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
PERFORMANCE INDICA
WEIGHT
QUALITY
● Recommended and 100% of the teachers were

coordinated services for the recommended for
holistic development of school 5 promotion/training /scholarship in
personnel and learners a year
85-99 % of the teachers were
recommended for
4
promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
70-84% of the teachers were
April 2017 to recommended for
4% 3
March 2018 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
55-69% of the teachers were
recommended for
2 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
54% and below of the teachers

were recommended for
a year
● Initiated and compiled teacher's 100% of the teachers have
professional documents in 5 complete,neat ,accurate and
portfolios authentic portfolio in a year
85-99% of the teachers have

4 complete,neat, auhentic and
accurate portfolio in a year

April 2017 to complete,neat ,accurate and
3% 3 authentic portfolio in a year
March 2018

2 complete,neat ,accurate and
authentic portfolio in a year
54%and below of the teachers

1 have complete,neat ,accurate
and authentic portfolio in a year
BASIC ● Established linkages with Established 5 or more linkages
EDUCATION stakeholders 5 with stakeholders with MOA,
SERVICES MOU in a year.
KRA 4: Established 4 linkages with
PARENT'S stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in
INVOLVEMENT AND 4 a year.
COMMUNITY
PARTNERSHIPS
Established 3 linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in
(10%) April 2017 to 3 a year.
2%
March 2018
Name of Employee:
Position:
BASIC ● Established linkages with
EDUCATION
Review Period: stakeholders
SERVICES
KRA 4:
PARENT'S
INVOLVEMENT AND
COMMUNITY TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
PARTNERSHIPS
PERFORMANCE INDICA
(10%) WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES April 2017 to
TIMELINE 2%KRA
PER
QUALITY
March 2018
Established 2 linkages with

stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in
2 a year.
Established 1linkage with

stakeholder with MOA, MOU. in
1 a year.
● Met parents regularly to Met PTA 5 or more times in a

confer/inform about school year to discuss SRC ,etc.
accomplishments 5 supported by minutes,
agreements,attendance
sheets,pictures,etc.
Met PTA 4 times in a year too

discuss SRC, etc. supported by
4 minutes, agreements,attendance
Met PTA 3 times in a year to

April 2017 to discuss SRC, etc. supported by
2%
March 2018 3 minutes, agreements,attendance
Met PTA 2 times in a year to

Met PTA 1 time in a year to

● Designed programs/projects Designed 5 or more programs
with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to
school needs address school needs based on
SWOT supported with program
5 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
Designed 4 programs /projects

with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT
supported with program
pictures,etc
April 2017 to
2%
March 2018
● Designed programs/projects
OFFICE
with stakeholders to address PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW F
school needs
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
PERFORMANCE INDICA
WEIGHT
QUALITY

April 2017 to supported with program
2%
March 2018 3 design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc

supported with program
pictures,etc
Designed 1 program /project with

stakeholders to address school
needs based on SWOT
1 supported with program
design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
● Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more

of stakeholders stakeholders during programs
5 within the school year fully
documented
Awarded 15 to 19 stakeholders
4 during programs at the end of the
school year fully documented
April 2017 to Awarded 10 - 14 stakeholders
2%
March 2018 3 during programs at the end of the
school year fully documented
Awarded 5-9 stakeholders during
2 programs at the end of the school
year fully documented
Awarded 4 and below
1 stakeholders during programs at
the end of the school year
● Mediated and ensured Resolved all conflicts within the
resolution of conflicts in school 5 school level with complete
documents
Resolved all conflicts within the

4 school level with incomplete
documents
conflicts not resolved within the

April 2017 to school level and reaches to
1% 3 district office with complete
March 2018
documents
Name of Employee:
Position: ● Mediated and ensured
Review Period: resolution of conflicts in school
PERFORMANCE INDICA
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE 1%
March 2018 PER KRA
QUALITY
all conflicts not resolved within

2 the school level reaches division
level with complete documents
all conflicts not resolved within

1 the school level with complete
documents
BASIC ● Formulated school policies with Formulated 5 or more school

