INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III, SPET I-IV, Special Science Teacher

I-II P
Name of Employee: RIVERA, JAMES B. Name of Rater: ALEJANDRO, FLORIIDA A.

Position: Teacher I Position: Master Teacher II

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CAALIBANGBANGAN INTEGRATED SCHOOL - Cabanatuan City Date of Review: July 29, 2021

Rating Period: SY 2020-2021

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied SY 2020- 24.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in Demonstrated Level 7 in
Education Knowledge and Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT Objective 1 as shown in COT
knowledge of 2021
rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver
Services Pedagogy content within and agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms or No agreement forms
across curriculum acceptable evidence was
teaching areas. shown 5 0 0 5.000 0.400

Efficiency
Timeliness
2. Ensured the SY 2020- Quality Ensured that the ICT used Ensured that the ICT used Ensured that the ICT used Ensured that ICT are used No acceptable evidence was Ensured that the ICT used
redefine and transform augment and enrich modify processes and but do not create a new shown redefine and transform
positive use of ICT 2021
learning experiences and are learning experiences and are improve learning learning experience and/or learning experiences and are
to facilitate the documented properly and documented properly and experiences and are are documented but not documented properly and
teaching and consistently using any consistently using any documented properly and consistent with one consistently using any
learning process referencing style as shown referencing style as shown consistently using any referencing style as shown referencing style as shown in
in the submitted learning in the submitted learning referencing style as shown in the submitted learning the submitted learning
material material in the submitted learning material material 5 0 0 5.000 0.400
material

Efficiency
Timeliness
3. Applied a range SY 2020- Quality Applied teaching strategies Applied teaching strategies Applied teaching strategies Applied teaching strategies No acceptable evidence was Applied teaching strategies
that challenge learners to that require learners to that require learners to that lead learners along a shown that challenge learners to
of teaching 2021
draw conclusions and make connections using describe and explain ideas single path of inquiry draw conclusions and justify
strategies to justify their thinking or put ideas learned as shown in learned as shown in the and/or to simple recall and their thinking or put parts
develop critical parts together to promote the submitted learning submitted learning material rote memorization of together to promote deeper
and creative deeper understanding of material concepts as shown in the understanding of ideas
thinking, as well ideas learned as shown in submitted learning material learned as shown in the
the submitted learning submitted learning material 5 0 0 5.000 0.400
as other higher- material
order thinking
skills.

Efficiency
Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Diversity
2. Content of 1. Established
4. Applied a SY 2020- 24.00% Quality Utilized effective teaching Utilized effective teaching Utilized an effective Utilized a teaching strategy No acceptable evidence was Utilized effective teaching
Education Knowledge
Learners & and knowledge of 2021 strategies that are strategies that are teaching strategy that is or strategies that partially shown strategies that are
learnercentered
appropriate in responding to appropriate in responding to appropriate in responding to respond to learners’ appropriate in responding to
Services Pedagogy
Assessment and contentby
culture within
usingand learners’ linguistic, cultural, learners’ linguistic, cultural, learners’ linguistic, cultural, linguistic, cultural, learners’ linguistic, cultural,
Reporting across curriculum
teaching socioeconomic, or religious socioeconomic, or religious socioeconomic, or religious socioeconomic, or religious socioeconomic, or religious
teaching areas.
strategies that backgrounds at an backgrounds at a group backgrounds as shown in the backgrounds as shown in the backgrounds at an individual 5 0 0 5.000 0.400
respond to their individual level* as shown level* as shown in the submitted learning material submitted learning material level* as shown in the
in the submitted learning submitted learning material submitted learning material
linguistic, cultural, material 5 0 0 5.000 0.400
socioeconomic
and religious
backgrounds
Efficiency

Timeliness

5. Planned and SY 2020- Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in Demonstrated Level 7 in
Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT Objective 5 as shown in COT
delivered teaching 2021
rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver
strategies that are agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms or No agreement forms
responsive to the acceptable evidence was
special shown 5 0 0 5.000 0.400
educational needs
of learners in
difficult Efficiency
circumstances*, Timeliness
6. Used strategies SY 2020- Quality Provided learners with Provided learners with Provided learners with Provided learners with No evidence was shown Provided learners with
accurate, and specific and accurate, and specific accurate, and general inaccurate and/or accurate, and specific
for providing 2021
directed constructive constructive feedback as constructive feedback as destructive feedback as constructive feedback as
timely, accurate feedback* as shown in the shown in the evidence shown in the evidence shown in the evidence shown in the evidence
and constructive evidence submitted submitted submitted submitted submitted
feedback to
improve learner 4 0 4 4.000 0.320
performance Efficiency
Timeliness MOV submitted shows MOV submitted shows MOV submitted shows MOV submitted shows No evidence was shown MOV submitted shows
feedback given within 5 feedback given within 6-10 feedback given within 11-20 feedback given beyond 20 feedback given within 6-10
working days from working days from working days from working days from
working days from
submission** submission** submission** submission**
submission**
3. Curriculum and 7. Selected, SY 2020- 16.00% Quality Demonstrated Level 7 in Demonstrated Level 6 in Demonstrated Level 5 in Demonstrated Level 4 in Demonstrated Level 3 in Demonstrated Level 7 in
Planning Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT Objective 7 as shown in COT
developed, 2021
rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver rating sheets/interobserver
organized and agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms agreement forms or No agreement forms
used appropriate acceptable evidence was
teaching and shown
learning 5 0 0 5.000 0.400
resources,
including ICT, to Efficiency
address learning
goals Timeliness

