Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
Division of Zamboanga Del Norte
Roxas I District
Minang Elementary School
Name of Employee: PACITA B. IMPONG
Position: ESP-III Name of Rater: LOURMA I. POCULAN
Division: Z. N. Position: ASDS
Rating Period: June, 2018- APRIL 2019 Date of Review: APRIL 2019

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T AVERAGE
Provision of KRA1 1. To be accounted for learning JUNE-2018- 30% 6 – NAT performance GSA is 115-129% NAT Performance is 81 – 100%
Quality Basic outcomes of schools and APRIL-2019 5 – NAT Performance is 81-100% above 4 4 4 4.000 0.400
Education centers viz -a- viz to goals and target .
Services targets 4 – NAT Performance is 76-80%
3 – NAT Performance is 75%
INSTRUCTIONAL 10% 2 – NAT Performance is 50-75%
LEADERSHIP JUNE , 2018- 1 – NAT Performance is 50% and below
Improving quality -Increase NAT result by 2% over APRIL,2019
of learning and the standard.
instructional 2. To perform instructional 5 – Performed the following with 4 4 4 4 0.4
delivery supervision for improved evidences:
learning outcomes  Collected, analyzed and utilized
data to identify and plan  Recommended localized
Year round 10% needed interventions curriculum
 Recommended localized
curriculum (mother tongued-
based) for instruction
 Collected, analyzed and utilized
 Organized appropriate class
data to identify and plan
programs, flexible learning
needed interventions
options as stop-gap measures
 Organized appropriate class
programs, flexible learning
options as stop-gap measures
 Consolidated reports on  Prepared a monthly
learning difficulties, home Supervisory Plan
visitations and peculiar in
incidents used for planning and
implementing appropriate
interventions
 Prepared a monthly Supervisory
Plan approved by the ASDS
  Submitted 100 formal
observations and 100 walk
through observations in all
learning areas in different grade  Submitted 100 formal
levels observations and 100 walk
4-6 requirements satisfied (with evidences) through observations in all
3-4 to 5 requirements satisfied (with learning areas in different
evidences) grade levels
2-2 to 3 requirements satisfied (with
evidences)
1-2 requirements and reported largely
missing
3. To perform data – based Year round 10% 5-Performed the following reports Produced a school strategic plan/SIP and 4 4 4 4 0.400
strategic planning supported by documents: AIP through the strategic planning sources
Produced a school strategic plan/SIP and
AIP through the strategic planning process
 Conduct of school situational
analysis, SWOT, determining
strategies through prioritizing
strategic options, resource and
facilities planning and
formulation of PAPs based on
analysis
 Strategic Plan was based on
DepED vision, contextualized in
school vision and mission
 All stakeholders were engaged
in strategic planning process
 M & E for process and
outcomes checkpoints were
developed and utilized
 Above accomplishments of
school targets with evidence
contained in school report card
 School report card presented to
all stakeholders
4-Produced strategic plan following the
strategic planning process with minimal
deviation AND 115-129% accomplishment
of school targets (supported by evidence)
3-Produced strategic plan following the
strategic planning process with minimal
deviation and 100-114% accomplishment
of school targets (supported by evidence)
2- Produced strategic plan following the
strategic planning process with minimal
deviation and 51-99% accomplishment of
school targets (supported by evidence)
1-50% and below accomplishments,
strategic planning and evidences are
largely absent
 MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T AVERAGE

1. To ensure school age children JUNE,2018 TO 10% 5- Enrolment rate is 100% and above target Enrolment rate is 85-99% 4 4 4 4 0.400
Improving access KRA 2 are in school MARCH, 2019 4- Enrolment rate is 85-99%
and efficiency LEARNING 3- Enrolment rate is 75-84%
ENVIRONMENT 2- Enrolment rate is 51-74%
1-Enrolment rate is 50% and below

