Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region 02
Schools Division of Isabela
San Mariano I District
STA. FILOMENA INTEGRATED SCHOOL
San Mariano

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

June 2017 - March 2018

Name of EmployeBYRON C. DIZON Name of Rater: VICTORIA SUSAN A. ORIENTE

Position: Teacher-I Position: Head Teacher - III/School Head
School: STA. FILOMENA INTEGRATED SCHOOL Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

KEY RESULT WEIGH
MAJOR FINAL RATING
AREAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE T PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AVERAGE SCORE
OUTPUTS
(KRAs) KRA Q E T
5 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way.
4 180 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way.
1.Prepared DLL per learning
Year round 20% 3 160 -179 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way. 5 5 4 4.67 0.93
area
2 140-159 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way.
1 140 below updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way.

5 40 or more IM's made per learning area

Teaching
Learning Made Instructional Materials
Process (40%)
per learning area
3.Initiated positive attitude of
pupils/ students including
classroom rules, guidelines
and individual and group
task.
1.Monitored, evaluated and
maintained pupil’s/student’s
progress through
4 30-39 IM's made per learning area
Year round 10% 3 20 -29 IM's made per learning area 4 4 4 4.00 0.40
2 20 below IM's made per learning area
1 no IM's made per learning area
5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Year round 10% 4 4 4 4.00 0.40
2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
(Supported with write-up and documentation)
Indicators:
1. Test Questions with TOS
2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio, SF1, SF2, Monthly
Accomplishment Report.)

Year round 15% 4 4 4 4.00 0.60

 *Assessment for Learning
(Formative)
*Assessment of Learning
(Summative)
*Periodic Test
2.Conducted
remediation/enrichment
Pupils' Learning program to improve the
Outcomes (35%) performance of slow learners
3.Conducted Quarterly
Examination/Assessment
4. Achieved at least 75% of
the puypils/students
performance at the end of
the school year
1.Conducted regular/periodic
PTA meetings/conferences
Community
Involvement
(10%)
2. Visited parents of
pupils/students needing
academic monitoring/follow
up
3. Rating sheets
Year round 15% 4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed, etc. 4 4 4 4.00 0.60
5 All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due time
4 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
5 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
4 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
Quarterly 5% 3 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 5 4 4 4.33 0.22
2 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
1 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
5 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment on the schedule date
4 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment 3 days after the schedule date
Quarterly 5% 3 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment 4 days after the schedule date 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
2 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment 5 days after the schedule date
1 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment 1 week after the schedule date
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 75%
5 achievement level .
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 65%-74%
4 achievement level.
June 2017 &
10% Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 55%-64% 4 4 4 4.00 0.40
March 2018 3 achievement level.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 54%-below
2 achievement level.
1 did not conduct achievement test
100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully
5 documented.
84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were
4 fully documented.
68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were
Quarterly 5% 3 fully documented.
4 4 4 4.00 0.20
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were
2 fully documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were
1
fully documented.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported
5 with documents.
84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
4
supported with documents.
Quarterly 2.5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.10
 Community
Involvement
(10%)

2. Visited parents of
pupils/students needing 68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
Quarterly 2.5% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.10
academic monitoring/follow supported with documents.
up 52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
2 supported with documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
1
supported with documents.

5 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.

3.Undertaken/initiated 4 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.

projects/events/activities with Year round 2.5% 3 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 4 4 4 4 0.1
external funding/sponsorship
2 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
1 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
5 Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings
Participated in seminars, 4 Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings
workshops, trainings within a
Year round 5% 3 Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
year (District, Division,
Regional and National) 2 Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings
1 No trainings attended
Professional Received 4 or more Special/Recognition Awards with supporting documents &
5
Growth and accomplishment
Development
(15%) 4 Received 3 Special/Recognition Awards with supporting documents with accomplishment.
Served as coordinator &
received Special/Recognition Year round 5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
Awards 3 Received 2 Special/Recognition Awards with supporting documents with accomplishment.

2 Received 1 Special/Recognition Awards with supporting documents with accomplishment

1 No Special/Recognition Award & Acoomplishment

Serves as speaker in Seminar & planned/organized & managed SLAC session (District &
5 School)
Serves as speaker in Seminar & planned/organized & managed SLAC session in school
4 level with complete evidence
Served as speaker &
Planned/organized managed Year round 5% Serves as speaker in Seminar & planned/organized & managed SLAC session in school 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
3 level with incomplete evidence
SLAC Session/Seminar
Serves as speaker in Seminar & planned/organized & managed SLAC session in school
2
level without evidence
1 Not speaker in seminar & no planned/organized SLAC session
TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 3.55
ADJECTIVAL RATING Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee: Rater:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 BYRON C. DIZON VICTORIA SUSAN A. ORIENTE, HT - III

Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I School Head

Poor 1.000 1.499
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region 02
Schools Division of Isabela
San Mariano I District
UEG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
San Mariano

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHERS
June 2015 - March 2016

Name of Employee: MARK Y. SALAS Name of Rater: CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU

Position: Teacher - I Position: Head Teacher - III/School Head
School: Badong National High School Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULTS
AREAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs) Q E T
5 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Write lesson plans/logs based 4 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
on the standards-based 5% 3 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 3 3 3 3.00 0.15
curriculum guides daily. 2 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
1 1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way
Facilitate learning through the 5 10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
use of written/computerized 4 8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
lesson plans, modules, 3 6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
teaching guides, and other 5% 4 5 4 4.33 0.22
learning resources with the 2 4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
adequate and updated 1 2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials. (Supported with write-up and documentation)
Teaching 5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Learning Initiate discipline of students 4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Process (20%) including classroom rules, 5% 3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
guidelines and individual and
group task. 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
 Teaching
Learning Initiate discipline of students
Process (20%) including classroom rules, 5% 4 4 4 4.00 0.20
guidelines and individual and
group task.
1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last
5
day of the month
Monitor attendance, diversity 85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every
appreciation, safe, positive and 4
last day of the month
motivating environment, over-
70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every
all physical atmosphere, 5% 3 2 3 5 3.33 0.17
last day of the month
cleanliness, and orderliness of
classrooms including proper 55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every
2
waste disposal. last day of the month
54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted
1
every last day of the month
Indicators:
Monitor, evaluate and maintain
1. Test Questions with TOS
pupil’s/student’s progress
through 2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio, etc.)

*Assessment for Learning 3. Rating sheets

(Formative) 4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed, etc.

3% 2 2 2 2.00 0.06
All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due
*Assessment as Learning 5
time
(Reflective) 4 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
*Assessment of Learning 3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
(Summative) 2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
*Periodic Test 1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
5 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
Conduct 4 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
remediation/enrichment
3% 3 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
programs to improve
performance indicators 2 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
1 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the
5
scheduled time without error
85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
4
the scheduled time without error
Maintain pupil’s/students 70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before
3% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.12
school records the scheduled time with minimal error
 Maintain pupil’s/students
3% 4 4 4 4.00 0.12
school records
55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week
2
after the due time
54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two
1
weeks before the due time
85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
5
competency.
82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
4
competency
Attain the required GSA for 79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
3% 3 4 4 4 4.00 0.12
Grade level and learning areas competency
76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning
2
competency

1 75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency
5 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area
Attain 75% MPS per subject 4 Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area.
area in the National 3% 3 Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area. 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
Achievement Test 2 Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area.
Students'
Learning 1 Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area.
Outcomes (30%) initiated at least one successful instructional program to 100% of the teachers with
5
full documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 84%-99% of the
4
teachers with full documentation.
Initiate improvements in
3% initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 63%-83% of the 3 4 4 3.67 0.11
instructional programs 3
teachers with full documentation.
initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 52%-62% of the
2
teachers with full documentation.
1 no evidence of initiating instructional program.
lead 100% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a
5
year with full documentation.
lead 84%-99%% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within
4
a year with full documentation.
Lead in the preparation of
3% lead 68%-83% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a 4 2 3 3.00 0.09
instructional materials. 3
year with full documentation.
lead 52%-67% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a
2
year with full documentation.
1 no evidence of leading in preparation of instructional program.

Serve as demonstrator teacher,
facilitator or resource speaker
at the school level and or
provided mentoring services to
demonstration teachers.
Interpret test results and utilize.
Initiate projects and programs
that will enhance the curriculum
and its delivery to achieve 75%
NAT performance.
Provision of Quality
Basic Education
Observe teachers every
quarter.
Excellent execution of the lesson plan and excellent mentoring services provided to
5
the demonstration teacher
Very Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Very Satisfactory mentoring
4
services provided to the demonstration teacher
Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Satisfactory mentoring services
3% 3 4 5 3 4.00 0.12
provided to the demonstration teacher
Fair execution of the lesson plan and Fair mentoring services provided to the
2
demonstration teacher.
Poor execution of the lesson plan and Poor mentoring services provided to the
1
demonstration teacher
100% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
5
submitted before the scheduled time.
84%-99% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
4
submitted before the scheduled time.
68%-83% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
3% 3 4 3 2 4.00 0.12
submitted before the scheduled time.
52%-67 of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
2
submitted before the scheduled time.
51%-below of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and
1
submitted before the scheduled time.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
5
75% in NAT Performance.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
4
65%-74% in NAT Performance.
3% Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 4 4 2 3.33 0.10
3
55%-64% in NAT Performance.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
2
54%-below in NAT Performance.
1 the project or program did not materialized
100% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
5
checklist form at the end of the quarter.
84%-99% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
4
checklist form at the end of the quarter.
68%-83% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
5% 3 4 3 2 3.00 0.15
checklist form at the end of the quarter.
52%-67 of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
2
checklist form at the end of the quarter.
51%-below of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation
1
checklist form at the end of the quarter.