8. Set achievable SY 2020- Quality All of the learning Majority of the learning Half of the learning Less than half of the No acceptable evidence was Majority of the learning
outcomes set are aligned outcomes set are aligned outcomes set are aligned learning outcomes set are shown outcomes set are aligned
and appropriate 2021
with the learning with the learning with the learning aligned with the learning with the learning
learning outcomes competencies as shown in competencies as shown in competencies as shown in competencies as shown in competencies as shown in
that are aligned the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
4 0 0 4.000 0.320
with learning
competencies
Efficiency
Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Community
4. Content 1. Built
9. Applied SY 2020- 24.00% Quality Sustained engagement Secured collaboration with Communicated with and Communicated with No acceptable evidence was Secured collaboration with
Education Knowledge and knowledge with parents/ guardians and/ parents/ guardians and/ or obtained response from parents/ guardians and/or shown parents/ guardians and/ or
Linkages and relationshipsofwith 2021
or wider school community to wider school community to parents/ guardians and/ or wider school community to wider school community to
Services Pedagogy
Professional content within
parents/ and
guardians facilitate involvement in the facilitate involvement in the wider school community to facilitate involvement in the facilitate involvement in the
Engagement & across
and thecurriculum
wider educative process as educative process as facilitate involvement in the educative process but educative process as
Personal Growth teaching
school areas.
community evidenced by 2 or more of evidenced by one MOV no. 1 educative process as received no evidenced by one MOV no. 1 5 0 0 5.000 0.400
and Professional to facilitate MOV no. 1 or 2 or 2 evidenced by MOV No. 3 response/reply as or 2
Development evidenced by MOV No. 3
involvement in the 4 4 0 4.000 0.320
educative process

Efficiency Submitted any 4 of the Submitted any 3 of the Submitted any 2 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence was Submitted any 3 of the
acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV shown acceptable MOV*

Timeliness
10. Participated in SY 2020- Quality Participated in any Participated in any Participated in any Participated in any No acceptable evidence was Participated in any
professional network/ activity professional network/ activity professional network/ activity professional network/ activity shown professional network/ activity
professional 2021
that requires output* and that requires output* and that requires output* to that does not require that requires output* and
networks to share proof of implementation ** proof of implementation ** share knowledge and to output to share knowledge proof of implementation **
knowledge and to within the school to share within the enhance practice as and to enhance practice as within the department/grade
enhance practice knowledge and to enhance department/grade level to evidenced by the submitted evidenced by the submitted level to share knowledge and
practice as evidenced by the share knowledge and to MOV MOV to enhance practice as
submitted MOV enhance practice as evidenced by the submitted
evidenced by the submitted MOV
MOV 4 4 0 4.000 0.320

Efficiency Submitted 4 different kinds Submitted 3 different kinds Submitted 2 different kinds Submitted 1 of the No acceptable evidence was Submitted 3 different kinds of
of acceptable MOV*** of acceptable MOV*** of acceptable MOV*** acceptable MOV shown acceptable MOV***

Timeliness
11. Developed a SY 2020- Quality Updated the Development Discussed progress on the Accomplished the Accomplished the No acceptable evidence was Discussed progress on the
Plan and approved by the Development Plan with the Development Plan from Strengths and shown Development Plan with the
personal 2021
rater during Phase II of the rater to check whether learning objectives up to Development Needs portion rater to check whether
improvement plan RPMS cycle Development Needs were resources needed to address of the Development Plan Development Needs were
based on addressed Development Needs during after self-assessment at the addressed
reflection of one’s Phase I of the RPMS cycle beginning of the school year
practice and
4 4 0 4.000 0.320
ongoing
professional
learning Efficiency Submitted the IPCRF-DP Submitted the IPCRF-DP Submitted the IPCRF-DP Submitted the IPCRF-DP No acceptable evidence was Submitted the IPCRF-DP
with any 4 of the with any 3 of the with any 2 of the with any 1 of the shown with any 3 of the acceptable
acceptable Supporting acceptable Supporting acceptable Supporting acceptable Supporting Supporting MOV*
MOV* MOV* MOV* MOV
Timeliness
5. Plus Factor 12. Performed SY 2020- 12.00% Quality Performed at least 1 related Performed at least 1 related Performed at least 1 related Performed at least 1 related No acceptable evidence was Performed at least 1 related
work/activity that contributed work/activity that contributed work/activity that contributed work/activity that contributed shown work/activity that contributed
various related 2021
to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning to the teaching-learning
works/ activities process beyond the school/ process within the school/ process within the learning process within the class as process beyond the school/
that contribute to Community Learning Community Learning area/ department as evidenced by submitted MOV Community Learning Center
the teaching- Center (CLC) as evidenced Center (CLC) as evidenced evidenced by submitted MOV (CLC) as evidenced by
learning process by submitted MOV by submitted MOV submitted MOV
5 5 0 5.000 0.600

Efficiency Submitted any 4 of the Submitted any 3 of the Submitted any 2 of the Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence was Submitted any 4 of the
acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV* acceptable MOV shown acceptable MOV*
Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Outstanding 4.600

 TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION
Performance Indicators
Weight Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Score
per KRA QET
5 4 3 2 1 Q E T Ave
Basic 1. Content
ADJECTIVAL1. RATING
Applied EQUIVALENCES
SY 2020- 24.00%
Education RANGE
Knowledge and knowledge of ADJECTIVAL
2021 RATING
Services Pedagogy content within and
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
across curriculum
3.500 – 4.499 teaching areas. Very Satisfactory 5 0 0 5.000 0.400
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

RIVERA, JAMES B. ALEJANDRO, FLORIIDA A. GUSI, NARCISA D.,ED.D

Ratee Rater Approving Authority