2. To provide safe and child
friendly learning and fun school
environment for pupils/learners
JUNE,2018 TO 5% 5- Accomplishments on the following All mechanisms are present except for 4 4 4 4 0.200
MARCH, 2019 (supported by evidence such as school some minimal requirements
policy (5), monthly reports submitted,
information materials provided, advocacy
activities (5), regular meetings (10x)
inventory (2x)
 Adhered to Child-Friendly
environment standards and
programs
 Institutionalized child protection
mechanisms and processes (per
DepED Order No. 40 s. 2012
 Provided ICT facilities/workshop
rooms as learning support
systems
 Has clear DRRM mobilization
plans
4-All mechanisms are present except for
some minimal requirements
3-All mechanisms are present but without
evidences
2-Incomplete mechanisms and absence of
reports
1-Mechanisms and reports are missing
 MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T AVERAGE
1. To MAJOR REPAIR Grade Aug.2018 to 15% 1.Sustained strong linkage and generate
KRA-3 KINDER, GRADE –I, II, III, IV April 2019 resources from the NGO, LGU ,
classrooms and Principal`s ZNFEPA ,Private Sectors and Stakeholders
Office and
SCHOOL PHYSICAL 2.To acquire Computer set 2.Submit resolutions,
ENVIRONMENT 3.To acquire potable water solicitations, requests
tank JUNE 2018 TO
4. Completion of Concrete APRIL,2019
Perimeter Fence
5. Acquire Science KIT
From 2015 up
6.School Signage
t0 the Present
7. School Covered Court
8. School Feeding Program

Strengthening School Leadership 9. To ensure to DepED policy on June, 2018 20% 5- Dropout rate is 100% and above target Dropout rate is 100% and above target 4 4 4 4 0.400
internal system of Management and “No Child Left Behind” March, 2019 4- Dropout rate is 85-99%
governance Operations 3- Dropout rate is 75-85%
2- Dropout rate is 51-74%
10% 1-Dropout rate is 50% and below

Dropout rate from 10% to 5%
over the total no. Of learners
10. To perform school
leadership, management and
operations functions
Year Round 10% 5- With clear financial management system With clear financial management system 4 4 4 4 0.400
for the school supported by evidences for the school supported by evidences
such as reports, account logs, database such as reports, account logs, database
system system
 Allocated/Prioritized funds for
programs and school facilities
improvement and maintenance
 Monitored, accounted and
reported utilization of school
funds
 Reported sources and uses of
funds
 Ensured quality standards for
facilities given to the school
 Coordinated with stakeholders
 on resource mobilization
 Maintained an updated school
BEIS and regularly submit MIS
report to the Division Office
4- With clear financial and resource
management system but two requirements
were missing (with complete evidence)
3- With clear financial and resource
management system but three
requirements and/or reports were lacking
2- Financial management and reporting
were in their initial stages
1-No Financial Management System and/or
reports observed

MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T AVERAGE

Human KRA-4 APRIL-MAY, 20% Teachers provided with technical 3 4 3 3 0.6

Resource To provide technical 2018 assistance with corresponding
Management assistance to evidences like teachers portfolio
and teachers on matters containing observation reports, TSNA
Development pertaining to results, performance analysis and
enhancement of recommendation for development
classroom interventions, performance contracts
management, skills and performance evaluation results in
and instructional prescribed tools.
competence within 5- Performs the following supported
the RPMS Cycle by documents: Produced school
master plan (Teaching loads, class
programs, class schedules-regular and
intervention)-all teachers have
portfolio containing observation
reports, TSNA results, performed all
RPMS processes among school
personnel with the following as
evidences;
Performance contracts and
performance evaluation results in
prescribed tools
Prepared proposed development
plans (individual teacher/all teachers)
conducted 2 school-based training
4- 4 requirements met
3- 3 requirements met
 2- requirements are largely missing
1-requirements are absent

MFO’s KRA’s OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T AVERAGE

KRA-5 TO ESTABLISHED SCHOOL JUNE, 2018 15% 5- Has stakeholders partnership/ Has stakeholders partnership/ 4 4 4 4 0.600
AND COMMUNITY or as the mobilization plan (Complete with mobilization plan (Complete with
PARENTS PARTNERSHIP FOR SCHOOL need arise reports and documentations of reports and documentations of
INVOLVEMENT PERFORMANCE, BRIGADA meetings, agreements, etc.)- meetings, agreements, etc.)-
AND COMMUNITY “BAYANIHAN SPIRIT “. Organized programs with Organized programs with
PARTNERSHIP stakeholders, esp. Parents for stakeholders, esp. Parents for
academic and other purposes (esp. academic and other purposes (esp.
Strategic planning)- Obtained Strategic)
resources for the school through
stakeholders’ partnership
4- Has mobilization plan and
occasionally meets stakeholders in
meetings and activities but some
elements (e.g. not enough resources
raised)
3- has mobilization plan and
occasionally meets stakeholders but
not resulting to resources generated
and evidences are missing
2- Poor mobilization skills and seldom
meets stakeholders
1-No evidence in this area
 Over-All Rating for Accomplishment Very Satisfactory 3.800

LOURMA I. POCULAN PACITA B. IMPONG-ESP-III ,Ed. D.

RATER RATEE
ASDS

Approving Authority:

PEDRO MELCHOR M. NATIVIDAD, CESEE

SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT