Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
Division of Surigao del Sur
KAHAYAGAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
KAHAYAGAN, TAGBINA, SURIGAO DEL SUR

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW

Name of Employee: NENA C. GABUTERO Name of Rater: ARIELJUN P. ROSAL

Position: SST-1 Position: School Head
Review Period: JUNE 2018 - March 2019 Date of Review: 2018-2019
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SDS

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL RESULTS
WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,
KRA MAJOR OUTPUTS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER KRA
TARGET ACTUAL RATING SCORE
Efficiency, Timeliness)
EFFICIEN TIMELINES
QUALITY AVERAGE
CY S

To provide basic education services.

5- 95%-100 % Detailed LPs with daily activities and

approriate IMs prepared w/ workplan
4- 85%-94% Detailed
• Prepare lesson plans and daily logs 190 lesson log
LPs/DLL with appropriate Ims prepared. 190 lesson logs,
• Daily Lesson Plan and of activities including appropriate, JUNE 2018- for June and July
10% 3- 70% - 84% Daily with IM's 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.500
Instructional materials adequate and updated instructional MARCH 2019 , 20 Ims,
LP/ lesson logs with some appropriate IMS prepared
materials workplan
2 - 55% - 69% Daily lesson
log prepared
1- 54% below No. LPS/DLL prepared

5- 95%-100 % Establish challenging and measurable

goals
4- 85%-94% Establish measurable goals
• Facilitate learning through 190 lesson logs,
TEACHING- • Functional lesson plans, JUNE 2018- 3- 70%-84% Establish a focus on 190 lesson log,
functional lessons plans, daily logs 10% with IM's 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.500
LEARNING PROCESS daily logs, teaching strategies and innovative teaching strategies MARCH 2019 students learning 20 IMs
prepared
(40%) 2- 55%-69% No clear focus for student
learning
1-54% below No focus for student learning

5-95%-100 % of the students observe proper values

4- 85% - 94% of the students observe proper

values
• Initiate discipline of students 3- 70% - 84% of the 100% students 95% students
• Class Rules and well- JUNE 2018-
including classroom rules, guidelines 10% students observe proper values with observe with observe 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.500
behaved students MARCH 2019
and individual and group tasks proper values proper values
2- 55% to 69% of the students observe proper values

1- 54% below of the students observe proper

values
 5- 95%-100 % Most of the time teacher monitors
attendance,pose motivation, and clean environment
4- 85% -
94% Sometimes teacher monitors attendance,pose
• Monitor attendance, diversity Teacher monitors Teacher monitors
motivation, and clean environment
appreciation, safe, positive and attendance, pose attendance, pose
3- 76% - 84% Teacher
• Positive/productive/safe motivating environment, overall JUNE 2018- motivation, and motivation, and
10% monitors attendance,pose motivation, and clean 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.500
learning environment physical atmosphere, cleanliness and MARCH 2019 clean clean
environment
orderliness of classrooms including environment environment
2- 55% to 69% teacher rarely monitors
proper waste disposal. every session every session
attendance,pose motivation, and clean environment
1- 54%
below teacher didnt monitor attendance,pose
motivation, and clean environment

5- 95%-100 % Always observed complete and

accurate class record
4- 85% - 94% Sometimes observed
complete and accurate class record
Complete and
3- 76% - 84% Observed Complete and
• Complete and accurate • Monitor and evaluated and JUNE 2018- accurate class
10% complete and accurate class record accurate class 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.500
class record maintained pupils/ students’ progress MARCH 2019 record every
2- 55% to 69% record .
quarter
Rarely observed complete and accurate class record
1- 54%
below No evidence of complete and accurate class
record

5- 95%-100 % Always observed

remediation/enrichment programs
4- 85% - 94%Sometimes
observed remediation/enrichment programs
Observed
• Conduct remediation/enrichment 3- 70% - 84% Observed No
• Remediation/enrichment JUNE 2018- remediation/enri
programs to improve performance 5% remediation/enrichment programs remediation/enric 1 1 1 1.00 1.00 0.050
programs conducted MARCH 2019 chment program
indicators hment conducted
if necessary
2- 55% to 69% Rarely observed
remediation/enrichment programs
1- 54% below No
remediation/enrichment programs conducted
STUDENTS
OUTCOMES (30%)

5- 95%-100 % Always updates students school

records
4- 85% - 94% Occasionally updates students school
records Updates students Updates students
• Updated pupils/students’ • Maintain updated pupils/students’ JUNE 2018-
5% 3- 70% - 84% Updates students school records school records school records 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.250
school records school records MARCH 2019
2- 55% to 69% every quarter every quarter
Rarely updates students school records
1- 54% below Not
updated students school records
 5- 95%-100 % of students have mastery in learning
competencies
4- 85% - 94% of students have have mastery in
100% of the 88% of the
learning competencies
• Students’ mastery of the students have students have
• Attain the required GSA for grade JUNE 2018- 3- 76% - 84% of students have mastery in
required learning 10% mastered the mastered the 4 4 4 4.00 4.00 0.400
level and learning areas MARCH 2019 learning competencies
competencies per grade level learning learning
2- 55% to 69% of students have mastery in
competencies competencies
learning competencies
1- 54% below of students have mastery in
learning competencies

