Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teachers

Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region IVB- MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF MARINDUQUE
District of Mogpog
MOGPOG NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL
Capayang, Mogpog, Marinduque
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

June 2015 - March 2016
Name of Employee: MYRA R. RAMOS Name of Rater:

Position: Teacher - I Position: PRINCIPAL
School: MOGPOG NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HI Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION
KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULTS
AREAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs) Q E T
5 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Prepare lesson plans and daily
lesson logs of activities 4 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
including appropriate, adequate 10% 3 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 3 3 3 3.00 0.30
and updated instructional 2 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
materials
1 1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Facilitate learning through the 5 10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
use of written/computerized 4 8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
lesson plans, modules, 3 6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
teaching guides, and other 10% 4 5 4 4.33 0.43
learning resources with the 2 4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
adequate and updated 1 2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials (Supported with write-up and documentation)
Teaching 5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Learning Initiate discipline of students 4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Process (30%) including classroom rules, 5% 3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
guidelines and individual and
group task 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
/marcuz rex/
Teaching
Learning Initiate discipline of students
Process (30%) including classroom rules, 5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
group task
1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last
5
day of the month
Monitor attendance, diversity 85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every
appreciation, safe, positive and 4
last day of the month
motivating environment, over-
70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every
all physical atmosphere, 7% 3 2 3 5 3.33 0.23
cleanliness, and orderliness of
classrooms including proper 55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every
2
waste disposal. last day of the month
54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
1
every last day of the month
Indicators:
Monitor, evaluate and maintain
1. Test Questions with TOS
pupil’s/student’s progress
through 2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio, etc.)
*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets
(Formative) 4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed, etc.

8% 2 2 2 2.00 0.16
All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due
*Assessment as Learning 5
time
(Reflective) 4 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
*Assessment of Learning 3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
(Summative) 2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
*Periodic Test 1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
5 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
Conduct 4 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
remediation/enrichment
5% 3 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 3 3 3 3.00 0.15
programs to improve
performance indicators 2 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
1 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the
5
scheduled time without error
Students' 85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
Learning 4
the scheduled time without error
Outcomes (30%)
Maintain pupil’s/students 70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
5% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
school records the scheduled time with minimal error
/marcuz rex/
Students'
Learning
Outcomes (30%)
Maintain pupil’s/students
5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
school records
55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week
2
after the due time
54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two
1
weeks before the due time
85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
5
competency.
82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
4
competency
Attain the required GSA for 79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
5% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
Grade level and learning areas competency
76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
2
competency
1 75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency
5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area

Attain 75% MPS per subject 4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
area in the National 5% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area. 3 3 3 3.00 0.15
Provision of Quality Achievement Test 2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Basic Education 1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements
5
were fully documented.
84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
4
agreements were fully documented.
Conduct regular/periodic PTA 68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
8% 3 2 3 4 3.00 0.24
meetings/conferences agreements were fully documented.
2
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
1
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
5
supported with documents.
Community
Involvement 84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
4
20% up supported with documents.
Visit parents of pupils/students
68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
needing academic 7% 3 2 2 2 2.00 0.14
up supported with documents.
monitoring/follow up
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
2
/marcuz rex/
needing academic 7% 2 2 2 2.00 0.14
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was

1
followed up supported with documents.
5 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
Undertake/initiate 4 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
projects/events/activities with 5% 3 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
external funding/sponsorship 2 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
1 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the
5
Division Level Research Conference/Summit
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the District
4
Level Research Conference/Summit
Conducted action research 5% 2 2 4 2.67 0.13
Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any
3
level of research conference/summit
2 Proposed an action research.
1 Conceptualize an action research
Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level
5
and earned 9 units in graduate studies
Professional
Growth and 4 Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level.
Development Attend relevant
trainings/workshops/conference 3
20% 10% and earn 9 units in graduate studies 3 5 3 3.67 0.37
s or seminars or earn 9 units of
post graduate education
2 Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level.
1 Attended at aggregate of 24 hours training at least in the District level