Conduct mentoring/coaching
activities and prepare
instructional material available.
Instructional
Supervision
(20%)
Guided co-teachers in the
performance of duties and
responsibilities.
Check lesson plans of teachers
in the assigned grade/subject
area.
Conduct regular/periodic PTA
meetings/conferences
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 100% of the teachers and prepared
5
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 84%-99%% of the teachers and
4
prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented.
5% Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 68%-83% of the teachers and prepared 4 1 2 2.33 0.12
3
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 52%-67% of the teachers and prepared
2
innovative instructional materials fully documented.
1 no evidence of mentoring/coaching conducted
100% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
5
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
84%-99% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
4
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
68%-83% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
5% 3 4 5 2 3.67 0.18
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
52%-67 of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
2
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
51%-below of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical
1
assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
100% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
5
observation log every end of the month.
84%-99% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
4
observation log every end of the month.
68%-83% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
5% 3 4 5 1 3.33 0.17
observation log every end of the month.
52%-67 of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
2
observation log every end of the month.
51%-below of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
1
observation log every end of the month.
100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements
5
were fully documented.
84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
4
agreements were fully documented.
68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
5% 3 4 5 3 4.00 0.20
agreements were fully documented.
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
2
agreements were fully documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
1
agreements were fully documented.

Community
Involvement
(15%)

Community
Involvement
(15%)
Visit parents of pupils/students
needing academic
monitoring/follow up
Undertake/initiate
projects/events/activities with
external funding/sponsorship
Conducted action research
Take charge of the school
reading program, remedial
and/or enrichment program.
Professional
Growth and
Development
(15%)
Participate in the planning and
implementation of training
programs in school, district and
division level.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
5
supported with documents.
84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
4
up supported with documents.
68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
5% 3 2 2 2 2.00 0.10
up supported with documents.
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
2
supported with documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was
1
followed up supported with documents.
5 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
4 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
5% 3 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
2 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
1 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the
5
Division Level Research Conference/Summit
Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the District
4
Level Research Conference/Summit
5% 2 2 4 2.67 0.13
Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any
3
level of research conference/summit
2 Proposed an action research.
1 Conceptualize an action research
Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency
5
level of at least 4 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter.
Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency
4
level of at least 2 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
4% Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency 3 5 3 3.67 0.15
3
level of at least 3 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter.
Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency
2
level of at least 1 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
1 No evidence of conducting remedial program
Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the division
5
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
3% 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
 Growth and
Development
(15%)

Participate in the planning and Participated in the planning of at least 2 training programs conducted in the district
4
implementation of training level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
3% 3 3 3 3.00 0.09
programs in school, district and Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the district
division level. 3
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
Participated in the planning of at least 2 training program conducted in the school
2
level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time
1 No evidence of participation in planning training programs
Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an
5
excellent way with documentation
Participate in seminars, Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent
4
workshops, trainings within a way with documentation
3% 2 2 2 2.00 0.06
year (Division, Regional and
National) 3 Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
2 Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
1 No trainings attended
Attain five of the following: 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents

1. Published at least one (1)

article in professional
4 Attained 4 indicators with documents
magazines/ periodicals related
to field of specialization.

2. Served as resource person/

consultant in seminar/
3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
workshop/ training related to
field of specialization.
Plus Factor (5%) 5% 1 1 1 1.00 0.05
3. Conducted action research
the findings/ results of which
2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
were utilized within the rating
period.
4. Designed evaluation and
monitoring program for the 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents
district/ division.
5. Teacher-In-Charge of a
school for one rating period

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 3.40

Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Satisfactory

Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee: Rater:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 MARK Y. SALAS CYNTHIA S. ESPIRITU, HT - III
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I School Head
Poor 1.000 1.499
 Transmutation Table
1.000 1.499 Poor
1.500 2.499 Unsatisfactory
2.500 3.499 Satisfactory
3.500 4.499 Very Satisfactory
4.500 5.000 Outstanding
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region 02
Schools Division of Isabela
San Mariano I District
STA. FILOMENA INTEGRATED SCHOOL
San Mariano

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

June 2017 - March 2018

Name of Employee: ______________________________________ Name of Rater: VICTORIA SUSAN A. ORIENTE

Position: Teacher - Position: Head Teacher - III/School Head
School: STA. FILOMENA INTEGRATED SCHOOL Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION

KEY RESULT
MAJOR FINAL WEIGHT RATING
AREAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AVERAGE SCORE
OUTPUTS PER KRA
(KRAs) Q E T
5 181 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way with IM's
1.Prepared DLL, adequate and 4 180 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way with IM's
updated intructional materials Year round 20% 3 160 -179 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way with IM's
per learning area 2 140-159 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way with IM's
1 140 below updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way with IM's
Indicators:
1. Reading Progress Chart
2. Accomplishment Report of Functional Reading Program (Quarterly)
Teaching 5 100% of targeted Non/Struggle Readers completed the reading program
2.Initiate Functional Reading
Learning Year round 10%
Program 4 75% of targeted Non/Struggle Readers completed the reading program
Process (40%)
3 50% of targeted Non/Struggle Readers completed the reading program
2 25% of targeted Non/Struggle Readers completed the reading program
1 No Improvement of Targeted Pupils
5 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
4 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
3.Initiate positive attitude of
pupils/ students including 3 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
Year round 10%
classroom rules, guidelines and 2 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
individual and group task. 1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed
(Supported with write-up and documentation)
Indicators:
1.Monitor, evaluate and
1. Test Questions with TOS
maintain pupil’s/student’s
progress through 2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio, SF1, SF2,
Monthly Accomplishment Report.)

Year round 15%

 *Assessment for Learning
(Formative)
*Assessment of Learning
(Summative)
*Periodic Test
2.Conduct
remediation/enrichment
program to improve the
performance of slow learners
Pupils' Learning
Outcomes (35%)
3.Conduct Quarterly
Examination/Assessment
4. Achieved at least 75% of the
puypils/students performance Year round
at the end of the school year
1.Conduct regular/periodic PTA
meetings/conferences
Community
Involvement
(10%)
2. Visit parents of
pupils/students needing
academic monitoring/follow up
3. Rating sheets
4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed, etc.
Year round 15%
All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due
5
time
4 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time
3 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
2 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date
1 no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date.
5 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
4 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
Quarterly 5% 3 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
2 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
1 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully
5 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment on the schedule date
4 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment 3 days after the schedule date
Quarterly 5%
3 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment 4 days after the schedule date
2 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment 5 days after the schedule date
1 conduct Quarterly Examination/Assessment 1 week after the schedule date
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
5
75% achievement level .
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
4
65%-74% achievement level.
10% Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
3
55%-64% achievement level.
Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve
2
54%-below achievement level.
1 did not conduct achievement test
100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements
5
were fully documented.
84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
4
agreements were fully documented.
68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
Quarterly 5% 3
agreements were fully documented.
52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
2
agreements were fully documented.
51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set
1
agreements were fully documented.
100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
5
supported with documents.
84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
4
up supported with documents.
Quarterly 2.5%
 Community
Involvement
(10%)

2. Visit parents of
68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed
pupils/students needing Quarterly 2.5% 3
up supported with documents.
academic monitoring/follow up
52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up
2
supported with documents.
51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was
1
followed up supported with documents.
5 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation.
3.Undertake/initiate 4 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
projects/events/activities with Year round 2.5% 3 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
external funding/sponsorship 2 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
1 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation.
5 Attended 4 or more seminars, workshops trainings
Participate in seminars, 4 Attended 3 seminars, workshops trainings
workshops, trainings within a
Year round 5% 3 Attended 2 or more seminars, workshops trainings
year (District, Division,
Regional and National) 2 Attended 1 seminars, workshops trainings
1 No trainings attended
Professional Received 4 or more Special/Recognition Awards with supporting documents &
Growth and 5
accomplishment
Development
Received 3 Special/Recognition Awards with supporting documents with
(15%) 4
Serves as coordinator & accomplishment.
receive Special/Recognition Year round 5% Received 2 Special/Recognition Awards with supporting documents with
3
Awards accomplishment.
Received 1 Special/Recognition Awards with supporting documents with
2
accomplishment
1 No Special/Recognition Award & Acoomplishment
Serves as speaker in Seminar & planned/organized & managed SLAC session
5
(District & School)
Serves as speaker in Seminar & planned/organized & managed SLAC session in
4
Serves as speaker & school level with complete evidence
Planned/organized managed Year round 5% Serves as speaker in Seminar & planned/organized & managed SLAC session in
3
SLAC Session/Seminar school level with incomplete evidence
Serves as speaker in Seminar & planned/organized & managed SLAC session in
2
school level without evidence
1 Not speaker in seminar & no planned/organized SLAC session
TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT
Plus Factor (winning coach/action research) 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING
Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Ratee: Rater:
Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 _________________________ VICTORIA SUSAN A. ORIENTE, HT - III
Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Teacher - I School Head
Poor 1.000 1.499