EDUCATION stakeholders policies with the participation of
SERVICES 5 the stakeholders fully
documented
Formulated 4 school policies with

the participation of the
4 stakeholders fully documented

April 2017 to 3 stakeholders fully documented
1%
March 2018

Formulated 1school policy with

● Divide equally the teaching Prepared/submitted SF 7

loads to all school teaching reflecting 6 loads with
personnel 5 coordinatorships/clubs of the
teaching personnel approved by
SDS within the school year.
KRA 5: Prepared/submitted SF 7
SCHOOL reflecting 5 loads with
LEADERSHIP, 4 coordinatorships/clubs of the
MANAGEMENT AND teaching personnel approved by
OPERATIONS SDS within the school year.
(20%)
Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 4 loads with
April 2017 to
March 2018
4% 3 coordinatorships/clubs of the
2 coordinatorships/clubs of the
KRA 5:
SCHOOL OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW F
LEADERSHIP,
MANAGEMENT AND
Name of Employee:
OPERATIONS
Position: (20%)
Review Period:
April 2017 to
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: 4%
March 2018
PERFORMANCE INDICA
WEIGHT
QUALITY
1 coordinatorships/clubs of the
● Led and implemented led and implemented 5 or more
educational programs educational programs, program
5 design is approved by SDS
before the implementation
led and implemented 4
educational programs, program

April 2017 to 3 design is approved by SDS
3% before the implementation
March 2018


educational program, program
BASIC ● Performed School Leadership Submitted complete,

EDUCATION and Management and accurate ,authentic liquidation
SERVICES Operations Functions 5 reports monthly
Submitted complete,
accurate ,authentic liquidation
4 reports bi-monthly
Submitted incomplete,
accurate ,authentic liquidation
April 2016 to 3 reports monthly
3%
March 2017
Submitted
incomplete,inaccurate ,not
2 authentic liquidation reports
monthly
Submitted
incomplete,inaccurate ,not
1 authentic liquidation reports bi-
monthly
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
PERFORMANCE INDICA
WEIGHT
QUALITY
● Requested and distributed 100% of the requested

instructional materials instructional materials were
distributed to teachers as
5 reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement
received by teachers.
85-99 % of the requested
instructional materials were
75-84% of the requested
April 2016 to 3 reflected in the SIP,APP and
3%
March 2017 summary of disbursement
55-74% of the requested

54% and below of the requested

● Led the preparation of Crafted a doable, original ,need-

SIP/AIP/APP and ensured based SIP/AIP /APP and ensured
participation of stakeholders 100% participation of internal and
5 external stakeholders approved
by SDS supported with
documents
Crafted a doable, original ,need-

based SIP/AIP /APP and ensured
85-99% participation of internal
4 and external stakeholders
approved by SDS supported with
documents

April 2016 to 3 and external stakeholders
4% approved by SDS supported with
March 2017
documents
Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
PERFORMANCE INDICA
April 2016 to
4%
WEIGHT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
March 2017 PER KRA
QUALITY

2 and external stakeholders
approved by SDS supported with
documents

54% and below participation of
internal and external stakeholders
1 approved by SDS supported with
documents
● Organized special classes for Organized at least 4 special

learners with special needs classes for learners with special
5 needs with complete documents
(enrolment,teacher,needs)
Organized 3 special classes for

learners with special needs with
4 complete documents ( enrolment,
teacher, needs)
Organized 2 special class for
April 2016 to learners with special needs with
3%
March 2017 3 complete documents
( enrolment, teacher, needs)
Organized 1 special class for

learners with special needs with
2 complete documents
Organized no special class for

1 learners with special needs.
100%
Ratee: Rater:
JEAN G. VELOSO
Assistant Schools Division Superintenden
Approving Authority:
CHERRY MAE L. LIMBACO, PhD., CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Position: Assistant Schools Division Superin
Date of Review:
sion: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental
TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUA

WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E
● Supervised regularly all school 65 (and above)teachers are 65 (and above) teachers are
teaching personnel supervised and analyzed result of 65 (and above) teachers were supervised in a month 1-5 days
5 supervision supervised monthly and were before the schedule as per
given TA per signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
50-64 teachers are supervised 50-64 teachers were supervised 65 (and above) teachers are
NAL 4 and analyzed result of monthly and were given TA per supervised in a month as per
supervision signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
40%)
April 2017 to 35-49 teachers are supervised 35-49 teachers were supervised 50-64 teachers are supervised in
10% 0 0
March 2018 3 with out analysing the supervision monthly and were given TA per a month as per approved
result signed TA forms supervisory plan
20-34 teachers are supervised 20-34 teachers were supervised 30-49 teachers are supervised in
2 with out analysing supervision monthly and were given TA per a month as per approved
result signed TA forms supervisory plan
19 (and below) teachers are 19 and below teachers were 20 teachers and below are
1 supervised with out analysing supervised monthly and were supervised in a month as per
supervision result given TA per signed TA forms approved supervisory plan
● Managed Instructional System 100% of the instructional 105% and above of the Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were supervisory plans were supervisory plan and
5 implemented/achieved as implemented in a month accomplishment report before the
planned deadline
85-99% of the instructional 100% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
supervisory plans were were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
4 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report on the
planned deadline
70-84% of the instructional 85-99% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
April 2017 to 3 implemented/achieved as
10% accomplishment report 1 day 0 0
March 2018
planned after the deadline
55-69% of the instructional 70-84% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional
2 implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 2 days
54%and below of the 55-69% of the supervisory plans Submitted instructional

