Republic of the Philippines

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
OF THE PHILIPPINES

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM

I, FEDERICO B. RIVERA JR, Faculty Member of the DEPARTMENT OF FILIPINOLOGY from the COLLEGE OF ARTS AND LETTERS, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the
following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period JANUARY TO JUNE 2020

FEDERICO B. RIVERA JR.

NAME OF FACULTY

Reviewed by: Date Approved by: Date

MARVIN G. LAI Dr. EVANGELINA S. SERIL

Chairperson Dean

OUTPUT SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATING REMARKS

Strategic Priority Q1 E2 T3 A4

EFFICIENCY
1. Academic Program Development
5 130% and above
4 115% - 129%
1.1. Outcomes-based syllabus developed for all
3 90% - 114%
courses for the Department in the Main Campus
2 51% - 89%
only.
1 50% and below

Page 1 of 6
 Republic of the Philippines
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
OF THE OUTPUT
PHILIPPINES SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATING REMARKS

Strategic Priority Q1 E2 T3 A4

2. Human Resource Development COVID 19: CHANGING HOW WE EFFICIENCY

EDUCATE FUTURE GENERATIONS 5 130% and above
1.1. Faculty/personnel attended seminars/ fora / Attended at least 16 hours of relevant faculty/staff Pinangasiwaan ng ABIVA
4 115% - 129%
conferences in Institutional / regional /national development activities and seminars within one
year. (E) PUBLISHING HOUSE, INC. 3 90% - 114%
International level within the year
May 1, 2020 2 51% - 89%
Part-Time Faculty 1 50% and below

LEARNING EXPERIENCE DESIGN FOR

TEACHERS Pinangasiwaan ng ABIVA
PUBLISHING HOUSE, INC. May 6,
2020

TECHNOLOGY ENGAGEMENT: WAYS

TO RESPOND TO THE NEW NORMAL
Pinangasiwaan ng ABIVA
PUBLISHING HOUSE, INC. May 7,
2020

SELF-PACED OUT OF CLASS

LEARNINGPinangasiwaan ng ABIVA
PUBLISHING HOUSE, INC. May 8,
2020

EFFICIENCY

2.2. Improved faculty and personnel 20% change (9/45) in number of graduate study 5 130% and above
educational profile thru focused units earned within the rating period. (E) 4 115% - 129%
professional development. 3 90% - 114%
2 51% - 89%
1 50% and below

OUTPUT SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATING REMARKS

Page 2 of 6
 Republic of the Philippines
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
Core Functions
OF THE PHILIPPINES
1. Faculty Members rated Very Satisfactory or better by Rated Very Satisfactory or better by supervisors in QUALITY
supervisor and students in the on line faculty the on-line faculty evaluation. (Q)
evaluation. 5 91-100 Outstanding
Rated Very Satisfactory or better by students in 4 71-90.9999 Very Satisfactory
the on-line faculty evaluation. (Q) 3 51-70.9999 Satisfactory
2 31-50.9999 Fair
1 20-30.9999 Poor

OUTPUT SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATING REMARKS

Core Functions Q1 E2 T3 A4

2. Outputs/Outcomes in Research Services EFFICIENCY

1.1. Research studies completed. None 5 130% and above

1.2. Researches published in CHED-recognized None 4 115% - 129%
journal. 3 90% - 114%
1.3. Researches presented in local, regional, national 0 Researches presented in local, regional, national 2 51% - 89%
and international fora/conferences and international fora/conferences 1 50% and below

None
1.4. Researches completed within the original project
timeframe

2.5. Number of research and development

output:
None
2.5.1. Applied for patenting None
2.5.2. Patented or commercialized. None
2.5.3. Adopted by industry or by other
beneficiaries. None
2.5.4. Copyrighted.

1. Output/Outcomes in Extension and Technical

Page 3 of 6
 Republic of the Philippines
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
Advisory Services. None
1.1.OF THE P
Persons HILIPPINES
trained weighted by length of
training activity (Training defined as a
structured activity designed for a large None
group of participants).
1.2. Persons provided with technical advice None
(defined as an offshoot of a training activity
or a seminar).
1.3. Trainees who rate the training course a VS None
or better (based on the analysis of
Feedback forms accomplished by the
trainees). None
1.4. Clients who rate the advisory services as
VS or better (based on the analysis of
feedback forms). None
1.5. Requests for training responded to within 3
day of request (Action taken should be
verifiable from the CTS). None
1.6. Requests for technical advice that are
responded to within 3 day of request (Action
taken should be verifiable from the CTS). None
1.7. Persons who received the training or
advisory services who rate timeliness of
services as very satisfactory or better.
1.8. Partnerships with LGU’s, small and medium None
enterprises, local entrepreneurs, and other
national agencies in developing,
implementing or using new technologies.
1.9. Poor beneficiaries of technology
transfer/extension programs and activities
leading to livelihood improvement.

2. Supervision and Coordination of all the Department EFFICIENCY

under the College.
5 130% and above
4 115% - 129%
1.1. Attendance of Chairpersons, faculty members 70% (26/37) attendance in all scheduled
3 90% - 114%
and administrative staff in official sector/office meeting and other
University/College/Department functions. (E) 2 51% - 89%
University/College function.
1 50% and below
3. Issued Notices and Office Memoranda to concerned EFFICIENCY

Page 4 of 6
 Republic of the Philippines
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
Officers and Administrative Staff 5 130% and above
OF THE PHILIPPINES 4 115% - 129%
1.1. Compliance of Officers and Administrative Staff 70% (26/37) Compliance with notices and office 3 90% - 114%
with notices and office memos issued by the memos issued by the Dean/Chairperson of Head 2 51% - 89%
Head of the Office based on the deadline set by of Office based on the deadline set by the same. 1 50% and below
the same. (E)

6. Written queries/requests acted upon within 5 100% of written queries/requests acted upon TIMELINESS
working days for simple communications and 10 within 5 working days for simple communication
working days for complex communication from and 10 working days for complex communication Simple Complex
receipt of the written queries/requests. from receipt of the written queries/requests. (T)
Within 1 working
Within 2 working day
5 day
6 working days
3 working days
10 working days
5 working days
4 7 working days
14 working days
3 18 working days or
9 working days or
2 more
more
1

OUTPUT SUCCESS INDICATORS ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATING REMARKS

Support Functions Q1 E2 T3 A4

1. Satisfied and empowered clients. 70% of clients rated the services rendered by EFFICIENCY
Department of Filipinology as Very Satisfactory or
Better. (E) 5 130% and above
4 115% - 129%
3 90% - 114%
2 51% - 89%
1 50% and below

2. Submission of mandatory periodic reports of the unit Submitted DTR on the 3rd working day of the TIMELINESS
complied with: following month. (T)
Submitted medical clearance to the Medical 5 Within the set schedule
Services Department (MSD) on the set deadline. 4 1 working day after the set
• DTR (individual)
(T) schedule
• Medical Clearance
Class Records submitted to Department/College 3 2 working days after the set
• Class Record schedule
• Gradesheets on the set deadline. (T)
Grade Sheets submitted to Department/College on 2 3 working days after the set
the set deadline. (T) schedule
1 4 working days after the set

Page 5 of 6
 Republic of the Philippines
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
schedule
OF THE PHILIPPINES

Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes

Discussed with Date Assessed by Date Final Rating by Date

I certify that I discussed my assessment of

the performance with the employee.

FEDERICO B. RIVERA JR. DR. EVANGELINA S. SERIL

MARVIN G. LAI

Employee Supervisor Head of Office

Page 6 of 6