(Attached certificate of participation and Grades)
5 Received certificate of recognition in the National level.
Received special 4 Received certificate of recognition in the Regional level
awards/citation/recognition for 5% 3 Received certificate of recognition in the Division level 3 3 3 3.00 0.15
exemplary performance 2 Received certificate of recognition in the District level
1 Received certificate of recognition in the School level
Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents
4 Attained 4 indicators with documents
/marcuz rex/
Plus Factor 5% 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10

1. Serve as coordinator in any
working committee in the 3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
school
2. Publish an article in national
circulation
3. Serve as demonstration
Plus Factor 5% 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
teacher/resource 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
speaker/cooperating teacher
4. Received an outstanding
employee award at least in the
District level
5. Conducted an innovation
6. Participated in any activities

as teachers’ association
TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 3.41
Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Satisfactory

Adjectival Rating Scale /marcuz rex/
Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee: Rater:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 MYRA R. RAMOS ROSALIA B. MAPACPAC
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I PRINCIPAL
Poor 1.000 1.499
/marcuz rex/
Caraga Administrative Region
DIVISION OF SURIGAO DEL SUR
Tago - I District
BADONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Junction Badong - Cabangahan, Tago, Surigao del Sur
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: MARK Y. SALAS Name of Rater: CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU

Position: Teacher - I Position: Head Teacher - III/School Head
School: Badong National High School Date of Review:
KEY RESULT
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs) Q E T
with clear financial management system for the school supported by evidences such
5
as reports, account logs, database system.
Manage school resources in with clear financial and resource management system but one or more requirements
accordance with Deped policies 4
were missing
and accounting rules and 10% 3 3 3 3.00 0.30
regulations and other pertinent with clear financial and resource management system but 2 reports or requirements
3
guideline. were lacking
2 financial management system and reporting were in its initial stages
1 no financial report
with clear financial management system for the school supported by evidences such
School 5
as reports, account logs, database system.
Leadership,
Management Utilize funds for approved with clear financial and resource management system but one or more requirements
4
and Operation school programs and projects were missing
5% 4 5 4 4.33 0.22
(20%) as reflected in the SIP/AIP. with clear financial and resource management system but 2 reports or requirements
3
were lacking
2 financial management system and reporting were in its initial stages
1 no financial report
5 submitted required reports five days or more before the set deadlines
Prepare financial
reports/liquidation reports and
submit/communicate the same 5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
to higher education authorities
and other education partners.
School
Leadership,
Management
and Operation
(20%)
KEY RESULT
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs) Q E T
Prepare financial
reports/liquidation reports and 4 submitted required reports four days before the set deadlines
submit/communicate the same 5% 3 submitted required reports three days before the set deadlines 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
to higher education authorities 2 submitted required reports two days before the set deadlines
and other education partners.
1 submitted required reports on the set deadlines
4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Attain 75% MPS in NAT 15% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area. 2 2 2 2.00 0.30
2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
5 zero drop-out
Instructional Monitor attendance of students 4 1%-3% drop-out
Leadership regularly and attain/maintain 10% 3 4%-6% drop-out 3 3 3 3.00 0.30
(40%) zero drop-out rate. 2 7%-9% drop-out
1 10%-above drop-out rate
5 100% fully implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
4 84%-99% implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
Improve instructional leadership
15% 3 68%-83% implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan 4 4 4 4.00 0.60
practices.
2 52%-67 implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan.
1 51%-below implemented and functional instructional and supervisory plan
5 100% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
Provide clinical supervision to 4 84%-99% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
teachers for the improvement 10% 3 68%-83% of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance 2 3 4 3.00 0.30
of teaching-learning outcomes 2 52%-67 of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
1 51%-below of the teachers are observed and given clinical assistance
100% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an
5
action plan fully documented
Provision of Quality
Basic Education
84%-99% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an
4
Human Create a school-based
68%-83% of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an
Resource professional learning 10% 3 2 2 2 2.00 0.20
Management community.
and
Development
(25%)
Provision of Quality
Basic Education KEY RESULT
AREAS Create OBJECTIVES
a school-based TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS Human PER KRA
Resource
(KRAs) professional learning 10% 2
Q E2 T2 2.00 0.20
Management community.
52%-67 of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with an
and 2
Development
(25%) 1 51%-below of the NCBTS-TSNA of teachers were consolidated and provided with
an action plan fully documented
Conducted at least 4 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly
5
documented
4
documented
Organize and conducts
5% Conducted at least 2 INSET/GAD with 100% attendance of participants properly 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
INSETS/GAD Training. 3
documented
2
documented
1 no training conducted
5 initiate/collaborate with stakeholders to put up a tangible project fully documented.
4 has stakeholders partnership/mobilization plan complete with reports.
Encourage stakeholders to
has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders in meetings and activities
create safe, healthy and child- 3
10% but some elements are not enough resources raised 2 2 4 2.67 0.27
friendly school environment for
Parents student. has mobilization plan and occasionally meets stakeholders but not resulting to
2
Involvement and resources generated and evidences are missing
Community has no mobilization plan and seldom meets with stakeholders but not resulting to
Partnership 1
resources generated and evidences missing.
(15%)
5 4 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
Meet parents regularly to 4 3 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
confer/inform about school
5% 3 2 meetings attended and conducted within the school year with documentation. 3 5 3 3.67 0.18
accomplishment and students
progress. 2 1 meeting attended and conducted within the school year with documentation.
1 conducted meetings but not documented
1. Serve as resource speaker at
least in the District level.
2. Serve as chairman in any