instructional supervisory plans were implemented in a month supervisory plan and
1 were implemented/achieved as accomplishment report 3 days
● Inspected regularly Daily 100% of the teachers submitted 100% of the DLP/DLL were
Lesson Plans/ Logs (DLL) neat and accurate DLP/DLL. As inspected /checked before the
5 reflected in a logbook or scheduled time/date
monitoring sheet.
85-99% of the teachers submitted 100% of the DLP/DLL were
neat and accurate DLP/DLL.as inspected /checked on the
4 reflected in a logbook or scheduled time/date
monitoring sheet
April 2017 to neat and accurate DLP/DLL. As inspected /checked one day after
10% 3 refelcted in a logbook or the scheduled time/date 0 0
March 2018
monitoring sheet
● Inspected regularly Daily Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Lesson Plans/ Logs (DLL) Position: Assistant Schools Division Superin
Date of Review:

OBJECTIVES TIMELINE 10%
PER KRA 0 0
March 2018 QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E

neat and accurate DLP/DLL.as inspected /checked 2days after
2 reflected in a logbook or the scheduled time/date
monitoring sheet
54% and below of the teachers 100% of the DLP/DLL were

submitted neat and accurate inspected /checked 3 days after
1 DLP/DLL as reflected in a the scheduled time/date
logbook or monitoring sheet.
● Monitored teachers upkeep of 100% of the learners records Implemented 5 appropriate

Implemented the appropriate
students records were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed
5 intervention 1 month after having
for improvement result
the analyzed result
85-99% of the learners records Implemented 4 appropriate Implemented the appropriate
4 were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed intervention 2 month after having
for improvement result the analyzed result
70-84% of the learners records Implemented 3 appropriate
April 2017 to were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed Implemented the appropriate
10% 0 0
March 2018 3
for improvement result intervention 3 month after having
the analyzed result
55-69 % of the learners records Implemented 2 appropriate Implemented the appropriate

2 were analyzed and utilized result intervention on the anallyzed intervention 4 month after having
for improvement result the analyzed result
54%and below of the learners Implemented 1appropriate Implemented the appropriate
1 records were analyzed and intervention on the anallyzed intervention 5 month after having
utilized result for improvement result the analyzed result
● Provided a safe and child 100% of the classrooms were 0% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
friendly learning environment painted,lighted,well Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well
for learners ventilated ,structured and others through school-based ventilated ,structured and
5
secured as supported by pictures DRRM secured as supported by pictures
1month before the opening of
classes
85-99% of the classrooms were 10% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
painted,lighted,well Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well
4
ventilated ,structured and others through school-based ventilated ,structured and
) during the opening of classes
April 2017 to ventilated ,structured and others through school-based ventilated ,structured and
5% 3 0 0
March 2018 secured as supported by pictures DRRM secured as supported by pictures
2months after the opening of
classes
2 ventilated ,structured and others through school-based ventilated ,structured and
3months after the opening of
classes
) Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
Date of Review:
April 2017 to
sion: 5% 0 0
March 2018

WEIGHT
54% and below of the classrooms 40% School Casualties during 100% of the classrooms were
were painted,lighted,well Typhoons, school events and painted,lighted,well
ventilated ,structured and others through school-based ventilated ,structured and
1 secured as supported by pictures DRRM secured as supported by pictures
4month after the opening of
classes
● Evaluated the school plant, Submitted valid,accurate and Conducted a bi- monthly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
physical facilities, safety and authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
sufficiency with the assistance 5 and design proposals/ before the deadline supported by
of specialist intervention the transmital
Submitted valid and accurate Conducted a monthly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
physical plant inventory and based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
4 design proposals/ intervention on the deadline supported by the
transmital
Submitted valid,accurate but not Conducted a quarterly School- Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
April 2017 to 3 and design proposals/ 1 day after the deadline
5% intervention supported by the transmital 0 0
March 2018
Submitted not accurate and not Conducted twice a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
authentic physical plant inventory based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
2 and without proposals/ 2 days after the deadline
intervention supported by the transmital
Submitted physical plant Conducted once a year School- Submitted valid,accurate and
inventory without based DRRM authentic physical plant inventory
1 proposal/intervention 3 days after the deadline
supported by the transmital
● Formulated intervention Formulated 4 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 4 or Formulated the intervention
program to determine the 5 programs based from the SWOT more interventions programs programs based from the SWOT
strength, weakness, attached based on SWOT attached. attached 1 month after
opportunities, threats (SWOT)
of the school Formulated 3 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 3 Formulated the intervention
4 programs based from the SWOT interventions programs based on programs based from the SWOT
attached SWOT attached. attached 2 months after
Formulated 2 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 2 Formulated the intervention
April 2017 to 3 programs based from the SWOT interventions programs based on programs based from the SWOT
5% 0 0
March 2018 attached SWOT attached. attached 3 months after
Formulated 1 or more intervention Formulated and Conducted 1 Formulated the intervention