5- 95%-100 % Always conduct PTA

meetings/conferences
4- 85% - 94% Occasionally conduct PTA
meetings/conferences 3- 4 4
• PTA meetings/conferences • Conduct regular/periodic PTA JUNE 2018-
5% 76% - 84% Conduct PTA meetings/conferences meetings/confere meetings/confere 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.250
organized meetings/conferences MARCH 2019
2- 55% to 69% Rarely conduct nces nces
PTA meetings/conferences
1-54% below No observed PTA
meetings/conferences

5- 95%-100 % Always conduct home visitation

4- 85% -
94% Sometimes conduct home visitation
Conduct Conduct
• Academic • Visit parents of students needing JUNE 2018- 3- 76% - 84%
COMMUNITY 5% homevisitation homevisitation 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.250
monitoring/follow-up academic monitoring/follow-up MARCH 2019 Conduct home visitation 2-
INVOLVEMENT (15%) twice a year twice a year
55% to 69% Rarely conduct home visitation
1- 54% below No
home visitation conducted

5- 95%-100 % Always
initiateprojects/events/activities
4- 85% - 94% Sometimes initiate
• Undertake/initiate 1 initiated 1 initiated
• Projects/events/activities JUNE 2018- projects/events/activities 3-
projects/events/activities with external 5% projects/events/a projects/events/ac 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.250
initiated/undertaken MARCH 2019 70% - 84% Initiate projects/events/activities
funding/sponsorship ctivities tivities
2- 55% to 69% Rarely initiate
projects/events/activities 1-
54% below No initiated projects/events/activities

0.00 0.000

5- 95%-100 % Always conduct action research

4- 85% -
94% Sometimes conduct action research
No action
JUNE 2018- 3- 70% - 84%
• Action research • Conduct Action Research 3% 1 Action research research 1 1 1 1.00 1.00 0.030
MARCH 2019 Conduct action research 2-
conducted
55% to 69% Rarely conduct action research
1- 54% below
No action research conducted

PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT (15%)
 5- 95%-100 % Always participate in community
linkages
4- 85% - 94% Occasionally participate
in community linkages
• Professional membership • Participate in activities such as JUNE 2018- 3- 70% - 84% Participate in 2 Community 2 Community
5% 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.250
and/or community linkages teachers’ association, etc. MARCH 2019 community linkages involvement involvement
2- 55% to 69% Rarely participate in
PROFESSIONAL community linkages
GROWTH AND 1- 54% below No participation in community
DEVELOPMENT (15%) linkages

5-36 units obtained

4-24 units obtained
JUNE 2018-
• Post graduate holder • Enroll in post graduate studies 2% 3-18units obtained 9 units 18 units obtained 3 3 3 3.00 3.00 0.060
MARCH 2019
2-12 units obtained
1-9 units obtained

5- 95%-100 %Acted as coach in regional level

4- 85% -
94% Acted as coach in division level
• Special • Receive special 3- 70% - 84% Acted
JUNE 2018- Coach in school Coach in school
awards/citation/recognition awards/citation/recognition for 5% as coach in district level 1 1 1 1.00 1.00 0.050
MARCH 2019 level level
for exemplary performance exemplary performance 2- 55% to 69% Acted as coach
in school level

1- 54% below No involvement

5- 95%-100 % Mov's
Speakership/ Facilatator, Receive Cerificates of Commendation/ 4- 85% - 94% Mov's Certificatesand 1 Certificate and
JUNE 2018-
PLUS FACTOR (5%) Autorship / Organized or Cert. of Recognition/ Submit Training 3% 3- 70% - 84% Mov's other requiset other requiset 1 1 1 1.00 1.00 0.030
MARCH 2019
initiated trainings. Deisgn/ Pictorials/Attendance sheet 2- 55% to 69% Mov's documents documents
1- 54% below Mov's

5- 95%-100 % Very active in performing additional

designation
4- 85% - 94% Active in performing additional
designated as
designation
• Special designation / • Performed additional duties and JUNE 2018- School Planning
2% 3- 70% - 84% Performing additional 2 designations 5 5 5 5.00 5.00 0.100
Coordinatorship responsibilities. MARCH 2019 and Canteen
designation 2-
Manager
55% to 69% Rarely performed additional designation
1- 54%
below Not performing in additional designation

OVERALL
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned RATING FOR 4.470
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Adjectival rating Very Satisfactory

Ratee:
Rater:
NENA C. GABUTERO ARIELJUN P. ROSAL
TEACHER I School Head
 CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
1. Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development
2. Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive
and takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the
organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged
by higher goals.
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts, checklists,
etc.) to achieve goals.
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.

Professionalism and Ethics

1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of
Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA
6713).
2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into
account the impact of his/her actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of
attendance and punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.5. Acts with
a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs,
improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness.

Result Focus

1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by
placing organizational needs before personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of
work In terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision
required.
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or
inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
Division of Surigao del Sur
BAROBO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
POBLACION, BAROBO, SURIGAO DEL SUR

PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

FINAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS RATING ADJECTIVAL RATING

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

Rater-Ratee Agreement
The signature below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee: Name of Superior:

Signature: Signature

Date: Date
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Caraga Administrative Region
Division of Surigao del Sur
BAROBO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
POBLACION, BAROBO, SURIGAO DEL SUR

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

ACTION PLAN
STRENGTHS DEVELOPMENT NEEDS (Recommended Developmental TIMELINE RESOURCES NEEDED
Intervention)

Rater Ratee Approving Officer