working technical committees.
Plus Factor 5% 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10

KEY RESULT
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs) Q E T
3. Conducts one income
generating project properly 2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
implemented with documentation.
Plus Factor 5% 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
4. Conducts an action
research/innovation.
1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
5.Organize/maintain one socio-

cultural group.
6. Publish article in national
circulation.
7. Acquire title of school site.

Adjectival Rating Scale
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU, HT - III CYNTHIA O. ACEVEDO
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 School Head Public School District Supervisor
Poor 1.000 1.499
Caraga Administrative Region
DIVISION OF SURIGAO DEL SUR
Tago - I District
BADONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHERS
Name of Employee: MARK Y. SALAS Name of Rater: CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU

Position: Teacher - I Position: Head Teacher - III/School Head
School: Badong National High School Date of Review:
KEY RESULT
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs) Q E T
Write lesson plans/logs based 4 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
on the standards-based 5% 3 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 3 3 3 3.00 0.15
curriculum guides daily. 2 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
instructional materials. (Supported with write-up and documentation)
group task. 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Teaching
group task.
5
day of the month
2
1
Indicators:

3% 2 2 2 2.00 0.06
time
programs to improve
5
85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
4
3% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.12
3% 4 4 4 4.00 0.12
school records
2
after the due time
1
5
competency.
4
competency
3% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.12
2
competency
Achievement Test 2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Students'
Learning 1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
Outcomes (30%) initiated at least one successful instructional program to 100% of the teachers with
5
full documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 84%-99% of the
4
teachers with full documentation.
Initiate improvements in
3% initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 63%-83% of the 3 4 4 3.67 0.11
instructional programs 3
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 52%-62% of the
2
1 no evidence of initiating instructional program.
lead 100% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a
5
year with full documentation.
lead 84%-99%% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within
4
a year with full documentation.
Lead in the preparation of
3% lead 68%-83% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a 4 2 3 3.00 0.09
instructional materials. 3
lead 52%-67% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a
2
1 no evidence of leading in preparation of instructional program.
Excellent execution of the lesson plan and excellent mentoring services provided to
5
the demonstration teacher
Very Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Very Satisfactory mentoring
Serve as demonstrator teacher, 4
services provided to the demonstration teacher
facilitator or resource speaker
Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Satisfactory mentoring services
at the school level and or 3% 3 4 5 3 4.00 0.12
provided to the demonstration teacher
provided mentoring services to
demonstration teachers. Fair execution of the lesson plan and Fair mentoring services provided to the
2
demonstration teacher.
Poor execution of the lesson plan and Poor mentoring services provided to the
1
demonstration teacher
100% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
5
submitted before the scheduled time.
84%-99% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
4
68%-83% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
Interpret test results and utilize. 3% 3 4 3 2 4.00 0.12
52%-67 of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
2
51%-below of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
1
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
5
75% in NAT Performance.
Initiate projects and programs 4
65%-74% in NAT Performance.
that will enhance the curriculum
3% Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 4 4 2 3.33 0.10
and its delivery to achieve 75% 3
55%-64% in NAT Performance.
NAT performance.
2
54%-below in NAT Performance.
Provision of Quality 1 the project or program did not materialized
Basic Education 100% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
5
checklist form at the end of the quarter.
84%-99% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
4
Observe teachers every 68%-83% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
5% 3 4 3 2 3.00 0.15
quarter. checklist form at the end of the quarter.
52%-67 of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
2
51%-below of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
1
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 100% of the teachers and prepared
5
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 84%-99%% of the teachers and
4
Conduct mentoring/coaching prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented.
activities and prepare 5% Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 68%-83% of the teachers and prepared 4 1 2 2.33 0.12
3
instructional material available. innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 52%-67% of the teachers and prepared
2
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Instructional 1 no evidence of mentoring/coaching conducted
Supervision 100% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
5
(20%) assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
84%-99% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
4
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
Guided co-teachers in the
68%-83% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
performance of duties and 5% 3 4 5 2 3.67 0.18
responsibilities.
52%-67 of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
2
51%-below of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
1
100% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
5
observation log every end of the month.
84%-99% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
4
Check lesson plans of teachers
68%-83% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
in the assigned grade/subject 5% 3 4 5 1 3.33 0.17
area.
52%-67 of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
2
51%-below of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
1
5
4
5% 3 4 5 3 4.00 0.20
2
1
Community
Involvement
(15%)
5
Community
4
(15%) up supported with documents.
2
1
5
4
3
Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency
5
level of at least 4 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter.
4
level of at least 2 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
Take charge of the school
reading program, remedial 4% Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency 3 5 3 3.67 0.15
3
and/or enrichment program. level of at least 3 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter.
Professional 2
level of at least 1 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
Growth and
Development 1 No evidence of conducting remedial program
(15%)
Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the division
5
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
Participate in the planning and

implementation of training
3% 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
programs in school, district and
division level.
Growth and
Development
(15%)
Participate in the planning and Participated in the planning of at least 2 training programs conducted in the district
4
implementation of training level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
3% 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
programs in school, district and Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the district
division level. 3
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
Participated in the planning of at least 2 training program conducted in the school
2
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time
1 No evidence of participation in planning training programs
Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an
5
excellent way with documentation
Participate in seminars, Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent
4
workshops, trainings within a way with documentation
3% 2 2 2 2.00 0.06
year (Division, Regional and
National) 3 Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
2 Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
1 No trainings attended
1. Published at least one (1)

article in professional
magazines/ periodicals related
to field of specialization.
2. Served as resource person/

consultant in seminar/
workshop/ training related to
field of specialization.
Plus Factor (5%) 5% 1 1 1 1.00 0.05
3. Conducted action research
the findings/ results of which
were utilized within the rating
period.
4. Designed evaluation and
monitoring program for the 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
district/ division.
5. Teacher-In-Charge of a
school for one rating period

Adjectival Rating Scale
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 MARK Y. SALAS CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU, HT - III
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I School Head
Poor 1.000 1.499
Region IVB- MIMAROPA
DIVISION OF MARINDUQUE
MOGPOG District
MOGPOG NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

Name of Employee: MYRA R. RAMOS Name of Rater:

Position: Teacher - I Position: PRINCIPAL
School: MOGPOG NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HI Date of Review:
KEY RESULT
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs) Q E T
Prepare lesson plans and daily
lesson logs of activities 4 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
including appropriate, adequate 10% 3 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 3 3 3 3.00 0.30
and updated instructional 2 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
materials
instructional materials (Supported with write-up and documentation)
group task 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
/marcuz rex/
Teaching
group task
5
day of the month
2
1
Indicators:

8% 2 2 2 2.00 0.16
time
programs to improve
5
Students' 85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
Learning 4
Outcomes (30%)
5% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
/marcuz rex/
Students'
Learning
Outcomes (30%)
5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
school records
2
after the due time
1
5
competency.
4
competency
5% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
2
competency

Provision of Quality Achievement Test 2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Basic Education 1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
5
4
8% 3 2 3 4 3.00 0.24
2
1
5
Community
4
20% up supported with documents.
2
/marcuz rex/
needing academic 7% 2 2 2 2.00 0.14

1
5
4
3
5
and earned 9 units in graduate studies
Professional
Growth and 4 Attended an aggregate of 48 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level.
Development Attend relevant
trainings/workshops/conference 3
20% 10% and earn 9 units in graduate studies 3 5 3 3.67 0.37
s or seminars or earn 9 units of
post graduate education
2 Attended an aggregate of 24 hours of relevant trainings at least in the Division level.
1 Attended at aggregate of 24 hours training at least in the District level

(Attached certificate of participation and Grades)
5 Received certificate of recognition in the National level.
Received special 4 Received certificate of recognition in the Regional level
awards/citation/recognition for 5% 3 Received certificate of recognition in the Division level 3 3 3 3.00 0.15
exemplary performance 2 Received certificate of recognition in the District level
1 Received certificate of recognition in the School level
/marcuz rex/
Plus Factor 5% 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10

1. Serve as coordinator in any
working committee in the 3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
school
2. Publish an article in national
circulation
3. Serve as demonstration
Plus Factor 5% 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
teacher/resource 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
speaker/cooperating teacher
4. Received an outstanding
employee award at least in the
District level
5. Conducted an innovation
6. Participated in any activities

as teachers’ association

Adjectival Rating Scale /marcuz rex/
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 MYRA R. RAMOS ROSALIA B. MAPACPAC
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I PRINCIPAL
Poor 1.000 1.499
/marcuz rex/
Transmutation Table
1.000 1.499 Poor
1.500 2.499 Unsatisfactory
2.500 3.499 Satisfactory
3.500 4.499 Very Satisfactory
4.500 5.000 Outstanding
MMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teachers

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (Ipcrf) For Teachers

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

Name of Employee: MYRA R. RAMOS Name of Rater:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets

(Formative) 4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed, etc.

5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area

51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was

1 Attended at aggregate of 24 hours training at least in the District level

Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents

4 Attained 4 indicators with documents

Plus Factor 5% 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10

6. Participated in any activities

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Satisfactory

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: MARK Y. SALAS Name of Rater: CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

2. Serve as chairman in any

Plus Factor 5% 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10

5.Organize/maintain one socio-

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Satisfactory

Name of Employee: MARK Y. SALAS Name of Rater: CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets

(Formative) 4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed, etc.

Participate in the planning and

1. Published at least one (1)

2. Served as resource person/

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Satisfactory

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

Name of Employee: MYRA R. RAMOS Name of Rater:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets

(Formative) 4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed, etc.

5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area

51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was

1 Attended at aggregate of 24 hours training at least in the District level

Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents

4 Attained 4 indicators with documents

Plus Factor 5% 5% 2 2 2 2.00 0.10

6. Participated in any activities

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Satisfactory

You might also like