programs based from the SWOT intervention program based on programs based from the SWOT
2
attached SWOT attached. attached 4months after
Formulated no intervention Formulated and Conducted no Formulated the intervention

1 programs based from the SWOT intervention program based on programs based from the SWOT
attached SWOT attached. attached 5 months after
Date of Review:

WEIGHT
● Organized and conducted Conducted 4 or more school Conducted 4 or more school Conducted 4 or more school
School-based In-Service based trainings/LAC Sessions based trainings/LAC Sessions based trainings/LAC Sessions
Training/LAC Sessions 5 within a year supported with within a year supported with within a year supported with
training matrix,attendance and training matrix,attendance and training matrix,attendance and
pictures pictures using other funds. pictures before INSET Schedule
Conducted 3 school based Conducted 3 school based Conducted 4 or more school
URCE trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
AND 4 year supported with training year supported with training within a year supported with
matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
using other funds pictures during October INSET
Conducted 2 school based Conducted 2 school based Conducted 4 or more school

April 2017 to trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a based trainings/LAC Sessions
4% 0 0
March 2018 3 year supported with training year supported with training within a year supported with
matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures training matrix,attendance and
using other funds pictures during summer INSET
Conducted 1 school based Conducted 1 school based
trainings/LAC Sessions within a trainings/LAC Sessions within a
2 year supported with training year supported with training
matrix,attendance and pictures matrix,attendance and pictures
using other funds.
Organized but Conducted no Conducted no school based

school based trainings/LAC trainings/LAC Sessions within a
1 Sessions within a year. year using other funds.
● Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers to Performs 3 ancillary services on
best fit to teach the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
(grades/learning areas, special 5 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
assignments) approved class program program before deadline
Assigned 85-99% of the teachers Performs 2 ancillary services on

to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
4 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class
approved class program program on the deadline
Assigned 70-84% of the teachers Performs 1 ancillary service on

to the areas,grades they best fit top of the regular teaching loads Printed and submitted hard
April 2017 to
4% 3 within a year supported by with high mastery level copies of the approved class 0 0
March 2018 approved class program program 1 day after the deadline
Assigned 55- 69% of the Performs regular teaching loads

teachers to the areas,grades they with high mastery level with high Printed and submitted hard
copies of the approved class
2 best fit within a year supported by mastery level
approved class program program 2-3 days after the
deadline
Assigned 54% and below of the Performs regular teaching loads

teachers to the areas,grades they with average mastery level Printed and submitted hard
best fit within a year supported by copies of the approved class
1
approved class program program 4-5 days after the
deadline
Date of Review:

WEIGHT
● Recommended and 100% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations

coordinated services for the recommended for before the dealine
holistic development of school 5 promotion/training /scholarship in
personnel and learners a year
85-99 % of the teachers were Submitted recommendations on
recommended for the the dealine
4
promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
70-84% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 1
April 2017 to recommended for day after the dealine
4% 3 0 0
March 2018 promotion/training /scholarship in
a year
55-69% of the teachers were Submitted recommendations 2
recommended for days after the dealine
a year
54% and below of the teachers Submitted recommendations 3

were recommended for days after the dealine
a year
● Initiated and compiled teacher's 100% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,
professional documents in 5 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
portfolios authentic portfolio in a year portfolio before March 2017
85-99% of the teachers have Complied complete ,neat ,

4 complete,neat, auhentic and accurate and authentic teacher's
accurate portfolio in a year portfolio first week of March 2017

April 2017 to complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
3% 3 authentic portfolio in a year 0 0
March 2018 portfolio second week of March
2017
2 complete,neat ,accurate and accurate and authentic teacher's
authentic portfolio in a year portfolio 3rd week of March 2017
54%and below of the teachers Complied complete ,neat ,

1 have complete,neat ,accurate accurate and authentic teacher's
and authentic portfolio in a year portfolio on April 2017
● Established linkages with Established 5 or more linkages Established linkages with
stakeholders 5 with stakeholders with MOA, stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
MOU in a year. the start of the school year.
Established 4 linkages with Established linkages with
stakeholders with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
AND 4 a year. the first quarter of the school
Y year.
S
April 2017 to 3 a year. the 2nd quarter of the school
2% 0 0
March 2018 year.
● Established linkages with Position: Assistant Schools Division Superin
stakeholders Date of Review:
AND
Y TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION TO BE
S
WEIGHT
OBJECTIVES April 2017 to
TIMELINE 2%KRA
PER
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS 0
Q 0E
March 2018

2 a year. the 3rd quarter of the school year.
Established 1linkage with Established linkages with

stakeholder with MOA, MOU. in stakeholders with MOA, MOU in
1 a year. the 4th quarter of the school year.
● Met parents regularly to Met PTA 5 or more times in a 90%-100% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings in
confer/inform about school year to discuss SRC ,etc. during PTA Meeting advance of the schedule under
accomplishments 5 supported by minutes, D.O. 25, s. 2017
agreements,attendance
Met PTA 4 times in a year too 79%-89% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings within
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting the schedule under D.O. 25, s.
4 minutes, agreements,attendance 2017
Met PTA 3 times in a year to 59%-78% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings a week
April 2017 to discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O.
2% 0 0
March 2018 3 minutes, agreements,attendance 25, s. 2017
Met PTA 2 times in a year to 39%-58% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 2 weeks
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O.
2 minutes, agreements,attendance 25, s. 2017
Met PTA 1 time in a year to 10%-38% Parents' Attendance Conducted the meetings 3 weeks
discuss SRC, etc. supported by during PTA Meeting after the schedule under D.O. 25,
1 minutes, agreements,attendance s. 2017
● Designed programs/projects Designed 5 or more programs Implemented 5 or more Implemented programs /projects
with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to programs /projects with with stakeholders to address
school needs address school needs based on stakeholders to address school school needs based on SWOTa
SWOT supported with program needs based on SWOT week after the approval of the
5 design,minutes/agreements, supported with program design, supported with program
pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc pictures,etc
Designed 4 programs /projects Implemented 4 programs Implemented programs /projects

with stakeholders to address /projects with stakeholders to with stakeholders to address
school needs based on SWOT address school needs based on school needs based on SWOT,2
supported with program SWOT supported with program weeks after the approval of the
4 design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc pictures,etc design,minutes/agreements,
pictures,etc
April 2017 to
2% 0 0
March 2018
● Designed programs/projects
OFFICE
with stakeholders to address PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
school needs
Date of Review:

WEIGHT

school needs based on SWOT address school needs based on school needs based on SWOT, a
April 2017 to supported with program SWOT supported with program month after the approval of the
2% 0 0
March 2018 3 design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc

school needs based on SWOT address school needs based on school needs based on SWOT, 2
supported with program SWOT supported with program months after the approval of the
2 design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc
Designed 1 program /project with Implemented 1 program /project Implemented programs /projects
stakeholders to address school with stakeholders to address with stakeholders to address
needs based on SWOT school needs based on SWOT school needs based on SWOT,
1 supported with program supported with program 3months after the approval of the
design,minutes/agreements, design,minutes/agreements, design, supported with program
pictures,etc
● Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders every end
of stakeholders stakeholders during programs awards of less cost using funds of the activity/project
5 within the school year fully outside from
documented MOOE/PTA/Teachers
Awarded 15 to 19 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during

4 during programs at the end of the awards of less cost using funds assembly every end of the
school year fully documented from PTA grading period
April 2017 to Awarded 10 - 14 stakeholders Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders during
2% 0 0
March 2018 3 during programs at the end of the awards of less cost using funds education week celebration
school year fully documented from MOOE
Awarded 5-9 stakeholders during Use simple but presentable Awarded stakeholders at the end
2 programs at the end of the school awards of high cost of March
year fully documented
Awarded 4 and below Use most expensive awards of Awarded stakeholders during
1 stakeholders during programs at high cost using funds from the bregada eskwela .
the end of the school year teacher.
● Mediated and ensured Resolved all conflicts within the Resolved conflicts before it is filed
resolution of conflicts in school 5 school level with complete in the school level
documents
Resolved all conflicts within the Resolved conflicts after it is filed

4 school level with incomplete in the school level
documents
conflicts not resolved within the Resolved conflicts in two hearings

April 2017 to school level and reaches to after it is filed in the school level
1% 3 district office with complete 0 0
March 2018
documents
● Mediated and ensured Position: Assistant Schools Division Superin
resolution of conflicts in school Date of Review:

OBJECTIVES TIMELINE 1% 0 0
March 2018 PER KRA
all conflicts not resolved within Resolved conflicts in three

2 the school level reaches division hearings after it is filed in the
level with complete documents school level
all conflicts not resolved within Resolved conflicts in four

1 the school level with complete hearings after it is filed in the
documents school level
● Formulated school policies with Formulated 5 or more school Formulated school policies with
stakeholders policies with the participation of the participation of the
5 the stakeholders fully stakeholders fully documented
documented before the start of classes
Formulated 4 school policies with Formulated school policies with

the participation of the the participation of the
4 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented
during the start of classes
April 2017 to 3 stakeholders fully documented stakeholders fully documented a
1% 0 0
March 2018 month after the start of classes
two months after the start of
classes
Formulated 1school policy with Formulated school policies with
three months after the start of
classes
● Divide equally the teaching Prepared/submitted SF 7 100% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
loads to all school teaching reflecting 6 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
personnel 5 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 10 days before
SDS within the school year. the deadline
Prepared/submitted SF 7 85-99% of the teachers garnered Prepared/submitted SF 7
reflecting 5 loads with awards as coordinators on top of reflecting loads with
P, 4 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
AND teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 5 days before
20%)
April 2017 to
March 2018
4% 3 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers 0 0
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS on the
SDS within the school year. deadline
2 coordinatorships/clubs of the their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 5 days after
P,
AND Name of Rater: JEAN G. VELOSO
20%) Position: Assistant Schools Division Superin
Date of Review:
April 2017 to
sion: 4% 0 0
March 2018

WEIGHT
Prepared/submitted SF 7 54%and below of the teachers Prepared/submitted SF 7

reflecting 6 loads with garnered awards as coordinators reflecting loads with
1 coordinatorships/clubs of the on top of their teaching loads. coordinatorships of teachers
teaching personnel approved by approved by SDS 10 days after
● Led and implemented led and implemented 5 or more Addressed 100% of the identified Submitted Accomplishment
educational programs educational programs, program school problems supported by Report before the date spicified
5 design is approved by SDS accomplishment report and in the approved implementation
before the implementation noted by SDS plan
led and implemented 4 Addressed 85% - 99% of the Submitted Accomplishment
educational programs, program identified school problems Report on the date spicified in
4 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment the approved implementation
before the implementation report and noted by SDS plan

educational programs, program identified school problems Report 1day after the date
April 2017 to 3 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
3% before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan 0 0
March 2018

educational programs, program identified school problems Report 2 days after the date
2 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan
led and implemented 1 Addressed 54% and below of the Submitted Accomplishment
educational program, program identified school problems Report 3 days after the date
1 design is approved by SDS supported by accomplishment spicified in the approved
before the implementation report and noted by SDS implementation plan
● Performed School Leadership Submitted complete, Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete,
and Management and accurate ,authentic liquidation together with Cash advance for accurate ,authentic liquidation
Operations Functions 5 reports monthly the next month with no instance reports 3 days before the
of unliquidated CA. deadline
Submitted complete, Submitted liquidation report Submitted complete,

accurate ,authentic liquidation without CA for the next month accurate ,authentic liquidation
4 reports bi-monthly with no instance of unliquidated reports 2 days before the
CA deadline
Submitted incomplete, Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete,
accurate ,authentic liquidation both Cash advance for the next accurate ,authentic liquidation
April 2016 to 3 reports monthly month with one instances of reports 1 days before the
3% 0 0
March 2017 unliquidated CA deadline
Submitted Submitted liquidation report; or Submitted complete,

incomplete,inaccurate ,not both Cash advance for the next accurate ,authentic liquidation
2 authentic liquidation reports month with two instances of reports on the deadline
monthly unliquidated CA
Submitted Submitted liquidation report ; or Submitted complete,

incomplete,inaccurate ,not bjoth Cash advance for the next accurate ,authentic liquidation
1 authentic liquidation reports bi- month with three instances of reports 1-3 days after the
monthly unliquidated CA deadline
Date of Review:

WEIGHT
● Requested and distributed 100% of the requested 100% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers immediately after
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as the delivery .
5 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
received by teachers. received by teachers.
85-99 % of the requested 85-99% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers a day after the
distributed to teachers as to the needs of the teachers as delivery .
75-84% of the requested 75-84% of the requested Distributed instructional materials
instructional materials were instructional materials according to teachers 2 days after the
April 2016 to 3 reflected in the SIP,APP and reflected in the SIP,APP and
3% 0 0
March 2017 summary of disbursement summary of disbursement
55-74% of the requested 55-74% of the requested Distributed instructional materials

54% and below of the requested 54% and below of the requested Distributed instructional materials
● Led the preparation of Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, Submitted a doable,
SIP/AIP/APP and ensured based SIP/AIP /APP and ensured original ,need-based SIP/AIP original ,need-based SIP/AIP
participation of stakeholders 100% participation of internal and /APP and ensured participation /APP and ensured participation
5 external stakeholders approved of internal and external of internal and external
by SDS supported with stakeholders without revision on stakeholders before the deadline
documents SIP /AIP and APP.
Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable, Submitted a doable,

based SIP/AIP /APP and ensured original ,need-based SIP/AIP original ,need-based SIP/AIP
85-99% participation of internal /APP and ensured participation /APP and ensured participation
4 and external stakeholders of internal and external of internal and external
approved by SDS supported with stakeholders without revision on stakeholders on the deadline
documents SIP and AIP. And revision on
APP.
April 2016 to 3 and external stakeholders of internal and external of internal and external
4% approved by SDS supported with stakeholders with revisions on the stakeholders 1 day after the 0 0
March 2017
documents two deadline
Date of Review:

April 2016 to
4%
WEIGHT 0 0
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
March 2017 PER KRA

2 and external stakeholders of internal and external of internal and external
approved by SDS supported with stakeholders with revisions on the stakeholders 2 days after the
documents three deadline
Crafted a doable, original ,need- Submitted a doable,

based SIP/AIP /APP and ensured original ,need-based SIP/AIP
54% and below participation of /APP and ensured participation
internal and external stakeholders of internal and external
1 approved by SDS supported with stakeholders 3 days after the
documents deadline
● Organized special classes for Organized at least 4 special Conducted at least 4 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs classes for learners with special classes for learners with special with special needs at the start of
5 needs with complete documents needs the school year.
(enrolment,teacher,needs)
Organized 3 special classes for Conducted at least 3 special Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs a week after
4 complete documents ( enrolment, needs the start of the school year.
teacher, needs)
Organized 2 special class for Conducted at least 2 special Conducted classes for learners
April 2016 to learners with special needs with classes for learners with special with special needs two weeks
3% 0 0
March 2017 3 complete documents needs after the start of the school year.
Organized 1 special class for Conducted 1 special classes for Conducted classes for learners
learners with special needs with learners with special needs with with special needs a month after
2 complete documents no documents the start of the school year.
Organized no special class for non-compliant Conducted classes for learners

1 learners with special needs. with special needs two months
after the start of the school year.
100%
LEGEND:
Rater: 4.5 - 5
JEAN G. VELOSO 3.5 - 4.49
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent 2.5 - 3.49
1.5 - 2.49
Approving Authority:
CHERRY MAE L. LIMBACO, PhD., CESO V
Schools Division Superintendent
CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR OPCRF
( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
● Supervised and directed all school Instructional Supervisory Plan (Completed Monthly,stamped received in the Division
KRA 1: teaching & non-teaching personnel Office on the target date.
INSTRUCTIONA ● Managed Instructional System

L LEADERSHIP Instructional Supervision Form and /or Clinical observation sheets compiled monthly
● Inspected regularly Daily Lesson Instructional Accomplishment Reports in the form of Individual Teacher Teaching
Logs (DLL) Performance Record (ITTPR)
Teacher Observed and Given Assistance( TOGA) complied monthly ,stamped received
in the Division Office on the Target date.
● Monitored teachers upkeep of Report comparative NAT RESULT (Graphical Presentation of previous and present
students records results showing comparison)
● Provided a safe and child friendly Child Friendly School Survey

KRA 2: learning environment for learners Child Protection Policy
Scouting
SCHOOL Feeding Program
RESOURCE
Health Care Package
MANAGEMENT
Athletics
Religious Instruction
● Evaluated the school plant, physical School Building Inventory

facilities, safety and sufficiencywith DRRM Mobilization Plan
the assistance of specialist Fire Insurance
School Report Card
Classroom Structuring
Updated EBEIS
Child Protection Policy
School Site Development Plan
School Ownership
School Policy Development
● Formulated intervention prorgram to Performance Indicators

determine the strength, weakness, Fire Drill
opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the Eartquake Drill
school
School Watching List
School Deworming Report
School Immunization Report
Brigada Eskwela
Schoo-Based Management
Continuous Improvemement (CI) Projects
● Supervised and directed all school Teacher's Portfolio

KRA 3: teaching and non-teaching personnel a) Observation Sheets
b) TSNA Result
HUMAN c) IPPD
RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
● Organized and conducted In-Service Report on Training conducted in school
AND
DEVELOPMENT Training a) Memorandum of In-Service Training
b) Training Matrix and Design
c) Attendance Sheet
d) Narrattive Report and Pictures
● Assigned teachers where they best SF 7

fit to teach (grades/learning areas, Form 201
special assignments) DHRIS
RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
AND
DEVELOPMENT
( / or REMARKS /
KRA's OBJECTIVES x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
● Promoted and coordinated services List of teachers recommended for promotion with approved ERF
for the holistic development of school List of teachers promoted
personnel and learners List of teachers sent as trainers, coaches, chaperons or coordinators
● Initiated and compiled teacher's Teacher's Portfolio

professional documents in portfolios DHRIS
List of teachers promoted
● Established linkages with Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

KRA 4: stakeholders MOA
Resolution
PARENT'S Projects Implemented
INVOLVEMENT
Brigada Eskwela
AND
COMMUNITY BSP/GSP
PARTNERSHIPS Participation Community Activities
● Met parents regularly to Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

confer/inform about school Quarterly Conferences
accomplishments Narrative Report
SOSA (Accomplishment Reports, SRC, Financial Report)
● Designed programs with ESIP

stakeholders to address schoo AIP
needs School Development Plan
Strategic Plan
Accomplishment Report
Pictorials
● Recognized accomplishments of Certificate of Appreciation/Recognition

stakeholders Program of Activities (Stakeholderr's Day, Team Building)
Narrattive Report
Pictorials
● Promoted welfare of stakeholders Action Plan

School Policies
Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
● Mediated and ensured resolution of School Mediation Committee (Organizational Structure)

conflicts in school School Grievance Committee
Anectdotal Record
School Case Record
Narrative Report
Pictorials
● Formulated school policies with Stakeholders Constitution and by Laws

stakeholders Handbook
● Harnessed participation of alumni Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials

and other organization (NGO's, Alumni Organizational Structure
LGU's, PPP) Alumni Activities
Membership Records, Financial Reords
Projects Implemented
Accomplishment Report
● Supervised and directed all school Class Porgram

KRA 5: teaching and non-teaching personnel Coordinatorships and Clubs
SCHOOL ● Led and implemented educational DropOut Reduction Program

LEADERSHIP, programs
MANAGEMENT
AND
OPERATIONS
KRA 5:
( / or REMARKS /
KRA's
SCHOOL OBJECTIVES
● Led and implemented educational x) DOCUMENTS AND ARTIFACTS SUGGESTIONS GIVEN
LEADERSHIP, programs IPED
MANAGEMENT
AND Reading Program
OPERATIONS Alternative Delivery Mode
GAD
● Directed, coordinated nad managed Request for Cash Advances

school funds according to prioritizes Liquidation Reports
needs
● Requested and distributed Purchase Request

instructional materials Requisition and Issue Slip
Logbook
● Led the preparation of SIP/AIP and Accomplished AIP, SIP

ensured participation of stakeholders Letter of Invitation, Minutes, Attendance, Pictorials
● Organized special classes for List of learners with special needs

learners with special needs School Form 1, SF-2, SF-5, SF-6
Learning Modules and Materials

Template For Opcrf of School Heads 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Template For Opcrf of School Heads 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW F

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

● Supervised regularly all school 65 (and above)teachers are

BASIC KRA 1: 50-64 teachers are supervised

20-34 teachers are supervised

19 (and below) teachers are

54%and below of the

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

55-69% of the teachers submitted

54% and below of the teachers

● Monitored teachers upkeep of 100% of the learners records

85-99% of the learners records

55-69 % of the learners records

KRA 2: 85-99% of the classrooms were

70-84% of the classrooms were

55-69% of the classrooms were

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

54% and below of the classrooms

● Evaluated the school plant, Submitted valid,accurate and

Submitted valid and accurate

Submitted valid,accurate but not

Submitted not accurate and not

Submitted physical plant

BASIC ● Formulated intervention Formulated 4 or more intervention

Formulated 1 or more intervention

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

● Organized and conducted Conducted 4 or more school

Conducted 1 school based

Organized but Conducted no

● Assigned teachers where they Assigned 100% of the teachers to

Assigned 85-99% of the teachers

Assigned 70-84% of the teachers

Assigned 55- 69% of the

Assigned 54% and below of the

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

● Recommended and 100% of the teachers were

54% and below of the teachers

85-99% of the teachers have

75-84% of the teachers have

55-69% of the teachers have

54%and below of the teachers

Established 2 linkages with

Established 1linkage with

● Met parents regularly to Met PTA 5 or more times in a

Met PTA 4 times in a year too

Met PTA 3 times in a year to

Met PTA 2 times in a year to

Met PTA 1 time in a year to

Designed 4 programs /projects

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

Designed 3 programs /projects

Designed 2 programs /projects

Designed 1 program /project with

● Recognized accomplishments Awarded 20 or more

Resolved all conflicts within the

conflicts not resolved within the

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Department of Education/Misamis Oriental

TO BE FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION